Book a demo

Cut patent&paper research from weeks to hours with PatSnap Eureka AI!

Try now
TherapeuticsMD & Mayne Pharma v. Sun Pharma | IMVEXXY® Patent Litigation | PatSnap
Explore in Eureka
Case ID2:24-cv-07974
FiledJul 2024
ClosedOct 2025
Patent Litigation

TherapeuticsMD & Mayne Pharma v. Sun Pharma: IMVEXXY® Patent Case Consolidated

TherapeuticsMD and Mayne Pharma asserted 20 Orange Book-listed patents against Sun Pharmaceutical’s generic estradiol vaginal insert ANDA in the District of New Jersey. After 439 days, Case No. 2:24-cv-07974 was consolidated with a related 2020 action, concentrating all IMVEXXY® patent disputes into a single trial track.

Resolution time
439days
439 days from filing to consolidation order — consistent with ANDA litigation timelines in NJ
Patents asserted
20
US11065197B2 and 19 further Orange Book patents asserted for IMVEXXY® estradiol vaginal inserts
Outcome
Case Consolidated
Case merged with 20-3485 for discovery, case management, and trial by court order
Cost ruling
Not Awarded
No costs ruling issued; case procedurally consolidated prior to any merits determination
Published by PatSnap Insights Team · Verified by PatSnap Eureka Data
Case overview

A 20-Patent ANDA Battle Over IMVEXXY® Enters Unified Trial Track

TherapeuticsMD, Inc. and Mayne Pharma LLC filed Case No. 2:24-cv-07974 on July 24, 2024 in the District of New Jersey against Sun Pharmaceutical Industries, Inc., alleging infringement of 20 Orange Book-listed patents protecting IMVEXXY® (estradiol vaginal inserts, 4 mcg and 10 mcg). The asserted patents span formulation, dosing, and method-of-use claims tied to Sun’s ANDA for generic estradiol vaginal inserts at 0.004 mg and 0.01 mg strengths.

On October 3, 2025, the court issued a consolidation order merging 2:24-cv-07974 with the earlier-filed Civil Action No. 2:20-cv-03485, which involved the same plaintiffs, the same IMVEXXY® Orange Book patents, and both Sun Pharmaceutical and Teva Pharmaceuticals USA as defendants. Consolidation was ordered for the purposes of discovery, case management, and trial, effectively closing the 2024 docket as a standalone proceeding.

The consolidation reflects a common judicial efficiency strategy in multi-defendant ANDA litigation: rather than running parallel proceedings on identical patent portfolios and the same reference listed drug, the court unified the cases into a single trial track. Notably, the parties agreed to consolidation but retained a disputed issue regarding the fact-discovery deadline, which the court resolved in the same order. The merged proceeding will ultimately determine whether Sun’s generic can lawfully enter the estradiol vaginal insert market.

Case at a glance
Case no.2:24-cv-07974
CourtNew Jersey
JudgeN/A
FiledJuly 24, 2024
ClosedOctober 6, 2025
Duration439 days
OutcomeCase Consolidated
Verdict causeInfringement Action
BasisCase Consolidated
Prior Art Intelligence
See what prior art exists on this patent.
Eureka scans millions of patents and papers to surface prior art that may have invalidated these claims before costly litigation begins.
Check Prior Art
Case data sourced from PACER / New Jersey District Court via PatSnap Eureka Litigation Intelligence Explore similar cases ↗
Case timeline

Filing to Case Consolidated in 439 days

439 days from filing to consolidation order — consistent with ANDA litigation timelines in NJ

Case timeline: Complaint filed JUL 24 2024, FEB–MAR — 439 days total Horizontal timeline showing the three key events in Therapeuticsmd, Inc. v Sun Pharmaceutical Industries, Inc. from filing to resolution. Source: PACER, New Jersey District Court. JUL 24 2024 Complaint filed Pre-trial proceedings OCT 6 2025 Case Consolidated 439 DAYS TOTAL
Case consolidation

Cases merged: what consolidation means for the IMVEXXY® litigation

Legal mechanism

Consolidation closes 2024 docket — litigation continues in unified action

A consolidation order under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 42(a) merges related actions sharing common questions of law or fact. Here, both cases involved the same plaintiffs, the same IMVEXXY® Orange Book patents, and generic ANDA defendants. The 2024 case is administratively closed as a standalone docket; all claims, patents, and parties are absorbed into the consolidated action under Case No. 20-3485. No merits ruling has been issued.

