Book a demo

6G Sub-THz / mmWave Patent Landscape 2026

6G Sub-THz / mmWave Patent Landscape 2026
Competitive Landscape
6G Sub-THz / mmWave Patent Landscape in 2026

The 6G Sub-THz and mmWave patent space is in a growth phase, with Samsung Electronics holding an overwhelming dominant position that sets it apart from all other filers. Activity has expanded sharply on a multi-year basis, though the most recent filing periods remain understated by publication lag.

1,456
Patent families in scope
89%
Top-5 share of top-100 filers
+1036%
3-yr filing growth (lag-adj.)
WIPO (PCT)
Leading jurisdiction
↗ Tap any metric to explore the underlying patents and uncover deeper insights in PatSnap Eureka
Published byPatSnap Insights Team··7 min readVerified by PatSnap Eureka data
Overview

Samsung Electronics leads a highly concentrated field

Samsung Electronics sits at the top of the applicant ranking with 1,240 patent families, a lead that dwarfs every other filer in the corpus. The next-ranked applicant, Fractal Networks LLC, holds 22 patent families, followed by AT&T Intellectual Property I L. P. with 19.

The top five filers account for 89% of the combined total among the hundred largest filers, signaling extreme concentration. The gap between Samsung and the second tier is structural, not marginal — the challenger tier consists primarily of specialized entities, telecom operators, and universities, none of whom approach Samsung’s volume.

Leading applicants
#ApplicantPatent familiesShare
1Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.1,240
2Fractal Networks LLC22
3AT&T INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY I L P19
4Southeast University14
5AT&T MOBILITY II LLC10
6SEOUL NATIONAL UNIVERSITY R&DB FOUNDATION6
7SwiftLink Technologies Inc.5
8Fudan University4
9Bapatla Engineering College4
10Qualcomm Incorporated4
#ApplicantPatent familiesShare
11Parallel Wireless Inc.4
12SAVEETHA INST OF MEDICAL & TECH SCI3
13Chandigarh University3
14Xidian University3
15NANJING UNIV OF POSTS & TELECOMM3
16CORNING RES & DEV CORP3
17AAC Precise Manufacturing Technology (Changzhou) Co., Ltd.3
18Yonsei University Industry Foundation3
19JRD Communication (Shenzhen) Ltd.3
20BEIJING SAMSUNG TELECOM R&D CENT3
↗ Hover a row · click a company to ask Eureka

Samsung’s dominance implies that any new entrant or challenger must either carve out a highly differentiated technical niche or accept operating in the long tail of this landscape. Universities and research institutes make up a meaningful share of the mid-ranking positions, suggesting the field still has active academic exploration outside the industrial leader.

Filing counts for the most recent 18–24 months are understated due to standard patent publication lag; apparent softening in 20252026 data should not be interpreted as a real decline in activity. Longer-window growth, applicant concentration, and technology-route coverage are therefore more reliable signals than the latest-year bar alone.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Chart shows the top applicants ranked by patent families. Applicant counts can overlap where a patent family lists several applicants, so they need not sum to the total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Trends & Structure

Rapid multi-year growth with transmission and wireless networks dominating the technology mix

Annual filings grew from near-zero in 2017 to a corpus-period peak in 2023, reflecting a field that has moved quickly from exploratory research to substantive patenting activity. The technology composition is heavily weighted toward core wireless transmission and network protocols, with antenna hardware and AI-assisted computing as secondary clusters.

Annual filing trend

Filings were negligible through 2019, then accelerated sharply from 2020 onward, reaching a corpus peak in 2023. The apparent step-down in 2024–2026 reflects publication lag rather than a real deceleration; treat recent-year bars as lower-bound estimates.

Annual filing trendAnnual values from 2017 to 2026, peaking at 435 in 2023.02017420181520192620205320212322022435202340120242432025472026↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka

Technology composition

H04B (Transmission, general) and H04W (Wireless communication networks) together account for the large majority of classified records, confirming that air-interface and network-layer protocols are the primary battleground. H04L (Digital information transmission), H01Q (Antennas), and G06N (AI models) form a secondary tier, while all remaining branches hold single-digit or token counts.

Technology compositionH04B · Transmission (general) leads with 1,355; H04W · Wireless communication networks 1,030.H04B · Transmission (gen…1,355H04W · Wireless communic…1,030H04L · Digital informati…762H01Q · Antennas157G06N · Computing based o…118F21S · Non-portable ligh…22G10L · Speech & audio an…22H04J · Multiplex communi…15↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Technology-branch counts are measured in patent records; a single patent family can carry several IPC classes, so class totals can exceed the family total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Key Patents

Highly cited patent families surfaced by the query

Citation-heavy patent families returned by the query. Use this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents.

