Book a demo

Aboveground Storage Tank Design Patents: Leaders & Filing Trends 2026

Aboveground Storage Tank Design Patents: Leaders & Filing Trends 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/aboveground-storage-tank-design-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Storage Tanks & Terminals
Aboveground Storage Tank Design Patents: Who Leads and Where Filings Are Headed
  • Concentrated at the top. The five leading assignees hold 30.3% of all 244 records in scope, and the ranked leader alone accounts for 23 filings.
  • Filing activity peaked in 2021 at 30 records and fell to just 1 by 2024 — a -97% swing that predates the usual 18-month publication lag, so treat it as a real pullback, not a data gap.
  • Containers and packaging claims dominate the class mix, with B65D present on 61.9% of records, while testing, measuring and fire-fighting classes each sit in single digits.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
244
Published Records
30%
Top-5 Share of All Records
-97%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
US
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (30 records) with 2024 (1) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 244 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What this landscape covers

Aboveground storage tank design spans the mechanical and structural claims that keep large-volume liquid storage tanks safe and efficient: shell course construction, rim seal systems, wind girders, and the internal floating roof hardware that reduces evaporation loss. The dataset behind this page pulls 244 published records filed between 2015 and mid-2026 that match aboveground storage tank and floating roof tank terminology alongside specific mechanical subsystems — rim seals, wind girders, bottom settlement, annular plate corrosion, breathing loss and internal floating roofs.

Filing offices skew toward the United States and China, with Japan, Canada, WIPO and the EPO each contributing a meaningful but smaller share — a pattern consistent with a mature industrial infrastructure niche rather than a fast-globalising one. Because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, the most recent one to two years in any trend chart will always look thinner than they eventually turn out to be.

Filing activity and technology composition, 2015-2026
  1. 1CHICAGO BRIDGE & IRON CO23
  2. 2AXON4D CORP16
  3. 3IMHOF HEINRICH14
  4. 4BASF SE12
  5. 5AST SERVICES9
  6. 6BOARD OF RGT THE UNIV OF TEXAS SYST9
  7. 7SANDBORN ROOFS8
  8. 8VERTICAL TANK INC8
  9. 9A HAK INDAL SERVICES8
  10. 10Guan Kaihua7
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Aboveground Storage Tank Design covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
The Numbers

Filing trend and technology composition

Two views of the same 244 records: how filing volume moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses carry the claims.

A sharp peak, then a pullback

Filings ran from 8 in 2017 to a peak of 30 in 2021, then declined to 1 by 2024 — a -97% move over that three-year span. 2025 and 2026 figures are still filling in under the usual publication lag and should not be read as a continuation of the decline.

A sharp peak, then a pullback0815233082017201820192020302021202220232024202512026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Containers and packaging carry the claim weight

B65D (containers and packaging) appears on 61.9% of the 244 records, far ahead of flow/level measuring (G01F, 7.4%), structural testing (G01M, 7.0%), cleaning (B08B, 5.7%), pipe fittings (F16L, 5.3%), material analysis (G01N, 5.3%), acyclic compounds (C07C, 4.9%) and fire-fighting (A62C, 4.1%). Because records can carry multiple classes, these shares sum to well over 100% of the record total.

Containers and packaging carry the claim weightB65D · Containers & packaging15161.9%G01F · Flow, level & volume measuring187.4%G01M · Testing machine & structure ba…177.0%B08B · Cleaning (general)145.7%F16L · Pipes & pipe fittings135.3%G01N · Material analysis & testing135.3%C07C · Acyclic & carbocyclic compounds124.9%A62C · Fire-fighting104.1%Other15161.9%

Shares are the percentage of the 244 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Aboveground Storage Tank Design covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Aboveground Storage Tank Design with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about aboveground storage tank design and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

The most-cited records in this space

Representative Filing
US6164479A2000-12-26

Internal floating roof tank and peripheral seal (US6164479A)

ULTRA FLOTA CORP.

A floating roof storage tank fitted with a peripheral sealing ring of shoes distributed around the internal floating roof, held against the tank wall by spring-loaded or resilient members that travel horizontally without vertical movement, keeping the roof centred and covering the shoe-to-deck gap with a flexible material to limit product loss.Filed by Ultra Flota Corp., granted 2000-12-26 — a foundational rim-seal design still cited by later floating-roof filings in this dataset.

