Book a demo

6G Network Optimization (SON) Patent Landscape 2026

6G Network Optimization (SON) Patent Landscape 2026
Competitive Landscape
6G Network Optimization (SON) Patent Landscape in 2026

Samsung Electronics dominates a highly concentrated field, holding the majority of the 170 patent families in scope, with the top five filers collectively accounting for 77% of the hundred largest filers’ combined total. The field is still expanding on a multi-year basis, though annual volume has eased from its 2023 peak and the most recent years remain further understated by publication lag.

170
Patent families in scope
77%
Top-5 share of top-100 filers
+475%
3-yr filing growth (lag-adj.)
United States
Leading jurisdiction
↗ Tap any metric to explore the underlying patents and uncover deeper insights in Patsnap Eureka
Published byPatsnap Insights Team··6 min readVerified by Patsnap Eureka data
Overview

Samsung leads a heavily concentrated emerging field

Samsung Electronics holds the top position by a wide margin in 6G SON patent families, with AT&T Intellectual Property, Huawei, and Intel occupying the next three ranks at significantly lower counts.

The top five filers account for 77% of the hundred largest filers’ combined total, signaling a highly concentrated competitive structure where a single player’s portfolio dwarfs the rest of the field. The gap between the leader and the second-ranked filer is substantial.

Leading applicants
#ApplicantPatent familiesShare
1Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.105
2AT&T INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY I L P13
3Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd.11
4Intel Corporation8
5Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (Ericsson)3
6Tejas Networks Ltd3
7Boost Subscriberco LLC2
8Northeastern University (US)2
9Chandigarh University2
10Fractal Networks LLC2
#ApplicantPatent familiesShare
11HNNOIX India Pte Ltd2
12Sichuan Communications Research Planning and Design Co., Ltd.1
13Dr. Abhilash C N1
14Symbiosis International Deemed University1
15Wuhan University1
16Shanghai Committee China Telecom Group Labor Union1
17Dalian Maritime University1
18Dr. Chetan R1
19Dr. Babji Prasad Chapa1
20Dr. M Ananthalakshmi1
↗ Hover a row · click a company to ask Eureka

Samsung’s commanding position reflects an early, systematic filing strategy in wireless network management and AI-driven optimization, giving it a structural advantage as 6G standardization progresses. Challengers entering now face both a volume gap and an entrenched claim position in core H04W subclasses.

Filing counts for the most recent 18–24 months are understated due to standard patent publication lag; the apparent easing from 2023 levels should not be interpreted as a slowdown until more publications clear. Longer-window growth, applicant concentration, and technology-route coverage are therefore more reliable signals than the latest-year bar alone.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Chart shows the top applicants ranked by patent families. Applicant counts can overlap where a patent family lists several applicants, so they need not sum to the total in scope. This same dataset is now available on Patsnap Open Platform via MCP.Connect via MCP →
Trends & Structure

Rapid multi-year growth anchored in wireless network management, with AI emerging as a secondary axis

The filing trend and technology composition together reveal a field that grew sharply from 2020 onward, concentrated in wireless network protocols but increasingly intersecting AI and signal-processing branches.

Annual filing trend

Activity in this field was negligible through 2018, then rose steadily from 2019, accelerating sharply to a recorded peak in 2023. The recent-window growth figure reflects a substantial multi-year expansion. Years 2024–2026 are materially understated by publication lag and should not be read as a real-terms decline.

Annual filing trendAnnual values from 2017 to 2026, peaking at 54 in 2023.0201702018220191120207202126202254202335202428202572026↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka

Technology composition

H04W (Wireless Communication Networks) is the dominant IPC class, covering virtually all families in scope, with H04L (Digital Information Transmission) and H04B (Transmission General) as secondary classes. G06N (AI/ML Models) is the fourth-largest branch, indicating that AI-native network management is becoming a meaningful thread in the portfolio mix, though it remains far smaller than the core wireless classes.

Technology compositionH04W · Wireless communication networks leads with 170; H04L · Digital information transmission 60.H04W · Wireless communic…170H04L · Digital informati…60H04B · Transmission (gen…28G06N · Computing based o…22G01S · Radar, sonar & po…4H04J · Multiplex communi…4H01Q · Antennas3F21S · Non-portable ligh…2↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Technology-branch counts are measured in patent records; a single patent family can carry several IPC classes, so class totals can exceed the family total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Key Patents

Highly cited patent families surfaced by the query

Citation-heavy patent families returned by the query. Use this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents.

Featured patent
WO2026075459A1Published 2026-04-09

Method and apparatus for optimizing mobility and c…

Samsung Electronics CO., LTD.