No merits adjudication
Patent holder outcome

Plaintiffs gain efficiency — all 20 patents litigated in one coordinated proceeding

Consolidation is typically neutral-to-favourable for patent holders asserting the same portfolio against multiple ANDA filers. TherapeuticsMD and Mayne Pharma can now coordinate discovery across Sun and Teva in a single forum, reducing duplicative expert reports and claim construction proceedings. The full 20-patent Orange Book portfolio remains live and unadjudicated, preserving injunctive relief and damages claims through trial.

Portfolio intact — trial pending
Challenger outcome

Sun Pharma faces consolidated exposure alongside Teva in one trial

Consolidation places Sun Pharmaceutical alongside Teva Pharmaceuticals as co-defendants in a single proceeding, which may increase litigation costs and coordination complexity. Sun’s ANDA for estradiol vaginal inserts remains blocked during the Hatch-Waxman 30-month stay period, and no carve-out or early resolution has been recorded in the public docket. The merged schedule — including the disputed fact-discovery deadline — will govern Sun’s path to trial.

Market entry remains blocked
Commercial implications

Unified ANDA trial sharpens risk calculus for the generic estradiol market

With 20 Orange Book patents covering IMVEXXY® now defended in a single consolidated action against two major generic filers, the litigation creates a high-stakes barrier to the generic estradiol vaginal insert market. Pharmaceutical companies evaluating entry into this space should monitor the consolidated trial schedule closely. A plaintiff win across even a subset of the 20 patents could extend market exclusivity significantly; a defendant win on all could open a competitive generic market simultaneously for both Sun and Teva.

Market entry contingent on trial outcome
Legal analysis based on PACER docket records for case 2:24-cv-07974 and PatSnap Eureka litigation intelligence Search PatSnap Eureka ↗
Parties and representation

Full party and counsel information

RoleNameTypeDetail
PlaintiffTherapeuticsmd, Inc.CompanyPharmaceutical IP holders — co-owners of 20 Orange Book patents for IMVEXXY® estradiol vaginal insertsSearch in Eureka ↗
Co-PlaintiffMayne Pharma, LLCCompanySearch in Eureka ↗
DefendantSun Pharmaceutical Industries, Inc.CompanySun Pharmaceutical Industries, Inc. — generic pharmaceutical company seeking ANDA approval for estradiol vaginal insertsSearch in Eureka ↗
Co-DefendantSun Pharmaceutical Industries, Inc.CompanySearch in Eureka ↗
Plaintiff counselAlexander Lee CalloAttorneyCounsel for Therapeuticsmd, Inc.Search in Eureka ↗
Plaintiff counselWilliam C. BatonAttorneyCounsel for Therapeuticsmd, Inc.Search in Eureka ↗
Plaintiff law firmSaul Ewing LLPLaw FirmRepresenting Therapeuticsmd, Inc.Search in Eureka ↗
Defendant counselCATHERINE SALERNOAttorneyCounsel for Sun Pharmaceutical Industries, Inc.Search in Eureka ↗
Defendant counselGregory D. MillerAttorneyCounsel for Sun Pharmaceutical Industries, Inc.Search in Eureka ↗
Defendant counselTimothy P. GonzalezAttorneyCounsel for Sun Pharmaceutical Industries, Inc.Search in Eureka ↗
Defendant law firmRivkin Radler LLPLaw FirmRepresenting Sun Pharmaceutical Industries, Inc.Search in Eureka ↗
Presiding judgeJudge N/AJudgeNew Jersey District CourtSearch in Eureka ↗
Official verdict

Official order — verbatim text

“WHEREAS, Civil Action Nos. 20-3485 and 24-7974 relate to Plaintiffs TherapeuticsMD, Inc. and Mayne Pharma LLC’s (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) allegations of infringement of patents listed in the FDA’s publication entitled “Approved Drug Products with Case 2:24-cv-07974-BRM-SDA Document 70 Filed 10/06/25 Page 1 of 4 PageID: 7092 -2- Therapeutics Equivalence Evaluations” (the “Orange Book”) for Plaintiffs’ IMVEXXY® (estradiol vaginal inserts) drug product; WHEREAS, Plaintiffs, Defendant Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., and Defendants Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. and Sun Pharmaceutical Industries, Inc. (collectively, “Sun”) agree that consolidation of Civil Action Nos. 20-3485 and 24-7974 would promote efficiency with respect to the parties’ and the Court’s resources; and WHEREAS, the parties have agreed to the schedule set forth below (with the exception of a dispute as to the agreed-upon deadline for the close of fact discovery, which the Court resolves herein); IT IS on this 3rd day of October , 2025, for good cause shown: ORDERED that Civil Action Nos. 20-3485 and 24-7974 (hereinafter, the “Consolidated Action”) are consolidated for the purposes of discovery, case management, and trial, subject to further order of the Court”
Source: PACER Docket, Case 2:24-cv-07974, New Jersey District Court

The court’s October 2025 order is procedural rather than substantive: it consolidates two related ANDA patent actions for efficiency without adjudicating infringement, validity, or enforceability on the merits. The order resolves a discrete scheduling dispute — the fact-discovery deadline — while deferring all substantive patent questions to the unified proceeding. For practitioners, the consolidation signals that the court views the two dockets as materially identical in their legal and factual foundations, which may inform how claim construction and expert discovery are structured going forward.

