Book a demo

5G New Radio Channel Coding Patent Landscape 2026

5G New Radio Channel Coding Patent Landscape 2026
Competitive Landscape
5G New Radio Channel Coding Patent Landscape in 2026

Samsung Electronics holds an overwhelming lead in 5G NR channel coding, accounting for the vast majority of activity among the top filers, with wireless communication networks as the dominant technology route. The field reached its annual peak in 2020 and has since eased, with recent low counts reflecting publication lag rather than a confirmed exit from activity.

7,389
Patent families in scope
93%
Top-5 share of top-100 filers
-59%
3-yr filing growth (lag-adj.)
United States
Leading jurisdiction
↗ Tap any metric to explore the underlying patents and uncover deeper insights in PatSnap Eureka
Published byPatSnap Insights Team··7 min readVerified by PatSnap Eureka data
Overview

Samsung Electronics leads a heavily concentrated field

Samsung Electronics is ranked first by a wide margin, with 6,632 patent families, followed distantly by Qualcomm (278), Intel (210), Apple (155), and Nvidia (86). The top five filers account for 93% of the combined total among the hundred largest filers, signalling an exceptionally concentrated competitive structure.

The tier gap between the leader and its nearest challenger is stark: Samsung’s portfolio is roughly 24 times larger than Qualcomm’s. Beyond the top five, the remaining ranked applicants each hold fewer than 90 patent families, forming a long tail of universities, start-ups, and regional operators.

Leading applicants
#ApplicantPatent familiesShare
1Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.6,632
2Qualcomm Incorporated278
3Intel Corporation210
4Apple Inc.155
5Nvidia Corporation86
6Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd.53
7Sharp Corporation40
8Nokia Technologies Oy32
9MediaTek Inc.28
10FG Innovation Co., Ltd.28
#ApplicantPatent familiesShare
11RES & BUSINESS FOUND SUNGKYUNKWAN UNIV24
12EdgeQ Inc.22
13InterDigital Patent Holdings, Inc.15
14KOREA UNIV RES & BUSINESS FOUND14
15POSTECH Academy-Industry Foundation14
16NOKIA SOLUTIONS & NETWORKS OY12
17Lenovo (Beijing) Ltd.12
18LG Electronics Inc.12
19Charter Communications Operating LLC11
20Intel IP Corporation11
↗ Hover a row · click a company to ask Eureka

Samsung’s scale implies deep prior-art coverage across the core wireless and digital-transmission classes, creating high freedom-to-operate risk for new entrants targeting the mainstream H04W and H04L subclasses. Challengers and academic entrants are differentiating in narrower coding-theory (H03M) and multiplexing (H04J) branches.

Filing counts for 20242026 are expected to be significantly under-counted due to the 18–24 month patent publication lag; the apparent sharp decline in those years should not be interpreted as a confirmed market exit. Longer-window growth, applicant concentration, and technology-route coverage are therefore more reliable signals than the latest-year bar alone.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Chart shows the top applicants ranked by patent families. Applicant counts can overlap where a patent family lists several applicants, so they need not sum to the total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Trends & Structure

Activity peaked in 2020; wireless network classes dominate the technology mix

The annual filing trend reveals a sharp build-up from 2017 to a 2020 peak, followed by an easing trajectory. The technology composition is heavily concentrated in wireless and digital-transmission classes, with a small but notable tail of coding-theory and multiplexing filings.

Annual filing trend

Filings climbed from 814 in 2017 to a peak of 1,404 in 2020, then declined through 2022 (741) and 2023 (483). The 2024–2026 values are materially suppressed by publication lag and should not be read as confirmed final counts.

Annual filing trendAnnual values from 2017 to 2026, peaking at 1,404 in 2020.81420171,31320181,09620191,40420201,12720217412022483202327420241232025142026↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka

Technology composition

H04W (Wireless communication networks) and H04L (Digital information transmission) dominate, reflecting the core NR air-interface focus of the corpus. H04B (Transmission, general) ranks third, while H03M (Coding and code conversion) and H04J (Multiplex communication) each hold smaller but technically distinct shares, pointing to the algorithm-level and multiplexing layers of channel coding.

Technology compositionH04W · Wireless communication networks leads with 6,518; H04L · Digital information transmission 4,153.H04W · Wireless communic…6,518H04L · Digital informati…4,153H04B · Transmission (gen…1,351H03M · Coding & code con…409H04J · Multiplex communi…230G06F · Electric digital …53G01S · Radar, sonar & po…44G06N · Computing based o…33↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Technology-branch counts are measured in patent records; a single patent family can carry several IPC classes, so class totals can exceed the family total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Key Patents

Highly cited patent families surfaced by the query

Citation-heavy patent families returned by the query. Use this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents.

Featured patent
US10355819B2Published 2019-07-16

Apparatus and method for decoding data in mobile c…

Samsung Electronics CO., LTD.

