Book a demo

6G O-RAN Open Interfaces Patent Landscape 2026

6G O-RAN Open Interfaces Patent Landscape 2026
Competitive Landscape
6G O-RAN / Open Interfaces Patent Landscape in 2026

Samsung Electronics holds an unusually dominant position in 6G O-RAN and open interfaces patenting, with the field still expanding on a multi-year basis even as annual volume has eased from its 2023 peak. WIPO (PCT) is the leading filing route, reflecting an early-stage global technology race where applicants are reserving international options.

190
Patent families in scope
89%
Top-5 share of top-100 filers
+688%
3-yr filing growth (lag-adj.)
WIPO (PCT)
Leading jurisdiction
↗ Tap any metric to explore the underlying patents and uncover deeper insights in Patsnap Eureka
Published byPatsnap Insights Team··7 min readVerified by Patsnap Eureka data
Overview

Samsung leads a highly concentrated field with a commanding share of the top-100 filers

Samsung Electronics is the clear leader with 138 patent families, more than nine times the count of the second-ranked applicant AT&T Intellectual Property (15 patent families). The top five filers together account for 89% of the combined total among the hundred largest filers, signalling an exceptionally concentrated competitive structure at this early stage.

The tier gap between Samsung and the remaining players is substantial. After AT&T Intellectual Property at rank two, Intel and Huawei are tied at seven patent families each, and Jio Platforms holds four — underscoring how sharply the ranking drops off after the first two positions.

Leading applicants
#ApplicantPatent familiesShare
1Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.138
2AT&T INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY I L P15
3Intel Corporation7
4Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd.7
5Jio Platforms Limited4
6Boost Subscriberco LLC3
7AT&T MOBILITY II LLC3
8Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ)2
9Jio Platforms Limited2
10Rakuten Mobile Inc.1
#ApplicantPatent familiesShare
11Medicaps University1
12DISH Wireless LLC1
13Nokia Technologies Oy1
14Vardhaman College of Engineering1
15Shanghai Kuchao Technology Co., Ltd.1
16NEC Corporation1
17Rakuten Symphony USA LLC1
18Ms. Ritu Bhadauria1
19InterDigital Patent Holdings, Inc.1
20NIMS University Rajasthan1
↗ Hover a row · click a company to ask Eureka

Samsung’s scale implies it has already built broad freedom-to-operate across the core wireless-network and digital-transmission branches, which will create licensing leverage as standards solidify. All other players remain in early position-building mode, leaving the competitive structure highly asymmetric.

The most recent 18–24 months of filings are under-represented due to typical patent publication lag; current activity is likely higher than the raw counts suggest. Longer-window growth, applicant concentration, and technology-route coverage are therefore more reliable signals than the latest-year bar alone.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Chart shows the top applicants ranked by patent families. Applicant counts can overlap where a patent family lists several applicants, so they need not sum to the total in scope. This same dataset is now available on Patsnap Open Platform via MCP.Connect via MCP →
Trends & Structure

Rapid multi-year growth from a near-zero base, dominated by wireless-network and transmission classes

Filing activity was negligible before 2019 and surged sharply through 2022–2023, confirming the field is still in an early-growth phase on a multi-year basis. The technology mix is anchored in wireless-network protocols and digital-transmission management, with AI-model computing appearing as a small but notable secondary cluster.

Annual filing trend

Filings were effectively zero in 2017–2018, then stepped up from 2019 onward and accelerated strongly in 2022 (41 families) and 2023 (53 families). The 2023 figure represents the recorded peak; 2024 and 2025 counts are still accruing due to publication lag and should not be read as a sustained decline.

Annual filing trendAnnual values from 2017 to 2026, peaking at 53 in 2023.020170201882019420205202141202253202340202438202512026↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka

Technology composition

H04W (wireless communication networks) and H04L (digital information transmission) are the dominant IPC classes, reflecting the protocol-layer focus of O-RAN interface standardisation. G06N (AI models) and G06F (digital data processing) appear at lower shares, signalling early but real activity at the AI-RAN intersection.

Technology compositionH04W · Wireless communication networks leads with 171; H04L · Digital information transmission 106.H04W · Wireless communic…171H04L · Digital informati…106H04B · Transmission (gen…22G06N · Computing based o…11G06F · Electric digital …8H04M · Telephonic commun…3G08B · Signalling & alar…2G06Q · Business, commerc…1↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Technology-branch counts are measured in patent records; a single patent family can carry several IPC classes, so class totals can exceed the family total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Key Patents

Highly cited patent families surfaced by the query

Citation-heavy patent families returned by the query. Use this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents.