PACER case 2:24-cv-07974 · Public docket record Explore in Eureka ↗
Patent at issue

US11065197B2 and 19 further patents — IMVEXXY® estradiol vaginal insert formulations

Publication No.US11065197B2
Application No.US16/837929
Patent details
ProductEstradiol vaginal insert formulations — dosing and composition
Cited in actionJuly 24, 2024

Publication No.US11304959B2
Application No.US16/746434
Patent details
ProductEstradiol vaginal insert formulations — method of use
Cited in actionJuly 24, 2024

Publication No.US10398708B2
Application No.US15/893542
Patent details
ProductEstradiol vaginal insert compositions — systemic absorption control
Cited in actionJuly 24, 2024

Publication No.US10537581B2
Application No.US14/521230
Patent details
ProductEstradiol vaginal insert — low-dose delivery method
Cited in actionJuly 24, 2024

Publication No.US10471072B2
Application No.US15/893550
Patent details
ProductEstradiol vaginal insert formulations — excipient and release profile
Cited in actionJuly 24, 2024

Publication No.US10568891B2
Application No.US15/372385
Patent details
ProductEstradiol vaginal insert — mucoadhesive formulation
Cited in actionJuly 24, 2024

Publication No.US10806697B2
Application No.US14/521002
Patent details
ProductEstradiol vaginal insert — manufacturing process and composition
Cited in actionJuly 24, 2024

Publication No.US11246875B2
Application No.US16/677831
Patent details
ProductEstradiol vaginal insert — hormonal dosing regimen
Cited in actionJuly 24, 2024

Publication No.US9180091B2
Application No.US14/136048
Patent details
ProductEstradiol vaginal insert — early-stage formulation composition
Cited in actionJuly 24, 2024

Publication No.US10668082B2
Application No.US15/975723
Patent details
ProductEstradiol vaginal insert — biodegradable carrier system
Cited in actionJuly 24, 2024

Publication No.US11351182B2
Application No.US16/833186
Patent details
ProductEstradiol vaginal insert — extended-release insert composition
Cited in actionJuly 24, 2024

Publication No.US11497709B2
Application No.US16/834780
Patent details
ProductEstradiol vaginal insert — patient compliance dosing method
Cited in actionJuly 24, 2024

Publication No.US11266661B2
Application No.US15/781840
Patent details
ProductEstradiol vaginal insert — tissue-specific delivery method
Cited in actionJuly 24, 2024

Publication No.US10258630B2
Application No.US15/893546
Patent details
ProductEstradiol vaginal insert — ultra-low-dose estradiol formulation
Cited in actionJuly 24, 2024

Publication No.US11241445B2
Application No.US16/833188
Patent details
ProductEstradiol vaginal insert — therapeutic dosing window method
Cited in actionJuly 24, 2024

Publication No.US10835487B2
Application No.US16/834844
Patent details
ProductEstradiol vaginal insert — soft-gel insert composition
Cited in actionJuly 24, 2024

Publication No.US11123283B2
Application No.US16/837937
Patent details
ProductEstradiol vaginal insert — insert with stabilising excipients
Cited in actionJuly 24, 2024

Publication No.US10888516B2
Application No.US16/833213
Patent details
ProductEstradiol vaginal insert — lipid-based delivery composition
Cited in actionJuly 24, 2024

Publication No.US9289382B2
Application No.US14/624051
Patent details
ProductEstradiol vaginal insert — early formulation and insert design
Cited in actionJuly 24, 2024

Publication No.US11116717B2
Application No.US16/837933
Patent details
ProductEstradiol vaginal insert — hormonal insert with polymer matrix
Cited in actionJuly 24, 2024

The 20 asserted patents cover a range of formulation, composition, and method-of-use claims related to IMVEXXY® — a low-dose estradiol vaginal insert indicated for moderate-to-severe dyspareunia due to vulvar and vaginal atrophy. The patents span application filings from 2013 (US9180091B2, filed US14/136048) through 2020, reflecting iterative innovation around estradiol delivery, excipient selection, dosing regimens, and insert geometry. All 20 are listed in the FDA’s Orange Book for IMVEXXY®, making them automatically enforceable against ANDAs referencing the product under the Hatch-Waxman framework.

