Book a demo

5G O-RAN Open Interfaces Patent Landscape 2026

5G O-RAN Open Interfaces Patent Landscape 2026
Competitive Landscape
5G O-RAN / Open Interfaces Patent Landscape in 2026

Samsung Electronics holds a commanding position in the 5G O-RAN and open interfaces patent space, with the top five filers collectively accounting for more than half of the hundred largest filers’ combined total. The field remains in a growth phase on a multi-year basis, though annual volume eased from its 2023 peak, and operators and new entrants are rapidly reshaping the competitive structure.

1,665
Patent families in scope
53%
Top-5 share of top-100 filers
+45%
3-yr filing growth (lag-adj.)
United States
Leading jurisdiction
↗ Tap any metric to explore the underlying patents and uncover deeper insights in PatSnap Eureka
Published byPatSnap Insights Team··7 min readVerified by PatSnap Eureka data
Overview

Samsung leads a highly concentrated field with a substantial tier gap

Samsung Electronics holds the top rank with 411 patent families, more than double the second-ranked filer AT&T Intellectual Property (170 patent families), establishing a clear lead that no single challenger yet approaches.

The top five filers — Samsung Electronics, AT&T Intellectual Property, InterDigital. Patent Holdings, Ericsson, and Qualcomm — together account for 53% of the hundred largest filers’ combined total, signaling high concentration at the apex while the mid-tier remains contested.

Leading applicants
#ApplicantPatent familiesShare
1Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.411
2AT&T INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY I L P170
3InterDigital Patent Holdings Inc.132
4Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (Ericsson)121
5Qualcomm Incorporated78
6Intel Corporation62
7Boost Subscriberco LLC59
8Jio Platforms Limited49
9DISH Wireless LLC43
10LG Electronics Inc.38
#ApplicantPatent familiesShare
11Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd.37
12Apple Inc.33
13Parallel Wireless Inc.31
14AT&T MOBILITY II LLC28
15Microsoft Technology Licensing LLC26
16Guangdong OPPO Mobile Telecommunications Corp., Ltd.23
17Cisco Technology Inc.23
18Charter Communications Operating LLC22
19NVIDIA Corporation20
20Nokia Technologies Oy19
↗ Hover a row · click a company to ask Eureka

Samsung’s dominance across wireless network architecture subclasses, combined with its strong momentum trajectory, means any new entrant or challenger must either occupy differentiated sub-domains or accept competing directly against a deeply entrenched portfolio.

Filing counts for 20242026 are understated due to standard patent publication lag of 18–24 months; apparent softness in those years should not be interpreted as a real slowdown. Longer-window growth, applicant concentration, and technology-route coverage are therefore more reliable signals than the latest-year bar alone.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Chart shows the top applicants ranked by patent families. Applicant counts can overlap where a patent family lists several applicants, so they need not sum to the total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Trends & Structure

Multi-year expansion with wireless network architecture dominating the technology mix

Annual filing volume grew steadily from 2017 through 2023, with the recent three-year window sitting well above the prior three-year window at +45%. The technology composition is heavily anchored in wireless communication networks, with adjacent digital transmission and AI subclasses representing thinner but strategically relevant coverage.

Annual filing trend

Filings climbed from 55 in 2017 to a peak of 327 in 2023, reflecting rapid technology and standardization activity. The apparent drop in 2024 and 2025 reflects publication lag rather than a real decline; those years remain materially under-counted.

Annual filing trendAnnual values from 2017 to 2026, peaking at 327 in 2023.5520171212018169201924220201552021297202232720231952024942025102026↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka

Technology composition

H04W (wireless communication networks) dominates with 1,571 records, followed by H04L (digital information transmission) at 789 records. Branches such as G06N (AI models) at 48 records and G01S (radar and positioning) at 31 records are present but sparse relative to the core, pointing to areas where coverage is thin.

Technology compositionH04W · Wireless communication networks leads with 1,571; H04L · Digital information transmission 789.H04W · Wireless communic…1,571H04L · Digital informati…789H04B · Transmission (gen…201G06F · Electric digital …57G06N · Computing based o…48G01S · Radar, sonar & po…31H04J · Multiplex communi…29H04M · Telephonic commun…21↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Technology-branch counts are measured in patent records; a single patent family can carry several IPC classes, so class totals can exceed the family total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Key Patents

Highly cited patent families surfaced by the query

Citation-heavy patent families returned by the query. Use this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents.

Featured patent
US11882006B1Published 2024-01-23

User interface for 5G radio access network (RAN) t…

Juniper NETWORKS, INC.