The present disclosure relates to a communication method and system for converging a 5th-Generation (5G) communication system for supporting higher data rates beyond a 4th-Generation (4G) system with a technology for Internet of Things (IoT). The present disclosure may be applied to intelligent services based on the 5G communication technology and the… (excerpt from the patent abstract)

Apparatus and method for decoding data in mobile c… — patent drawingApparatus and method for decoding data in mobile c… — patent drawing
Representative drawings from the patent document.
Open this patent in Eureka →
Highly cited patent families surfaced by this query
#PatentCitations
1Method and apparatus for transmitting group messag…326
2Method and device for transmitting or receiving gr…315
3Method and apparatus for managing user plane opera…276
4Method and apparatus for performing and reporting …239
5Physical downlink control channel (PDCCH) blind de…210
6Apparatus and method of transmitting/receiving sig…209
7Parallel de-rate-matching and layer demapping for …205
8Method and apparatus for downlink control informat…198

Ranked by total forward citations. Citation counts favour older and broadly cited patent families, and broad or adjacent patents may appear when they match the search scope. Treat this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents. Some patent titles may be shown in their original, non-English language where an accurate translation could not be guaranteed.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Citation-ranked patent families surfaced by this query.Open in Eureka →
Insights

What the competitive structure means for R&D investment decisions

The combination of high concentration, a post-peak lifecycle, and a well-established dominant filer creates a clear strategic context: the core air-interface coding space is mature and crowded, while adjacent coding-theory and multiplexing branches offer relatively more room.

Decline

Field is in decline from a 2020 peak

The lifecycle stage is classified as Decline, with annual filings easing back from the 2020 peak of 1,404 families. On a multi-year basis the corpus still represents substantial accumulated prior art (7,389 patent families), but the forward filing pace has slowed markedly. New entrants should expect dense prior art in core NR coding subclasses and price their freedom-to-operate assessments accordingly.

Post-peak · 2020 apex
Concentration

Single-firm dominance creates asymmetric barriers

The top five filers’ 93% share of the hundred largest filers’ combined total is exceptionally high for a broad telecommunications technology area. Samsung’s 6,632-family portfolio alone dwarfs the rest of the field combined. Any entrant seeking to license or design around the core wireless-network and digital-transmission classes must treat Samsung’s portfolio as the primary freedom-to-operate constraint, with Qualcomm and Intel as secondary considerations.

Top-5 share: 93%
Collaboration

Samsung anchors a university-heavy co-filing ecosystem

The most active co-filing pair is Sharp and FG Innovation (32 joint families), reflecting a technology-transfer arrangement. Samsung co-files extensively with Korean universities: Sungkyunkwan University (24 families), Korea University (14), and POSTECH (14) are its most active academic partners, with smaller collaborations extending to KAIST, Seoul National University, and Chonnam National University. Intel co-files with Intel IP Corp (6 families). This pattern suggests that foundational coding-algorithm research is being channelled from Korean academia directly into Samsung’s portfolio.

University-anchored ecosystem
Geography

US and EPO lead filings; India and China are secondary markets

The United States is the leading jurisdiction with 2,761 patent records, followed by Europe (EPO) at 2,310 and WIPO/PCT at 892. India ranks fourth at 715 records, ahead of China at 572, reflecting strategic filing decisions oriented toward large 5G deployment markets. South Korea and Japan together account for fewer than 100 records, which is notable given the Korean and Japanese nationality of several top applicants.

US · EPO · India lead
PatSnap Eureka · TRIZ Solution Agent
Facing a specific technical bottleneck in this field?

Go beyond the landscape: Eureka’s TRIZ Solution agent breaks down an R&D problem and returns patented concept solutions, each with a technical approach and cited patent & literature evidence.

Solve it in Eureka →
Top collaboration links
ApplicantCollaboratorCo-filings
Sharp CorporationFG Innovation Co., Ltd.32
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.Sungkyunkwan University Industry-Academic Cooperation Foundation24
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.Korea University Research and Business Foundation14
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.POSTECH Academy-Industry Foundation14
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.Beijing Samsung Telecom R&D Center7
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.韩国科学技术院6
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.Seoul National University R&DB Foundation6
Intel CorporationIntel IP Corporation6
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.全南大学校产学协力团5
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.延世大学校产学协力团4

Co-filing pairs, ranked by the number of jointly-filed patent families.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Insights are derived from applicant ranking, collaboration, lifecycle, and jurisdiction data.Explore insights →
Leaders

Samsung Electronics leads; Intel shows a divergent upward momentum

The top two ranked applicants — Samsung Electronics and Qualcomm — both show declining recent filing rates, while Intel and Nvidia diverge with positive momentum, and Huawei’s recent activity remains limited.

