Book a demo

3D NAND Flash Scaling Patents: Who Leads, Where the Gaps Are 2026

3D NAND Flash Scaling Patents: Who Leads, Where the Gaps Are 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/3d-nand-flash-scaling-and-integration-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Semiconductors & Microelectronics
3D NAND flash scaling and integration patents: string stacking, wafer bonding and CMOS-under-array claims
  • Filing activity peaked at 11 records in 2023 after years of near-zero output, then dropped back — a single spike rather than a sustained ramp.
  • 16 published families total concentrated almost entirely under IPC class H10B, meaning the searchable claim space here is still small and specific.
  • United States drew 10 of the filings against 4 in China and 2 in Taiwan, so US filing strategy dominates this corpus more than global manufacturing share would suggest.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
16
Published Records
US
Leading Jurisdiction
2023
Peak Filing Year
H10B
Lead IPC Subclass
Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What this landscape covers

3D NAND scaling depends on stacking more memory layers without stacking more cost, and the claim activity here tracks three mechanical answers to that problem: string stacking across multiple decks, wafer bonding that separates array and logic fabrication, and CMOS-under-array integration that places control circuitry beneath the memory stack. The search also captures system integration claims spanning staircase contacts, interconnect structures and the mechanical/chemical steps used to planarise and connect them.

The dataset is small and narrow by design: 16 published families sit almost entirely inside IPC subclass H10B, with only light overlap into general semiconductor device claims (H01L) and process steps like grinding, polishing and polishing compositions. That concentration makes this a workable landscape to read claim-by-claim rather than statistically.

Filing activity and technology composition, 2015–2026
  1. 1Macronix International Co., Ltd.16
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on 3D NAND Flash Scaling and Integration covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology

Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.

10,000 free credits to start
The data

Filing trend and technology composition

Publication counts by year and by IPC subclass, drawn from the 16 families matching the search string.

A spike, not a ramp

Filings sat at zero through the middle of the period, then rose to a peak of 11 records in 2023 before falling away again. Because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, the most recent years understate real filing activity — but the shape here is a burst around one filing cycle, not a steady climb across the window.

A spike, not a ramp03691202017201820192020202120221120232024202502026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Claim space is narrow

All 16 records sit in H10B (memory device manufacture); a handful also touch H01L (semiconductor devices generally) and single records touch grinding, polishing compositions and adjacent H10-series subclasses. There is almost no spread into unrelated fields, which means the white space to look for is inside H10B, not outside it.

Claim space is narrowH10B · Memory device manufacture16100.0%H01L · Semiconductor devices425.0%B24B · Grinding & polishing16.3%C09G · Polishing compositions16.3%H10P16.3%H10W16.3%

Shares are the percentage of the 16 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on 3D NAND Flash Scaling and Integration covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on 3D NAND Flash Scaling and Integration with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about 3d nand flash scaling and integration and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Representative filing

A representative claim: staircase contact structures

Filed by Macronix International
US20250107081A12025-03-27

Memory device (US20250107081A1)

MACRONIX INTERNATIONAL CO., LTD.

The claim covers a memory device built around an interconnect structure, a staircase structure, a dielectric layer and a stop structure sitting between the interconnect and the staircase/dielectric layers. The stop structure carries an opening that exposes the interconnect, and a first contact runs through the dielectric layer and that opening to reach it.Published 2025-03-27. This is a structural fix for a known failure mode: contacts landing on staircase steps can punch through into the interconnect below if there is no etch-stop layer defining where the contact must land.

US20250107081A1 — patent drawing 1US20250107081A1 — patent drawing 2
View full filing
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on 3D NAND Flash Scaling and Integration covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers mean for filing strategy

Three readings of the same 16-family dataset, aimed at where to file next and where not to bother.

Filing pattern
Peak 2023: 11
records in the peak year

One cycle, not a trend

With a midpoint year of 2022 at zero and a single peak of 11 filings in 2023, this looks like one filing wave tied to a specific product or process milestone rather than sustained R&D output. Treat the 2023 spike as the signal to investigate, not as evidence of ongoing momentum.

Confirm with underlying priority dates before assuming the trend has ended.
Jurisdiction mix
US 10 / CN 4 / TW 2
receiving offices

US-weighted filing

Ten of sixteen records were filed as US applications, with China and Taiwan taking the rest. For a manufacturing process this globally distributed, that skew suggests either a US-centric applicant base in this narrow search or a deliberate US-first filing strategy for defensive coverage.

Cross-check against manufacturing footprint before reading this as global filing intent.
Technology depth
16/16 in H10B
families touching H10B

Claim space is shallow but dense

Every family in this set touches H10B, and the overlap into H01L, grinding and polishing subclasses is minimal. That means competitors are not spreading claims across adjacent process domains — the contest is happening inside a tight structural claim space around staircase, stacking and bonding geometry.

A dense single-subclass corpus rewards precise claim drafting over broad coverage.
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to 3d nand flash scaling and integration, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on 3D NAND Flash Scaling and Integration covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who is filing, and where the gaps sit

With only 16 families in this corpus, no single assignee shows sustained multi-year output — momentum here is better read filing-by-filing than by cumulative rank.

Recent momentum
0 in latest year
Macronix (旺宏电子)

Flat recent output from the named assignee

The one assignee with recent-year data tracked shows zero filings in the latest year, consistent with the broader post-2023 drop-off across the dataset rather than a company-specific pullback.

Check priority-year filings before concluding activity has stopped.
Geographic concentration
10 of 16 in the US
receiving office share

US filings dominate the corpus

Given the small sample size, US-heavy filing may reflect which applicants and search terms surface in this dataset rather than a global filing preference across the whole 3D NAND industry.

Compare against a broader NAND search to check this is not a sampling artefact.
Structural focus
16/16 H10B
families in memory device manufacture

Everyone is claiming the same subclass

The absence of spread into adjacent IPC codes means differentiation between filers has to be read at the claim level — staircase geometry, stop-layer placement, bonding sequence — not at the subclass level.

Claim charts, not classification codes, will separate the players here.
🔍
Under-claimed branches worth checking first
Based on the narrow IPC spread, these adjacent process steps show only single-digit coverage in this corpus:
Etch-stop layer placement for staircase contactsWafer-bonding alignment tolerance claimsCMOS-under-array thermal budget managementPost-bond polishing composition chemistryMulti-deck string joint interconnects
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Macronix International Co., Ltd.0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on 3D NAND Flash Scaling and Integration covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's next

Where to take this analysis

The trend and classification data point to a narrow, structurally-focused claim space with one recent filing spike. These are the natural next steps for a team acting on it.

Chart the staircase and stop-layer claims

With all 16 families sitting inside H10B, the differentiating detail is in structural claim language around staircase contacts, stop layers and interconnect routing — worth a claim chart before filing near this geometry.

Run a claim comparison in Eureka

Confirm the 2023 spike against priority dates

Publication lag means the apparent drop after 2023 may partly be unpublished recent filings. Pulling priority dates rather than publication dates will show whether the wave has actually ended.

Check priority filings in Eureka

Test the white-space branches directly

Etch-stop placement, bonding alignment tolerance and post-bond polishing chemistry show minimal coverage in this corpus — each is a candidate for a freedom-to-operate check before drafting new claims there.

Search white space in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on 3D NAND Flash Scaling and Integration covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions on 3D NAND scaling patents

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on 3D NAND Flash Scaling and Integration covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research 3D NAND Flash Scaling and Integration in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole 3d nand flash scaling and integration corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.