Book a demo

6G Network Digital Twin Patent Landscape 2026

6G Network Digital Twin Patent Landscape 2026
Competitive Landscape
6G Network Digital Twin Patent Landscape in 2026

The 6G network digital twin field is highly concentrated, with Samsung Electronics commanding an outsized share of 286 patent families in scope and the top five filers accounting for 84% of the hundred largest filers’ combined total. The field sits in the Growth stage on a multi-year basis, though annual volume has eased from its 2023 peak and the most recent filing years remain further understated by publication lag.

286
Patent families in scope
84%
Top-5 share of top-100 filers
+2800%
3-yr filing growth (lag-adj.)
WIPO (PCT)
Leading jurisdiction
↗ Tap any metric to explore the underlying patents and uncover deeper insights in Patsnap Eureka
Published byPatsnap Insights Team··7 min readVerified by Patsnap Eureka data
Overview

Samsung leads a sharply concentrated field with a wide gap to all challengers

Samsung Electronics holds the top position with 230 patent families, establishing a lead that dwarfs every other applicant in this space. Huawei Technologies ranks second with 16 patent families, followed by Intel Corporation at 9, leaving a pronounced tier gap between the leader and the rest of the field.

The top five filers — Samsung Electronics, Huawei Technologies, Intel Corporation, Xidian University, and Datang Mobile Communications Equipment — together account for 84% of the hundred largest filers’ combined total, signaling an unusually tight concentration for an emerging technology area. Below the top three, the remaining ranked applicants each hold only two or three patent families, indicating that no credible second-tier cluster has yet formed.

Leading applicants
#ApplicantPatent familiesShare
1Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.230
2Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd.16
3Intel Corporation9
4Xidian University3
5Datang Mobile Communications Equipment Co., Ltd.3
6AT&T MOBILITY II LLC3
7AT&T INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY I L P3
8Tasione Innovations Co., Ltd.2
9Boost SubscriberCo LLC2
10Medicaps University2
#ApplicantPatent familiesShare
11Jio Platforms Ltd.2
12InterDigital Patent Holdings, Inc.2
13Prasad Durga Venkata P1
14Jeniffer Thresa J1
15UNIV OF SCI & TECH BEIJING1
16iPLOOK Networks Co., Ltd.1
17Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur1
18Dr. Sneha Rai1
19DISH Wireless LLC1
20Dr. A. Kavitha1
↗ Hover a row · click a company to ask Eureka

Samsung’s position implies it has treated 6G digital twin as a core platform investment rather than a peripheral research theme. For R&D teams evaluating entry, this concentration means freedom-to-operate analysis must focus heavily on Samsung’s portfolio, while the shallow depth of challengers leaves navigable space in sub-branches not yet densely claimed.

The most recent 18–24 months of filings are understated due to patent publication lag; apparent slowdown in 20242026 data should not be read as a real deceleration. Longer-window growth, applicant concentration, and technology-route coverage are therefore more reliable signals than the latest-year bar alone.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Chart shows the top applicants ranked by patent families. Applicant counts can overlap where a patent family lists several applicants, so they need not sum to the total in scope. This same dataset is now available on Patsnap Open Platform via MCP.Connect via MCP →
Trends & Structure

Explosive multi-year growth anchored in wireless and AI-driven network management

The filing trend reveals a field that moved from near-zero activity before 2022 to a peak in 2023, while the technology composition shows the dominant focus on wireless network management with a meaningful but smaller AI-computing layer.

Annual filing trend

Annual filings were negligible through 2021, then surged to 99 families in 2023 — a three-year growth rate of approximately 2,800% versus the prior window — before appearing to ease in 2024 and 2025. The 2024–2026 data are substantially understated by publication lag and should not be interpreted as a genuine decline; the field remains in a multi-year growth phase.

Annual filing trendAnnual values from 2017 to 2026, peaking at 99 in 2023.020170201822019220203202140202299202364202470202562026↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka

Technology composition

Wireless communication networks (H04W) and digital information transmission (H04L) together dominate the technology mix, reflecting the core 6G protocol and network-management focus of most filings. Computing based on AI models (G06N) forms a meaningful third branch, consistent with the field’s emphasis on AI-driven network optimization, while transmission-general (H04B), digital data processing (G06F), and all remaining branches are sparsely populated.

