Book a demo

5G Radio Resource Control Patent Landscape 2026

5G Radio Resource Control Patent Landscape 2026
Competitive Landscape
5G Radio Resource Control Patent Landscape in 2026

Samsung Electronics dominates a heavily concentrated field of 18,972 patent families, holding a commanding lead over all rivals. Annual filing volume peaked around 2020 and has since eased, signaling a maturing standardization cycle rather than continued expansion.

18,972
Patent families in scope
75%
Top-5 share of top-100 filers
-28%
3-yr filing growth (lag-adj.)
United States
Leading jurisdiction
↗ Tap any metric to explore the underlying patents and uncover deeper insights in Patsnap Eureka
Published byPatsnap Insights Team··7 min readVerified by Patsnap Eureka data
Overview

Samsung leads a highly concentrated field with a substantial tier gap

Samsung Electronics sits at the top of the applicant ranking with 11,306 patent families, a position that dwarfs all other filers and reflects the company’s deep involvement in 5G NR standardization and device chipsets. Qualcomm ranks second at 2,677 patent families, followed by Apple at 1,627.

The top five filers account for 75% of the combined output of the hundred largest filers, confirming extreme concentration. The gap between Samsung and the second-ranked Qualcomm is larger than Qualcomm’s entire portfolio in this space, creating a structural moat that is difficult to close in a mature standardization cycle.

Leading applicants
#ApplicantPatent familiesShare
1Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.11,306
2Qualcomm Incorporated2,677
3Apple Inc.1,627
4Intel Corporation612
5Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd.586
6InterDigital Patent Holdings, Inc.488
7AT&T INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY I L P469
8Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ)377
9LG Electronics Inc.352
10Nokia Technologies Oy350
#ApplicantPatent familiesShare
11Guangdong OPPO Mobile Telecommunications Corp., Ltd.217
12Sharp Corporation178
13Beijing Xiaomi Mobile Software Co., Ltd.174
14MediaTek Inc.164
15KT Corporation139
16The Massengill Family Trust108
17T-Mobile US, Inc.107
18Lenovo (Beijing) Limited107
19NTT DOCOMO, Inc.102
20Sony Group Corporation99
↗ Hover a row · click a company to ask Eureka

Samsung’s scale implies it holds blocking or essential positions across most Radio Resource Control sub-protocols, giving it leverage in standards-essential patent licensing and cross-licensing negotiations. Challengers such as Qualcomm, Apple, and Intel have meaningful but structurally subordinate portfolios that are more defensively than offensively positioned.

Filing counts for 20242026 are understated due to the 18–24 month publication lag inherent in patent systems; the apparent drop in those years should not be read as a sudden exit by any player. Longer-window growth, applicant concentration, and technology-route coverage are therefore more reliable signals than the latest-year bar alone.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Chart shows the top applicants ranked by patent families. Applicant counts can overlap where a patent family lists several applicants, so they need not sum to the total in scope. This same dataset is now available on Patsnap Open Platform via MCP.Connect via MCP →
Trends & Structure

Peak activity is behind us; wireless-protocol classes dominate the technology mix

The annual filing trend reveals a clear life-cycle arc, while the IPC composition confirms that core wireless-network and digital-transmission classes absorb the overwhelming majority of activity, with a long tail of emerging application verticals.

Annual filing trend

Filings grew sharply from 2017 to a peak around 2020, then declined through subsequent years. The 2024–2026 bars are truncated by publication lag and should not be read as a real acceleration of the decline. The overall shape is consistent with a field that mobilized heavily during early 5G NR standardization and is now normalizing.

Annual filing trendAnnual values from 2017 to 2026, peaking at 2,950 in 2020.1,70720172,93420182,55520192,95020202,44820212,29320222,06020231,33720246412025472026↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka

Technology composition

H04W (Wireless communication networks) and H04L (Digital information transmission) together account for the large majority of patent records, confirming that resource scheduling, uplink/downlink control signaling, and channel coding are the core battlegrounds. Secondary branches such as H04B (Transmission general) and H04J (Multiplex communication) are present at meaningfully lower volumes. A sparse long tail of verticals — including AI/ML (G06N), positioning (G01S), IoT (G16Y), and vehicular systems (B60W) — signals early-stage application of RRC technology beyond pure cellular protocol.

Technology compositionH04W · Wireless communication networks leads with 18,107; H04L · Digital information transmission 11,919.H04W · Wireless communic…18,107H04L · Digital informati…11,919H04B · Transmission (gen…3,889H04J · Multiplex communi…583G01S · Radar, sonar & po…163G06N · Computing based o…161G06F · Electric digital …66H03M · Coding & code con…45↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Technology-branch counts are measured in patent records; a single patent family can carry several IPC classes, so class totals can exceed the family total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Key Patents

Highly cited patent families surfaced by the query

Citation-heavy patent families returned by the query. Use this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents.

