Book a demo

6G Beamforming Patent Landscape 2026

6G Beamforming Patent Landscape 2026
Competitive Landscape
6G Beamforming Patent Landscape in 2026

The 6G beamforming patent field is in a growth phase, with Samsung Electronics holding an overwhelming share of the 1,032 patent families in scope and annual filing volume rising sharply since 2021. Concentration is extreme, with a thin but broadening challenger tier comprising AT&T, Nokia, and a wave of new academic and telecom entrants.

1,032
Patent families in scope
88%
Top-5 share of top-100 filers
+1664%
3-yr filing growth (lag-adj.)
WIPO (PCT)
Leading jurisdiction
↗ Tap any metric to explore the underlying patents and uncover deeper insights in PatSnap Eureka
Published byPatSnap Insights Team··7 min readVerified by PatSnap Eureka data
Overview

Samsung commands the field; challengers are a fraction of its scale

Samsung Electronics is the clear dominant filer, ranked first with 915 patent families — more than fifty times the output of the second-ranked applicant, AT&T Intellectual Property, which holds 18 patent families.

The top five filers collectively account for 88% of the hundred largest filers’ combined total, signaling extreme concentration. Nokia Technologies (9 families), Nanjing University (5 families), and Seoul National University R&DB Foundation (5 families) form a distant second tier with no meaningful near-term challenge to Samsung’s position.

Leading applicants
#ApplicantPatent familiesShare
1Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.915
2AT&T INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY I L P18
3Nokia Technologies Oy9
4Nanjing University5
5SEOUL NATIONAL UNIVERSITY R&DB FOUNDATION5
6Tejas Networks Ltd5
7ZTE Corporation4
8Jio Platforms Ltd4
9Yonsei University Industry-Academic Cooperation Foundation4
10Fractal Networks LLC3
#ApplicantPatent familiesShare
11Luxembourg Institute of Science and Technology (LIST)3
12CVR College of Engineering3
13LG Electronics Inc.3
14Symbiosis International (Deemed University)2
15CHONGQING UNIV OF POSTS & TELECOMM2
16Saveetha Engineering College2
17Intel Corporation2
18China Telecom Corporation Ltd2
19David E. Newman2
20UNIV OF ELECTRONICS SCI & TECH OF CHINA2
↗ Hover a row · click a company to ask Eureka

Samsung’s dominance implies that any entrant seeking freedom-to-operate must map its portfolio carefully, while challengers and new entrants have so far staked out narrow but distinct sub-routes in wireless network signaling and digital transmission.

Filing counts for 2025 and 2026 are understated due to standard patent publication lag; the apparent plateau in those years should not be read as a slowdown. Longer-window growth, applicant concentration, and technology-route coverage are therefore more reliable signals than the latest-year bar alone.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Chart shows the top applicants ranked by patent families. Applicant counts can overlap where a patent family lists several applicants, so they need not sum to the total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Trends & Structure

Filings accelerated sharply from 2021; wireless transmission dominates the technology mix

Two complementary views — annual filing volume and IPC technology composition — reveal both the pace of market formation and the degree of technical concentration within the field.

Annual filing trend

Annual filings were negligible through 2020 (fewer than 10 per year), then surged from 27 in 2021 to a recorded high of 322 in 2023. The 2024 figure of 298 and 2025 figure of 185 are subject to upward revision as publications clear the lag period; the growth trajectory across the multi-year window remains strongly positive.

Annual filing trendAnnual values from 2017 to 2026, peaking at 322 in 2023.0201702018720191020202720211562022322202329820241852025272026↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka

Technology composition

H04B (Transmission, general) spans the entire corpus, with H04W (Wireless communication networks) and H04L (Digital information transmission) covering the bulk of records. AI-related computing (G06N) and antenna design (H01Q) appear at notably lower counts, marking them as adjacent rather than core branches in the current filing landscape.

Technology compositionH04B · Transmission (general) leads with 1,032; H04W · Wireless communication networks 776.H04B · Transmission (gen…1,032H04W · Wireless communic…776H04L · Digital informati…624G06N · Computing based o…95H01Q · Antennas26H04J · Multiplex communi…10G01S · Radar, sonar & po…5G10L · Speech & audio an…4↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Technology-branch counts are measured in patent records; a single patent family can carry several IPC classes, so class totals can exceed the family total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Key Patents

Highly cited patent families surfaced by the query

Citation-heavy patent families returned by the query. Use this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents.

Featured patent
US20260136349A1Published 2026-05-14

Methods and apparatus relating to beam management

Samsung Electronics CO., LTD.