Leader · Samsung Electronics

Samsung Electronics

Samsung Electronics holds 6,632 patent families, the largest portfolio in this space by a wide margin. Its technology emphasis centres on H04W 72 (wireless network resource scheduling), H04L 5 (multi-carrier and duplex transmission), and H04L 1 (error detection and correction), reflecting end-to-end NR air-interface coverage. Recent filing momentum shows a decline of 64% versus the prior three-year period, consistent with the field-wide post-peak easing rather than a strategic withdrawal.

patent families: 6,632
Challenger · Intel Corporation

Intel Corporation

Intel ranks third overall with 210 patent families and is the notable positive outlier among top filers, with recent filing activity running at 3.3 times its prior three-year pace. Its technology focus mirrors the mainstream — H04W 72, H04L 5, and H04L 1 — suggesting Intel is deepening coverage in core NR scheduling and transmission rather than differentiating into adjacent branches. This momentum is worth monitoring as a signal of renewed or redirected 5G modem investment.

patent families: 210
🔍
See the full applicant breakdown
Access the complete ranked list of all 100 applicants, their technology emphasis, and filing trajectories.
Qualcomm IncNvidia Corporation+ more
Unlock full assignee analysis →
Leading-applicant momentum (recent 3 yrs, lag-adjusted)
ApplicantRecent (3 yrs)Trend
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.1,132▼ -64%
Qualcomm Incorporated39▼ -71%
Intel Corporation145▲ 3.3× vs prior 3-yr
Apple Inc.27▼ -72%
Nvidia Corporation42▲ +11%
Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd.7▼ -59%
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Player cards cite patent family counts from the applicant ranking; momentum figures are recent-versus-prior three-year comparisons.Explore players →
Adjacent Branches

Under-served branches in coding theory and multiplex communication

Two IPC classes sit adjacent to the dominant wireless-network core but hold comparatively low filing volumes, making them worth examining for teams with algorithm-level or physical-layer differentiation strategies.

H03M · Coding and Code Conversion

H03M holds 409 patent records — roughly 3% of the records in the top IPC classes — despite being the most directly relevant class to channel-coding algorithms (turbo, LDPC, polar codes). The sparse coverage relative to the H04W and H04L dominant classes suggests that algorithm-level innovations are less contested at the patent level. Huawei and Nvidia both show H03M 13 as their leading subclass focus, and Sungkyunkwan University’s academic portfolio is also anchored here. Teams developing novel encoding/decoding architectures or AI-assisted coding schemes could find more navigable prior art in this branch than in the core wireless classes.

Search this in Eureka →

H04J · Multiplex Communication

H04J (Multiplex communication) accounts for 230 patent records — approximately 2% of the top-class records — despite OFDM and NOMA being central to 5G NR physical-layer design. The relative sparsity may reflect how most multiplexing innovations are filed under H04W or H04L subclasses rather than H04J directly, but it also indicates that H04J-specific claims could be filed with less prior-art crowding. Entrants working on novel waveform multiplexing, non-orthogonal multiple access, or spectral-efficiency techniques may find this an accessible adjacent branch.

Search this in Eureka →
🔒
Unlock the full white-space map
See all under-served IPC branches, filing gaps by jurisdiction, and year-by-year entry windows across the full corpus.
G06N · Computing based on AI modelsG01S · Radar, sonar and positioning+ more
Unlock full analysis →
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Adjacent branch identification is based on relative filing share within the top IPC classes observed in the corpus.Explore emerging →
Route Matrix

How leaders differ by technology route across NR coding subclasses

Route coverage across the main technology branches in the current evidence set.

PlayerH04W 72 · Wireless communication networksH04L 5 · Digital information transmissionH04L 1 · Digital information transmissionH04W 76 · Wireless communication networksH04B 7 · Transmission (general)
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.Strong · 3,354Strong · 2,282Strong · 1,725Moderate · 1,259Moderate · 954
Qualcomm IncorporatedStrong · 113Strong · 102Strong · 77Moderate · 29Moderate · 49
Intel CorporationStrong · 132Strong · 84Moderate · 41Moderate · 33Moderate · 36
Apple Inc.Strong · 61Strong · 63Moderate · 17Emerging · 11Moderate · 26
Nvidia CorporationStrong · 16Moderate · 5Strong · 22AbsentStrong · 17
Sharp CorporationModerate · 9Strong · 35AbsentAbsentModerate · 10
FG Innovation Co., Ltd.AbsentStrong · 32AbsentAbsentModerate · 9
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Matrix values are measured in patent records and should not be compared directly with family-level applicant totals.Compare in Eureka →
Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

Still have questions? PatSnap Eureka answers them from patent and research data.Ask Eureka →
PatSnap Eureka

Ready to map your own 5G NR channel coding landscape?

Join 18,000+ innovators using PatSnap Eureka to map any technology landscape: search 2B+ patents and papers, surface key assignees, and generate a report like this in minutes.

18,000+innovators worldwide
2B+patents & papers
< 5 minper landscape report

Disclaimer. This page is generated from PatSnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. PatSnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Explore in Eureka ↗
Powered by PatSnap Eureka

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.