Book a demo

5G New Radio Waveform and Modulation Patent Landscape

5G New Radio Waveform and Modulation Patent Landscape
Competitive Landscape

5G New Radio Waveform and Modulation Patent Landscape in 2026

Qualcomm holds a commanding lead in 5G NR waveform and modulation IP, with the top five filers accounting for nearly two-thirds of the hundred largest filers’ combined output. The field has moved past its 2018 peak, indicating that foundational waveform and modulation positions are now largely staked and competition is shifting toward adjacent or second-order technical problems.

753
Patent families in scope
63%
Top-5 share of top-100 filers
-55%
3-yr filing growth (lag-adj.)
United States
Leading jurisdiction
↗ Tap any metric to explore the underlying patents and uncover deeper insights in PatSnap Eureka
Published byPatSnap Insights Team··7 min readVerified by PatSnap Eureka data
Overview

Qualcomm leads a highly concentrated field with a clear tier gap to challengers

Qualcomm is the dominant filer in 5G NR waveform and modulation, ranking first with 245 patent families — more than double the second-ranked Apple at 99 patent families. Sharp ranks third at 85, followed by FG Innovation at 50 and Samsung Electronics at 41.

The top five filers together account for 63% of the hundred largest filers’ combined total, signaling a highly concentrated competitive structure. There is a pronounced tier gap between the top three (Qualcomm, Apple, Sharp) and the mid-tier players clustered between 36 and 50 patent families.

Leading applicants
#ApplicantPatent familiesShare
1Qualcomm Incorporated245
2Apple Inc.99
3Sharp Corporation85
4FG Innovation Co., Ltd.50
5Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.41
6Intel Corporation36
7Beijing Xiaomi Mobile Software Co., Ltd.36
8MediaTek Inc.26
9PCTEL, Inc.12
10InterDigital Patent Holdings, Inc.12
#ApplicantPatent familiesShare
11Nokia Technologies Oy11
12Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd.11
13Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson10
14Lenovo (Beijing) Ltd.10
15T-Mobile US, Inc.9
16Software Radio Systems Limited9
17NVIDIA Corporation9
18Sony Group Corporation7
19Active Wireless Technologies LLC6
20Sharp Laboratories of America, Inc.5
↗ Hover a row · click a company to ask Eureka

Qualcomm’s position, roughly 2.5 times larger than Apple’s, reflects early and sustained standards-engagement activity; challengers at or below 50 patent families will find it difficult to contest the core waveform IP stack without targeted licensing or partnership strategies.

Activity from approximately 2024 onward is subject to publication lag and will likely revise upward as pending applications publish; figures for those years should be treated as provisional. Longer-window growth, applicant concentration, and technology-route coverage are therefore more reliable signals than the latest-year bar alone.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Chart shows the top applicants ranked by patent families. Applicant counts can overlap where a patent family lists several applicants, so they need not sum to the total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Trends & Structure

Filing activity peaked in 2018 and has eased; digital-transmission classes dominate the technology mix

The annual filing trend and technology composition charts together show a field that crystallized rapidly around a core set of IPC classes and has since shifted from volume growth to consolidation.

Annual filing trend

Filings peaked sharply in 2018 at 190 and have declined in every subsequent year, reflecting the maturation of foundational 5G NR waveform specifications. Data from 2024 onward reflects publication lag and should be read as a lower bound rather than a true decline; the multi-year window still captures a substantial body of activity.

Annual filing trendAnnual values from 2017 to 2026, peaking at 190 in 2018.89201719020181192019104202095202168202245202330202412202512026↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka

Technology composition

H04L (Digital information transmission) is the dominant class by a wide margin, followed by H04W (Wireless communication networks) and H04B (Transmission, general). Multiplex communication (H04J), radar and positioning (G01S), and coding and code conversion (H03M) are present at much lower volumes, indicating that the core waveform and modulation problem set sits firmly within the digital-transmission and wireless-networking branches.

Technology compositionH04L · Digital information transmission leads with 726; H04W · Wireless communication networks 453.H04L · Digital informati…726H04W · Wireless communic…453H04B · Transmission (gen…183H04J · Multiplex communi…75G01S · Radar, sonar & po…17H03M · Coding & code con…8H03F · Amplifiers5G06F · Electric digital …3↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Technology-branch counts are measured in patent records; a single patent family can carry several IPC classes, so class totals can exceed the family total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Key Patents

Highly cited patent families surfaced by the query

Citation-heavy patent families returned by the query. Use this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents.

Featured patent
CA3086829A1Published 2021-01-16

Systems and methods for locating all synchronizati…

PCTEL, INC.