The disclosure relates to a 5G or 6G communication system for supporting a higher data transmission rate. A method for Artificial Intelligence/Machine Learning (AI/ML)-based beam management in a mobile communications system comprising a User Equipment (UE) and a network, the method comprising: prioritizing, based on an inference from a beam management AI/ML… (excerpt from the patent abstract)

Methods and apparatus relating to beam management — patent drawingMethods and apparatus relating to beam management — patent drawing
Representative drawings from the patent document.
Open this patent in Eureka →
Highly cited patent families surfaced by this query
#PatentCitations
1Facilitating sparsity adaptive feedback in the del…21
2Method and apparatus for monitoring and reporting …18
3Method and device for RIS automatic setup18
4Method and device for performing improved beam tra…12
5Facilitating sparsity adaptive feedback in the del…12
6Facilitating sparsity adaptive feedback in the del…12
7一种基于深度强化学习的RIS辅助MU-MISO通信系统智能波束成形方法11
8Method and device for beam failure recovery of net…10

Ranked by total forward citations. Citation counts favour older and broadly cited patent families, and broad or adjacent patents may appear when they match the search scope. Treat this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents. Some patent titles may be shown in their original, non-English language where an accurate translation could not be guaranteed.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Citation-ranked patent families surfaced by this query.Open in Eureka →
Insights

What the patent structure means for R&D strategy

The combination of rapid growth, extreme concentration, and a thin challenger tier shapes distinct strategic implications across maturity, market structure, ecosystem development, and geography.

Growth

Growth stage with filing volume still climbing

The lifecycle evidence classifies 6G beamforming as a Growth-stage field. Annual filings remained near zero through 2020 and have risen sharply since 2021, with recent years understated by publication lag. Entrants can still influence the direction of the standard rather than merely designing around an established corpus.

Growth stage
Concentration

One dominant player; genuine competition is nascent

The top five filers hold 88% of the hundred largest filers’ combined total, with Samsung alone accounting for the vast majority. AT&T (18 families) and Nokia (9 families) are the closest institutional challengers, but the tier gap is substantial. New entrants — notably Jio Platforms, ZTE, and several universities — are filing but at single-digit family counts.

Highly concentrated
Collaboration

Samsung anchors all observed co-filing activity

Every documented co-applicant pair features Samsung Electronics as one party. The most active collaboration links Samsung with Seoul National University R&DB Foundation (4 co-filings), Yonsei University’s industry-academic foundation (3 co-filings), and Samsung’s own Beijing R&D center (3 co-filings). A second Yonsei University entity also appears with 2 co-filings. No independent collaboration clusters exist outside Samsung’s orbit in the current evidence.

Samsung-centric ecosystem
Geography

PCT and EPO lead; US and India are secondary filing offices

WIPO (PCT) is the leading filing jurisdiction with 383 records, followed closely by Europe (EPO) at 356 records, indicating a strategy oriented toward broad international protection. The United States ranks third at 136 records and India fourth at 88 records — a notable position that likely reflects the active Indian telecom and engineering-college filer community visible in the applicant list. China and South Korea trail at 46 and 14 records respectively.

PCT-led, global scope
PatSnap Eureka · TRIZ Solution Agent
Facing a specific technical bottleneck in this field?

Go beyond the landscape: Eureka’s TRIZ Solution agent breaks down an R&D problem and returns patented concept solutions, each with a technical approach and cited patent & literature evidence.

Solve it in Eureka →
Top collaboration links
ApplicantCollaboratorCo-filings
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.Seoul National University R&DB Foundation4
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.Yonsei University Industry-Academic Cooperation Foundation3
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.Samsung Research China – Beijing3
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.Yonsei University Industry Foundation2

Co-filing pairs, ranked by the number of jointly-filed patent families.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Insight cards are grounded in filing trend, lifecycle, collaboration, and jurisdiction data from the 6G beamforming corpus.Explore insights →
Leaders

Samsung Electronics leads decisively; Nokia and AT&T are the nearest institutional challengers

The applicant ranking reveals a single dominant player separated from challengers by an order of magnitude, with momentum data showing Samsung accelerating while AT&T retreats.

