VoltStar Technologies, Inc. v. Premier Accessory Group, LLC
Infringement action filed 5 Jan 2023 in the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey and closed 30 May 2023, with US9024581B2 asserted. Recorded basis of termination: case dismissed.
Case record
- Patent involved
- US9024581B2
- Application no.
- US12/124515
- Case no.
- 2:23-cv-00051
- Verdict cause
- Infringement action
- Court
- D.N.J.
- Court level
- District Court
- Case region
- New Jersey
- Chief judge
- None recorded
- Trial level
- First instance
- Filed – Closed
- 5 Jan 2023 – 30 May 2023
- Duration
- 145 days
- Basis of termination
- Case Dismissed
- Products & marks
- Charger plug with improved package
- Validity challenges
- None recorded
Check this patent against your own product
Prior art, claim scope, infringement exposure and design-around routes. Every answer cites the records behind it.
Get an FTO claim chart- 01Ranked prior artEvery hit source-linked
- 02Claim-level comparisonAgainst your own product
- 03Legal statusAcross 174 jurisdictions
Charger plug with improved package
A reduced plug-size charger plug for power conversion is disclosed utilizing a pair of blades that are slidably mounted into a charger housing, obviating the need for insertion molding. To promote and maintain electrical contact while minimizing package size and charger plug cost, a pair of spring contacts are provided for electrically connecting the blades with internal circuitry.
- Legal status
- Inactive
- Granted
- 5 May 2015
- Est. expiry
- 23 Oct 2030
- Validity challenges
- None recorded
- Licences recorded
- None recorded
- Inventors
- MCGINLEY, JAMES W. · RIMDZIUS, DONALD · MARCUSEN, DAVID P.
- Classification
- H02J7/00H01R13/24H01R31/06
- Examiner
- MURALIDAR, RICHARD V
Parties of record
VoltStar Technologies, Inc.
- Core tech
- H02J7/00H01R13/24H01R31/06
- Counsel
- Eliezer Lekht
- Firm
- Sriplaw
Premier Accessory Group, LLC
- Core tech
- Not recorded
- Counsel
- Not recorded
- Firm
- Not recorded
Counsel of record
| Attorney | For | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Eliezer Lekht | VoltStar Technologies, Inc. | Plaintiff |
Basis of termination
From the record · verbatim“It appearing to the Court that the above case has been pending for more than 90 days without any proceeding having taken therein and no objection having been entered at a call of the calendar; It is this 30TH day of May, 2023; ORDERED that the above case be and the same hereby is dismissed accordance with L. Civ. R. 41.1 without prejudice and without costs to either party”
Case 2:23-cv-00051 · D.N.J. · closed 30 May 2023
Related cases
Three questions this record usually leads to. Each one runs against the full litigation and patent corpus, and cites what it finds.
Frequently asked questions
What is case 2:23-cv-00051?
2:23-cv-00051 is a patent infringement action brought by VoltStar Technologies, Inc. against Premier Accessory Group, LLC, filed on 5 Jan 2023 in the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey. The case closed on 30 May 2023.
Which patent was asserted in 2:23-cv-00051?
US9024581B2 (“Charger plug with improved package”), assigned to VOLTSTAR TECHNOLOGIES, INC., currently inactive. The record also lists Charger plug with improved package.
How was case 2:23-cv-00051 terminated?
The recorded basis of termination is case dismissed. The termination text reads: “It appearing to the Court that the above case has been pending for more than 90 days without any proceeding having taken therein and no objection having been entered at a call of the calendar; It is this 30TH day of May, 2023; ORDERED that the above case be and the same hereby is dismissed accordance with L. Civ. R. 41.1 without prejudice and without costs to either party”
What does dismissal without prejudice mean?
A dismissal without prejudice ends this action but leaves the claims alive — the plaintiff may file them again later, subject to the limitation period.
How long did case 2:23-cv-00051 take?
145 calendar days, from filing on 5 Jan 2023 to closure on 30 May 2023.
Who were the attorneys and the judge in 2:23-cv-00051?
Eliezer Lekht is recorded as counsel for plaintiff VoltStar Technologies.
Disclaimer. This page reproduces publicly available court docket data for case 2:23-cv-00051 and is provided for general information and reference only. It is not legal advice and must not be relied upon as such.
Docket data has limits. Records are drawn from a snapshot and may lag the live docket. Sealed filings, amended complaints, counterclaims and post-closure motions may not be reflected. Party names, attorney names and firm affiliations are reproduced as recorded and may contain omissions. Where a field is absent from the record, this page marks it as not recorded rather than inferring a value.
No characterisation of the parties or the outcome. This page reports what the record contains. Nothing here should be read as an assertion that any party infringed, that any patent is valid or invalid, that any settlement occurred, or that any party prevailed.
No FTO or validity opinion. Nothing on this page constitutes a freedom-to-operate, novelty, validity or infringement opinion. Any decision touching a live patent dispute should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent counsel.