The disclosure relates to a 5G or 6G communication system for supporting a higher data transmission rate. Embodiments herein provide a method and system for optimizing mobility in a NR in a wireless communication network. The method includes logging, by a UE (100), measurements associated with a neighbor cell in a SPR or a SHR. Further, the method includes… (excerpt from the patent abstract)

Method and apparatus for optimizing mobility and c… — patent drawingMethod and apparatus for optimizing mobility and c… — patent drawing
Representative drawings from the patent document.
Open this patent in Eureka →
Highly cited patent families surfaced by this query
#PatentCitations
1Intelligence and Learning in O-RAN for 5G and 6G C…95
2Policy enhancement to support group application fu…30
3Device contexts, operational modes, and policy dri…21
4Method and apparatus for implementation of ai/ML i…13
5Exchange of time of day between two IoT devices11
6Facilitating heterogeneous network analysis and re…11
7Intelligence and learning in O-RAN for 5G and 6G c…10
8一种基于6G空中基站信号增强及智能按需覆盖优化方法8

Ranked by total forward citations. Citation counts favour older and broadly cited patent families, and broad or adjacent patents may appear when they match the search scope. Treat this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents. Some patent titles may be shown in their original, non-English language where an accurate translation could not be guaranteed.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation-ranked patent families surfaced by this query.Open in Eureka →
Insights

What the competitive structure means for R&D investment decisions

The combination of high concentration, early-stage lifecycle, and an AI-adjacent white space defines where incremental investment can still differentiate versus where it will face entrenched positions.

Growth

Growth stage: expanding on a multi-year basis, past its 2023 annual peak

The field is classified at the Growth stage, with the recent three-year filing window sitting well above the prior three-year window. Annual volume peaked in 2023 and has since eased, though publication lag means the true recent rate is higher than recorded figures suggest. For R&D teams, this window still offers the opportunity to stake foundational claims before the field reaches maturity.

Growth stage
Concentration

Single-player dominance creates a high barrier but also visible gaps

With the top five filers holding 77% of the hundred largest filers’ combined total and one player holding a disproportionate share, the field is structurally concentrated. Challengers are unlikely to displace the leader through volume alone. The viable strategy is differentiation by subclass — particularly in AI-driven optimization (G06N), antenna design (H01Q), or positioning and sensing (G01S), where the leader’s relative position is weaker.

High concentration
Collaboration

Intra-group co-filing is the only observed collaboration pattern

The only co-applicant relationship in evidence is between Samsung Electronics (Korea) and its Beijing research center, representing a single shared family. No cross-company or industry-academia collaboration is recorded among the top filers. This absence of ecosystem co-development is notable given that 6G SON is expected to require multi-vendor interoperability; it may represent an early-stage gap that opens as standardization bodies begin coordinating.

Minimal co-filing
Geography

US, PCT, and EPO account for the bulk of filings; China is a minor jurisdiction despite Chinese applicants

The United States leads as a filing jurisdiction, closely followed by WIPO PCT and Europe (EPO), indicating that the dominant players are pursuing broad international protection. India is the fourth jurisdiction, driven by its active academic and startup filers. China, despite having Huawei and Chinese academic applicants in the ranking, shows relatively few filings in this specific corpus, suggesting either strategic restraint or that domestic Chinese filings in this subspace are not yet fully indexed.

US/PCT/EPO led
Patsnap Eureka · TRIZ Solution Agent
Facing a specific technical bottleneck in this field?

Go beyond the landscape: Eureka’s TRIZ Solution agent breaks down an R&D problem and returns patented concept solutions, each with a technical approach and cited patent & literature evidence.

Solve it in Eureka →
Top collaboration links
ApplicantCollaboratorCo-filings
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.Beijing Samsung Telecom R&D Center1

Co-filing pairs, ranked by the number of jointly-filed patent families.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Insights are derived from applicant ranking, lifecycle assessment, collaboration data, and jurisdiction distribution.Explore insights →
Leaders

Samsung Electronics leads decisively; AT&T, Huawei, and Intel compete in a distant second tier

All momentum-tracked filers entered this specific space recently, reflecting the nascent state of 6G SON as a defined filing category. Samsung’s technology focus spans network monitoring, session management, and digital transmission management.

Leader · Samsung Electronics

Samsung Electronics

Samsung Electronics holds 105 patent families in this space — more than eight times the nearest rival — with its primary technical emphasis on H04W 24 (wireless network monitoring and testing), H04W 76 (connection management), and H04L 41 (network management and configuration). Its applicant momentum is flagged as a new entrant to this defined subspace, with 87 recent families, consistent with a concentrated push as 6G standardization has accelerated. The intra-group collaboration with its Beijing R&D center adds marginal further coverage.