Embodiments disclosed herein include systems and methods for locating all synchronization signal blocks on a 5G new radio channel. Such systems and methods can include measuring downlink signal energy over a bandwidth of the 5G new radio channel to identify a center frequency of a signal broadcast on the 5G new radio channel, processing the signal at the… (excerpt from the patent abstract)

Open this patent in Eureka →
Highly cited patent families surfaced by this query
#PatentCitations
1Apparatus and method to support ultra-wide bandwid…283
2Parallel de-rate-matching and layer demapping for …205
3Beam indication for 5g new radio121
4Beam indication for 5g new radio119
5Physical Downlink Control Channel Design for NR Sy…114
6SHORT PUCCH FORMATS AND SCHEDULING REQUEST (SR) TR…80
7Bandwidth group (BWG) for enhanced channel and int…69
8Null resource elements for dynamic and bursty inte…62

Ranked by total forward citations. Citation counts favour older and broadly cited patent families, and broad or adjacent patents may appear when they match the search scope. Treat this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents. Some patent titles may be shown in their original, non-English language where an accurate translation could not be guaranteed.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Citation-ranked patent families surfaced by this query.Open in Eureka →
Insights

What the patent structure means for R&D investment decisions

The combination of high concentration, a post-peak filing curve, and a tightly defined IPC footprint shapes where new entrants and incumbents alike should direct effort.

Decline

Field is in decline from a 2018 peak

The lifecycle stage is Decline: annual filings have eased back from the 2018 peak of 190 and the recent-window growth rate stands at -55%. Foundational waveform and modulation positions are largely established, meaning incremental improvements to the core physical-layer design offer diminishing IP returns. R&D effort is better directed toward adjacent problems — such as multiplexing schemes, integrated sensing, or interference management — where the filing density remains lower.

Post-peak · 2018 apex
Concentration

Top five filers hold nearly two-thirds of the leading-100 share

With 63% of the hundred largest filers’ combined output concentrated in five assignees, the core IP stack is effectively controlled by a small group led by Qualcomm, Apple, and Sharp. New entrants face a high licensing or design-around burden in the primary H04L and H04W branches. Mid-tier players such as Intel and Xiaomi hold meaningful but significantly smaller positions and may represent acquisition or licensing targets for companies seeking faster access to the stack.

High concentration
Collaboration

Sharp and FG Innovation are the field’s most active co-filers

The only documented co-applicant relationship in the evidence is between Sharp and FG Innovation, with 59 jointly filed patent families. This pairing accounts for a meaningful share of both assignees’ portfolios and suggests a sustained, structured R&D collaboration rather than ad-hoc joint filing. No other co-applicant pairs are recorded in the evidence, indicating that the broader field operates primarily through independent filings.

Sharp × FG Innovation · 59 families
Geography

US and EPO dominate; India is a notable emerging filing destination

The United States is the leading filing jurisdiction, followed by Europe (EPO) and WIPO (PCT). India ranks fourth ahead of China, which is an unusual pattern for wireless-technology IP and likely reflects the market strategies of device OEMs and chipset vendors targeting the Indian mobile market. Taiwan and South Korea also appear in the top ten, consistent with the presence of MediaTek, Samsung, and Sharp Laboratories among the top filers.

US · EPO · India top three
PatSnap Eureka · TRIZ Solution Agent
Facing a specific technical bottleneck in this field?

Go beyond the landscape: Eureka’s TRIZ Solution agent breaks down an R&D problem and returns patented concept solutions, each with a technical approach and cited patent & literature evidence.

Solve it in Eureka →
Top collaboration links
ApplicantCollaboratorCo-filings
Sharp CorporationFG Innovation Co., Ltd.59

Co-filing pairs, ranked by the number of jointly-filed patent families.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Insights are drawn from lifecycle, concentration, collaboration, and jurisdiction evidence.Explore insights →
Leaders

Qualcomm leads on volume and breadth; Apple holds the strongest challenger position

Both top players concentrate their filings in H04L digital-transmission and H04W wireless-network subclasses, but Qualcomm’s scale advantage in H04L 27 (modulation) differentiates its portfolio from Apple’s more resource-management-oriented emphasis.

Leader · Qualcomm

Qualcomm

Qualcomm leads with 245 patent families, more than double Apple’s tally. Its portfolio is concentrated in H04L 5 (multi-carrier transmission, 191 filings), H04L 27 (modulation, 83 filings), and H04W 72 (resource scheduling, 76 filings), giving it broad coverage across the core waveform design space. Recent momentum shows a trend of -66%, consistent with the field-wide post-peak pattern rather than a specific strategic withdrawal.

