Book a demo

6G Air Interface Patent Landscape 2026

6G Air Interface Patent Landscape 2026
Competitive Landscape
6G Air Interface Patent Landscape in 2026

The 6G air interface patent field is highly concentrated, with Samsung Electronics commanding a commanding lead among all filers and the top five filers accounting for 95% of the hundred largest filers’ combined output. The field is still expanding on a multi-year basis — recent three-year growth stands at 2,645% over the prior window — though annual volume has eased from its 2023 peak, and Europe (EPO) is the primary filing destination.

2,332
Patent families in scope
95%
Top-5 share of top-100 filers
+2645%
3-yr filing growth (lag-adj.)
Europe (EPO)
Leading jurisdiction
↗ Tap any metric to explore the underlying patents and uncover deeper insights in Patsnap Eureka
Published byPatsnap Insights Team··7 min readVerified by Patsnap Eureka data
Overview

Samsung leads an extreme-concentration field with a handful of challengers far behind

Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd ranks first with 2,105 patent families, a position so dominant that the gap to every other applicant is structurally decisive. The Massengill Family Trust holds second place at 111 patent families, followed by Newman David E at 90 — both well below an order of magnitude of the leader.

The top five filers collectively account for 95% of the hundred largest filers’ combined total, signalling extreme concentration at the apex of the ranking. Below the top three, counts fall sharply: AT&T Intellectual Property I L P holds 28 patent families, Intel Corp 18, and Nokia Technologies Oy 13, underscoring a steep drop-off from second tier to third.

Leading applicants
#ApplicantPatent familiesShare
1Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.2,105
2The Massengill Family Trust111
3NEWMAN DAVID E90
4AT&T INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY I L P28
5Intel Corporation18
6Nokia Technologies Oy13
7AT&T MOBILITY II LLC11
8Qualcomm Incorporated10
9Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ)8
10Lenovo (United States) Inc.5
#ApplicantPatent familiesShare
11Parallel Wireless Inc.4
12BEIJING SAMSUNG TELECOM R&D CENT4
13Yonsei University Industry-Academic Cooperation Foundation3
14InterDigital Patent Holdings Inc.3
15Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur2
16National Yunlin University of Science and Technology2
17MediaTek Inc.2
18Oswego Technologies LLC2
19LG Electronics Inc.2
20Tasione Innovations Co., Ltd.1
↗ Hover a row · click a company to ask Eureka

Samsung’s position implies that any new entrant or challenger must either differentiate strongly by technology sub-branch or by geographic filing strategy to avoid direct overlap with a portfolio that spans H04L digital transmission, H04W wireless networks, and H04B general transmission simultaneously.

The most recent 18–24 months of filings are under-counted due to standard patent publication lag; apparent softness in 20242026 data should not be interpreted as a real decline in activity. Longer-window growth, applicant concentration, and technology-route coverage are therefore more reliable signals than the latest-year bar alone.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Chart shows the top applicants ranked by patent families. Applicant counts can overlap where a patent family lists several applicants, so they need not sum to the total in scope. This same dataset is now available on Patsnap Open Platform via MCP.Connect via MCP →
Trends & Structure

A field that erupted in 2022 and remains structurally anchored in wireless and digital transmission

The annual filing trend reveals a near-zero baseline through 2021 before a sharp acceleration, while the technology composition shows that activity is overwhelmingly concentrated in two adjacent IPC classes with smaller adjacent branches representing potential differentiation space.

Annual filing trend

Filings were negligible through 2021, then surged to 537 records in 2022 and peaked at 844 in 2023. The 2024 count of 568 and 2025 count of 286 reflect publication lag and should not be read as demand contraction. The multi-year growth rate of 2,645% over the prior window confirms the field is still in expansion on a cumulative basis.

Annual filing trendAnnual values from 2017 to 2026, peaking at 844 in 2023.02017020181020191920204220215372022844202356820242862025262026↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka

Technology composition

H04W (Wireless communication networks) and H04L (Digital information transmission) together account for the overwhelming majority of records, reflecting the air interface’s core focus on channel access and data transport. H04B (Transmission, general) forms a meaningful secondary cluster. Adjacent branches — G06N (AI models), G01S (Radar and positioning), and H04J (Multiplex communication) — each represent sparse but technically relevant subfields.

Technology compositionH04W · Wireless communication networks leads with 2,079; H04L · Digital information transmission 2,039.H04W · Wireless communic…2,079H04L · Digital informati…2,039H04B · Transmission (gen…657G06N · Computing based o…58G01S · Radar, sonar & po…43H04J · Multiplex communi…37G06F · Electric digital …10H04M · Telephonic commun…7↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Technology-branch counts are measured in patent records; a single patent family can carry several IPC classes, so class totals can exceed the family total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Key Patents

Highly cited patent families surfaced by the query

Citation-heavy patent families returned by the query. Use this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents.

Featured patent
US20240196415A1Published 2024-06-13

Method and apparatus for indicating dynamic wavefo…

Samsung Electronics CO., LTD.

