Book a demo

Cut patent&paper research from weeks to hours with PatSnap Eureka AI!

Try now
TQ Delta v. Pace Americas | Patent Lawsuit 1:13-cv-01835

TQ Delta, LLC v. Pace Americas, Inc.

1:13-cv-01835 D. Del. Closed 24 patents
Get a prior-art report

Infringement action filed 4 Nov 2013 in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware and closed 16 Oct 2023, with 24 patents asserted. Recorded basis of termination: case stayed.

Case recordPatsnap Litigation Data·

Case record

Case no.
1:13-cv-01835
Verdict cause
Infringement action
Court
D. Del.
Court level
District Court
Case region
Delaware
Chief judge
Richard G. Andrews
Trial level
First instance
Filed – Closed
4 Nov 2013 – 16 Oct 2023
Duration
3633 days
Basis of termination
Case Stayed
Products & marks
Customer premise equipment (“CPE”) products, including without limitation gateways, that operate in accordance with various DSL-related standards
Source: Patsnap Litigation Data. Case 1:13-cv-01835, United States District Court for the District of Delaware. Open this record in Eureka
Patsnap Eureka

Check this patent against your own product

Prior art, claim scope, infringement exposure and design-around routes. Every answer cites the records behind it.

Get an FTO claim chart
10,000 free credits to start
Patent at issue
US7836381B1 Inactive App. US12/853020

Computer readable medium with instructions for resource sharing in a telecommunications environment

A transceiver is designed to share memory and processing power amongst a plurality of transmitter and/or receiver latency paths, in a communications transceiver that carries or supports multiple applications. For example, the transmitter and/or receiver latency paths of the transceiver can share an interleaver/deinterleaver memory. This allocation can be done based on the data rate, latency, BER, impulse noise protection requirements of the application, data or information being transported over each latency path, or in general any parameter associated with the communications system.

Read claims and description in Eureka
Patent standing
Legal status
Inactive
Granted
16 Nov 2010
Earliest priority
12 Oct 2004
Est. expiry
11 Oct 2025
Validity challenges
2 on recordIPR2023-00066 · Patentability · filed by COMMSCOPE, INCIPR2022-00665 · Other · filed by Nokia Corporation
Licences recorded
None recorded
Classification
H03M13/00H04L45/00H04L47/36H04L47/10H04L47/52H04L47/56H04L49/901
Examiner
HWANG, JOON H
US7836381B1 patent drawing, figure 1
Fig. 1
US7836381B1 patent drawing, figure 2
Fig. 2
US7889784B2 Inactive App. US12/779708

Multicarrier modulation messaging for SNR per subchannel during showtime information

Upon detection of a trigger, such as the exceeding of an error threshold or the direction of a user, a diagnostic link system enters a diagnostic information transmission mode. This diagnostic information transmission mode allows for two modems to exchange diagnostic and/or test information that may not otherwise be exchangeable during normal communication. The diagnostic information transmission mode is initiated by transmitting an initiate diagnostic link mode message to a receiving modem accompanied by a cyclic redundancy check (CRC). The receiving modem determines, based on the CRC, if a robust communications channel is present. If a robust communications channel is present, the two modems can initiate exchange of the diagnostic and/or test information. Otherwise, the transmission power of the transmitting modem is increased and the initiate diagnostic link mode message re-transmitted to the receiving modem until the CRC is determined to be correct.

Read claims and description in Eureka
Patent standing
Legal status
Inactive
Granted
15 Feb 2011
Earliest priority
10 Aug 2000
Est. expiry
8 Jan 2021
Validity challenges
None recorded
Licences recorded
None recorded
Classification
H04B1/38H04L12/26H04L1/00H04L69/40H04L1/18H04L1/24H04L5/14H04M3/22H04M3/30H04M11/00
Examiner
TRAN, KHANH C
US7889784B2 patent drawing, figure 1
Fig. 1
US7889784B2 patent drawing, figure 2
Fig. 2

Also asserted in this case

22 more

The docket lists 24 asserted patents. Full bibliographic detail, drawings and prosecution history for the remaining 22 asserted patents are one query away in Eureka.

Source: Patsnap patent data + case record. Bibliographic fields and drawings reproduced from the published patent document. Break down the claims
Parties & counsel

Parties of record

Plaintiff

TQ Delta, LLC

Core tech
H03M13/00H04L45/00H04L47/36H04L47/10
Counsel
Andrew B. Karp · Anna M. Targowska · Ari B. Lukoff · Ashley M. Ratycz · Benjamen C. Linden · Brian E. Farnan · David A. Prange · James P. Murphy · Kris Y. Teng · Michael J. Carrozza · Michael J. Farnan · Michael S. Tomsa · Paul W. McAndrews · Peter J. McAndrews · Rajendra A. Chiplunkar · Rosemary Jean Piergiovanni · Sharon A. Hwang · Sharon E. Roberg-Perez · Thomas J. Wimbiscus · Timothy J. Malloy · William E. Manske
Firm
Farnan LLP

Counsel of record

Source: case record + Patsnap company data. Attorney names appear as recorded in the docket. Compare both portfolios
Outcome

Basis of termination

From the record · verbatim

“ORAL ORDER: The Court has reviewed D.I. 1648 . It seems likely the case will be stayed for at least a year. In the meantime, the case will be administratively closed. Ordered by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 10/16/2023. (nms) (Entered: 10/16/2023)”

Case 1:13-cv-01835 · D. Del. · closed 16 October 2023
Source: case record, verbatim. The quoted paragraph is the basis-of-termination text as filed.

