Aboveground Storage Tank Design Patents: Leaders & Filing Trends 2026
- Concentrated at the top. The five leading assignees hold 30.3% of all 244 records in scope, and the ranked leader alone accounts for 23 filings.
- Filing activity peaked in 2021 at 30 records and fell to just 1 by 2024 — a -97% swing that predates the usual 18-month publication lag, so treat it as a real pullback, not a data gap.
- Containers and packaging claims dominate the class mix, with B65D present on 61.9% of records, while testing, measuring and fire-fighting classes each sit in single digits.
Filing growth compares 2021 (30 records) with 2024 (1) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 244 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.
What this landscape covers
Aboveground storage tank design spans the mechanical and structural claims that keep large-volume liquid storage tanks safe and efficient: shell course construction, rim seal systems, wind girders, and the internal floating roof hardware that reduces evaporation loss. The dataset behind this page pulls 244 published records filed between 2015 and mid-2026 that match aboveground storage tank and floating roof tank terminology alongside specific mechanical subsystems — rim seals, wind girders, bottom settlement, annular plate corrosion, breathing loss and internal floating roofs.
Filing offices skew toward the United States and China, with Japan, Canada, WIPO and the EPO each contributing a meaningful but smaller share — a pattern consistent with a mature industrial infrastructure niche rather than a fast-globalising one. Because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, the most recent one to two years in any trend chart will always look thinner than they eventually turn out to be.
Filing trend and technology composition
Two views of the same 244 records: how filing volume moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses carry the claims.
A sharp peak, then a pullback
Filings ran from 8 in 2017 to a peak of 30 in 2021, then declined to 1 by 2024 — a -97% move over that three-year span. 2025 and 2026 figures are still filling in under the usual publication lag and should not be read as a continuation of the decline.
Containers and packaging carry the claim weight
B65D (containers and packaging) appears on 61.9% of the 244 records, far ahead of flow/level measuring (G01F, 7.4%), structural testing (G01M, 7.0%), cleaning (B08B, 5.7%), pipe fittings (F16L, 5.3%), material analysis (G01N, 5.3%), acyclic compounds (C07C, 4.9%) and fire-fighting (A62C, 4.1%). Because records can carry multiple classes, these shares sum to well over 100% of the record total.
Shares are the percentage of the 244 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
Go deeper on Aboveground Storage Tank Design with Eureka
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about aboveground storage tank design and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaThe most-cited records in this space
Internal floating roof tank and peripheral seal (US6164479A)
A floating roof storage tank fitted with a peripheral sealing ring of shoes distributed around the internal floating roof, held against the tank wall by spring-loaded or resilient members that travel horizontally without vertical movement, keeping the roof centred and covering the shoe-to-deck gap with a flexible material to limit product loss.Filed by Ultra Flota Corp., granted 2000-12-26 — a foundational rim-seal design still cited by later floating-roof filings in this dataset.


| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US6282863B1 | Scaffoldless tank erection method | 51 |
| 2 | US5560509A | Guide pole fitting seal for floating roof storage tanks | 40 |
| 3 | US20040045379A1 | Hydraulic and electric umbilical connection for an inspection vehicle for inspecting a liquid-filled tank | 31 |
| 4 | US20040036859A1 | Method for inspecting an internal floating roof in a liquid-containing storage tank | 31 |
| 5 | US20040016755A1 | Removable hatch cover for an internal floating roof manway | 25 |
| 6 | US6929142B2 | Removable hatch cover for an internal floating roof manway | 20 |
| 7 | US20160229627A1 | Floating roof monitoring with laser distance measurement | 18 |
| 8 | US7017432B2 | Hydraulic and electric umbilical connection for an inspection vehicle for inspecting a liquid-filled tank | 18 |
| 9 | US7246468B2 | Shade assembly for storage tank and method of use thereof | 18 |
| 10 | US20040137610A1 | Biofilter system equipped with inlet load equalizer for removing volatile organic compounds | 18 |
Citation counts inside a searched corpus favour older filings — read this as a signal of influence on later filers, not of current technical importance.
Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
Put your own technology through the same analysis
Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →MCP server & REST API
When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →What the data means for filing strategy
Three read-throughs from the concentration, timing and class data above.
The top of the field is tight, the tail is long
The five leading assignees combined hold 30.3% of all 244 records, and the ranked leader alone sits at 23 filings against a fifth place of 9 and a tenth place of 7 — a steep drop-off after the leader rather than a gradual one. The other 87 ranked assignees each hold a handful of filings, typical of an infrastructure niche where many operators and service firms file defensively around one core design.
The 2021 peak has not been replaced
Filing volume rose from 8 in 2017 to a peak of 30 in 2021, then fell to 1 by 2024, a -97% move. That kind of drop after a peak year typically marks either a design generation reaching maturity or a shift of R&D attention elsewhere in the terminal — the 2025-2026 figures are too early, under the publication lag, to say which.