Technology compositionH04W · Wireless communication networks leads with 240; H04L · Digital information transmission 210.H04W · Wireless communic…240H04L · Digital informati…210G06N · Computing based o…47H04B · Transmission (gen…20G06F · Electric digital …6G01S · Radar, sonar & po…2G06Q · Business, commerc…2G01N · Material analysis…1↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Technology-branch counts are measured in patent records; a single patent family can carry several IPC classes, so class totals can exceed the family total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Key Patents

Highly cited patent families surfaced by the query

Citation-heavy patent families returned by the query. Use this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents.

Featured patent
WO2023085824A1Published 2023-05-19

Method and apparatus for configuring session conne…

Samsung Electronics CO., LTD.

The disclosure relates to a 5G or 6G communication system for supporting a higher data transmission rate. A method performed by a network data analytics function (NWDAF) in a mobile communication system is provided. The method includes receiving, from a session management function (SMF), a message requesting a subscription to a data analysis service related… (excerpt from the patent abstract)

Method and apparatus for configuring session conne… — patent drawingMethod and apparatus for configuring session conne… — patent drawing
Representative drawings from the patent document.
Open this patent in Eureka →
Highly cited patent families surfaced by this query
#PatentCitations
1Policy enhancement to support group application fu…30
2Method and apparatus to support federated machine …16
3通信方法及装置15
4Method and apparatus for implementation of ai/ML i…13
5Method and apparatus for energy performance policy12
6测量方法和测量装置12
7Exchange of time of day between two IoT devices11
8Automated root cause determination using a pre-tra…9

Ranked by total forward citations. Citation counts favour older and broadly cited patent families, and broad or adjacent patents may appear when they match the search scope. Treat this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents. Some patent titles may be shown in their original, non-English language where an accurate translation could not be guaranteed.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation-ranked patent families surfaced by this query.Open in Eureka →
Insights

What the patent structure means for R&D investment decisions

The combination of rapid growth, extreme concentration, and nascent collaboration signals a field where early positioning still matters but where the dominant player already shapes the competitive landscape.

Growth

Growth stage with eased annual volume from the 2023 peak

The field is classified as Growth: three-year filing volume sits well above the prior three-year window at roughly 2,800% growth. Annual output peaked in 2023 and has moderated since, though publication lag artificially suppresses 2024–2026 counts. New entrants can still secure meaningful positions, but the window for first-mover advantage in core wireless-management claims is narrowing.

Growth · post-peak caution
Concentration

Single dominant player controls the vast majority of families

The top five filers account for 84% of the hundred largest filers’ combined total, with Samsung Electronics alone holding 230 patent families against Huawei’s 16 and Intel’s 9. This tier structure leaves limited room for challengers to match the leader on breadth; a focused sub-domain strategy targeting sparse branches — particularly H04B transmission and G06F data processing — offers a more viable entry path than head-on competition in H04W or H04L.

High concentration
Collaboration

Minimal co-filing activity; AT&T entities are the sole documented pair

The only recorded co-applicant relationship is between AT&T Mobility II LLC and AT&T Intellectual Property I L.P., which have jointly filed 3 patent families — likely reflecting an intra-corporate IP structuring arrangement rather than an external partnership. No cross-company or industry-academia co-filing clusters are visible in the evidence, suggesting the ecosystem has not yet coalesced around joint development agreements in this space.

Collaboration nascent
Geography

PCT and EPO lead; US and Asia secondary but present

WIPO (PCT) is the leading filing office, followed by Europe (EPO) and the United States, indicating that leading applicants are pursuing broad multi-jurisdictional protection rather than concentrating in a single home market. India and China are secondary destinations, consistent with the presence of applicants such as Jio Platforms and Datang Mobile. The UK, New Zealand, and Canada appear at low volumes, suggesting geographic breadth is still consolidating.

PCT-led geography
Patsnap Eureka · TRIZ Solution Agent
Facing a specific technical bottleneck in this field?

Go beyond the landscape: Eureka’s TRIZ Solution agent breaks down an R&D problem and returns patented concept solutions, each with a technical approach and cited patent & literature evidence.

Solve it in Eureka →
Top collaboration links
ApplicantCollaboratorCo-filings
AT&T移动第二有限责任公司AT&T知识产权一部有限合伙公司3

Co-filing pairs, ranked by the number of jointly-filed patent families.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Cards synthesize applicant ranking, collaboration, lifecycle, and jurisdiction evidence.Explore insights →
Leaders

Samsung Electronics and Huawei Technologies lead on different sub-route emphases

All tracked leading applicants entered the field recently, reflecting the field’s own novelty, with Samsung establishing a commanding position on both network-management and information-transmission routes while Huawei concentrates on wireless network coverage.