Related cases

Three questions this record usually leads to. Each one runs against the full litigation and patent corpus, and cites what it finds.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

What is case 1:13-cv-01835?

1:13-cv-01835 is a patent infringement action brought by TQ Delta, LLC against Pace Americas, Inc., filed on 4 Nov 2013 in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware. The case closed on 16 October 2023.

Which patents were asserted in 1:13-cv-01835?

US7836381B1 (“Computer readable medium with instructions for resource sharing in a telecommunications environment”), assigned to TQ DELTA, LLC, currently inactive; US7889784B2 (“Multicarrier modulation messaging for SNR per subchannel during showtime information”), assigned to TQ DELTA, LLC, currently inactive; US8218610B2 (“System and method for descrambling the phase of carriers in a multicarrier communications system”), assigned to TQ DELTA, LLC; US7925958B2 (“CRC counter normalization”), assigned to DONGBU HITEK CO., LTD.|TQ DELTA, LLC; US7292627B2 (“System and method for scrambling the phase of the carriers in a multicarrier communications system”), assigned to TQ DELTA, LLC; US7835430B2 (“Multicarrier modulation messaging for frequency domain received idle channel noise information”), assigned to TQ DELTA, LLC; US8462835B2 (“Impulse noise management”), assigned to TQ DELTA, LLC; US8090008B2 (“System and method for scrambling the phase of the carriers in a multicarrier communications system”), assigned to TQ DELTA, LLC; US7570686B2 (“Systems and methods for establishing a diagnostic transmission mode and communicating over the same”), assigned to TQ DELTA, LLC; US8422511B2 (“Systems and methods for multi-pair ATM over DSL”), assigned to TQ DELTA, LLC; US7978706B2 (“Combining multiple DSL transceivers for a high data rate connection”), assigned to TQ DELTA, LLC; US8355427B2 (“System and method for descrambling the phase of carriers in a multicarrier communications system”), assigned to TQ DELTA, LLC; US7453881B2 (“Systems and methods for multi-pair ATM over DSL”), assigned to TQ DELTA, LLC; US7979778B2 (“CRC counter normalization”), assigned to TQ DELTA, LLC; US8073041B1 (“System and method for descrambling the phase of the carriers in a multicarrier communications system”), assigned to TQ DELTA, LLC; US8238412B2 (“Multicarrier modulation messaging for power level per subchannel information”), assigned to TQ DELTA, LLC; US7844882B2 (“Resource sharing in a telecommunications environment”), assigned to TQ DELTA, LLC; US7831890B2 (“Resource sharing in a telecommunications environment”), assigned to TQ DELTA, LLC; US8516337B2 (“CRC counter normalization”), assigned to TQ DELTA, LLC; US7451379B2 (“CRC counter normalization”), assigned to TQ DELTA, LLC; US8495473B2 (“Resource sharing in a telecommunications environment”), assigned to TQ DELTA, LLC; US8432956B2 (“Multicarrier modulation messaging for power level per subchannel information”), assigned to TQ DELTA, LLC; US8276048B2 (“Resource sharing in a telecommunications environment”), assigned to TQ DELTA, LLC; US7471721B2 (“System and method for scrambling the phase of the carriers in a multicarrier communications system”), assigned to TQ DELTA, LLC. The record also lists Customer premise equipment (“CPE”) products, including without limitation gateways, that operate in accordance with various DSL-related standards.

How was case 1:13-cv-01835 terminated?

The recorded basis of termination is case stayed. The termination text reads: “ORAL ORDER: The Court has reviewed D.I. 1648 . It seems likely the case will be stayed for at least a year. In the meantime, the case will be administratively closed. Ordered by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 10/16/2023. (nms) (Entered: 10/16/2023)”

How long did case 1:13-cv-01835 take?

3633 calendar days, from filing on 4 Nov 2013 to closure on 16 October 2023.

Who were the attorneys and the judge in 1:13-cv-01835?

Chief Judge Richard G. Andrews presided. Andrew B. Karp, Anna M. Targowska, Ari B. Lukoff, Ashley M. Ratycz, Benjamen C. Linden, Brian E. Farnan, David A. Prange, James P. Murphy, Kris Y. Teng, Michael J. Carrozza, Michael J. Farnan, Michael S. Tomsa, Paul W. McAndrews, Peter J. McAndrews, Rajendra A. Chiplunkar, Rosemary Jean Piergiovanni, Sharon A. Hwang, Sharon E. Roberg-Perez, Thomas J. Wimbiscus, Timothy J. Malloy and William E. Manske are recorded as counsel for plaintiff TQ Delta. Brett M. Schuman, Colm F. Connolly and Ryan L. Scher appear for defendant Pace Americas.

Answers reproduce fields from the case record for 1:13-cv-01835 and do not constitute legal advice. Ask your own question

Disclaimer. This page reproduces publicly available court docket data for case 1:13-cv-01835 and is provided for general information and reference only. It is not legal advice and must not be relied upon as such.

Docket data has limits. Records are drawn from a snapshot and may lag the live docket. Sealed filings, amended complaints, counterclaims and post-closure motions may not be reflected. Party names, attorney names and firm affiliations are reproduced as recorded and may contain omissions. Where a field is absent from the record, this page marks it as not recorded rather than inferring a value.

No characterisation of the parties or the outcome. This page reports what the record contains. Nothing here should be read as an assertion that any party infringed, that any patent is valid or invalid, that any settlement occurred, or that any party prevailed.

No FTO or validity opinion. Nothing on this page constitutes a freedom-to-operate, novelty, validity or infringement opinion. Any decision touching a live patent dispute should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent counsel.

Related Litigation Cases

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.