The disclosure relates to a fifth generation (5G) or sixth generation (6G) communication system for supporting higher data rates. Disclosed is a method performed by a terminal in a wireless communication system, including receiving downlink control information (DCI) from a base station, identifying whether the DCI includes a dynamic waveform indicator, and… (excerpt from the patent abstract)

Method and apparatus for indicating dynamic wavefo… — patent drawingMethod and apparatus for indicating dynamic wavefo… — patent drawing
Representative drawings from the patent document.
Open this patent in Eureka →
Highly cited patent families surfaced by this query
#PatentCitations
1Facilitation of dynamic edge computations for 6g o…153
2Method and apparatus for transceiving signal using…148
3Facilitation of dynamic edge computations for 6g o…147
4Method and system for DSS between LTE cell and NR …88
5Method and device for header compression or decomp…20
6Methods and systems for AF control of network slic…20
7Low-complexity demodulation of 5G and 6G messages19
8Facilitation of dynamic edge computations for 6G o…19

Ranked by total forward citations. Citation counts favour older and broadly cited patent families, and broad or adjacent patents may appear when they match the search scope. Treat this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents. Some patent titles may be shown in their original, non-English language where an accurate translation could not be guaranteed.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation-ranked patent families surfaced by this query.Open in Eureka →
Insights

What the patent structure means for R&D investment decisions

The combination of extreme concentration, rapid growth from a near-zero base, and sparse adjacent branches creates a clear strategic picture: the core wireless and digital transmission space is already staked out, while AI, radar, and multiplex branches remain open.

Growth

Growth stage — multi-year expansion still positive, annual volume eased from 2023 peak

The lifecycle evidence classifies this field as Growth. The recent three-year filing window sits well above the prior three-year window at 2,645% cumulative growth, confirming that the field is still expanding on a multi-year basis. Annual volume peaked in 2023 and has eased since, though publication lag means the true 2024–2025 baseline is higher than current counts show. New entrants still have time to establish claims in adjacent sub-branches before standards consolidate.

Lifecycle: Growth
Concentration

Extreme apex concentration — one filer commands the dominant share

Samsung Electronics alone holds 2,105 patent families, while the next-ranked filer holds 111 and the third holds 90. The top five filers’ share of the hundred largest filers’ combined total reaches 95%. This level of concentration means that licensing exposure and freedom-to-operate analysis must begin with Samsung’s portfolio. Challengers AT&T (28 patent families) and Intel (18 patent families) are active but operate at a fraction of Samsung’s scale.

Concentration: Extreme
Collaboration

Co-filing activity is modest and largely intra-group

The most active co-filing pair is AT&T Intellectual Property I L P with AT&T Mobility II LLC, sharing 11 joint filings — an intra-corporate relationship. Samsung Electronics co-files with Beijing Samsung Telecom R&D Center on 6 patent families and with Yonsei University on 2. Nokia Technologies Oy has one joint filing each with Nokia (Shanghai) and Nokia Solutions & Networks. Co-filing outside established corporate families is minimal, suggesting that open ecosystem collaboration has not yet taken hold in this field.

Collaboration: Intra-group
Geography

Europe (EPO) leads filings; India and WIPO are secondary nodes; China filings are sparse

Europe (EPO) is the top filing jurisdiction at 878 patent records, followed by WIPO (PCT) at 750 and the United States at 550. India ranks fourth at 112, unusually high for an emerging telecom market at this stage of a new generation cycle. China, despite being a major 6G R&D spender, accounts for only 23 records in this corpus — a gap that may reflect different search or classification boundaries rather than genuine absence. Japan and the United Kingdom each represent minor shares.

Geography: EPO-led
Patsnap Eureka · TRIZ Solution Agent
Facing a specific technical bottleneck in this field?

Go beyond the landscape: Eureka’s TRIZ Solution agent breaks down an R&D problem and returns patented concept solutions, each with a technical approach and cited patent & literature evidence.

Solve it in Eureka →
Top collaboration links
ApplicantCollaboratorCo-filings
AT&T知识产权一部有限合伙公司AT&T移动第二有限责任公司11
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.Beijing Samsung Telecom R&D Center6
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.延世大学校产学协力团2
Nokia Technologies OyNokia Shanghai Bell Co., Ltd.1
Nokia Technologies OyNokia Solutions & Networks Oy1

Co-filing pairs, ranked by the number of jointly-filed patent families.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Insight cards are grounded in applicant ranking, lifecycle, collaboration, and jurisdiction evidence.Explore insights →
Leaders

Samsung sets the pace; AT&T and Intel are the nearest traceable challengers at a fraction of scale

The applicant ranking is structurally two-tiered: Samsung Electronics stands in a category of its own, while a cluster of industry names occupies distant positions. Momentum data shows Samsung’s recent three-year filings running at 50 times its prior three-year base, confirming that the bulk of its position has been built in the current growth wave.