Leader · Samsung Electronics

Samsung Electronics

Samsung Electronics holds 230 patent families and entered as a new entrant, now representing a dominant share of the entire corpus. Its technology emphasis spans H04L 41 (digital information transmission, 155 records), H04W 24 (wireless network monitoring and performance, 134 records), and H04W 8 (wireless network data management, 42 records), indicating a broad platform strategy that covers both the protocol and the network-management layers of the 6G digital twin stack.

patent families: 230
Challenger · Huawei Technologies

Huawei Technologies

Huawei Technologies holds 16 patent families and also entered as a new entrant in this specific domain. Its filings concentrate on H04W 24 (wireless network monitoring, 14 records), with smaller positions in H04L 25 and H04W 4, suggesting a narrower but coherent focus on the network-monitoring sub-layer rather than Samsung’s broader transmission and management coverage.

patent families: 16
🔍
See the full applicant breakdown
Access ranked profiles for all 20 tracked applicants, including Intel, Datang Mobile, AT&T entities, and academic filers.
Intel CorporationDatang Mobile Communications Equipment+ more
Unlock full assignee analysis →
Leading-applicant momentum (recent 3 yrs, lag-adjusted)
ApplicantRecent (3 yrs)Trend
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.168▲ new entrant
Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd.13▲ new entrant
Intel Corporation9▲ new entrant
Datang Mobile Communications Equipment Co., Ltd.2▲ new entrant
DISH Wireless LLC3▲ new entrant
Tasione Innovations Co., Ltd.1▲ new entrant
Jio Platforms Ltd.2▲ new entrant
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Player counts are at the patent-family level as reported in the applicant ranking.Explore players →
Adjacent Branches

Under-served branches in transmission and data processing adjacent to the core

Two IPC branches sit at notably lower patent densities relative to the dominant H04W and H04L clusters, representing areas where the technical foundation exists but filing activity remains sparse.

H04B · Transmission (general)

With 20 patent records and a 4% share among the top branches, H04B covers physical-layer and general transmission methods that underpin 6G channel modeling — a prerequisite for accurate digital twin simulation. The relative sparsity against the dominant wireless-management layers suggests that physical-layer twin modeling remains an under-claimed area. Teams with antenna, waveform, or channel-estimation expertise could find navigable whitespace here, though entry requires deep physical-layer competence to differentiate from existing H04W claims.

Search this in Eureka →

G06F · Electric digital data processing

G06F accounts for only 6 patent records and a 1% share, pointing to sparse coverage of the data-processing and computational infrastructure supporting digital twin platforms — areas such as real-time data pipelines, synchronization algorithms, and twin-state management. Given that operational digital twins require substantial software and compute orchestration, this gap may reflect a lag in filing rather than a lack of technical activity. Applicants focused on cloud-native or edge-computing implementations of 6G network twins may find this branch relatively open.

Search this in Eureka →
🔒
Unlock the full white-space map
See detailed claim-level analysis across all 11 IPC branches identified in the 6G network digital twin corpus.
G01S · Radar, sonar and positioningH02J · Power supply and grid systems+ more
Unlock full analysis →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Branch counts are at the patent-record level; sparse branches are observations of relative filing density, not validated commercial opportunities.Explore emerging →
Route Matrix

How leaders differ across wireless management, transmission, and AI sub-routes

Route coverage across the main technology branches in the current evidence set.

PlayerH04L 41 · Digital information transmissionH04W 24 · Wireless communication networksH04L 67 · Digital information transmissionH04W 88 · Wireless communication networksH04W 8 · Wireless communication networks
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.Strong · 155Strong · 134Moderate · 37Moderate · 38Moderate · 42
Intel CorporationStrong · 7Moderate · 2Moderate · 3Strong · 5Absent
Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd.Emerging · 2Strong · 14AbsentAbsentAbsent
Xidian UniversityStrong · 3Strong · 3AbsentAbsentAbsent
Jio Platforms Ltd.Strong · 2Strong · 2Strong · 2AbsentAbsent
DISH Wireless LLCStrong · 3AbsentAbsentModerate · 1Absent
AT&T Intellectual Property I, L.P.AbsentStrong · 3AbsentAbsentAbsent
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Matrix values are measured in patent records and should not be compared directly with family-level applicant totals.Compare in Eureka →
Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

Still have questions? Patsnap Eureka answers them from patent and research data.Ask Eureka →

Built on Patsnap Open Platform

This report’s underlying patent dataset — filings, assignees, technology clusters — is open for developers via MCP and REST API. Free to start, 10,000 credits, no credit card required.

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Explore in Eureka ↗
Powered by Patsnap Eureka

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.