33 cases on record
- Cases on record
- 33
- Classification
- F16L21/02 · F16L3/00 · F16L3/06 · H02G3/00 · H02G3/04 · F16L17/00 · F16L23/18 · F16L17/04 · F16L21/00 · F16L25/14 · F16L21/06 · F16L23/08 · F16L17/025 · F16L23/032 · F16L23/04 · F16L33/04 · F16L55/165 · B32B1/08 · F16L55/16 · F16L11/00 · F16L33/01 · F16L11/12 · F16L11/04 · F16L3/10 · B62B5/00 · F16M11/04 · A61G5/00 · B60P1/00 · F16B2/10 · F16M13/02 · B60P7/08 · B62J11/00 · F16L9/14 · F16L9/18 · F24F13/02 · F16L23/14 · F16L57/04 · F16L9/00 · E04F17/04 · F16L25/00 · F16L59/14 · F16L15/00 · E21B17/042 · E21B17/08 · F16L15/06 · F16L15/08 · F16L5/00 · E03C1/042 · F16L55/10 · F16L58/18 · H02G3/08 · A62C4/00 · A62C3/16 · F16L5/04 · H02G3/22 · F16L11/118 · F16L11/11 · F16L11/112 · F16L11/115 · F16L11/24 · A47L5/36 · A47L9/24 · F16L33/18 · F16L37/00
- Courts involved
- C.D. Cal. · W.D. Pa. · S.D. Cal. · Fed. Cir. · S.D.N.Y. · E.D. Mich. · D.N.J. · N.D. Okla. · W.D. Wis. · S.D. Tex. · D.S.C. · E.D. Tex. · D. Del. · Court of Justice of Sao Paulo
| Case no. | Parties | Court | Filed | Duration | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2:26-cv-01759 | Norma U.S. Holding v. Lynol Cooling Systems, Inc. | C.D. Cal. | 18 Feb 2026 | 125 d | Voluntary dismissal |
| 3:25-cv-00283 | Affordable Wire Management, LLC v. Cambria County Association for the Blind and Handicapped, Inc. | W.D. Pa. | 3 Sep 2025 | 41 d | Voluntary dismissal |
| 3:25-cv-02049 | Victaulic, Co. v. Allied Rubber & Gasket Co. Inc. | S.D. Cal. | 8 Aug 2025 | 34 d | Consent Judgment |
| 25-1817 | Buergofol GMBH v. Omega Liner Company, Inc | Fed. Cir. | 30 May 2025 | 53 d | Appeal Dismissed |
| 1:25-cv-01557 | Telebrands, Corp. v. Ningbo Fine Source Imp&Exp Co., Ltd | S.D.N.Y. | 24 Feb 2025 | 452 d | Voluntary dismissal |
| 2:24-cv-13373 | Norma U.S. Holding v. Liaocheng Everlast Auto Parts Co., LTD | E.D. Mich. | 17 Dec 2024 | 540 d | Default Judgment |
| 2:24-cv-10460 | Telebrands, Corp. v. Tristar Products, Inc. | D.N.J. | 12 Nov 2024 | 324 d | Case Settled |
| 4:24-cv-00347 | Kim Rinamo v. Sawyer Manufacturing Company | N.D. Okla. | 22 Jul 2024 | 126 d | Voluntary dismissal |
| 4:24-cv-00341 | Kim Rinamo v. Hardware Factory Store OKC, Inc. | N.D. Okla. | 18 Jul 2024 | 130 d | Voluntary dismissal |
| 3:24-cv-00389 | Kim Rinamo v. Advance Fittings LLC | W.D. Wis. | 11 Jun 2024 | 17 d | Voluntary dismissal |
| 3:24-cv-00390 | Kim Rinamo v. VNE Corporation | W.D. Wis. | 11 Jun 2024 | 233 d | Dismissed without Prejudice |
| 24-1537 | Van-Packer, Co. v. Dura Systems Barriers, Inc. | Fed. Cir. | 6 Mar 2024 | 456 d | Appeal Dismissed |
| 1:24-cv-00011 | Telebrands, Corp. v. Emsco, Inc. | W.D. Pa. | 12 Jan 2024 | 299 d | Case Stayed |
| 4:23-cv-03638 | Aep Excluded Assetco, LLC v. Bellanergy, LLC | S.D. Tex. | 27 Sep 2023 | 530 d | Case Remanded |
| 5:23-cv-01415 | Danco, Inc. v. Kingston Brass, Inc. | C.D. Cal. | 19 Jul 2023 | 78 d | Dismissed with Prejudice |
| 6:23-cv-02559 | Buergofol GMBH v. Omega Liner Company, Inc. | D.S.C. | 8 Jun 2023 | 196 d | Case Transferred |
| 2:23-cv-00223 | Robroy Industries Texas, LLC v. ABB, Inc. | E.D. Tex. | 19 May 2023 | 157 d | Dismissed with Prejudice |
| 23-1888 | Van-Packer, Co. v. Dura Systems Barriers, Inc. | Fed. Cir. | 15 May 2023 | 22 d | Voluntary dismissal |