Leader · Samsung Electronics

Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd

Samsung holds 2,105 patent families and shows a momentum trend of 50 times its prior three-year period, meaning its portfolio was built almost entirely during the 2022–2024 surge. Technology focus spans H04L 5 (digital transmission, 1,598 records), H04W 72 (wireless networks, 1,264 records), and H04B 7 (general transmission, 513 records) — a broad cross-section that covers the core air interface stack. Beijing Samsung Telecom R&D Center co-files on 6 families, extending Samsung’s reach into China-based R&D.

patent families: 2,105
Challenger · AT&T Intellectual Property I L P

AT&T Intellectual Property I L P

AT&T Intellectual Property I L P ranks fourth with 28 patent families and shows a declining momentum trend of –71% in recent filings versus the prior period, suggesting the group’s 6G air interface activity has contracted. Its technology focus centers on H04B 7 (transmission, general), H04L 5 (digital transmission), and H04W 28 (wireless networks), with joint filings alongside AT&T Mobility II LLC (11 co-filings). Intel Corp, fifth-ranked at 18 patent families, enters as a new entrant in the recent window and focuses on H04L 5 and H04W 72, signaling a fresh commitment to the field.

patent families: 28
🔍
See the full applicant breakdown
Access ranked profiles for all top filers, including Nokia, Qualcomm, Ericsson, and Lenovo.
Nokia Technologies OyQualcomm Inc+ more
Unlock full assignee analysis →
Leading-applicant momentum (recent 3 yrs, lag-adjusted)
ApplicantRecent (3 yrs)Trend
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.1,782▲ 50× vs prior 3-yr
NEWMAN DAVID E108▲ new entrant
MASSENGILL R KEMP108▲ new entrant
AT&T知识产权一部有限合伙公司6▼ -71%
Intel Corporation12▲ new entrant
Nokia Technologies Oy9▲ new entrant
AT&T移动第二有限责任公司2▲ new entrant
Qualcomm Incorporated4▲ new entrant
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Player cards use patent family counts from the applicant ranking and trajectory from applicant momentum data.Explore players →
Adjacent Branches

AI models, radar/positioning, and multiplex communication are sparsely filed adjacent branches

Three IPC branches sit at the edge of the dominant H04W/H04L cluster with notably low filing counts, making them observable as under-served areas relative to the core. Each has plausible technical relevance to 6G air interface design, though entry paths and commercial readiness vary.

G06N · Computing based on AI models

With 58 patent records, G06N is sparse relative to the H04W and H04L branches that each exceed 2,000 records. AI-native air interface design — including learned channel estimation, AI-driven beam management, and neural network-based codecs — is a recognized technical direction in 6G standardization discussions. The low count suggests that most filers are currently classifying AI-related 6G work under the core wireless classes rather than explicitly under G06N, creating potential differentiation space for applicants who frame claims around the AI model architecture itself.

Search this in Eureka →

G01S · Radar, sonar & positioning

G01S holds 43 patent records, reflecting the integrated sensing and communication (ISAC) use case that is a defining architectural feature of 6G relative to 5G. The sparse count relative to the core wireless classes indicates that ISAC-specific air interface claims remain an under-occupied area. Applicants with radar signal processing or positioning expertise — particularly those not currently ranked in the top tier — may find a realistic entry path by targeting waveform design and resource-sharing claims that bridge H04W and G01S.

Search this in Eureka →
🔒
Unlock the full white-space map
See all sparse IPC branches, filing-density heatmaps, and applicant coverage gaps across the 6G air interface corpus.
H04J · Multiplex communicationG06F · Electric digital data processing+ more
Unlock full analysis →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Adjacent branch counts are at the patent-record level; a family filing across multiple classes will appear in each.Explore emerging →
Route Matrix

How leading filers differ by IPC technology route

Route coverage across the main technology branches in the current evidence set.

PlayerH04L 5 · Digital information transmissionH04W 72 · Wireless communication networksH04B 7 · Transmission (general)H04W 28 · Wireless communication networksH04L 1 · Digital information transmission
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.Strong · 1,598Strong · 1,264Moderate · 513Moderate · 441Moderate · 344
MASSENGILL R KEMPStrong · 71Strong · 40Emerging · 7Strong · 46Strong · 56
NEWMAN DAVID EStrong · 71Strong · 40Emerging · 7Strong · 46Strong · 56
AT&T Intellectual Property I L PStrong · 14Strong · 14Strong · 19Strong · 14Moderate · 6
Intel CorporationStrong · 9Strong · 8Moderate · 4Moderate · 3Moderate · 2
Nokia Technologies OyStrong · 9Strong · 7Strong · 5Moderate · 3Absent
AT&T Mobility II LLCAbsentAbsentStrong · 10Strong · 11Absent
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Matrix values are measured in patent records and should not be compared directly with family-level applicant totals.Compare in Eureka →
Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

Still have questions? Patsnap Eureka answers them from patent and research data.Ask Eureka →

Built on Patsnap Open Platform

This report’s underlying patent dataset — filings, assignees, technology clusters — is open for developers via MCP and REST API. Free to start, 10,000 credits, no credit card required.

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Explore in Eureka ↗
Powered by Patsnap Eureka

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.