Featured patent
US20250385442A1Published 2025-12-18

RF frontend for universal 5g/6g and leo satellite …

Swiftlink Technologies INC.

According to one embodiment, a millimeter wave (mmWave) antenna unit includes at least one dual-polarized radiating element having a dual feed including a first feed point and a second feed point, a first antenna feed line coupled to the at least one dual-polarized radiating element at the first feed point, and a second antenna feed line coupled to the at… (excerpt from the patent abstract)

RF frontend for universal 5g/6g and leo satellite … — patent drawingRF frontend for universal 5g/6g and leo satellite … — patent drawing
Representative drawings from the patent document.
Open this patent in Eureka →
Highly cited patent families surfaced by this query
#PatentCitations
1Facilitation of dynamic edge computations for 6g o…153
2Cellular system33
3Cellular system23
4Fast multi-beam listen before talk21
5Facilitation of dynamic edge computations for 6G o…19
6Method and apparatus for monitoring and reporting …18
7Method and device for RIS automatic setup18
8Cellular system17

Ranked by total forward citations. Citation counts favour older and broadly cited patent families, and broad or adjacent patents may appear when they match the search scope. Treat this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents. Some patent titles may be shown in their original, non-English language where an accurate translation could not be guaranteed.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Citation-ranked patent families surfaced by this query.Open in Eureka →
Insights

What the competitive structure means for R&D investment decisions

The combination of a single dominant incumbent, rapid recent growth, and a sparse second tier creates both constraints and openings for R&D planners. Understanding each dimension helps allocate effort efficiently.

Growth

Growth stage — annual filings expanding, multi-year trajectory positive

The lifecycle evidence places this field in the Growth stage, with annual filings still rising and recent years understated by publication lag. The field moved from essentially zero activity in 2017 to a corpus-period peak in 2023, indicating a fast-developing technology area that has not yet reached saturation. Early movers filing now can still shape the claim landscape before consolidation.

Growth stage
Concentration

Extreme concentration — one dominant incumbent, fragmented second tier

The top five filers hold 89% of the combined total among the hundred largest filers, and the leader alone accounts for 1,240 patent families against a next-best of 22. New entrants face a landscape where the dominant player has established deep coverage in H04B and H04W. Strategic entry paths are more viable in adjacent or underserved branches than in the core transmission and network-protocol space.

High concentration
Collaboration

Samsung-anchored co-filing network, with AT&T as the most active independent pair

The most active co-filing pair is AT&T Intellectual Property I L.P. and AT&T Mobility II LLC, with 10 joint families, reflecting an intra-group collaboration strategy. Samsung Electronics co-files with its Beijing R&D center (6 families), Seoul National University R&DB Foundation (5 families), and Yonsei University’s industrial foundation (3 families), demonstrating a hub-and-spoke model linking the industrial leader to academic partners. Southeast University co-files with Purple Mountain Laboratory and Nanjing Falcon Eye Electronic Technology, pointing to an emerging Chinese academic-industry cluster.

Hub-and-spoke ecosystem
Geography

PCT and EPO lead filings; US and China follow as key national offices

WIPO (PCT) and Europe (EPO) are the top two filing destinations, indicating that applicants are prioritizing broad international protection. The United States and China rank third and fourth respectively, while India ranks fifth — an unusual placement that likely reflects the volume of individual and academic filers from that jurisdiction. Japan, South Korea, and other offices hold minimal counts, suggesting limited national-phase entry outside the main four markets.

PCT-first strategy
PatSnap Eureka · TRIZ Solution Agent
Facing a specific technical bottleneck in this field?

Go beyond the landscape: Eureka’s TRIZ Solution agent breaks down an R&D problem and returns patented concept solutions, each with a technical approach and cited patent & literature evidence.

Solve it in Eureka →
Top collaboration links
ApplicantCollaboratorCo-filings
AT&T知识产权一部有限合伙公司AT&T移动第二有限责任公司10
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.Beijing Samsung Telecom R&D Center6
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.Seoul National University R&DB Foundation5
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.Yonsei University Industry Foundation3
Southeast UniversityPurple Mountain Laboratory2
Southeast UniversityNanjing Falcon Eye Electronic Technology Co., Ltd.2
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.Yonsei University1

Co-filing pairs, ranked by the number of jointly-filed patent families.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Insight cards draw on applicant ranking, collaboration pairs, lifecycle classification, and jurisdiction distribution from the patent corpus.Explore insights →
Leaders

Samsung Electronics leads by a structural margin; challengers occupy narrow technical niches

The applicant field divides into one overwhelmingly dominant industrial filer and a dispersed second tier of telecom operators, specialized entities, and universities. Momentum data reinforces Samsung’s trajectory while showing divergent paths among challengers.

Leader · Samsung Electronics

Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.