| 2:23-cv-02192 | Danco, Inc. v. Kissler & Co., Inc. | D.N.J. | 19 Apr 2023 | 91 d | Voluntary dismissal |
| 1:23-cv-00244 | Hilti Aktiengesellschaft v. Specified Technologies, Inc. | D. Del. | 6 Mar 2023 | 662 d | Case Dismissed |
| 21-2316 | Blue Gentian, LLC v. Tristar Products, Inc. | Fed. Cir. | 16 Sep 2021 | 631 d | Appeal Dismissed |
| 21-2317 | Blue Gentian, LLC v. Tristar Products, Inc. | Fed. Cir. | 16 Sep 2021 | 631 d | Appeal Dismissed |
| 2:16-cv-03594 | Telebrands, Corp. v. Ragner Technology, Corp. | D.N.J. | 21 Jun 2016 | 2451 d | Case Terminated |
| 2:16-cv-03474 | Telebrands, Corp. v. Ragner Technology, Corp. | D.N.J. | 15 Jun 2016 | 2457 d | Case Terminated |
| 2:15-cv-08185 | Ragner Technology, Corp. v. Telebrands, Corp. | D.N.J. | 20 Nov 2015 | 2665 d | Case Terminated |
| 2:15-cv-03163 | Telebrands, Corp. v. Ragner Technology, Corp. | D.N.J. | 5 May 2015 | 2864 d | Case Terminated |
| 1:13-cv-01758 | Blue Gentian, LLC v. Tristar Products, Inc. | D.N.J. | 21 Mar 2013 | 3843 d | Case Transferred |
| 2:13-cv-01758 | Blue Gentian, LLC v. Tristar Products, Inc. | D.N.J. | 21 Mar 2013 | 4578 d | Case Settled |
| 2030241-20.2023.8.26.0000 | Goodyear do Brasil Produtos de Borracha Ltda v. Afa Plásticos Ltda | Court of Justice of Sao Paulo | – | Appeal Dismissed | |
| 2050156-84.2025.8.26.0000 | Interglass Comércio de Ferragens and Acessórios para Vidros Eireli v. Box Elegance Ltda | Court of Justice of Sao Paulo | – | Appeal Dismissed | |
| 2084985-28.2024.8.26.0000 | Raesa Brasil Comercio and Industria deEquipamentos Agrícolas v. Jsb Irrigações Eireli Epp | Court of Justice of Sao Paulo | – | Appeal Granted | |
| 2135492-27.2023.8.26.0000/50000 | RAESA Brasil Comércio e Indússtria de Equipamentos Agrícolas, Importação e Exportação Ltda. v. Irrigabras Irrigação do Brasil Ltda | Court of Justice of Sao Paulo | – | Appeal Dismissed | |
| 2216470-88.2023.8.26.0000 | Raesa Brasil Comercio and Industria de Equipamentos Agricolas v. Irrbra Fabricação de Equipamentos Agrícolas Ltda. | Court of Justice of Sao Paulo | – | Appeal Dismissed |
Source: Patsnap Litigation Data. Cases classified under Pipes & Pipe Fittings.
Run this in Eureka
Patsnap Eureka
Where the claim space is crowded
Which patents are asserted most in this field, and which branches are still open.
Map this field10,000 free credits to start
Pipes & Pipe Fittings
Map this dispute space
- 01Ranked prior artEvery hit source-linked
- 02Claim-level comparisonAgainst your own product
- 03Legal statusAcross 174 jurisdictions
Disclaimer. This page indexes publicly available court docket data and is provided for general information and reference only. It is not legal advice and must not be relied upon as such.
Coverage has limits. Records come from a snapshot and may lag live dockets. Sealed filings, amended complaints and post-closure motions may not be reflected, and a case missing from this list is not evidence that it does not exist. Counts on this page describe what the snapshot contains, nothing more.
No characterisation of any party. Appearing on this page means a party is named in a docket record. Nothing here should be read as an assertion that any party infringed, that any patent is valid or invalid, or that any party prevailed.