Yeti Coolers, Inc. v. Bote, LLC

8:23-cv-00370 M.D. Fla. Closed 31 patents
Get a prior-art report

Infringement action filed 17 Feb 2023 in the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida and closed 22 Aug 2023, with 31 patents asserted. Recorded basis of termination: dismissed with prejudice.

Case recordPatsnap Litigation Data·

Case record

Case no.
8:23-cv-00370
Verdict cause
Infringement action
Court
M.D. Fla.
Court level
District Court
Case region
Florida
Chief judge
None recorded
Trial level
First instance
Filed – Closed
17 Feb 2023 – 22 Aug 2023
Duration
186 days
Basis of termination
Dismissed with Prejudice
Products & marks
Bag · Beverage holder · Bottle · Insulating container · Insulating device and method for forming insulating device · Lid · Tote bag
Source: Patsnap Litigation Data. Case 8:23-cv-00370, United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida. Open this record in Eureka
Patsnap Eureka

Check this patent against your own product

Prior art, claim scope, infringement exposure and design-around routes. Every answer cites the records behind it.

Get an FTO claim chart
10,000 free credits to start
Patent at issue
Source: Patsnap patent data + case record. Bibliographic fields and drawings reproduced from the published patent document. Break down the claims
Parties & counsel

Parties of record

Counsel of record

Source: case record + Patsnap company data. Attorney names appear as recorded in the docket. Compare both portfolios
Outcome

Basis of termination

From the record · verbatim

"Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), Plaintiff, YETI Coolers, LLC (“YETI”), and Defendant, BOTE, LLC (“BOTE”), by and through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate to the dismissal of this action with prejudice, including all claims asserted therein. YETI and BOTE each shall bear their own costs and attorneys’ fees"

Case 8:23-cv-00370 · M.D. Fla. · closed 22 August 2023
Source: case record, verbatim. The quoted paragraph is the basis-of-termination text as filed.

Related cases

Three questions this record usually leads to. Each one runs against the full litigation and patent corpus, and cites what it finds.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

What is case 8:23-cv-00370?

8:23-cv-00370 is a patent infringement action brought by Yeti Coolers, Inc. against Bote, LLC, filed on 17 Feb 2023 in the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida. The case closed on 22 August 2023.

Which patents were asserted in 8:23-cv-00370?

USD779892S (“Beverage holder”), assigned to YETI COOLERS, LLC, currently active; USD780533S (“Beverage holder”), assigned to YETI COOLERS, LLC, currently active; US10994918B1 (“Insulating device and method for forming insulating device”), assigned to YETI COOLERS, LLC; US11172741B2 (“Tote bag”), assigned to YETI COOLERS, LLC; USD822997S (“Bag”), assigned to YETI COOLERS, LLC; USD779285S (“Beverage holder”), assigned to YETI COOLERS, LLC; USD799906S (“Bottle”), assigned to YETI COOLERS, LLC; USD875479S (“Bottle”), assigned to YETI COOLERS, LLC; USD807126S (“Bottle”), assigned to YETI COOLERS, LLC; USD780532S (“Beverage holder”), assigned to YETI COOLERS, LLC; USD826003S (“Beverage holder”), assigned to YETI COOLERS, LLC; USD899870S (“Bottle”), assigned to YETI COOLERS, LLC; USD941638S (“Bottle”), assigned to YETI COOLERS, LLC; US9139352B2 (“Insulating container”), assigned to YETI COOLERS, LLC; USD823646S (“Bottle”), assigned to YETI COOLERS, LLC; USD786025S (“Beverage holder”), assigned to YETI COOLERS, LLC; USD843212S (“Lid”), assigned to YETI COOLERS, LLC; USD780530S (“Beverage holder”), assigned to YETI COOLERS, LLC; USD960661S (“Bottle”), assigned to YETI COOLERS, LLC; USD807125S (“Bottle”), assigned to YETI COOLERS, LLC; USD829058S (“Beverage holder”), assigned to YETI COOLERS, LLC; USD920746S (“Beverage holder”), assigned to YETI COOLERS, LLC; USD804256S (“Bottle”), assigned to YETI COOLERS, LLC; USD752397S (“Beverage holder”), assigned to YETI COOLERS, LLC; USD784775S (“Bottle”), assigned to YETI COOLERS, LLC; USD760586S (“Lid”), assigned to YETI COOLERS, LLC; USD888505S (“Beverage holder”), assigned to YETI COOLERS, LLC; USD822998S (“Bag”), assigned to YETI COOLERS, LLC; USD780531S (“Beverage holder”), assigned to YETI COOLERS, LLC; US11186422B2 (“Insulating device and method for forming insulating device”), assigned to YETI COOLERS, LLC; USD822999S (“Bag”), assigned to YETI COOLERS, LLC. The record also lists Bag, Beverage holder, Bottle, Insulating container, Insulating device and method for forming insulating device, Lid and Tote bag.

How was case 8:23-cv-00370 terminated?

The recorded basis of termination is dismissed with prejudice. The termination text reads: "Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), Plaintiff, YETI Coolers, LLC (“YETI”), and Defendant, BOTE, LLC (“BOTE”), by and through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate to the dismissal of this action with prejudice, including all claims asserted therein. YETI and BOTE each shall bear their own costs and attorneys’ fees"

What does dismissal with prejudice mean?

A dismissal with prejudice permanently ends the claims that were filed, so the same claims cannot be brought again against that defendant. It is the usual form when the parties have settled.

How long did case 8:23-cv-00370 take?

186 calendar days, from filing on 17 Feb 2023 to closure on 22 August 2023.

Who were the attorneys and the judge in 8:23-cv-00370?

Alaina Pak, David Stephen Johnson, Joseph J. Berghammer and Michael L. Krashin are recorded as counsel for plaintiff Yeti Coolers. Allen Kathir, Benjamin E. Hershkowitz, James Steven Toscano and Michael David Piccolo appear for defendant Bote.

Answers reproduce fields from the case record for 8:23-cv-00370 and do not constitute legal advice. Ask your own question

Disclaimer. This page reproduces publicly available court docket data for case 8:23-cv-00370 and is provided for general information and reference only. It is not legal advice and must not be relied upon as such.

Docket data has limits. Records are drawn from a snapshot and may lag the live docket. Sealed filings, amended complaints, counterclaims and post-closure motions may not be reflected. Party names, attorney names and firm affiliations are reproduced as recorded and may contain omissions. Where a field is absent from the record, this page marks it as not recorded rather than inferring a value.

No characterisation of the parties or the outcome. This page reports what the record contains. Nothing here should be read as an assertion that any party infringed, that any patent is valid or invalid, that any settlement occurred, or that any party prevailed.

No FTO or validity opinion. Nothing on this page constitutes a freedom-to-operate, novelty, validity or infringement opinion. Any decision touching a live patent dispute should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent counsel.