Tough Bags, LLC v. Surplus Link 1, LLC: Design Patent Infringement Case Settles in Georgia
What would you like to do next?
Choose your path based on your current needs:
📋 Case Summary
| Case Name | Tough Bags, LLC v. Surplus Link 1, LLC and Barry Dufault |
| Case Number | 1:24-cv-00918 (N.D. Ga.) |
| Court | U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
| Duration | Feb 2024 – June 2025 1 year 3 months |
| Outcome | Settled Confidentially |
| Patents at Issue | |
| Accused Products | RAM, RAMVAC, and RHINO product lines |
Case Overview
The Parties
⚖️ Plaintiff
Plaintiff and holder of a U.S. design patent, alleging infringement by competing commercial products.
🛡️ Defendants
Defendant company whose RAM, RAMVAC, and RHINO product lines were accused of infringing the plaintiff’s design patent. Individual defendant Barry Dufault also named.
The Patent at Issue
This case involved a dispute over Design Patent **USD872397S**, concerning the ornamental design of a commercial product.
- • US D872397S — (Application no. US29/617587)
Designing a similar product?
Check if your product’s design might infringe on existing design patents.
The Verdict & Legal Analysis
Outcome
The case was resolved through a confidential settlement before reaching a verdict. The litigation concluded after 477 days.
The Legal Dispute
Plaintiff Tough Bags, LLC alleged that the defendants’ RAM, RAMVAC, and RHINO product lines infringed its design patent USD872397S. The core of the claim centered on the ornamental appearance of the products, evaluated under the “ordinary observer” test common in design patent infringement cases.
Filing a design patent?
Learn from this case. Use AI to draft stronger claims that can withstand litigation.
Power Your Patent Strategy with Eureka IP
From novelty searches to patent drafting, Eureka’s AI-powered tools help you navigate the patent landscape with confidence.
⚠️ Freedom to Operate (FTO) Analysis
This case highlights critical IP risks in product design. Choose your next step:
📋 Understand This Case’s Impact
Learn about the specific risks and implications from this litigation.
- View related design patents in this technology space
- See companies active in design patents
- Understand design patent claim construction patterns
🔍 Check My Product’s Risk
Run a comprehensive FTO analysis for your own technology or product.
- Input your product description or technical features
- AI identifies potentially blocking patents
- Get actionable risk assessment report
High Risk Area
Product aesthetics in competitive markets
Active Litigation
Case duration: 477 days
Settlement Achieved
Confidential terms reached
✅ Key Takeaways
For Patent Attorneys & Litigators
Design patent cases, like this one, often settle before verdict due to the cost and complexity of visual comparison analysis.
Search related case law →Naming individual defendants alongside corporate entities can increase settlement leverage for plaintiffs.
Explore litigation strategies →For R&D Teams & IP Professionals
Proactive FTO analysis, including design patents, is crucial for competitive product development to mitigate infringement risk.
Start FTO analysis for my product →Design patents protect ornamental appearance; ensure product designs are sufficiently differentiated from competitors’ registered designs.
Try AI patent drafting →Ready to Strengthen Your Patent Strategy?
Join thousands of IP professionals using Eureka to conduct prior art searches, draft patents, and analyze competitive landscapes.