Yan Meihua v. Schedule A Defendants: Faucet Design Patent Case Settles
What would you like to do next?
Choose your path based on your current needs:
📋 Case Summary
| Case Name | Yan Meihua v. Individuals, Partnerships Identified in Schedule A |
| Case Number | 1:24-cv-05403 (N.D. Ill.) |
| Court | U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Duration | Jun 27, 2024 – Nov 11, 2025 502 days |
| Outcome | Plaintiff Win – Settlement (No Public Damages) |
| Patents at Issue | |
| Accused Products | Standard Design and Waterfall Design faucets (FORIOUS, BESy, VIBRANTBATH, BATHLAVISH, Homary International Limited, and others) |
Case Overview
The Parties
⚖️ Plaintiff
Individual patent holder asserting ownership of a registered U.S. design patent covering ornamental faucet configurations.
🛡️ Defendant
A broad array of faucet brands and e-commerce sellers including FORIOUS, BESy, VIBRANTBATH, BATHLAVISH, and Homary International Limited.
The Patent at Issue
This landmark case involved a single design patent covering the ornamental appearance of faucet hardware:
- • US D978,293S — Ornamental faucet designs (standard and waterfall)
Designing a similar product?
Check if your faucet design might infringe this or related patents.
The Verdict & Legal Analysis
Outcome
The case was **dismissed with prejudice** pursuant to a negotiated confidential settlement. No public damages award was disclosed, which is typical in settled multi-defendant actions.
Key Legal Issues
The resolution of this case highlights the strategic use of *Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of America* (511 U.S. 375, 1994) to retain federal court jurisdiction for enforcing confidential settlement agreements post-dismissal.
Filing a design patent?
Learn from this case. Use AI to draft stronger claims that can withstand litigation.
Power Your Patent Strategy with Eureka IP
From novelty searches to patent drafting, Eureka’s AI-powered tools help you navigate the patent landscape with confidence.
⚠️ Freedom to Operate (FTO) Analysis
This case highlights critical IP risks in faucet design, particularly for e-commerce sellers. Choose your next step:
📋 Understand This Case’s Impact
Learn about the specific risks and implications from this litigation.
- View the specific US D978,293S patent details
- See how multi-defendant actions are structured
- Understand visual similarity in faucet designs
🔍 Check My Product’s Risk
Run a comprehensive FTO analysis for your own technology or product.
- Input your product description or technical features
- AI identifies potentially blocking patents
- Get actionable risk assessment report
High Risk Area
Waterfall and standard faucet designs
1 Design Patent
Covering faucet aesthetics
Strategic Design-Around
Key for market entry
✅ Key Takeaways
For Patent Attorneys & Litigators
Schedule A multi-defendant actions remain an efficient design patent enforcement strategy in N.D. Illinois.
Explore N.D. Illinois precedents →Utilizing *Kokkonen* jurisdiction preservation in dismissal stipulations is crucial for enforcing confidential settlement agreements.
Search related case law →For R&D Leaders & Product Teams
Proactively conduct FTO analysis against design patents for aesthetic features in home fixture products, especially for popular styles.
Start FTO analysis for my product →Emphasize visual differentiation in product design to mitigate infringement risk, particularly for waterfall and standard faucet designs.
Try AI patent drafting →Ready to Strengthen Your Patent Strategy?
Join thousands of IP professionals using Eureka to conduct prior art searches, draft patents, and analyze competitive landscapes.