Featured patent
US20180279353A1Published 2018-09-27

Systems and methods for an enhanced scheduling req…

Sharp Kabushiki Kaisha

A 5G new radio (NR) Base Station (gNB) is described. The gNB includes a processor and memory in electronic communication with the processor. Instructions stored in the memory are executable to send a radio resource control (RRC) message to a user equipment (UE). The RRC message(s) includes different physical uplink control channel (PUCCH) configuration… (excerpt from the patent abstract)

Systems and methods for an enhanced scheduling req… — patent drawingSystems and methods for an enhanced scheduling req… — patent drawing
Representative drawings from the patent document.
Open this patent in Eureka →
Highly cited patent families surfaced by this query
#PatentCitations
1Spectral sensing and allocation using deep machine…556
2Connecting to Virtualized Mobile Core Networks395
3Radio Download Control Channel380
4Reference signal and control information processin…360
5Method and apparatus for UE signal transmission in…353
6System, method, and apparatus of beam-tracking and…342
7Upload Control Signaling For New Radio327
8Method and apparatus for transmitting group messag…326

Ranked by total forward citations. Citation counts favour older and broadly cited patent families, and broad or adjacent patents may appear when they match the search scope. Treat this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents. Some patent titles may be shown in their original, non-English language where an accurate translation could not be guaranteed.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation-ranked patent families surfaced by this query.Open in Eureka →
Insights

What the competitive structure means for R&D investment decisions

Four structural observations — maturity, concentration, ecosystem collaboration, and geographic distribution — together define the strategic context for any organization evaluating entry or expansion in 5G RRC.

Decline

Field is in decline: peak was 2020, annual volume has since eased

The lifecycle stage is Decline, driven by annual filings easing back from the 2020 peak. New R&D investment in purely incremental RRC protocol patents is likely to yield diminishing returns. The productive window is for differentiated work in adjacent application verticals or next-generation air interface research rather than incremental 5G NR standardization filings.

Lifecycle: Decline
Concentration

Extreme top-end concentration limits the viability of head-on portfolio competition

The top five filers hold 75% of the hundred largest filers’ combined output, with Samsung alone accounting for the single largest block at 11,306 patent families. A new entrant cannot realistically achieve parity through volume alone. Viable strategies include acquiring targeted essential patents, focusing on under-claimed sub-branches, or building complementary application-layer IP where concentration is lower.

High concentration
Collaboration

Samsung anchors the most active co-filing networks, predominantly with Korean universities

The most active co-filing pair is AT&T Intellectual Property I LP with AT&T Mobility II LLC (23 joint filings), reflecting intra-group coordination. Samsung Electronics co-files with Seoul National University R&DB Foundation (20 filings), Korea University Research & Business Foundation (16), Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (14), Sungkyunkwan University (13), and Yonsei University (13), indicating a structured university partnership program. Intel co-files with Intel IP Corporation (12 filings). Nokia Technologies co-files with Nokia USA Inc (7 filings).

University-industry links
Geography

US and EPO dominate filings; India is the leading emerging-market jurisdiction

The United States leads with 8,695 patent records, followed by the EPO at 5,423 and WIPO PCT at 3,390, confirming that protection strategy is concentrated in the three major prosecution routes. India ranks fourth at 970 records, notably ahead of China at 533, Japan at 97, and South Korea at 83 — an unusual pattern that may reflect filing strategy by US-centric licensors targeting large device markets.

US-EPO-PCT dominant
Patsnap Eureka · TRIZ Solution Agent
Facing a specific technical bottleneck in this field?

Go beyond the landscape: Eureka’s TRIZ Solution agent breaks down an R&D problem and returns patented concept solutions, each with a technical approach and cited patent & literature evidence.

Solve it in Eureka →
Top collaboration links
ApplicantCollaboratorCo-filings
AT&T知识产权一部有限合伙公司AT&T移动第二有限责任公司23
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.Seoul National University R&DB Foundation20
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.Korea University Research & Business Foundation16
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST)14
AT&T知识产权一部有限合伙公司AT&T TECHNICAL SERVICES CO INC14
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.成均馆大学校产学协力团13
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.延世大学校产学协力团13
Intel CorporationIntel IP Corporation12
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.Beijing Samsung Telecom R&D Center11
Nokia Technologies OyNOKIA USA INC7

Co-filing pairs, ranked by the number of jointly-filed patent families.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Insights derived from applicant ranking, collaboration pairs, lifecycle analysis, and jurisdiction distribution in the corpus.Explore insights →
Leaders

Samsung leads by a wide margin; most challengers are pulling back

Two tiers are visible: Samsung Electronics at a scale that has no peer in this corpus, and a second tier — Qualcomm, Apple, Intel — that remains commercially important but is filing at substantially reduced rates relative to prior periods.

