Infringement action filed 22 Jan 2024 in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas and closed 25 Mar 2026, with 4 patents asserted. Recorded basis of termination: dismissed with prejudice.
Access controls for known content · Content and identity delivery system for portable playback of content and streaming service integration · Contextual chapter navigation · Virtual secure digital card
Source: Patsnap Litigation Data. Case 2:24-cv-00031, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas.Open this record in Eureka
Patsnap Eureka
Check this patent against your own product
Prior art, claim scope, infringement exposure and design-around routes. Every answer cites the records behind it.
A system (and a method) are disclosed for generating a virtual secure digital (SD) card. One embodiment detects an SD card and reads a media key block and media identification for the SD card. The system stores the media key block and the media identification. The system creates a file system for secure data on a storage device for storage of secure data corresponding to a secure data area of the SD card and creates a file system for user data on the storage device for storage of user data corresponding to a user data area of the SD card. In addition, the system uses the virtual secure digital (SD) card. The system determines if the virtual SD card is provisioned and provisions it if not. The system accesses the data stored in the secure area of the provisioned virtual SD card. The system extracts the data from the secured area of the provisioned virtual SD card.
Personalized access controls associated with digital media are provided. The system records access controls associated with specific digital media assets in a digital library and creates policy decisions regarding use of the asset based on these settings. Data management for the access controls is also specified, including on an individual and group basis.
The docket lists 4 asserted patents. Full bibliographic detail, drawings and prosecution history for the remaining 2 asserted patents are one query away in Eureka.
Alfred Ross Fabricant · Enrique William Iturralde · Jennifer Leigh Truelove · John Andrew Rubino · Justine Minseon Park · Michael Mondelli III · Peter Lambrianakos · Vincent J. Rubino III
Firm
Fabricant LLP (NY), Fabricant, Rubino & Lambrianakos LLP, McKool Smith PC (Marshall), Rubino Ip, Rubino Law LLC
Amanda Nicole Brouillette · Andrew W. Rinehart · Caroline E. Wippman · Christopher P. Damitio · Melissa Richards Smith · Nicholas Lee · Nicholas Momti Nyemah · Richard Weil Goldstucker · Russell A. Korn · Steven David Moore · Sudip Kundu
2:24-cv-00031 is a patent infringement action brought by Truesight Communications, LLC against Lenovo, Inc., filed on 22 Jan 2024 in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas. The case closed on 25 March 2026.
Which patents were asserted in 2:24-cv-00031?
US8745749B2 (“Virtual secure digital card”), assigned to TRUESIGHT COMMUNICATIONS LLC, currently active; US8949879B2 (“Access controls for known content”), assigned to TRUESIGHT COMMUNICATIONS LLC, currently active; US8898803B1 (“Content and identity delivery system for portable playback of content and streaming service integration”), assigned to TRUESIGHT COMMUNICATIONS LLC; US9595300B2 (“Contextual chapter navigation”), assigned to TRUESIGHT COMMUNICATIONS LLC. The record also lists Access controls for known content, Content and identity delivery system for portable playback of content and streaming service integration, Contextual chapter navigation and Virtual secure digital card.
How was case 2:24-cv-00031 terminated?
The recorded basis of termination is dismissed with prejudice. The termination text reads: "DISMISSING CASE WITH PREJUDICE."
What does dismissal with prejudice mean?
A dismissal with prejudice permanently ends the claims that were filed, so the same claims cannot be brought again against that defendant. It is the usual form when the parties have settled.
How long did case 2:24-cv-00031 take?
793 calendar days, from filing on 22 Jan 2024 to closure on 25 March 2026.
Who were the attorneys and the judge in 2:24-cv-00031?
Chief Judge Rodney Gilstrap presided. Alfred Ross Fabricant, Enrique William Iturralde, Jennifer Leigh Truelove, John Andrew Rubino, Justine Minseon Park, Michael Mondelli III, Peter Lambrianakos and Vincent J. Rubino III are recorded as counsel for plaintiff Truesight Communications. Amanda Nicole Brouillette, Andrew W. Rinehart, Caroline E. Wippman, Christopher P. Damitio, Melissa Richards Smith, Nicholas Lee, Nicholas Momti Nyemah, Richard Weil Goldstucker, Russell A. Korn, Steven David Moore and Sudip Kundu appear for defendant Lenovo.
Answers reproduce fields from the case record for 2:24-cv-00031 and do not constitute legal advice.Ask your own question
Disclaimer. This page reproduces publicly available court docket data for case 2:24-cv-00031 and is provided for general information and reference only. It is not legal advice and must not be relied upon as such.
Docket data has limits. Records are drawn from a snapshot and may lag the live docket. Sealed filings, amended complaints, counterclaims and post-closure motions may not be reflected. Party names, attorney names and firm affiliations are reproduced as recorded and may contain omissions. Where a field is absent from the record, this page marks it as not recorded rather than inferring a value.
No characterisation of the parties or the outcome. This page reports what the record contains. Nothing here should be read as an assertion that any party infringed, that any patent is valid or invalid, that any settlement occurred, or that any party prevailed.
No FTO or validity opinion. Nothing on this page constitutes a freedom-to-operate, novelty, validity or infringement opinion. Any decision touching a live patent dispute should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent counsel.