Samsung Electronics holds 1,240 patent families and shows a momentum trend of 21× vs its prior three-year period, confirming that this is an accelerating commitment rather than a legacy position. Its technical focus is concentrated in H04B 7 (Transmission, general), H04W 72 (Wireless communication networks), and H04L 5 (Digital information transmission) — the three core air-interface and network-protocol classes that define the field’s mainstream. Its Beijing R&D subsidiary co-files on a subset of these families, extending the portfolio with local research output.

patent families: 1,240
Challenger · Fractal Networks LLC

Fractal Networks LLC

Fractal Networks LLC holds 22 patent families and is the highest-ranked filer outside Samsung, though its volume is roughly 56 times smaller. Momentum data for this entity is not separately reported in the evidence. AT&T Intellectual Property I L.P., the third-ranked filer with 19 patent families, shows a declining momentum trend of –80% vs its prior period, suggesting a pullback in active prosecution in this space. Both challengers focus on H04B 7 and H04W classes, overlapping directly with the leader’s core territory.

patent families: 22
🔍
See the full applicant breakdown
Access ranked profiles for all top-100 filers, including universities, telecom operators, and emerging entrants.
Qualcomm Inc.Southeast University+ more
Unlock full assignee analysis →
Leading-applicant momentum (recent 3 yrs, lag-adjusted)
ApplicantRecent (3 yrs)Trend
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.997▲ 21× vs prior 3-yr
AT&T知识产权一部有限合伙公司3▼ -80%
Southeast University3▲ new entrant
AT&T移动第二有限责任公司2▲ new entrant
Beijing Samsung Telecom R&D Center6▲ new entrant
SwiftLink Technologies Inc.3▲ new entrant
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Player cards are based on the patent family ranking and applicant momentum data from the corpus.Explore players →
Adjacent Branches

Under-served branches adjacent to the dominant transmission core

Several IPC branches appear in the corpus at notably lower counts relative to the dominant H04B and H04W classes. These represent observations of relative sparsity; where technical value and a plausible entry path exist, they are noted.

H01Q · Antennas

Antenna design holds 157 patent records — a count that is sparse relative to the transmission and networking classes but represents a branch with clear technical relevance to Sub-THz and mmWave propagation. Beam-steering arrays, reconfigurable intelligent surfaces, and compact high-gain antenna structures are active research problems in the 6G frequency range. An entrant with antenna hardware expertise could file in H01Q with lower head-to-head overlap against Samsung’s predominantly protocol-layer portfolio; Southeast University and SwiftLink Technologies are among the few current filers with an H01Q emphasis.

Search this in Eureka →

G06N · AI-driven signal processing

G06N (Computing based on AI models) holds 118 patent records, placing it fourth in the technology composition but well below the transmission core. The intersection of machine-learning inference with Sub-THz channel estimation, beam management, and interference mitigation is an emerging technical area where the patent record is still thin. An entrant combining AI/ML expertise with wireless domain knowledge could find less contested ground here than in core H04B or H04W filings.

Search this in Eureka →
🔒
Unlock the full white-space map
See all sparse IPC branches, their relative counts, and suggested entry queries across the full 6G Sub-THz / mmWave corpus.
G01S · Radar, sonar & positioningH01P · Waveguides & microwave elements+ more
Unlock full analysis →
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Adjacent branch observations are based on relative IPC class counts within the corpus; sparsity is measured against the dominant H04B and H04W classes.Explore emerging →
Route Matrix

How leading applicants differ by technology route

Route coverage across the main technology branches in the current evidence set.

PlayerH04B 7 · Transmission (general)H04W 72 · Wireless communication networksH04L 5 · Digital information transmissionH04W 24 · Wireless communication networksH04B 17 · Transmission (general)
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.Strong · 1,214Strong · 689Moderate · 597Moderate · 303Emerging · 228
AT&T Intellectual Property I, L.P.Strong · 19Moderate · 7AbsentAbsentAbsent
Beijing Samsung Telecom R&D CenterStrong · 6Strong · 4Moderate · 2Strong · 4Moderate · 2
AT&T Mobility II LLCStrong · 10AbsentAbsentAbsentAbsent
Southeast UniversityStrong · 7AbsentAbsentAbsentModerate · 3
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Matrix values are measured in patent records and should not be compared directly with family-level applicant totals.Compare in Eureka →
Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

Still have questions? PatSnap Eureka answers them from patent and research data.Ask Eureka →
PatSnap Eureka

Map your own 6G Sub-THz / mmWave patent landscape

Join 18,000+ innovators using PatSnap Eureka to map any technology landscape: search 2B+ patents and papers, surface key assignees, and generate a report like this in minutes.

18,000+innovators worldwide
2B+patents & papers
< 5 minper landscape report

Disclaimer. This page is generated from PatSnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. PatSnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Explore in Eureka ↗
Powered by PatSnap Eureka

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.