105 patent families
Challenger · AT&T Intellectual Property

AT&T Intellectual Property

AT&T Intellectual Property holds 13 patent families, ranking second, with its technical focus on H04W 28 (resource management), H04W 64 (locating users), and H04W 68 (paging). Like Samsung, its momentum in this subspace is flagged as a new entrant, with 5 recent families. AT&T’s emphasis on resource management and user-location functions suggests a network-operator perspective that complements Samsung’s equipment-vendor orientation, creating some differentiation in claim space.

13 patent families
🔍
See the full applicant breakdown
Access the complete ranked list of all filers including emerging academic and startup entrants.
Huawei TechnologiesIntel Corporation+ more
Unlock full assignee analysis →
Leading-applicant momentum (recent 3 yrs, lag-adjusted)
ApplicantRecent (3 yrs)Trend
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.87▲ new entrant
AT&T知识产权一部有限合伙公司5▲ new entrant
Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd.2▲ new entrant
Intel Corporation8▲ new entrant
Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (Ericsson)3▲ new entrant
Tejas Networks Ltd1▲ new entrant
HNNOIX India Pte Ltd2▲ new entrant
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Player rankings are by patent family count; technology focus is derived from IPC subclass distribution.Explore players →
Adjacent Branches

AI-native optimization and integrated sensing are under-served branches worth watching

Several IPC branches adjacent to the dominant H04W core carry low filing counts relative to the field’s overall activity, representing areas where technical contributions could still establish meaningful positions.

G06N · AI/ML Models for network optimization

With 22 records, G06N is the largest of the under-served adjacent branches — present but still a small share of the overall corpus. AI-native SON functions such as reinforcement-learning-based load balancing, federated learning for distributed RAN optimization, and neural-network-driven handover prediction sit here. The most-cited prior art explicitly references AI/ML in O-RAN for 5G and 6G contexts, and HNNOIX India has already staked an early G06N position alongside its H04W filings. Entry is plausible for teams with telecom-domain AI expertise, though Samsung’s growing presence in this subclass means the window for foundational claims is narrowing.

Search this in Eureka →

G01S · Radar, Sonar & Positioning for integrated sensing and communication

G01S holds only 4 records in this corpus, making it the sparsest technically plausible adjacent branch. Integrated Sensing and Communication (ISAC) is a recognized 6G architectural pillar, and SON functions that incorporate real-time positioning and environmental sensing fall squarely in G01S territory. The combination of low current filings, clear technical relevance to 6G network self-optimization (e.g., beam management informed by radar sensing), and limited incumbency from the dominant players makes this branch worth monitoring. Entry would require cross-domain expertise in both radar signal processing and RAN management protocols.

Search this in Eureka →
🔒
Unlock the full white-space map
See the complete adjacent-branch analysis including H04J multiplex communication and H01Q antenna subclasses.
H04J · Multiplex communicationH01Q · Antennas+ more
Unlock full analysis →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Adjacent branches are identified by low filing counts relative to the dominant IPC class within this corpus.Explore emerging →
Route Matrix

How leading filers differ across technology subclasses

Route coverage across the main technology branches in the current evidence set.

PlayerH04W 24 · Wireless communication networksH04W 76 · Wireless communication networksH04W 28 · Wireless communication networksH04L 41 · Digital information transmissionH04W 36 · Wireless communication networks
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.Strong · 100Moderate · 40Emerging · 13Moderate · 37Emerging · 20
Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd.Emerging · 2AbsentStrong · 11AbsentAbsent
Intel CorporationStrong · 8Moderate · 3AbsentAbsentEmerging · 1
AT&T Intellectual Property I, L.P.Emerging · 1AbsentStrong · 10Emerging · 1Absent
HNNOIX India Pte LtdStrong · 2AbsentAbsentAbsentStrong · 2
Northeastern University (US)AbsentAbsentStrong · 2AbsentStrong · 2
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Matrix values are measured in patent records and should not be compared directly with family-level applicant totals.Compare in Eureka →
Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

Still have questions? Patsnap Eureka answers them from patent and research data.Ask Eureka →

Built on Patsnap Open Platform

This report’s underlying patent dataset — filings, assignees, technology clusters — is open for developers via MCP and REST API. Free to start, 10,000 credits, no credit card required.

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Explore in Eureka ↗
Powered by Patsnap Eureka

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.