Containers and packaging claims are the crowded lane
B65D touches 61.9% of records in scope, meaning most filers are claiming some aspect of the tank-as-container itself rather than adjacent measurement or fire-safety systems. G01F, G01M, B08B, F16L, G01N, C07C and A62C each sit in the mid-single digits, suggesting narrower but far less occupied claim territory.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to aboveground storage tank design, with the prior art for and against each one.
Who is filing, and what they are filing near
The ranked leader's 23 filings anchor the field, but co-assignee pairs and recent-year momentum tell a more granular story about who is active now.
One assignee sets the pace
The top-ranked assignee holds 23 records, roughly two and a half times the fifth-place count of 9, marking it out as the reference point the rest of the field files around rather than one peer among equals.
Collaboration is limited but concentrated
Only 8 co-assignee pairs appear across the dataset, and the strongest of them recur around the same small group of individual co-inventors, pointing to a handful of long-running engineering partnerships rather than broad industry consortia.
Recent-year activity has gone quiet across the board
Momentum tracking shows most previously active assignees, including the ranking's top names, at zero filings in the latest tracked year, with one exception logging a single filing. This is consistent with the broader 2021-to-2024 pullback rather than any one company exiting the space.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| BASF SE | 1 | — |
| Chicago Bridge & Iron Co. | 0 | — |
| IMHOF HEINRICH | 0 | — |
| AXON4D CORP | 0 | -100% |
| AST SERVICES | 0 | — |
| Board of Regents, The University of Texas System | 0 | — |
| INTANK INC | 0 | — |
| VERTICAL TANK INC | 0 | — |
Where to take this next
The landscape data points to two practical follow-ups for a team deciding where to file or invest engineering time.
Map the white space claim by claim
Sub-areas like annular plate corrosion monitoring and breathing-loss capture sit well below the 61.9% B65D density — a claim search focused there is more likely to find open ground than another rim-seal filing.
Explore white space in EurekaWatch for the next filing wave
With most tracked assignees at zero filings in the latest year, the field is due for either consolidation or a fresh design generation; monitoring new applications as they publish will surface which comes first.
Set up monitoring in EurekaCommon questions about this landscape
The dataset ranks 97 assignees across 244 records, and the field is concentrated at the top: the leading assignee holds 23 records, more than double the fifth-place count of 9. The top five assignees combined account for 30.3% of all 244 records in scope, while the top ten reach 46.7%. Beyond that, filings spread thinly across dozens of companies and individual inventors, each holding only a handful of records, which is typical for infrastructure hardware tied to specific terminal operators and engineering contractors.
Filings peaked at 30 records in 2021 and fell to 1 by 2024, a -97% change over three years according to the tracked data. That kind of drop can reflect a design generation reaching maturity, a shift of engineering attention to adjacent systems, or simply fewer new entrants filing around an established rim-seal and floating-roof architecture. It is worth noting that 2025 and 2026 figures are still incomplete because publication typically lags filing by about 18 months, so the full extent of any rebound or continued decline is not yet visible in this data.
The dominant class is B65D, containers and packaging, appearing on 61.9% of the 244 records in scope, which reflects that most filings claim some structural aspect of the tank itself. Smaller but distinct clusters sit in G01F (flow, level and volume measuring, 7.4%), G01M (structural testing, 7.0%), B08B (cleaning, 5.7%), F16L (pipe fittings, 5.3%), G01N (material analysis, 5.3%), C07C (acyclic compounds, 4.9%) and A62C (fire-fighting, 4.1%). Because a single record can carry multiple IPC codes, these percentages add up to more than 100% of the record total, and they should be read as overlapping coverage rather than a strict breakdown.
US6164479A, granted to Ultra Flota Corp. in 2000, claims an internal floating roof tank with a peripheral sealing ring of shoes held against the tank wall by spring-loaded or otherwise resilient horizontally-travelling members, with a flexible cover over the shoe-to-deck gap to limit product loss. It matters because it establishes a specific mechanical approach to rim sealing that keeps the roof centred without vertical shoe travel, a design choice that later floating-roof filings in this dataset continue to reference. Anyone designing a new rim seal system should check this claim's mechanical linkage details closely before finalising a shoe-and-spring architecture.
The concentration data shows most claim density sitting in B65D container structure and rim-seal hardware, while adjacent branches such as annular plate corrosion monitoring, tank bottom settlement sensing, and breathing-loss capture systems carry comparatively few of the 244 records. These branches touch real operational problems — corrosion-driven tank failures and evaporation losses are well documented industry concerns — but they are not yet heavily claimed in this corpus. A team with a specific sensing or capture mechanism in one of these areas is more likely to find open claim space there than in another rim-seal or shell-course filing.
Research Aboveground Storage Tank Design in depth with Eureka
Go past this page: query the whole aboveground storage tank design corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.