245 patent families
Challenger · Apple

Apple

Apple ranks second with 99 patent families, focused on H04L 5 (83 filings), H04W 72 (27 filings), and H04L 27 (18 filings). Its portfolio skews toward multi-carrier and scheduling aspects rather than the modulation-waveform depth that defines Qualcomm’s position. Recent momentum is –62%, broadly in line with the field trend, suggesting Apple is maintaining relative standing rather than ceding ground.

99 patent families
🔍
See the full applicant breakdown
Access ranked profiles for all top filers including Sharp, FG Innovation, Samsung, Intel, and Xiaomi.
Sharp (85 patent families)FG Innovation (50 patent families)+ more
Unlock full assignee analysis →
Leading-applicant momentum (recent 3 yrs, lag-adjusted)
ApplicantRecent (3 yrs)Trend
Qualcomm Incorporated29▼ -66%
Apple Inc.24▼ -62%
Sharp Corporation1▼ -93%
FG Innovation Co., Ltd.1▼ -92%
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.4▼ -86%
Intel Corporation19▬ -5%
Beijing Xiaomi Mobile Software Co., Ltd.15▼ -6%
MediaTek Inc.4▼ -64%
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Family counts and technology focus are drawn from the applicant ranking and technology-composition evidence.Explore players →
Adjacent Branches

Under-served branches adjacent to the dominant waveform core

Three IPC classes sit at the periphery of the dominant H04L/H04W core with notably lower filing density; two have plausible technical relevance to next-generation NR evolution and merit closer inspection before concluding they represent investable white space.

H04J · Multiplex communication

With 75 patent records, H04J is the largest of the lower-share branches but represents only about 5% of the technology composition. Multiplexing schemes — including non-orthogonal multiple access and hybrid numerology multiplexing — are central to 6G waveform evolution and NR enhancements. The relatively sparse filing density compared to H04L suggests that firms with strong multi-carrier signal-processing capabilities could find room to establish differentiated positions, though the PCTEL and Nokia filings already present indicate some incumbent activity to map before entry.

Search this in Eureka →

G01S · Radar, sonar and positioning (integrated sensing)

G01S accounts for only 17 patent records — roughly 1% of the technology composition — despite integrated sensing and communication (ISAC) being a stated feature area for 5G-Advanced and 6G NR. The sparse filing density in this branch relative to the dominant digital-transmission classes suggests that the waveform-design community has not yet extensively claimed the overlap between NR waveform design and sensing functions. Entry cost is lower here than in the saturated H04L core, and the technical value is high given 3GPP Release 18 and 19 ISAC work items. Realistic entry requires expertise bridging signal-processing and radar systems.

Search this in Eureka →
🔒
Unlock the full white-space map
See filing density, key filers, and entry-path analysis for all adjacent IPC branches in this space.
H03M · Coding and code conversion (8 patent records)H03F · Amplifiers (5 patent records)+ more
Unlock full analysis →
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Adjacent branches are identified from the lower-share IPC classes in the technology composition evidence.Explore emerging →
Route Matrix

How top filers differ across technology sub-routes

Strength of each leader across the main technology routes.

PlayerH04L 5 · Digital information transmissionH04W 72 · Wireless communication networksH04L 27 · Digital information transmissionH04L 1 · Digital information transmissionH04B 7 · Transmission (general)
Qualcomm IncorporatedStrong · 191Moderate · 76Moderate · 83Emerging · 27Moderate · 39
Apple Inc.Strong · 83Moderate · 27Moderate · 18Emerging · 15Emerging · 9
Sharp CorporationStrong · 68Moderate · 22AbsentModerate · 21Emerging · 11
FG Innovation Co., Ltd.Strong · 59Moderate · 13AbsentModerate · 21Emerging · 10
Intel CorporationStrong · 35Strong · 22Moderate · 8Moderate · 17Moderate · 13
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.Strong · 37Strong · 25Emerging · 5Emerging · 6Emerging · 6
Sharp Laboratories of America, Inc.Strong · 29Strong · 22AbsentModerate · 14Absent
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Matrix values are measured in patent records and should not be compared directly with family-level applicant totals.Compare in Eureka →
Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

Still have questions? PatSnap Eureka answers them from patent and research data.Ask Eureka →
PatSnap Eureka

Ready to map your own 5G NR waveform landscape?

Join 18,000+ innovators using PatSnap Eureka to map any technology landscape: search 2B+ patents and papers, surface key assignees, and generate a report like this in minutes.

18,000+innovators worldwide
2B+patents & papers
< 5 minper landscape report

Disclaimer. This page is generated from PatSnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. PatSnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Explore in Eureka ↗
Powered by PatSnap Eureka

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.