US6164479A — patent drawing 1US6164479A — patent drawing 2
View full record
Highest-cited records in scope
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US6282863B1Scaffoldless tank erection method51
2US5560509AGuide pole fitting seal for floating roof storage tanks40
3US20040045379A1Hydraulic and electric umbilical connection for an inspection vehicle for inspecting a liquid-filled tank31
4US20040036859A1Method for inspecting an internal floating roof in a liquid-containing storage tank31
5US20040016755A1Removable hatch cover for an internal floating roof manway25
6US6929142B2Removable hatch cover for an internal floating roof manway20
7US20160229627A1Floating roof monitoring with laser distance measurement18
8US7017432B2Hydraulic and electric umbilical connection for an inspection vehicle for inspecting a liquid-filled tank18
9US7246468B2Shade assembly for storage tank and method of use thereof18
10US20040137610A1Biofilter system equipped with inlet load equalizer for removing volatile organic compounds18

Citation counts inside a searched corpus favour older filings — read this as a signal of influence on later filers, not of current technical importance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Aboveground Storage Tank Design covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the data means for filing strategy

Three read-throughs from the concentration, timing and class data above.

Concentration
30.3% of 244 records
held by top 5 assignees

The top of the field is tight, the tail is long

The five leading assignees combined hold 30.3% of all 244 records, and the ranked leader alone sits at 23 filings against a fifth place of 9 and a tenth place of 7 — a steep drop-off after the leader rather than a gradual one. The other 87 ranked assignees each hold a handful of filings, typical of an infrastructure niche where many operators and service firms file defensively around one core design.

Based on the 97-company assignee ranking.
Timing
30 → 1
peak year to 2024

The 2021 peak has not been replaced

Filing volume rose from 8 in 2017 to a peak of 30 in 2021, then fell to 1 by 2024, a -97% move. That kind of drop after a peak year typically marks either a design generation reaching maturity or a shift of R&D attention elsewhere in the terminal — the 2025-2026 figures are too early, under the publication lag, to say which.

2024 is the most recent year treated as complete.
Claim density
61.9% B65D
of 244 records

Containers and packaging claims are the crowded lane

B65D touches 61.9% of records in scope, meaning most filers are claiming some aspect of the tank-as-container itself rather than adjacent measurement or fire-safety systems. G01F, G01M, B08B, F16L, G01N, C07C and A62C each sit in the mid-single digits, suggesting narrower but far less occupied claim territory.

Class shares sum to more than 100% because records can carry multiple IPC codes.
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to aboveground storage tank design, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Aboveground Storage Tank Design covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who is filing, and what they are filing near

The ranked leader's 23 filings anchor the field, but co-assignee pairs and recent-year momentum tell a more granular story about who is active now.

Leader
23
records

One assignee sets the pace

The top-ranked assignee holds 23 records, roughly two and a half times the fifth-place count of 9, marking it out as the reference point the rest of the field files around rather than one peer among equals.

From the 97-company assignee ranking.
Co-filing
8 pairs
co-assignee combinations

Collaboration is limited but concentrated

Only 8 co-assignee pairs appear across the dataset, and the strongest of them recur around the same small group of individual co-inventors, pointing to a handful of long-running engineering partnerships rather than broad industry consortia.

Strongest pair recurs across three shared filings.
Momentum
0 in latest year
for most tracked assignees

Recent-year activity has gone quiet across the board

Momentum tracking shows most previously active assignees, including the ranking's top names, at zero filings in the latest tracked year, with one exception logging a single filing. This is consistent with the broader 2021-to-2024 pullback rather than any one company exiting the space.

Latest-year counts are still subject to publication lag.
🔍
Under-claimed sub-areas worth a fresh search
Branches adjacent to the core rim-seal and floating-roof claims that carry comparatively few of the 244 records.
Annular plate corrosion monitoringTank bottom settlement sensingBreathing-loss capture systemsWind girder structural optimisationInternal floating roof inspection robotics
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
BASF SE1
Chicago Bridge & Iron Co.0
IMHOF HEINRICH0
AXON4D CORP0-100%
AST SERVICES0
Board of Regents, The University of Texas System0
INTANK INC0
VERTICAL TANK INC0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Aboveground Storage Tank Design covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's Next

Where to take this next

The landscape data points to two practical follow-ups for a team deciding where to file or invest engineering time.

Map the white space claim by claim

Sub-areas like annular plate corrosion monitoring and breathing-loss capture sit well below the 61.9% B65D density — a claim search focused there is more likely to find open ground than another rim-seal filing.

Explore white space in Eureka

Watch for the next filing wave

With most tracked assignees at zero filings in the latest year, the field is due for either consolidation or a fresh design generation; monitoring new applications as they publish will surface which comes first.

Set up monitoring in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Aboveground Storage Tank Design covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions about this landscape

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Aboveground Storage Tank Design covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Aboveground Storage Tank Design in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole aboveground storage tank design corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.