Techniques are disclosed for a user interface for displaying a topology representation of infrastructure of a 5G Radio Access Network (RAN), such as an Open Radio Access Network (O-RAN) 5G infrastructure. For example, a computing system displays, via a user interface, first icons, each icon of the first icons representing first components providing Level-1… (excerpt from the patent abstract)

User interface for 5G radio access network (RAN) t… — patent drawingUser interface for 5G radio access network (RAN) t… — patent drawing
Representative drawings from the patent document.
Open this patent in Eureka →
Highly cited patent families surfaced by this query
#PatentCitations
1Radio Download Control Channel380
2Systems, methods and devices for control-user plan…188
3Improvements in dual connectivity for different ac…102
4Apparatus, system and method to implement reserved…84
5Configuration of fixed tracking areas and fixed ce…76
6Efficient and reliable data transfer in 5g systems74
7Uu interface enhancement for NR v2x65
8Method and apparatus for supporting network slicin…61

Ranked by total forward citations. Citation counts favour older and broadly cited patent families, and broad or adjacent patents may appear when they match the search scope. Treat this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents. Some patent titles may be shown in their original, non-English language where an accurate translation could not be guaranteed.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Citation-ranked patent families surfaced by this query.Open in Eureka →
Insights

What the patent structure means for R&D investment decisions

The combination of high concentration, operator-led new entry, and a still-expanding filing base creates an asymmetric competitive environment. Engineers and strategists need to weigh where incumbents are dense versus where adjacent technical territory is genuinely open.

Growth

Growth phase with easing annual volume from the 2023 peak

The lifecycle evidence places this field firmly in Growth: the recent three-year filing window is 45% above the prior three-year window. Annual volume peaked in 2023 at 327 families and has eased since, partly due to publication lag artificially compressing recent counts. The field is expanding on a multi-year basis but is no longer in an acceleration phase, suggesting that foundational interface and architecture claims are increasingly filed while differentiation is shifting to system-level and AI-integrated sub-domains.

Growth · post-2023 peak
Concentration

Top-heavy with a distinct tier gap after rank five

The top five filers hold 53% of the hundred largest filers’ combined total, and Samsung alone accounts for 411 patent families — roughly 2.4 times the second-ranked filer. The mid-tier, from Intel (62 families) through Nokia Technologies (19 families), is fragmented, offering more room for targeted portfolio building. New entrants such as DISH Wireless and JIO Platforms have filed aggressively and appear as significant presences, indicating operator-side IP strategy is accelerating.

Highly concentrated
Collaboration

Co-filing concentrated within the AT&T corporate family

The most active co-filing relationship identified is between AT&T Intellectual Property and AT&T Mobility II, with 24 jointly filed families, reflecting intra-group coordination on O-RAN deployment architecture. AT&T Intellectual Property also co-filed 4 families with AT&T Technical Services and 1 with Interwise. DISH Wireless co-filed 1 family with DISH Network Technologies India. Cross-company collaboration outside single corporate families is not prominent in the evidence, suggesting most players are building independent portfolios rather than consortium-based ones.

Intra-group dominant
Geography

US-led filing with meaningful EPO and PCT coverage

The United States is the leading jurisdiction with 590 patent records, followed by Europe (EPO) at 403 and WIPO (PCT) at 263, indicating that leading filers are pursuing broad multi-region protection. India appears at 148 records — notable given JIO Platforms’ emergence as a significant filer — while China at 86 and Japan at 93 are present but secondary. South Korea at 5 records appears low relative to Samsung’s dominance, which may reflect family consolidation or home-jurisdiction filing strategies.

US-centric, global reach
PatSnap Eureka · TRIZ Solution Agent
Facing a specific technical bottleneck in this field?

Go beyond the landscape: Eureka’s TRIZ Solution agent breaks down an R&D problem and returns patented concept solutions, each with a technical approach and cited patent & literature evidence.

Solve it in Eureka →
Top collaboration links
ApplicantCollaboratorCo-filings
AT&T知识产权一部有限合伙公司AT&T移动第二有限责任公司24
AT&T知识产权一部有限合伙公司AT&T TECHNICAL SERVICES CO INC4
AT&T知识产权一部有限合伙公司INTERWISE CO LTD1
DISH Wireless LLCDISH NETWORK TECHNOLOGIES INDIA PTE LTD1

Co-filing pairs, ranked by the number of jointly-filed patent families.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Insights are derived from applicant ranking, collaboration, lifecycle, and jurisdiction data in the 5G O-RAN and open interfaces corpus.Explore insights →
Leaders

Samsung accelerates while operators emerge as structural challengers

The leader board is split between device and infrastructure incumbents with deep wireless architecture portfolios and operators building IP around open, disaggregated RAN deployment. Momentum diverges sharply across the top filers.