The breadth of the portfolio — 20 patents covering overlapping aspects of the same reference listed drug — is consistent with a deliberate lifecycle management strategy common in specialty pharmaceutical development. For generic entrants, invalidating or designing around the full portfolio requires mounting distinct challenges across formulation, process, and method claims simultaneously. The portfolio’s concentration in a single Orange Book product also means that a successful IPR or district court invalidity ruling on core composition claims could cascade through the entire assertion strategy, making individual patent strength a critical variable for both sides.

Patent data sourced from USPTO via PatSnap Eureka patent database Search patent records in Eureka ↗
Freedom to operate

Should you run an FTO analysis against the IMVEXXY® Orange Book patent portfolio?

Any company developing or commercialising estradiol vaginal insert products — including ANDA filers, 505(b)(2) applicants, or novel formulation developers — faces direct exposure to this 20-patent portfolio. The Orange Book listing means automatic 30-month stay risk upon ANDA submission. R&D teams evaluating ultra-low-dose estradiol delivery, vaginal insert excipient design, or mucoadhesive drug delivery systems should conduct a comprehensive FTO review before committing to development expenditure.

PatSnap Eureka’s FTO Search Agent can map each of the 20 asserted patents against your specific formulation parameters, claim scope, and product design in minutes. Eureka identifies prior art gaps, flags dependent versus independent claim risk, and benchmarks your exposure against the full Orange Book listing for IMVEXXY® — giving your IP and regulatory teams a consolidated risk picture ahead of ANDA filing or commercial launch.

PatSnap Eureka FTO Search

Run a freedom-to-operate analysis on US11065197B2 to assess your product’s exposure

Run FTO in Eureka →
Related litigation

Similar Orange Book ANDA patent cases in the District of New Jersey

Related Hatch-Waxman ANDA patent infringement cases involving Orange Book-listed pharmaceutical patents litigated in the District of New Jersey.

🔍
Access 40+ similar cases in PatSnap Eureka
Therapeuticsmd, Inc. patent enforcement history, New Jersey case history, Therapeuticsmd, Inc.’s full IP portfolio, and comparable case analysis
Teva v. TherapeuticsMD 20-3485NJ ANDA estrogen therapy casesOrange Book 20+ patent assertionsWomen’s health ANDA litigation
Unlock similar cases in Eureka →
Strategic implications

What this case signals for the women’s health pharmaceutical IP landscape

A 20-patent Orange Book assertion consolidated against two ANDA filers illustrates the layered enforcement strategies emerging in specialty pharmaceutical litigation.

Orange Book patent stacking remains a potent ANDA barrier in women’s health

TherapeuticsMD and Mayne Pharma asserted 20 Orange Book-listed patents — spanning formulation, dosing method, and use claims — against a single generic ANDA product. This layered approach maximises the 30-month stay period and forces challengers to invalidate or design around a large, heterogeneous patent portfolio before market entry.

Consolidation with a 2020 action signals long litigation runway for IMVEXXY®

The merger of a 2024 filing with a case commenced in 2020 suggests the IMVEXXY® patent dispute has already run more than five years without merits resolution. Companies tracking this space should anticipate further delay before any final determination on validity or infringement — and plan generic entry timelines accordingly.

🔒
Full strategic analysis in PatSnap Eureka
Unlock deeper analysis of ANDA litigation strategy, IPR exposure, and settlement dynamics in this NJ District Court women’s health patent dispute.
Settlement pressure signalsIPR risk by patent typeFirst-filer exclusivity dynamics
Unlock full analysis →
Analysis powered by PatSnap Eureka Litigation Intelligence Explore in Eureka ↗
Frequently asked questions

Therapeuticsmd v Sun — key questions answered

Still have questions? PatSnap Eureka can answer them instantly from patent and litigation data. Ask Eureka ↗
PatSnap Eureka

Track the IMVEXXY® consolidated litigation and protect your pipeline

Monitor the consolidated IMVEXXY® ANDA proceedings — including trial scheduling, IPR filings, and any consent judgments — directly in PatSnap. Run FTO searches against all 20 Orange Book patents before committing to estradiol vaginal insert development.

Ask anything about this case.
PatSnap Eureka searches patents and litigation data to answer instantly.
Powered by PatSnap Eureka
Link copied to clipboard

Related Litigation Cases

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.