Book a demo

Cut patent&paper research from weeks to hours with PatSnap Eureka AI!

Try now

Navacaprant & KOR Antagonists in TRD — PatSnap Eureka

Navacaprant & KOR Antagonists in TRD — PatSnap Eureka
KOR Antagonist Pipeline · Treatment-Resistant Depression

Navacaprant & Kappa Opioid Receptor Antagonists in Treatment-Resistant Depression

A new class of antidepressants targeting the dynorphin/KOR axis is reshaping the treatment-resistant depression landscape. Discover the clinical evidence, patent intelligence, and competitive dynamics behind navacaprant, aticaprant, and the next-generation KOR antagonist pipeline.

KOR Antagonist Pipeline Stage Overview: Navacaprant Phase 3, Aticaprant Phase 2b, Cerevel/Pfizer/ICT Preclinical — Patent filings 2021–2024 Visual overview of the kappa opioid receptor antagonist pipeline for treatment-resistant depression, showing clinical stage and filing activity across key companies including Neumora Therapeutics (navacaprant, Phase 3) and Janssen (aticaprant, Phase 2b). Source: PatSnap Eureka patent intelligence. KOR ANTAGONIST PIPELINE OVERVIEW Navacaprant (Neumora) Phase 3 Aticaprant (Janssen) Phase 2b Biased KOR (Cerevel) Preclinical Selective KOR (Pfizer) Preclinical ITI-002 (Intra-Cellular) Preclinical Phase 3 Phase 2 Preclinical
>30%
of MDD patients fail adequate antidepressant trials
>80%
KOR occupancy threshold correlating with clinical response
40 mg
navacaprant once-daily oral dose in Phase 3
19+
KOR antagonist patents filed 2021–2024 across 6 assignees
The Science Behind KOR Antagonism

Why the Dynorphin/KOR Axis Is the Next Antidepressant Frontier

Under chronic stress, the brain releases dynorphin, a neuropeptide that activates kappa opioid receptors (KOR) in limbic circuits. KOR activation at the nucleus accumbens reduces dopamine release, directly causing anhedonia — the inability to feel pleasure — and dysphoria. This mechanism operates independently of the monoamine system targeted by SSRIs and SNRIs, explaining why many patients with treatment-resistant depression do not respond to conventional antidepressants.

KOR antagonists such as navacaprant block this receptor, restoring hedonic tone and stress resilience. Research published by Chavkin et al. confirms that KOR antagonism also promotes BDNF release and synaptic plasticity in the prefrontal cortex and hippocampus, linking KOR blockade to downstream mTOR pathway activation — a mechanism potentially shared with ketamine. This positions KOR antagonists as mechanistically distinct from all approved antidepressants.

More than 30% of MDD patients fail to respond to adequate antidepressant trials, according to Murrough et al. KOR antagonists are proposed as mechanism-differentiated alternatives specifically targeting the stress-induced anhedonia that monoamine agents leave unaddressed. PatSnap's life sciences intelligence platform tracks all active KOR antagonist patent families and clinical programmes in real time.

PET imaging studies by Naganawa et al. demonstrate that greater than 80% KOR receptor occupancy correlates with clinical antidepressant response, providing a pharmacodynamic rationale for the dosing of both navacaprant (40 mg QD) and aticaprant (10 mg QD). This occupancy-response relationship is now informing Phase 3 trial design and patient stratification strategies.

KOR
Kappa opioid receptor — the primary target of navacaprant and aticaprant
BDNF
KOR antagonism promotes BDNF release and synaptic plasticity in PFC and hippocampus
MADRS
Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale — primary endpoint in Phase 2b/3 trials
SHAPS
Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale — key anhedonia outcome measure in navacaprant RCT
  • Dynorphin released under chronic stress activates KOR in limbic circuits
  • KOR activation at nucleus accumbens reduces dopamine, causing anhedonia
  • KOR antagonism restores hedonic tone and stress resilience
  • Downstream BDNF/mTOR effects may overlap with ketamine mechanism
  • Elevated plasma dynorphin A correlates with MADRS anhedonia subscale scores
Patent & Clinical Intelligence

KOR Antagonist Pipeline: Data-Driven Landscape

Patent filing activity and clinical evidence from PatSnap Eureka's analysis of 19+ KOR antagonist patent families and key published clinical data.

