Book a demo

Cut patent&paper research from weeks to hours with PatSnap Eureka AI!

Try now
VLSI Technology v. Intel | Patent Lawsuit 24-1772

VLSI Technology, LLC v. Intel, Corp.

24-1772 Fed. Cir. Closed 8 patents
Get a prior-art report

Infringement action filed 2 May 2024 in the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit and closed 14 Apr 2026, with 8 patents asserted. Recorded basis of termination: appeal dismissed in part.

Case recordPatsnap Litigation Data·

Case record

Case no.
24-1772
Verdict cause
Infringement action
Court
Fed. Cir.
Court level
Court of Appeals
Case region
District of Columbia
Chief judge
None recorded
Trial level
Appeal
Filed – Closed
2 May 2024 – 14 Apr 2026
Duration
712 days
Basis of termination
Appeal Dismissed in Part
Products & marks
Low voltage memory device and method thereof · Method for power reduction and a device having power reduction capabilities · Method of assembly and assembly thus made · Multi-core system on chip · Power island with independent power characteristics for memory and logic · Process for forming an electronic device including a fin-type structure
Source: Patsnap Litigation Data. Case 24-1772, United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. Open this record in Eureka
Patsnap Eureka

Check this patent against your own product

Prior art, claim scope, infringement exposure and design-around routes. Every answer cites the records behind it.

Get an FTO claim chart
10,000 free credits to start
Patent at issue
US7706207B2 Inactive App. US12/209477

Memory with level shifting word line driver and method thereof

A memory includes a bit cell array including a plurality of word lines and address decode circuitry having an output to provide a predecode value. The address decode circuitry includes a first plurality of transistors having a first gate oxide thickness. The memory further includes word line driver circuitry having an input coupled to the output of the address decode circuitry and a plurality of outputs, each output coupled to a corresponding word line of the plurality of word lines. The word line driver includes a second plurality of transistors having a second gate oxide thickness greater than the first gate oxide thickness. A method of operating the memory also is provided.

Read claims and description in Eureka
Patent standing
Legal status
Inactive
Granted
27 Apr 2010
Est. expiry
15 May 2026
Validity challenges
1 on recordIPR2018-01040 · Other · filed by INTEL CORPORATION
Licences recorded
None recorded
Classification
G11C8/00
Prosecution counsel
Daylight Law, P.C.
Examiner
HOANG, HUAN
US7706207B2 patent drawing, figure 2
Fig. 2
US8004922B2 Active App. US12/479517

Power island with independent power characteristics for memory and logic

A power island for a system-on-a-chip (SoC) includes a first segment, a second segment, and a supply line. The first segment includes a hardware device and operates the hardware device at first power characteristics indicative of at least a first voltage. The second segment includes scalable logic and operates the scalable logic at second power characteristics indicative of at least a second voltage. The second power characteristics of the scalable logic are different from the first power characteristics of the hardware device. The supply line receives an external supply signal (VDD) and directs the external supply signal to both the first segment and the second segment. The second segment changes at least one power characteristic of the external supply signal to operate the scalable logic according to the second power characteristics.

Read claims and description in Eureka
Patent standing
Legal status
Active
Granted
23 Aug 2011
Est. expiry
3 Nov 2029
Validity challenges
2 on recordIPR2018-01033 · Other · filed by INTEL CORPORATIONIPR2018-01144 · Other · filed by INTEL CORPORATION
Licences recorded
None recorded
Classification
G11C7/00
Prosecution counsel
Daylight Law, P.C.
Examiner
NGUYEN, VANTHU
US8004922B2 patent drawing, figure 1
Fig. 1
US8004922B2 patent drawing, figure 2
Fig. 2
Source: Patsnap patent data + case record. Bibliographic fields and drawings reproduced from the published patent document. Break down the claims
Parties & counsel

Parties of record

Plaintiff

VLSI Technology, LLC

Core tech
G11C8/00G11C7/00
Counsel
Alan J. Heinrich · Babak Redjaian · Benjamin W. Hattenbach · Charlotte J. Wen · Elizabeth C. Tuan · Elizabeth Kathleen Clarke · Ian Washburn · Iian D. Jablon · Jeffrey A. Lamken · Lucas M. Walker · Morgan Chu
Firm
Irell & Manella LLP, MoloLamken LLP

