Woodbury Wireless vs. T-Mobile: 5G Patent Infringement Case Dismissed
What would you like to do next?
Choose your path based on your current needs:
📋 Case Summary
| Case Name | Woodbury Wireless, LLC v. T-Mobile USA, Inc. |
| Case Number | 2:24-cv-00088 |
| Court | United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas (Judge Rodney Gilstrap) |
| Duration | Feb 2024 – Mar 2025 1 year 1 month |
| Outcome | Defendant Win – Dismissed with Prejudice |
| Patents at Issue | |
| Accused Products | T-Mobile’s 5G Network and related services, T-Mobile 5G Hotspot, MiFi X Pro 5G Hotspot, T-Mobile 5G Gateway (Business), T-Mobile’s WiFi products and services |
Case Overview
The Parties
⚖️ Plaintiff
A patent assertion entity (PAE) focused on monetizing wireless communication technologies. As a non-practicing entity (NPE), Woodbury Wireless derives value through licensing negotiations and litigation.
🛡️ Defendant
A leading U.S. wireless carrier with an extensive 5G network footprint and a growing portfolio of consumer and enterprise wireless products.
Patents at Issue
This landmark case involved seven U.S. patents spanning wireless signal transmission and network communication technologies:
- • US9503163B2 (App. No. 14/476628)
- • US9859963B2 (App. No. 15/406661)
- • US10211895B2 (App. No. 16/120258)
- • US11108443B2 (App. No. 16/420133)
- • US9496930B2 (App. No. 14/952850)
- • US10516451B2 (App. No. 16/243421)
- • US9584197B2 (App. No. 14/952874)
Developing 5G wireless products?
Check if your technology might infringe these or related patents.
The Dismissal & Legal Analysis
Outcome
On March 24, 2025, Judge Rodney Gilstrap granted the joint motion to dismiss with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41. The order explicitly dismissed all of Plaintiff Woodbury Wireless’s claims against T-Mobile and all of T-Mobile’s counterclaims against Woodbury Wireless, with prejudice. Each party was directed to bear its own costs and fees. No damages were publicly awarded, and no injunctive relief was ordered.
Key Legal Issues
The dismissal with prejudice — joint in nature — strongly suggests a confidential settlement or licensing resolution was reached between the parties. This resolution occurred pre-trial, before claim construction hearings, indicating both parties preferred a negotiated certainty over prolonged litigation expense and risk. The seven-patent portfolio remains technically valid, allowing Woodbury Wireless to assert these patents against other defendants. The Eastern District of Texas continues to attract wireless NPE litigation, adding to the statistical pattern of pre-trial settlements in the district.
Filing 5G wireless patents?
Learn from this case. Use AI to draft stronger claims that can withstand litigation.
Power Your Patent Strategy with PatSnap Eureka IP
From novelty searches to patent drafting, PatSnap Eureka’s AI-powered tools help you navigate the patent landscape with confidence.
⚠️ Freedom to Operate (FTO) Analysis for 5G Wireless
This case highlights critical IP risks in 5G wireless technology. Choose your next step:
📋 Understand 5G Patent Landscape
Learn about the specific risks and implications in the 5G wireless domain.
- View all 7 asserted patents in this technology space
- See which companies are most active in 5G wireless patents
- Understand claim construction patterns for wireless tech
🔍 Check My Product’s Risk
Run a comprehensive FTO analysis for your own technology or product.
- Input your product description or technical features
- AI identifies potentially blocking patents
- Get actionable risk assessment report
High Risk Area
5G network infrastructure, hotspot devices
7 Asserted Patents
In 5G wireless communication
Design-Around Options
Available for many wireless claims
✅ Key Takeaways from This 5G Case
For Patent Attorneys & Litigators
Joint dismissal with prejudice and mutual fee-bearing strongly indicates a confidential licensing resolution — a common EDTX NPE outcome.
Search related case law →No claim construction or invalidity ruling was entered, preserving the patent portfolio’s legal standing against other defendants.
Explore precedents →For R&D Leaders
5G hotspot and gateway product teams should conduct ongoing FTO analysis against continuation patent families in the wireless communication space.
Start FTO analysis for my product →Early identification of relevant NPE portfolios enables proactive licensing strategy before litigation filing.
Try AI patent drafting →Ready to Strengthen Your Patent Strategy?
Join thousands of IP professionals using PatSnap Eureka to conduct prior art searches, draft patents, and analyze competitive landscapes.