Featured patent
WO2025100986A1Published 2025-05-15

Methods and apparatus for front haul overhead redu…

Samsung Electronics CO., LTD.

The present disclosure relates to a 5G communication system or a 6G communication system for supporting higher data rates beyond a 4G communication system such as long term evolution (LTE). The present disclosure relates to methods and systems for front-haul overhead reduction in a distributed base station. The method comprises estimating a channel in the… (excerpt from the patent abstract)

Methods and apparatus for front haul overhead redu… — patent drawingMethods and apparatus for front haul overhead redu… — patent drawing
Representative drawings from the patent document.
Open this patent in Eureka →
Highly cited patent families surfaced by this query
#PatentCitations
1Sixth generation (6G) system architecture and func…8
2Sixth generation (6G) system architecture and func…6
3Method and apparatus for providing user consent in…6
4System model and architecture for mobile integrate…6
5Method and apparatus for providing user consent in…5
6Facilitating mobility as a service in fifth genera…5
7Multi-access edge computing (MEC)4
8通信系统中用于支持机器学习或人工智能技术的方法和装置3

Ranked by total forward citations. Citation counts favour older and broadly cited patent families, and broad or adjacent patents may appear when they match the search scope. Treat this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents. Some patent titles may be shown in their original, non-English language where an accurate translation could not be guaranteed.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation-ranked patent families surfaced by this query.Open in Eureka →
Insights

What the patent structure means for R&D investment decisions

The combination of high concentration, rapid multi-year growth, and broad geographic filing routes shapes where new entrants can realistically build positions. Four structural factors stand out.

Growth

Growth stage — expanding on a multi-year basis, past its 2023 annual peak

The lifecycle evidence shows the field is still expanding on a multi-year basis, with a 688% jump in the recent three-year window versus the prior three-year window. Annual volume peaked in 2023 and has eased since, though publication lag understates recent activity. The window for early positioning is still open but narrowing as Samsung’s portfolio deepens.

Growth phase
Concentration

Extreme single-player dominance at the top; long tail of one-family filers

The top five filers hold 89% of the combined total among the hundred largest filers, and Samsung alone accounts for 138 patent families against an entire field of 190 patent families in scope. Below the top two, most applicants hold one to seven patent families, meaning the competitive tier below AT&T Intellectual Property is genuinely open for consolidation.

Highly concentrated
Collaboration

Limited co-filing observed; AT&T entities are the only identified co-applicant pair

The only recorded co-applicant collaboration is between AT&T Intellectual Property and AT&T Mobility II LLC, with three joint filings — reflecting intra-group coordination rather than cross-industry alliances. The absence of broad multi-party co-filing suggests the ecosystem has not yet formed the standardisation-driven consortia typically seen at later stages of wireless-technology development.

Low co-filing
Geography

WIPO PCT leads; Europe and the US are the primary national-phase targets

WIPO (PCT) is the leading filing office at 66 records, followed by Europe (EPO) at 48 and the United States at 35, consistent with applicants preserving broad international options early. India at 16 records is a notable entry, reflecting Jio Platforms’ domestic filing activity. China sits at 13 records, surprisingly low given Huawei’s overall presence in cellular standards.

PCT-led global
Patsnap Eureka · TRIZ Solution Agent
Facing a specific technical bottleneck in this field?

Go beyond the landscape: Eureka’s TRIZ Solution agent breaks down an R&D problem and returns patented concept solutions, each with a technical approach and cited patent & literature evidence.

Solve it in Eureka →
Top collaboration links
ApplicantCollaboratorCo-filings
AT&T知识产权一部有限合伙公司AT&T移动第二有限责任公司3

Co-filing pairs, ranked by the number of jointly-filed patent families.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Insights are derived from applicant ranking, lifecycle, collaboration, and jurisdiction data in the 6G O-RAN corpus.Explore insights →
Leaders

Samsung dominates wireless-network protocols; challengers cluster in transmission management and services

The two-tier structure is stark: Samsung has built a portfolio more than nine times larger than any other applicant, while AT&T and a set of new entrants are staking out narrower, complementary positions. Momentum data shows most ranked players entered or escalated activity only in the recent window.

