Book a demo

Cut patent&paper research from weeks to hours with PatSnap Eureka AI!

Try now
Vervain v. Micron Technology et al. | Patent Lawsuit 6:21-cv-00487

Vervain, LLC v. Micron Technology, Inc. et al.

6:21-cv-00487 W.D. Tex. Closed 4 patents
Get a prior-art report

Infringement action filed 10 May 2021 in the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas and closed 30 Jun 2023, with 4 patents asserted. Recorded basis of termination: dismissed with prejudice.

Case recordPatsnap Litigation Data·

Case record

Case no.
6:21-cv-00487
Verdict cause
Infringement action
Court
W.D. Tex.
Court level
District Court
Case region
Texas
Chief judge
Alan D Albright
Trial level
First instance
Filed – Closed
10 May 2021 – 30 Jun 2023
Duration
781 days
Basis of termination
Dismissed with Prejudice
Products & marks
Lifetime mixed level non-volatile memory system
Source: Patsnap Litigation Data. Case 6:21-cv-00487, United States District Court for the Western District of Texas. Open this record in Eureka
Patsnap Eureka

Check this patent against your own product

Prior art, claim scope, infringement exposure and design-around routes. Every answer cites the records behind it.

Get an FTO claim chart
10,000 free credits to start
Patent at issue
US9997240B2 Active App. US14/950553

Lifetime mixed level non-volatile memory system

A controller for managing at least one MLC non-volatile memory module and at least one SLC non-volatile memory module. The flash controller is adapted to determine if a range of addresses listed by an entry and mapped to said at least one MLC non-volatile memory module fails a data integrity test. In the event of such a failure, the controller remaps said entry to an equivalent range of addresses of said at least one SLC non-volatile memory module. The flash controller is further adapted to determine which of the blocks in the MLC and SLC non-volatile memory modules are accessed most frequently and allocating those blocks that receive frequent writes to the SLC non-volatile memory module and those blocks that receive infrequent writes to the MLC non-volatile memory module.

Read claims and description in Eureka
Patent standing
Legal status
Active
Granted
12 Jun 2018
Earliest priority
19 Jul 2011
Est. expiry
25 Apr 2032
Validity challenges
2 on recordIPR2025-00214 · Patentability · filed by PHISON ELECTRONICS CORPORATIONIPR2021-01549 · Patentability · filed by Micron Technology, Inc.
Licences recorded
None recorded
Classification
G11C16/04G11C29/00G11C29/52G06F11/10G06F12/02G11C16/34G11C16/16G11C11/56
Prosecution counsel
MUNCK WILSON MANDALA L.L.P
Examiner
BYRNE, HARRY W
US8891298B2 Active App. US13/455267

Lifetime mixed level non-volatile memory system

A flash controller for managing at least one MLC non-volatile memory module and at least one SLC non-volatile memory module. The flash controller is adapted to determine if a range of addresses listed by an entry and mapped to said at least one MLC non-volatile memory module fails a data integrity test. In the event of such a failure, the controller remaps said entry to an equivalent range of addresses of said at least one SLC non-volatile memory module. The flash controller is further adapted to determine which of the blocks in the MLC and SLC non-volatile memory modules are accessed most frequently and allocating those blocks that receive frequent writes to the SLC non-volatile memory module and those blocks that receive infrequent writes to the MLC non-volatile memory module.

Read claims and description in Eureka
Patent standing
Legal status
Active
Granted
18 Nov 2014
Earliest priority
19 Jul 2011
Est. expiry
17 Apr 2033
Validity challenges
3 on recordIPR2025-00212 · Patentability · filed by PHISON ELECTRONICS CORPORATIONIPR2021-01547 · Other · filed by Micron Technology, Inc.IPR2025-00614 · Patentability · filed by Kingston Technology Co., Inc.
Licences recorded
None recorded
Classification
G06F12/02G11C16/34
Prosecution counsel
MUNCK WILSON MANDALA L.L.P
Examiner
BYRNE, HARRY W
US8891298B2 patent drawing, figure 1
Fig. 1
US8891298B2 patent drawing, figure 2
Fig. 2

Also asserted in this case

2 more

The docket lists 4 asserted patents. Full bibliographic detail, drawings and prosecution history for the remaining 2 asserted patents are one query away in Eureka.

Source: Patsnap patent data + case record. Bibliographic fields and drawings reproduced from the published patent document. Break down the claims
Parties & counsel

Parties of record

Plaintiff

Vervain, LLC

Core tech
G11C16/04G11C29/00G11C29/52G06F11/10
Counsel
Alan Whitehurst · Arvind Jairam · Christopher Paul McNett · Elizabeth Bernard · James Quigley · Jennifer L. Truelove · John B. Campbell · Kathy H. Li · Stuart Mccommas
Firm
Kirkland & Ellis LLP, McKool Smith PC
Defendant

Micron Technology, Inc.