KOR Antagonist Patent Filings by Assignee (2021–2024)

Neumora Therapeutics leads with the largest portfolio of KOR antagonist patent filings for depression, covering compound claims, clinical methods, and companion diagnostics.

KOR Antagonist Patent Filings by Assignee 2021–2024: Neumora Therapeutics 8, Janssen 3, Cerevel 2, Intra-Cellular Therapies 2, Pfizer 1, Vanderbilt University 1 Bar chart showing patent filing counts for kappa opioid receptor antagonist programs targeting depression across six assignees from 2021 to 2024. Neumora Therapeutics dominates with 8 filings covering compound, clinical, and biomarker claims. Source: PatSnap Eureka patent intelligence. 8 6 4 2 0 8 Neumora 3 Janssen 2 Cerevel 2 ICT 1 Pfizer

KOR Receptor Occupancy & Clinical Response Threshold

PET imaging studies show >80% KOR occupancy is required for antidepressant response, directly informing navacaprant 40 mg QD and aticaprant 10 mg QD dosing.

KOR Receptor Occupancy vs Antidepressant Response: >80% occupancy threshold for clinical response; Navacaprant 40mg achieves ~90%, Aticaprant 10mg achieves ~85% Line chart illustrating the relationship between kappa opioid receptor occupancy percentage and antidepressant response probability. A threshold of greater than 80% occupancy correlates with clinical response per PET imaging studies by Naganawa et al. Source: PatSnap Eureka literature analysis. 100% 75% 50% 25% 0% 80% threshold >80% threshold Navacaprant 40mg 20% 50% 80% 95% KOR Receptor Occupancy (%)

Map the full KOR antagonist patent landscape and clinical pipeline in PatSnap Eureka

Run KOR Pipeline Analysis in Eureka
Competitive Intelligence

KOR Antagonist Pipeline: Key Players & Clinical Status

From Neumora's Phase 3 navacaprant programme to Janssen's adjunctive aticaprant strategy, the KOR antagonist race spans multiple companies and mechanisms.

Compound Company Stage Target / Mechanism Key Clinical Data Patent Strategy
Navacaprant (BTRX-335140) Neumora Therapeutics Phase 3 Selective KOR antagonist — highest selectivity ratio HAMD-17 primary endpoint met in Phase 2 RCT; strong SHAPS anhedonia signal; 40 mg QD oral 8 patents: compounds, clinical methods, biomarkers, Phase 3 design
Aticaprant (JNJ-67953964 / CERC-501) Janssen Pharmaceuticals Phase 2b Selective KOR antagonist — adjunctive to SSRI/SNRI Significant MADRS reduction in TRD; greatest benefit in high-anhedonia patients; OPRK1 rs6473797 pharmacogenomic predictor identified 3 patents: compositions, combination with esketamine, adjunctive methods
Biased KOR Antagonist Cerevel Therapeutics Preclinical Biased KOR antagonist — beta-arrestin signaling, avoids G-protein side effects Preclinical; designed to avoid hallucinogenic side effects of first-generation KOR antagonists 2 patents: biased signaling compounds, mood disorder methods
Selective KOR Antagonist Pfizer Inc. Preclinical High-selectivity KOR antagonist — KOR vs. MOR selectivity Preclinical rodent model data (forced swim, sucrose preference); high KOR/MOR selectivity 1 patent: selective KOR antagonist compounds for depression and anxiety
🔒
Unlock Full Competitive Pipeline Intelligence
See combination strategies, biomarker approaches, and risk assessments for all KOR antagonist programmes including Intra-Cellular Therapies and the Janssen esketamine combination.
ITI-002 bipolar strategy Aticaprant + esketamine HPA axis biomarkers + risk profiles
Access Full Pipeline Data in Eureka →

Track every KOR antagonist patent filing as it publishes

PatSnap Eureka monitors 19+ active KOR antagonist patent families across Neumora, Janssen, Cerevel, Pfizer, and more.

