Book a demo

Cut patent&paper research from weeks to hours with PatSnap Eureka AI!

Try now
Vector Licensing v. Zyxel Communications | Patent Lawsuit 8:22-cv-02163

Vector Licensing, LLC v. Zyxel Communications Corp.

8:22-cv-02163 C.D. Cal. Closed US9686655B2
Get a prior-art report

Infringement action filed 30 Nov 2022 in the United States District Court for the Central District of California and closed 21 Feb 2023, with US9686655B2 asserted. Recorded basis of termination: voluntary dismissal.

Case recordPatsnap Litigation Data·

Case record

Patent involved
US9686655B2
Application no.
US13/810172
Case no.
8:22-cv-02163
Verdict cause
Infringement action
Court
C.D. Cal.
Court level
District Court
Case region
California
Chief judge
None recorded
Trial level
First instance
Filed – Closed
30 Nov 2022 – 21 Feb 2023
Duration
83 days
Basis of termination
Voluntary dismissal
Products & marks
Apparatus and method for transmitting signal in communication system
Validity challenges
None recorded
Source: Patsnap Litigation Data. Case 8:22-cv-02163, United States District Court for the Central District of California. Open this record in Eureka
Patsnap Eureka

Check this patent against your own product

Prior art, claim scope, infringement exposure and design-around routes. Every answer cites the records behind it.

Get an FTO claim chart
10,000 free credits to start
Patent at issue
US9686655B2 Inactive App. US13/810172

Apparatus and method for transmitting signal in communication system

Provided are an apparatus and method for grouping multiple user data and transmitting the grouped data in a multiple antenna system. According to the method, a plurality of user groups are configured, and at least one antenna group is assigned to the plurality of user groups. Then, user signals for each user group are combined using at least one user multiplexing method to generate a user group signal, and a plurality of user group signals are combined using at least one group multiplexing method. Then, the combined user group signal is transmitted to a plurality of users belonging to the plurality of user groups using the at least one antenna group.

Read claims and description in Eureka
Patent standing
Legal status
Inactive
Granted
20 Jun 2017
Earliest priority
14 Jul 2010
Est. expiry
6 Apr 2033
Validity challenges
None recorded
Licences recorded
None recorded
Classification
H04W4/08H04W72/12H04B7/0452H04B7/06
Prosecution counsel
Harness Dickey
Examiner
HSU, ALPUS H
US9686655B2 patent drawing, figure 1
Fig. 1
US9686655B2 patent drawing, figure 2
Fig. 2
Source: Patsnap patent data + case record. Bibliographic fields and drawings reproduced from the published patent document. Break down the claims
Parties & counsel

Parties of record

Counsel of record

Source: case record + Patsnap company data. Attorney names appear as recorded in the docket. Compare both portfolios
Outcome

Basis of termination

From the record · verbatim

“Pursuant to F.R.C.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Plaintiff Vector Licensing LLC and their counsel, hereby give notice that the above captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, without prejudice against the Defendant Zyxel Communications, Inc.”

Case 8:22-cv-02163 · C.D. Cal. · closed 21 February 2023
Source: case record, verbatim. The quoted paragraph is the basis-of-termination text as filed.

Related cases

Three questions this record usually leads to. Each one runs against the full litigation and patent corpus, and cites what it finds.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

What is case 8:22-cv-02163?

8:22-cv-02163 is a patent infringement action brought by Vector Licensing, LLC against Zyxel Communications Corp., filed on 30 Nov 2022 in the United States District Court for the Central District of California. The case closed on 21 February 2023.

Which patent was asserted in 8:22-cv-02163?

US9686655B2 (“Apparatus and method for transmitting signal in communication system”), assigned to VECTOR LICENSING LLC, currently inactive. The record also lists Apparatus and method for transmitting signal in communication system.

How was case 8:22-cv-02163 terminated?

The recorded basis of termination is voluntary dismissal. The termination text reads: “Pursuant to F.R.C.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Plaintiff Vector Licensing LLC and their counsel, hereby give notice that the above captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, without prejudice against the Defendant Zyxel Communications, Inc.”

What does dismissal without prejudice mean?

A dismissal without prejudice ends this action but leaves the claims alive — the plaintiff may file them again later, subject to the limitation period.

How long did case 8:22-cv-02163 take?

83 calendar days, from filing on 30 Nov 2022 to closure on 21 February 2023.

Who were the attorneys and the judge in 8:22-cv-02163?

Jennifer L. Ishimoto is recorded as counsel for plaintiff Vector Licensing.

Answers reproduce fields from the case record for 8:22-cv-02163 and do not constitute legal advice. Ask your own question

Disclaimer. This page reproduces publicly available court docket data for case 8:22-cv-02163 and is provided for general information and reference only. It is not legal advice and must not be relied upon as such.

Docket data has limits. Records are drawn from a snapshot and may lag the live docket. Sealed filings, amended complaints, counterclaims and post-closure motions may not be reflected. Party names, attorney names and firm affiliations are reproduced as recorded and may contain omissions. Where a field is absent from the record, this page marks it as not recorded rather than inferring a value.

No characterisation of the parties or the outcome. This page reports what the record contains. Nothing here should be read as an assertion that any party infringed, that any patent is valid or invalid, that any settlement occurred, or that any party prevailed.

No FTO or validity opinion. Nothing on this page constitutes a freedom-to-operate, novelty, validity or infringement opinion. Any decision touching a live patent dispute should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent counsel.

Related Litigation Cases

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.