https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/5g-and-6g-terahertz-beamforming-patent-landscape-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · 5G & 6G
Terahertz Beamforming Patents: Mapping a Small, Concentrated Field
Get a prior-art report on your approach
28
Published Records
0%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
US
Leading Jurisdiction
25
Active Filers Ranked

Filing growth compares 2021 (2 records) with 2024 (2) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field.

Published byPatsnap Research··6 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

A small field with one clear leader and a long tail

Terahertz beamforming sits at the intersection of antenna design and next-generation wireless transmission, and the patent record reflects a technology still being staked out rather than one already built into standards. Across the 28 published records in scope, one assignee holds 14 of them — roughly half the field by document count — while the other 24 ranked assignees hold small, mostly single-digit positions. That shape is typical of an emerging RF hardware niche: a research-heavy leader establishes broad coverage early, and a long tail of universities, individual inventors and second movers stake out narrower claims around it.

Filing activity did not exist before 2017 in this dataset and reached a peak of 11 records in 2023. The flat 0% growth measured between 2021 and 2024 does not mean interest has stalled — publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, so the 2025 and 2026 figures are still incomplete and should not be read as a decline.

Filing activity, 2017–2026
  1. 1MASSACHUSETTS INST OF TECH14
  2. 2HUAWEI TECH CO LTD3
  3. 3CHEN JERRY C2
  4. 4HAN RUONAN2
  5. 5KOREA UNIV RES & BUSINESS FOUND2
  6. 6RIKEN CO LTD2
  7. 7MONROE NATHAN MCKAY2
  8. 8KAUSHIK SUMANTH2
  9. 9NARMADHA R1
  10. 10KAWASE KODO1
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on 5G & 6G: Terahertz Beamforming Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
The data

Filing trend and technology composition

The two views below cover the same 28 records from different angles: one shows when the claims were filed, the other shows what kind of hardware or signal-processing function they protect.

A field that only opened up in the last decade

Filings begin at zero in 2017, climb through the early 2020s, and peak at 11 records in 2023. The 2021-to-2024 window that anchors the growth figure is flat at 0%, and the most recent one or two years understate real activity because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months.

A field that only opened up in the last decade03691202017201820192020202120221120232024202532026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Antennas carry the claim density

H01Q (antennas) appears in 53.6% of the 28 records, well ahead of H04B general transmission at 28.6%. Measurement (G01B), digital transmission (H04L), optics (G02B, G02F) and wireless networking (H04W) each sit in single-digit shares, marking them as thinner, more open branches rather than settled ground. Because a record can carry more than one IPC class, these shares add up to more than 100% of the record total — that overlap is expected, not an error.

Antennas carry the claim densityH01Q · Antennas1553.6%H04B · Transmission (general)828.6%G01B · Measuring length & dimensions310.7%H04L · Digital information transmissi…310.7%G02B · Optical elements & systems27.1%G02F · Optical control & modulation27.1%H04W · Wireless communication networks27.1%G01P · Velocity & acceleration13.6%

Shares are the percentage of the 28 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on 5G & 6G: Terahertz Beamforming Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on 5G & 6G: Terahertz Beamforming Patent Landscape with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about 5g & 6g: terahertz beamforming patent landscape and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key patents

The prior art doing the most citing work

Representative filing
WO2009131113A12009-10-29

WO2009131113A1 — Terahertz beam steering apparatus and method thereof

RIKEN

The filing, from RIKEN, describes a terahertz beam steering apparatus built around two lasers of different wavelengths focused onto a common focal point, where a terahertz generator produces a beam via difference-frequency mixing. Changing the relative incident angle between the two laser beams steers the terahertz output at high speed over a wide angle, without mechanical moving parts.Filed 2009-10-29 — one of the earliest steering-specific claims in this dataset, and the family member (EP2270584A1) also appears among the most-cited records.

WO2009131113A1 — patent drawing 1WO2009131113A1 — patent drawing 2
View full record
Most-cited records in this dataset
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US20080074674A1Sensor for Measuring a Vibrating Surface Obscured from View24
2US7564567B2Sensor for measuring a vibrating surface obscured from view12
3WO2009131113A1Terahertz beam steering apparatus and method thereof4
4US20210266068A1APT Subsystem and Spacecraft Communications System3
5EP2270584A1Terahertz beam steering apparatus and method thereof3
6CN119030570ARIS辅助的低复杂度太赫兹波束赋形通信系统及方法1
7US20240022000A1Terahertz band beamforming antenna system1
8US12658596B2Terahertz beam steering antenna arrays1

Citation counts inside a searched corpus favour older filings — read them as a signal of influence on later work, not as a ranking of current commercial importance.

Patent titles are shown in the language they were filed in, not translated, so that each record stays verifiable against the original filing — a translated title will not match in Eureka or in any national register. Publication numbers are shown where the record carries one (8 of 8 rows); clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on 5G & 6G: Terahertz Beamforming Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis


  
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers mean for a filing decision

Three patterns stand out once the ranking, the trend and the class breakdown are read together.

Concentration at the top
14 of 28 records
held by the leading assignee

One assignee anchors the field

The leading assignee holds 14 of the 28 published records, against a fifth-place holder at 2 and a tenth-place holder at just 1. That gap suggests broad early coverage by one player rather than a competitive race among several — later entrants are filing around, not against, the incumbent's position.

Ranking covers 25 assignees, the full set the dataset returns.
Filing trajectory
0% growth, 2021→2024
flat across the last complete window

Activity plateaued, it did not collapse

The peak year so far is 2023 at 11 records, and the 2021-to-2024 comparison the dataset supports is flat at 0%. Treat 2025 and 2026 figures as provisional: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so the most recent years will fill in as more records publish.

Peak year: 2023 · 11 records.
Where the claims sit
53.6% in H01Q
of 28 records carry an antenna classification

Antenna hardware, not signal processing, is where the density is

H01Q (antennas) covers more than half the record set at 53.6%, with H04B transmission a distant second at 28.6%. Optics-adjacent classes (G02B, G02F) and wireless networking (H04W) sit at 7.1% each — thin enough that a well-drafted claim in those branches faces less prior art to work around.

Shares are of the 28-record total; a record can carry multiple IPC classes.
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to 5g & 6g: terahertz beamforming patent landscape, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on 5G & 6G: Terahertz Beamforming Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's next

Where to take this analysis

The dataset points to specific next steps depending on whether the goal is defensive clearance, freedom-to-operate, or identifying where to file next.

Map the antenna sub-claims in detail

H01Q carries over half the record set, so a freedom-to-operate check for any beam-steering antenna design should start there rather than treating the class as a single block.

Explore antenna claims in Eureka

Watch the optics-adjacent branches

G02B and G02F sit at 7.1% of records each — thin coverage relative to the antenna classes, and a plausible entry point for a first-mover claim in optical terahertz generation.

Run a white-space search in Eureka

Track the leader's filing cadence

One assignee holds half the ranked field; monitoring its continuing applications and any co-filing patterns is a more efficient signal than tracking the long tail individually.

Set up assignee tracking in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on 5G & 6G: Terahertz Beamforming Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions on terahertz beamforming patents

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on 5G & 6G: Terahertz Beamforming Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research 5G & 6G: Terahertz Beamforming Patent Landscape in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole 5g & 6g: terahertz beamforming patent landscape corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.