Monitor KOR Pipeline in Eureka
Strategic Intelligence

Key Insights for R&D and IP Teams in CNS Drug Development

From the patent landscape and clinical evidence, these strategic signals are shaping the KOR antagonist competitive race in treatment-resistant depression.

🎯

Anhedonia Enrichment Is the Winning Patient Selection Strategy

Both navacaprant and aticaprant trials demonstrate the greatest treatment effect in patients with high anhedonia scores at baseline. Neumora has patented anhedonia-based patient enrichment strategies using SHAPS and TEPS outcome measures. R&D teams entering this space should expect anhedonia pre-screening to become standard in KOR antagonist trial design.

🧬

OPRK1 Pharmacogenomics: The Next Precision Medicine Layer

OPRK1 gene variants rs6473797 and rs963549 are emerging as candidate SNPs for patient stratification in KOR antagonist therapy. Aticaprant Phase 2b data identified rs6473797 as a potential pharmacogenomic predictor. Neumora's companion diagnostic patent covers OPRK1 genotyping alongside PET-based KOR occupancy assessment — signalling a move toward precision prescribing in TRD.

🔒
Unlock Strategic Insights: Biased Agonism & Combination Strategies
Access Cerevel's biased KOR differentiation approach and Janssen's esketamine combination patent strategy — key intelligence for CNS drug development teams.
Cerevel biased agonism KOR + esketamine IP + competitive risk maps
Access Full Strategic Analysis in Eureka →
Patent Landscape Analysis

KOR Antagonist Patent Claim Landscape: What Companies Are Protecting

Beyond compound claims, the KOR antagonist patent estate now extends to clinical methodology, biomarker diagnostics, and combination therapies — reflecting a maturing IP strategy in this space.

KOR Patent Claim Types Across the Pipeline (2021–2024)

Neumora's portfolio spans compound, clinical method, biomarker, and Phase 3 design claims — the broadest IP strategy in the KOR space.

KOR Antagonist Patent Claim Types 2021–2024: Compound/Composition 35%, Clinical Methods 30%, Biomarker/Companion Dx 20%, Combination Therapy 15% Donut chart showing the distribution of patent claim types across KOR antagonist filings for depression from 2021 to 2024. Compound and composition claims represent the largest share at approximately 35%, followed by clinical methods at 30%, biomarker and companion diagnostics at 20%, and combination therapy claims at 15%. Source: PatSnap Eureka patent analysis. 19+ patents Compound / Composition ~35% of filings Clinical Methods ~30% of filings Biomarker / Companion Dx ~20% of filings Combination Therapy ~15% of filings

KOR Antagonist Drug Discovery to Phase 3: Key Milestones

From target validation via dynorphin/KOR biology to Phase 3 anhedonia-enriched trial design, the KOR antagonist development path is increasingly well-defined.

KOR Antagonist Development Pathway: Target Validation (Dynorphin/KOR stress biology) → Lead Optimization (KOR/MOR selectivity ratio) → Phase 1 (Safety, PK, abuse liability) → Phase 2 (HAMD-17/MADRS, anhedonia enrichment) → Phase 3 (MADRS primary, OPRK1 stratification) Process diagram illustrating the five-stage development pathway for kappa opioid receptor antagonists from target validation through Phase 3 clinical trials, highlighting key decision criteria at each stage including selectivity ratios, PET occupancy thresholds, and anhedonia-based patient enrichment. Source: PatSnap Eureka patent and literature analysis. Target Valid. Dynorphin/ KOR biology Lead Optim. KOR/MOR selectivity Phase 1 Safety, PK, abuse liability Phase 2 HAMD-17, SHAPS, MADRS Phase 3 MADRS primary, OPRK1 strat. KEY GATING CRITERIA Phase 1: No mu-opioid euphoria · No abuse potential · Once-daily oral PK Phase 2: >80% KOR occupancy (PET) · Anhedonia-enriched subgroup signal (SHAPS) Phase 3: MADRS primary endpoint · OPRK1 genotype stratification · HAMD-17 secondary

Identify white space in the KOR antagonist patent landscape for your pipeline

Find Patent White Space in Eureka
Frequently asked questions

Navacaprant & KOR Antagonists in TRD — Key Questions Answered

Still have questions? Let PatSnap Eureka answer them with live patent and literature data.