Core tech
Not recorded
Counsel
Christopher Childers · Claudia Wilson Frost · Darryl Adams · David N. Deaconson · Jared Bobrow · Jeremy Jason Lang · Margaret Abernathy · Parth Sagdeo · Robert Manhas
Firm
Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP, Pakis, Giotes, Page & Burleson, Slayden Grubert Beard PLLC
Also named
Micron Semiconductor Products, Inc. · Micron Technology Texas, LLC

Counsel of record

Source: case record + Patsnap company data. Attorney names appear as recorded in the docket. Compare both portfolios
Outcome

Basis of termination

From the record · verbatim

“Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41 (a), it is hereby stipulated by and among plaintiff, Vervain, LLC, and defendants, Micron Technology, Inc., Micron Semiconductor Products, Inc., and Micron Technology Texas, LLC, that the entire action, including all claims asserted in the action, is hereby dismissed with prejudice, each side to bear its own costs of suit, expenses, and attorneys’ fees.”

Case 6:21-cv-00487 · W.D. Tex. · closed 30 June 2023
Source: case record, verbatim. The quoted paragraph is the basis-of-termination text as filed.

Related cases

Three questions this record usually leads to. Each one runs against the full litigation and patent corpus, and cites what it finds.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

What is case 6:21-cv-00487?

6:21-cv-00487 is a patent infringement action brought by Vervain, LLC against Micron Technology, Inc., filed on 10 May 2021 in the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas. The case closed on 30 June 2023.

Which patents were asserted in 6:21-cv-00487?

US9997240B2 (“Lifetime mixed level non-volatile memory system”), assigned to VERVAIN, LLC, currently active; US8891298B2 (“Lifetime mixed level non-volatile memory system”), assigned to VERVAIN, LLC, currently active; US10950300B2 (“Lifetime mixed level non-volatile memory system”), assigned to VERVAIN, LLC; US9196385B2 (“Lifetime mixed level non-volatile memory system”), assigned to VERVAIN, LLC. The record also lists Lifetime mixed level non-volatile memory system.

How was case 6:21-cv-00487 terminated?

The recorded basis of termination is dismissed with prejudice. The termination text reads: “Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41 (a), it is hereby stipulated by and among plaintiff, Vervain, LLC, and defendants, Micron Technology, Inc., Micron Semiconductor Products, Inc., and Micron Technology Texas, LLC, that the entire action, including all claims asserted in the action, is hereby dismissed with prejudice, each side to bear its own costs of suit, expenses, and attorneys’ fees.”

What does dismissal with prejudice mean?

A dismissal with prejudice permanently ends the claims that were filed, so the same claims cannot be brought again against that defendant. It is the usual form when the parties have settled.

How long did case 6:21-cv-00487 take?

781 calendar days, from filing on 10 May 2021 to closure on 30 June 2023.

Who were the attorneys and the judge in 6:21-cv-00487?

Chief Judge Alan D Albright presided. Alan Whitehurst, Arvind Jairam, Christopher Paul McNett, Elizabeth Bernard, James Quigley, Jennifer L. Truelove, John B. Campbell, Kathy H. Li and Stuart Mccommas are recorded as counsel for plaintiff Vervain. Christopher Childers, Claudia Wilson Frost, Darryl Adams, David N. Deaconson, Jared Bobrow, Jeremy Jason Lang, Margaret Abernathy, Parth Sagdeo and Robert Manhas appear for defendant Micron Technology.

Answers reproduce fields from the case record for 6:21-cv-00487 and do not constitute legal advice. Ask your own question

Disclaimer. This page reproduces publicly available court docket data for case 6:21-cv-00487 and is provided for general information and reference only. It is not legal advice and must not be relied upon as such.

Docket data has limits. Records are drawn from a snapshot and may lag the live docket. Sealed filings, amended complaints, counterclaims and post-closure motions may not be reflected. Party names, attorney names and firm affiliations are reproduced as recorded and may contain omissions. Where a field is absent from the record, this page marks it as not recorded rather than inferring a value.

No characterisation of the parties or the outcome. This page reports what the record contains. Nothing here should be read as an assertion that any party infringed, that any patent is valid or invalid, that any settlement occurred, or that any party prevailed.

No FTO or validity opinion. Nothing on this page constitutes a freedom-to-operate, novelty, validity or infringement opinion. Any decision touching a live patent dispute should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent counsel.

Related Litigation Cases

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.