Book a demo

6G OTA / KPI Test Patent Snapshot 2026

6G OTA / KPI Test Patent Snapshot 2026
Evidence Snapshot
6G OTA / KPI Test Patent Snapshot in 2026

The 6G OTA/KPI test patent space is highly concentrated and in a growth stage, with Samsung Electronics commanding a dominant share and Huawei as the only other substantial filer. Activity accelerated sharply from 2020 onward, making this an early-mover field where a small number of actors are establishing foundational positions.

32
Patent families in scope
94%
Top visible applicants share
+1000%
3-yr filing growth (lag-adj.)
Europe (EPO)
Leading jurisdiction
↗ Tap any metric to explore the underlying patents and uncover deeper insights in Patsnap Eureka
Published byPatsnap Insights Team··6 min readVerified by Patsnap Eureka data
Overview

Samsung leads a highly concentrated, early-stage field

Samsung Electronics holds the top position in this space with 19 patent families, followed by Huawei with 6 and AT&T Intellectual Property with 3. The remaining ranked applicants each hold a single patent family.

The top five filers account for 94% of the combined output of the ranked applicants visible in this query, signaling an unusually tight concentration for a technology still in its formation stage. The gap between Samsung and the second-ranked Huawei is substantial.

Leading applicants
#ApplicantPatent familiesShare
1Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.19
2Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd.6
3AT&T INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY I L P3
4NOIDA INST OF ENG & TECH1
5Intel Corporation1
6MediaTek Inc.1
7MS RITU BHADAURIA1
↗ Hover a row · click a company to ask Eureka

Samsung’s dominance across wireless network management and performance monitoring branches suggests a deliberate strategy to establish broad foundational coverage as 6G test standards are being defined. Challengers entering now face an incumbent with a significant head start.

Filing counts for the most recent 18–24 months are understated due to patent publication lag and should be read as a lower bound on actual activity. Longer-window growth, applicant concentration, and technology-route coverage are therefore more reliable signals than the latest-year bar alone.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Chart shows the top applicants ranked by patent families. Applicant counts can overlap where a patent family lists several applicants, so they need not sum to the total in scope. This same dataset is now available on Patsnap Open Platform via MCP.Connect via MCP →
Trends & Structure

Filing activity has surged since 2020, anchored in wireless network management

The annual filing trend and the technology branch composition together reveal a field that ignited around 2020 and is overwhelmingly rooted in wireless network standards, with only nascent coverage in adjacent computing and antenna branches.

Annual filing trend

Filings were absent before 2020, then spiked in 2022 and again in 2024, reflecting the pace of 6G standards development. The 2025 and 2026 bars are understated due to publication lag and should not be read as a plateau or decline.

Annual filing trendAnnual values from 2017 to 2026, peaking at 10 in 2022.0201702018020192202002021102022220231020248202502026↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka

Technology composition

H04W (Wireless communication networks) is visible in the branch mix, followed by H04L (Digital information transmission) and H04B (Transmission, general). AI-model computing (G06N), electric digital data processing (G06F), and antennas (H01Q) each appear at very low counts, marking them as under-served adjacent branches.

Technology compositionH04W · Wireless communication networks leads with 32; H04L · Digital information transmission 10.H04W · Wireless communic…32H04L · Digital informati…10H04B · Transmission (gen…7G06N · Computing based o…2G06F · Electric digital …1H01Q · Antennas1↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Technology-branch counts are measured in patent records; a single patent family can carry several IPC classes, so class totals can exceed the family total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Key Patents

Highly cited patent families surfaced by the query

Citation-heavy patent families returned by the query. Use this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents.

Featured patent
WO2026029512A1Published 2026-02-05

Method and apparatus for CSI measurement and repor…

Samsung Electronics CO., LTD.

The disclosure relates to a 5G or 6G communication system for supporting a higher data transmission rate. Apparatuses and methods for channel state information (CSI) measurement and reporting. A method performed by a user equipment (UE) includes receiving a configuration about a CSI report. The configuration includes information about K measurement… (excerpt from the patent abstract)

Method and apparatus for CSI measurement and repor… — patent drawingMethod and apparatus for CSI measurement and repor… — patent drawing
Representative drawings from the patent document.
Open this patent in Eureka →
Highly cited patent families surfaced by this query
#PatentCitations
1测量方法和测量装置12
2Facilitating heterogeneous network analysis and re…11
3Data collection techniques for wireless systems1
4测量方法和测量装置1

Ranked by total forward citations. Citation counts favour older and broadly cited patent families, and broad or adjacent patents may appear when they match the search scope. Treat this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents. Some patent titles may be shown in their original, non-English language where an accurate translation could not be guaranteed.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation-ranked patent families surfaced by this query.Open in Eureka →
Visible assignees

Assignee snapshot from the current evidence set

The applicants below are visible in this query result. Because the evidence set is relatively small, read this section as a directional snapshot rather than a full competitive ranking.

Leader · Samsung Electronics

Samsung Electronics

Samsung holds 19 patent families — more than double the rest of the ranked applicants combined — and its recent filings trend as a new entrant with 13 families in the recent period. Its technology focus spans H04W 24 (network monitoring), H04W 88 (multi-mode devices), and H04W 28 (resource management), reflecting a broad coverage strategy across the OTA/KPI test workflow rather than a narrow sub-specialty.

families: 19
Challenger · Huawei Technologies

Huawei Technologies

Huawei holds 6 patent families and is also classified as a new entrant, with all 6 in the recent period. Its technology focus is concentrated in H04W 24 (network monitoring), indicating a targeted approach to KPI measurement and reporting rather than the broader system-level coverage pursued by Samsung. AT&T Intellectual Property, with 3 families, rounds out the meaningful secondary tier, focusing on H04W 16 (network design) and H04W 28 (resource management).

families: 6
🔍
More assignee evidence is available in Eureka
Use Eureka to validate whether these visible assignees remain central after refining the query scope and adding related patent classes.
Intel CorporationMediaTek Inc.+ more
Unlock full assignee analysis →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee evidence is drawn from the current PatSnap Eureka query. In small evidence sets, applicant counts should be treated as directional signals, not a complete competitive ranking.Explore players →
Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

Still have questions? Patsnap Eureka answers them from patent and research data.Ask Eureka →

Built on Patsnap Open Platform

This report’s underlying patent dataset — filings, assignees, technology clusters — is open for developers via MCP and REST API. Free to start, 10,000 credits, no credit card required.

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Explore in Eureka ↗
Powered by Patsnap Eureka

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.