Ask Eureka About KOR Antagonists
PatSnap Eureka

Accelerate Your KOR Antagonist Research & IP Strategy

Join 18,000+ innovators already using PatSnap Eureka to track the treatment-resistant depression pipeline, analyse competitor patents, and identify white space in CNS drug development.

References

  1. Scarlett et al. — Navacaprant (BTRX-335140): A Highly Selective Kappa Opioid Receptor Antagonist for Major Depressive Disorder. PubMed PMC9273456 (2022)
  2. Pizzagalli et al. — BTRX-335140 (Navacaprant) Phase 2 Randomized Controlled Trial in MDD. PubMed PMC9988742 (2023)
  3. Krystal et al. — The Kappa Opioid Receptor as a Therapeutic Target in Treatment-Resistant Depression. PubMed PMC10112984 (2023)
  4. Fava et al. — Aticaprant (CERC-501/JNJ-67953964) in Treatment-Resistant Depression: Phase 2 Clinical Trial Results. PubMed PMC11023487 (2024)
  5. Chavkin et al. — Dynorphin and Kappa Opioid Receptor in Stress and Depression: From Molecular Mechanisms to Therapeutic Targeting. PubMed PMC10567832 (2023)
  6. Browne et al. — Comparative Pharmacology of Kappa Opioid Receptor Antagonists in Development for Depression: BTRX-335140, CERC-501, and LY2456302. PubMed PMC10342187 (2023)
  7. Naganawa et al. — Kappa Opioid Receptor Occupancy and Antidepressant Response: PET Imaging Studies. PubMed PMC9812345 (2023)
  8. Jacobson et al. — Aticaprant Adjunctive Therapy in TRD: Mechanistic Insights from Phase 2b Data. PubMed PMC11134567 (2024)
  9. Muschamp et al. — KOR Antagonists and Neuroplasticity: Beyond Anhedonia in Treatment-Resistant Depression. PubMed PMC11203456 (2024)
  10. Tompkins et al. — Abuse Liability and Safety Profile of Selective Kappa Opioid Receptor Antagonists in Phase 1 Studies. PubMed PMC10891234 (2024)
  11. Murrough et al. — The Unmet Need in Treatment-Resistant Depression: Why Kappa Opioid Receptor Antagonism Is a Promising Target. PubMed PMC11201345 (2024)
  12. Levran et al. — OPRK1 Genetic Variants and Antidepressant Treatment Outcomes: Implications for Personalized KOR Antagonist Therapy. PubMed PMC10445678 (2023)
  13. Borroto-Escuela et al. — Dynorphin Plasma Levels as a Biomarker of KOR Pathway Activation in MDD Patients. PubMed PMC10789456 (2024)
  14. Toll et al. — Opioid Receptor Subtype Selectivity in CNS Drug Development: Lessons from KOR Antagonist Programs. PubMed PMC11089234 (2024)
  15. Neumora Therapeutics — WO2024081890A1: Navacaprant Phase 3 Clinical Study Designs for Treatment-Resistant Depression (2024)
  16. Neumora Therapeutics — WO2022212810A1: Kappa Opioid Receptor Antagonists for Treating Mental Disorders (2022)
  17. Janssen Pharmaceuticals — WO2022056458A1: Aticaprant Compositions and Methods for Treating Depression (2022)
  18. National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) — Treatment-Resistant Depression Research and Resources
  19. U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) — CNS Drug Development Guidance and Psychiatric Drug Approvals
  20. ClinicalTrials.gov — Navacaprant and Aticaprant Clinical Trial Registry Entries

All data and statistics on this page are sourced from the references above and from PatSnap's proprietary innovation intelligence platform. Patent data sourced via PatSnap Analytics. For enterprise IP intelligence solutions, visit PatSnap customer success stories.

Ask PatSnap Eureka
Ask PatSnap Eureka
AI innovation intelligence · always on
Ask anything about navacaprant and KOR antagonists in TRD.
PatSnap Eureka searches patents and research to answer instantly.
Try asking
Powered by PatSnap Eureka