Counsel of record

Source: case record + Patsnap company data. Attorney names appear as recorded in the docket. Compare both portfolios
Outcome

Basis of termination

From the record · verbatim

“THIS CAUSE having been considered, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED: REVERSED-IN-PART, AFFIRMED-IN-PART, AND REMANDED”

Case 24-1772 · Fed. Cir. · closed 14 April 2026
Source: case record, verbatim. The quoted paragraph is the basis-of-termination text as filed.

Related cases

Three questions this record usually leads to. Each one runs against the full litigation and patent corpus, and cites what it finds.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

What is case 24-1772?

24-1772 is a patent infringement action brought by VLSI Technology, LLC against Intel, Corp., filed on 2 May 2024 in the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. The case closed on 14 April 2026.

Which patents were asserted in 24-1772?

US7706207B2 (“Memory with level shifting word line driver and method thereof”), assigned to VLSI TECHNOLOGY LLC, currently inactive; US8004922B2 (“Power island with independent power characteristics for memory and logic”), assigned to VLSI TECHNOLOGY LLC, currently active; US8020014B2 (“Method for power reduction and a device having power reduction capabilities”), assigned to VLSI TECHNOLOGY LLC; US7268588B2 (“Cascadable level shifter cell”), assigned to VLSI TECHNOLOGY LLC; US7675806B2 (“Low voltage memory device and method thereof”), assigned to VLSI TECHNOLOGY LLC; US7709303B2 (“Process for forming an electronic device including a fin-type structure”), assigned to VLSI TECHNOLOGY LLC; US8268672B2 (“Method of assembly and assembly thus made”), assigned to VLSI TECHNOLOGY LLC; US8566836B2 (“Multi-core system on chip”), assigned to VLSI TECHNOLOGY LLC. The record also lists Low voltage memory device and method thereof, Method for power reduction and a device having power reduction capabilities, Method of assembly and assembly thus made, Multi-core system on chip, Power island with independent power characteristics for memory and logic and Process for forming an electronic device including a fin-type structure.

How was case 24-1772 terminated?

The recorded basis of termination is appeal dismissed in part. The termination text reads: “THIS CAUSE having been considered, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED: REVERSED-IN-PART, AFFIRMED-IN-PART, AND REMANDED”

How long did case 24-1772 take?

712 calendar days, from filing on 2 May 2024 to closure on 14 April 2026.

Who were the attorneys and the judge in 24-1772?

Alan J. Heinrich, Babak Redjaian, Benjamin W. Hattenbach, Charlotte J. Wen, Elizabeth C. Tuan, Elizabeth Kathleen Clarke, Ian Washburn, Iian D. Jablon, Jeffrey A. Lamken, Lucas M. Walker and Morgan Chu are recorded as counsel for plaintiff VLSI Technology. Andrew J. Danford, Dominic E. Massa, Joseph J. Mueller, Louis W. Tompros, Mary Virginia Sooter and William F. Lee appear for defendant Intel.

Answers reproduce fields from the case record for 24-1772 and do not constitute legal advice. Ask your own question

Disclaimer. This page reproduces publicly available court docket data for case 24-1772 and is provided for general information and reference only. It is not legal advice and must not be relied upon as such.

Docket data has limits. Records are drawn from a snapshot and may lag the live docket. Sealed filings, amended complaints, counterclaims and post-closure motions may not be reflected. Party names, attorney names and firm affiliations are reproduced as recorded and may contain omissions. Where a field is absent from the record, this page marks it as not recorded rather than inferring a value.

No characterisation of the parties or the outcome. This page reports what the record contains. Nothing here should be read as an assertion that any party infringed, that any patent is valid or invalid, that any settlement occurred, or that any party prevailed.

No FTO or validity opinion. Nothing on this page constitutes a freedom-to-operate, novelty, validity or infringement opinion. Any decision touching a live patent dispute should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent counsel.

Related Litigation Cases

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.