Leader · Samsung Electronics

Samsung Electronics

Samsung holds 138 patent families and is classified as a new entrant in momentum terms, meaning its entire portfolio was built in the recent filing window — a sign of deliberately rapid, concentrated investment rather than incremental accumulation. Its technology emphasis sits firmly in H04W 88 (wireless network architecture), H04W 92 (inter-node interfaces), and H04L 41 (network management and configuration), which maps directly to the O-RAN interface stack. This breadth across both the air-interface and management-plane layers positions Samsung to assert essential-patent claims as 6G O-RAN specifications mature.

patent families: 138
Challenger · AT&T Intellectual Property

AT&T Intellectual Property

AT&T Intellectual Property holds 15 patent families, the second-largest count, but its momentum trend shows a 75% decline in recent filings versus the prior period — indicating that its position reflects earlier activity rather than current investment. Its technology focus spans H04W 88 (wireless network architecture), H04W 72 (resource management), and H04B 7 (antenna/transmission), suggesting an operator-centric view of open interfaces rather than a device or infrastructure-vendor perspective. The declining momentum may reflect a strategic shift toward licensing or standards participation over continued organic filing.

patent families: 15
🔍
See the full applicant breakdown
Access ranked profiles for all top-100 filers, including Intel, Huawei, Jio Platforms, Ericsson, Nokia, and more.
Huawei TechnologiesJio Platforms+ more
Unlock full assignee analysis →
Leading-applicant momentum (recent 3 yrs, lag-adjusted)
ApplicantRecent (3 yrs)Trend
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.105▲ new entrant
AT&T知识产权一部有限合伙公司3▼ -75%
Intel Corporation6▲ new entrant
Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd.6▲ new entrant
Jio Platforms Limited4▲ new entrant
DISH Wireless LLC4▲ new entrant
AT&T移动第二有限责任公司1▲ new entrant
Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ)2▲ new entrant
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Player cards cite patent family counts from the applicant ranking and technology emphasis from IPC subclass analysis.Explore players →
Adjacent Branches

Under-served branches at the AI, processing, and signalling edges of 6G O-RAN

Several IPC branches adjacent to the dominant wireless-protocol core show materially lower filing density. These observations reflect relative sparsity and should be evaluated against technical fit and entry feasibility before treating them as investment targets.

G06N · AI and machine-learning models applied to O-RAN

G06N accounts for just 11 records at a 3% share of the technology composition, despite the clear technical relevance of AI-driven RAN intelligence controllers (RICs) to O-RAN architecture. Most cited patents in the corpus reference AI and ML integration, suggesting the commercial importance is recognised but the dedicated patent position is thin. An entrant with AI-RAN inference, model deployment, or xApp/rApp optimisation capabilities could occupy this branch with relatively limited prior-art density to navigate.

Search this in Eureka →

H04B · Physical-layer and antenna transmission in open interfaces

H04B (transmission general) holds 22 records at a 7% share — the third-largest branch but still sparse relative to the dominant H04W and H04L clusters. Its presence in the corpus mainly reflects Ericsson’s and AT&T Mobility’s narrower filings on antenna and channel aspects. Physical-layer open interfaces — including fronthaul compression, beamforming coordination across disaggregated units, and THz channel modelling relevant to 6G — remain lightly covered, offering a plausible entry path for antenna specialists or chipset vendors.

Search this in Eureka →
🔒
Unlock the full white-space map
Explore all adjacent IPC branches, including H04M, G08B, G06F, and cross-class intersections, with filing-density heatmaps.
H04M · Telephonic communication and O-RAN service layerG06F · Digital data processing and RAN orchestration+ more
Unlock full analysis →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Adjacent branches are identified from lower-share IPC classes in the technology composition and are presented as observations of relative sparsity.Explore emerging →
Route Matrix

How leading applicants differ across technology branches

Route coverage across the main technology branches in the current evidence set.

PlayerH04W 88 · Wireless communication networksH04L 41 · Digital information transmissionH04W 92 · Wireless communication networksH04W 76 · Wireless communication networksH04W 8 · Wireless communication networks
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.Strong · 90Strong · 46Strong · 54Moderate · 42Moderate · 36
AT&T Intellectual Property I, L.P.Strong · 12Emerging · 2Emerging · 1Moderate · 3Moderate · 3
Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd.Strong · 6AbsentEmerging · 1AbsentStrong · 4
Intel CorporationStrong · 4Strong · 7AbsentAbsentAbsent
AT&T Mobility II LLCStrong · 3AbsentAbsentAbsentStrong · 3
DISH Wireless LLCModerate · 1Strong · 4AbsentAbsentAbsent
Jio Platforms LimitedStrong · 2Strong · 2AbsentAbsentAbsent
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Matrix values are measured in patent records and should not be compared directly with family-level applicant totals.Compare in Eureka →
Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

Still have questions? Patsnap Eureka answers them from patent and research data.Ask Eureka →

Built on Patsnap Open Platform

This report’s underlying patent dataset — filings, assignees, technology clusters — is open for developers via MCP and REST API. Free to start, 10,000 credits, no credit card required.

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Explore in Eureka ↗
Powered by Patsnap Eureka

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.