Leader · Samsung Electronics

Samsung Electronics

Samsung Electronics holds 915 patent families in 6G beamforming and shows a trajectory of 33× recent-period filings versus the prior three-year window, indicating a sustained and accelerating commitment. Its technology emphasis spans the full transmission stack: H04B 7 (general transmission), H04W 72 (wireless network resource management), and H04L 5 (multi-carrier digital transmission). Co-filings with Seoul National University and Yonsei University suggest active engagement with Korean academic research pipelines.

families: 915
Challenger · Nokia Technologies

Nokia Technologies

Nokia Technologies holds 9 patent families and is classified as a new entrant by momentum data, indicating its 6G beamforming activity is a recent development. Its filings concentrate on H04B 7 (transmission), H04L 5 (digital transmission), and H04W 72 (wireless networks) — a technology profile that mirrors the core corpus but at a fraction of Samsung’s volume. Nokia’s established standards body influence gives it potential relevance beyond its raw family count.

families: 9
🔍
See the full applicant breakdown
Access ranked profiles, technology emphasis, and momentum scores for all filers in the 6G beamforming corpus.
Tejas Networks LtdJio Platforms Ltd+ more
Unlock full assignee analysis →
Leading-applicant momentum (recent 3 yrs, lag-adjusted)
ApplicantRecent (3 yrs)Trend
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.721▲ 33× vs prior 3-yr
AT&T知识产权一部有限合伙公司3▼ -80%
Nokia Technologies Oy6▲ new entrant
Nanjing University5▲ new entrant
Tejas Networks Ltd2▲ new entrant
Jio Platforms Ltd4▲ new entrant
ZTE Corporation3▲ new entrant
Seoul National University R&DB Foundation2▲ new entrant
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Player cards cite patent family counts from the applicant ranking and trajectory data from the filing momentum analysis.Explore players →
Adjacent Branches

AI models and antenna design are under-served relative to the transmission core

Two IPC branches sit at notably lower filing densities than the dominant transmission classes, representing areas where the intellectual property landscape is sparse and where technical demand is nonetheless plausible for 6G systems.

G06N · AI and machine-learning models

With 95 records against a corpus dominated by transmission and wireless-network classes at the thousands level, AI model techniques are an adjacent branch with limited dedicated coverage. Beamforming optimization using deep reinforcement learning and neural-network channel prediction are active research areas — one top-cited document in the corpus specifically addresses deep reinforcement learning for RIS-assisted beamforming — yet dedicated patent filings remain sparse. Teams with AI-native expertise and a 6G systems background could find entry paths here, though the thinness of filings may also reflect that current work is embedded within broader system claims rather than isolated in G06N.

Search this in Eureka →

H01Q · Antenna design and arrays

H01Q covers antenna elements and arrays — the physical hardware layer underlying any beamforming system — yet appears in only 26 records within this corpus. For 6G, which targets sub-terahertz and terahertz bands requiring novel antenna geometries, this sparsity is notable. Organizations with antenna hardware expertise (materials, array calibration, near-field compensation) may find this an entry point that complements rather than directly confronts Samsung’s software-and-protocol-heavy portfolio. Entry paths include reconfigurable intelligent surface (RIS) antenna structures and integrated circuit-antenna co-design for mmWave and THz bands.

Search this in Eureka →
🔒
Unlock the full white-space map
See all sparse IPC branches, filing density scores, and suggested claim directions for the 6G beamforming field.
G01S · Radar and positioningH04J · Multiplex communication+ more
Unlock full analysis →
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Adjacent branch observations are based on relative IPC record counts within the 6G beamforming corpus; sparsity alone does not confirm a commercial opportunity.Explore emerging →
Route Matrix

How leading filers differ by technology sub-route

Route coverage across the main technology branches in the current evidence set.

PlayerH04B 7 · Transmission (general)H04W 72 · Wireless communication networksH04L 5 · Digital information transmissionH04W 24 · Wireless communication networksH04B 17 · Transmission (general)
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.Strong · 915Strong · 550Strong · 497Moderate · 259Moderate · 191
AT&T Intellectual Property I, L.P.Strong · 18Moderate · 6Strong · 11AbsentModerate · 6
Nokia Technologies OyStrong · 9Strong · 6Strong · 6Strong · 5Absent
Tejas Networks LtdStrong · 5Strong · 3Moderate · 2Strong · 4Absent
Nanjing UniversityStrong · 5Moderate · 2AbsentAbsentStrong · 3
ZTE CorporationStrong · 4AbsentAbsentStrong · 3Absent
Jio Platforms LtdStrong · 4AbsentStrong · 3AbsentAbsent
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Matrix values are measured in patent records and should not be compared directly with family-level applicant totals.Compare in Eureka →
Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

Still have questions? PatSnap Eureka answers them from patent and research data.Ask Eureka →
PatSnap Eureka

Ready to map your own 6G beamforming landscape?

Join 18,000+ innovators using PatSnap Eureka to map any technology landscape: search 2B+ patents and papers, surface key assignees, and generate a report like this in minutes.

18,000+innovators worldwide
2B+patents & papers
< 5 minper landscape report

Disclaimer. This page is generated from PatSnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. PatSnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Explore in Eureka ↗
Powered by PatSnap Eureka

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.