Leader · Samsung Electronics

Samsung Electronics

Samsung holds 11,306 patent families, more than four times the second-ranked filer. Its technology focus is centered on H04W 72 (wireless resource scheduling), H04L 5 (multi-carrier digital transmission), and H04L 1 (error control coding) — the three sub-classes that sit at the heart of 5G NR RRC. Recent momentum shows a +6% increase versus the prior period, making Samsung the only top-tier player with a positive trajectory. This combination of scale and momentum reinforces its dominant standards-essential position.

patent families: 11,306
Challenger · Qualcomm

Qualcomm

Qualcomm ranks second with 2,677 patent families, with technology emphasis on H04W 72, H04L 5, and H04L 1 — closely mirroring Samsung’s focus, which places it in direct competition on the most contested sub-classes. However, recent momentum shows a –75% decline versus the prior period, indicating a significant pullback in new filings. This may reflect a strategic shift toward licensing existing essential patents rather than continued volume accumulation, or a redirection of R&D toward 5G-Advanced and 6G.

patent families: 2,677
🔍
See the full applicant breakdown
Access rankings for all top filers including Apple, Intel, Huawei, Ericsson, Nokia, and more.
Apple IncHuawei Technologies+ more
Unlock full assignee analysis →
Leading-applicant momentum (recent 3 yrs, lag-adjusted)
ApplicantRecent (3 yrs)Trend
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.3,623▲ +6%
Qualcomm Incorporated289▼ -75%
Apple Inc.325▼ -55%
Intel Corporation231▼ -22%
AT&T知识产权一部有限合伙公司66▼ -76%
Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd.85▼ -57%
Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ)53▼ -74%
LG Electronics Inc.35▼ -76%
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Player profiles draw on applicant ranking, technology emphasis, and recent filing momentum from the corpus.Explore players →
Adjacent Branches

Under-served branches adjacent to the dominant RRC core

Beyond the dominant H04W and H04L classes, several IPC branches are sparsely populated relative to their plausible technical relevance to 5G RRC. These represent observations of relative sparsity; two are noted below where a technical connection and realistic entry path can be articulated.

H04J · Multiplex communication

H04J accounts for only 583 patent records — roughly 2% of the corpus by share — despite multiplex communication techniques being foundational to OFDM-based 5G NR resource allocation. The sparsity may reflect most multiplex IP being classified directly under H04W or H04L rather than H04J, but it also signals that framing RRC innovations explicitly under multi-carrier multiplexing could yield less-crowded filing space. An R&D team with expertise in non-orthogonal or sparse-code multiple access variants could target this branch as an adjacent entry point.

Search this in Eureka →

G06N · Computing based on AI models

G06N holds only 161 patent records in this corpus, indicating that AI/ML-driven Radio Resource Control — for example, reinforcement-learning schedulers or neural-network beam management — remains lightly patented relative to classical protocol approaches. Given the active research interest in AI-native 5G-Advanced and 6G RRC, this branch is sparse today but technically credible. Organizations with ML infrastructure and wireless expertise could establish early IP positions before the field matures, though the combination of AI and RRC IP is itself becoming a competitive focus in adjacent 6G research.

Search this in Eureka →
🔒
Unlock the full white-space map
See all sparse IPC branches, their citation velocity, and suggested claim angles across the full corpus.
G01S · Radar, sonar & positioningG16Y · IoT data processing+ more
Unlock full analysis →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Adjacent branch analysis is based on relative IPC share within the 5G Radio Resource Control corpus; sparsity is an observation, not a validated opportunity.Explore emerging →
Route Matrix

How leading filers differ across RRC technology sub-routes

Route coverage across the main technology branches in the current evidence set.

PlayerH04W 72 · Wireless communication networksH04L 5 · Digital information transmissionH04L 1 · Digital information transmissionH04W 76 · Wireless communication networksH04B 7 · Transmission (general)
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.Strong · 8,052Strong · 5,006Moderate · 2,092Moderate · 1,856Moderate · 1,989
Qualcomm IncorporatedStrong · 1,631Strong · 1,415Moderate · 493Emerging · 243Emerging · 257
Apple Inc.Strong · 805Strong · 610Moderate · 212Moderate · 232Emerging · 115
Intel CorporationStrong · 487Strong · 335Moderate · 158Emerging · 81Emerging · 94
AT&T Intellectual Property I, L.P.Strong · 337Strong · 237Moderate · 113Moderate · 76Moderate · 156
Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd.Strong · 317Strong · 189AbsentEmerging · 58Absent
Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ)Strong · 179Strong · 189Moderate · 54Moderate · 39Moderate · 42
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Matrix values are measured in patent records and should not be compared directly with family-level applicant totals.Compare in Eureka →
Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

Still have questions? Patsnap Eureka answers them from patent and research data.Ask Eureka →

Built on Patsnap Open Platform

This report’s underlying patent dataset — filings, assignees, technology clusters — is open for developers via MCP and REST API. Free to start, 10,000 credits, no credit card required.

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Explore in Eureka ↗
Powered by Patsnap Eureka

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.