Leader · Samsung Electronics

Samsung Electronics

Samsung Electronics holds 411 patent families and is accelerating, with recent filings up 66% versus the prior period. Its technology focus is concentrated in H04W 88 (network architecture) and H04W 92 (inter-network interfaces), with H04W 72 (resource management) as a third pillar — a broad, foundational coverage pattern that reinforces its structural advantage across O-RAN specification layers.

patent families: 411
Challenger · DISH Wireless

DISH Wireless

DISH Wireless enters the ranking as a new entrant with 43 patent families but a recent-period count of 87 — indicating concentrated, rapid filing activity. Its emphasis on H04L 41 (network management and operations) and H04W 24 (quality and monitoring) reflects an operator building IP specifically around open RAN orchestration and management-plane interfaces, a strategically distinct angle from the device-side incumbents.

patent families: 43
🔍
See the full applicant breakdown
Access ranked profiles, momentum scores, and technology emphasis for all top filers in the 5G O-RAN and open interfaces landscape.
InterDigital Patent HoldingsJIO Platforms+ more
Unlock full assignee analysis →
Leading-applicant momentum (recent 3 yrs, lag-adjusted)
ApplicantRecent (3 yrs)Trend
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.216▲ +66%
AT&T知识产权一部有限合伙公司51▼ -47%
Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (Ericsson)50▬ -2%
DISH Wireless LLC87▲ new entrant
InterDigital Patent Holdings Inc.71▲ new entrant
Qualcomm Incorporated16▼ -56%
Intel Corporation36▲ +89%
Jio Platforms Limited48▲ new entrant
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Player profiles are based on applicant ranking, momentum, and technology emphasis in the 5G O-RAN and open interfaces corpus.Explore players →
Adjacent Branches

Under-served adjacent branches worth watching in O-RAN

Several IPC branches adjacent to the dominant H04W core carry low patent-record counts relative to their technical relevance to O-RAN disaggregation and intelligent RAN management. These represent observations of relative sparsity; entry value depends on specific technical and commercial context.

G06N · AI and machine learning models

With 48 patent records, AI model integration sits at 2% share of the technology composition despite being central to RAN intelligent controller (RIC) use cases in O-RAN architecture. The technical connection — xApp and rApp logic running on the RIC relies on inference models — is direct, yet the patent coverage is thin. Teams developing AI-native RAN optimization or closed-loop automation have observable room to establish claims, though the low count may partly reflect classification conventions routing some AI-in-RAN work under H04W.

Search this in Eureka →

G01S · Radar, sonar and positioning

G01S carries 31 patent records at 1% share, pointing to sparse coverage at the intersection of O-RAN open interfaces and integrated sensing and communication (ISAC) — a capability being actively standardized for 5G-Advanced and 6G. The technical entry path involves positioning reference signals and sensing data planes exposed through open fronthaul or E2 interfaces. Coverage here is low enough that a focused filing strategy could establish an early position, though commercial deployment timelines for ISAC remain early.

Search this in Eureka →
🔒
Unlock the full white-space map
See all adjacent IPC branches with low coverage, mapped against technical relevance and competitor density, for the full 5G O-RAN and open interfaces corpus.
H04J · Multiplex communicationG06F · Electric digital data processing+ more
Unlock full analysis →
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Adjacent branch observations are based on IPC white-space analysis of the 5G O-RAN and open interfaces patent corpus.Explore emerging →
Route Matrix

How leaders differ across O-RAN technology routes

Route coverage across the main technology branches in the current evidence set.

PlayerH04W 88 · Wireless communication networksH04W 92 · Wireless communication networksH04L 41 · Digital information transmissionH04W 76 · Wireless communication networksH04W 24 · Wireless communication networks
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.Strong · 337Strong · 190Moderate · 73Moderate · 88Moderate · 81
AT&T Intellectual Property I, L.P.Strong · 103Emerging · 18Strong · 53Moderate · 38Moderate · 35
Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (Ericsson)Strong · 55Strong · 37Strong · 41Strong · 36Strong · 32
DISH Wireless LLCModerate · 28AbsentStrong · 73AbsentStrong · 40
InterDigital Patent Holdings Inc.Strong · 44Strong · 36Moderate · 19Strong · 39Absent
Qualcomm IncorporatedStrong · 66Moderate · 15AbsentModerate · 15Absent
Convida Wireless LLCStrong · 29Strong · 16AbsentStrong · 15Absent
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Matrix values are measured in patent records and should not be compared directly with family-level applicant totals.Compare in Eureka →
Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

Still have questions? PatSnap Eureka answers them from patent and research data.Ask Eureka →
PatSnap Eureka

Map your own 5G O-RAN patent landscape

Join 18,000+ innovators using PatSnap Eureka to map any technology landscape: search 2B+ patents and papers, surface key assignees, and generate a report like this in minutes.

18,000+innovators worldwide
2B+patents & papers
< 5 minper landscape report

Disclaimer. This page is generated from PatSnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. PatSnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Explore in Eureka ↗
Powered by PatSnap Eureka

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.