Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →Filing growth compares 2021 (5 records) with 2024 (8) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 614 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.
Absorption chillers replace a mechanical compressor with a heat-driven absorption cycle, and the patent activity in this dataset clusters around two things: the refrigeration hardware that moves the cycle (F25B) and the absorbent-refrigerant chemistry that carries it (C09K), most often lithium bromide solution or an ammonia-water pair. The search covers 614 patent families published between 2015 and mid-2026, filtered to records that explicitly discuss working-fluid or absorbent-refrigerant pair chemistry rather than absorption cooling in general.
Filing counts here are family counts, not raw document counts, which matters in a field with a long institutional history and several corporate lineages (Carrier, DuPont, Honeywell) that have filed continuations and multi-jurisdiction variants over decades. Because publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, the last one or two years in any trend chart will understate real activity — read the 2026 figure as a floor, not a ceiling.
Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.
Two views of the same 614-family corpus: how filing volume has moved year over year, and how that volume splits across IPC subclasses. Together they show a field that is not growing in raw terms but remains chemically diverse in where the claims sit.
Filings ran at 11 in 2017, fell to 4 by the 2022 midpoint, and sit at 2 in the most recent (partial) year. There is no second wave visible in this window — the shape is a single peak followed by a longer decline, with no sign yet of a new filing cycle starting.
F25B (refrigeration & heat pumps) accounts for 572 of 614 records, effectively the whole corpus, since most system claims fall under this subclass by definition. C09K (working-fluid materials) reaches 175 — a substantial secondary cluster — while C23F (corrosion & metal removal, 42) reflects the well-known lithium bromide corrosion problem. F24F, F28D, B01D, F01K and C10G each register in the low tens, marking smaller, more specialised claim territories around air handling, heat exchange, separation, power cycles and hydrocarbon-based fluids.
Shares are the percentage of the 614 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about absorption chiller refrigerant and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaCarbon dioxide gas is bled into an absorption refrigeration system to reduce the alkaline normality of an aqueous lithium bromide solution. The carbon dioxide reacts with lithium hydroxide contained in the solution to form a carbonate, thereby reducing the alkaline normality of the solution.Filed by Carrier Corporation, this 1976 record is one of the earliest in-corpus treatments of lithium bromide alkalinity control — a corrosion-adjacent problem that still shows up in the C23F cluster today.


| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US5846450A | Vapor absorbent compositions comprising potassium formate | 101 |
| 2 | US6253571B1 | Liquid distributor, falling film heat exchanger and absorption refrigeration | 86 |
| 3 | US20100293973A1 | Combined cycle exhaust powered turbine inlet air chilling | 85 |
| 4 | US4373347A | Hybrid double-absorption cooling system | 75 |
| 5 | US3483710A | Cascade absorption refrigeration system | 75 |
| 6 | US3276217A | Maintaining the effectiveness of an additive in absorption refrigeration systems | 73 |
| 7 | US5943874A | Desiccant assisted air conditioning apparatus | 71 |
| 8 | US6909349B1 | Apparatus and method for cooling power transformers | 69 |
| 9 | US5546760A | Generator for absorption heat pumps | 69 |
| 10 | US20150345835A1 | Refrigeration system with absorption cooling | 68 |
Citation counts favour older documents simply because they have had more time to accumulate references inside this searched corpus — treat them as markers of influence on later filers, not as a signal that the underlying chemistry is still the state of the art.
Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →Read together, the trend line, the IPC split and the citation table point to a field where the core system architecture is heavily claimed and the chemistry layer is comparatively open — but only in specific corners.
The peak year in this window was 2017 at 11 filings; by the 2022 midpoint that had fallen to 4, and the latest tracked year sits at 2. Publication lag means the last year or two is undercounted, but even allowing for that, there is no visible second filing wave.
F25B appears in 572 of 614 records, meaning almost every filing touches core refrigeration-cycle mechanics in some form. New entrants competing purely on system architecture are filing into dense, well-mapped prior art.
C09K claims sit at less than a third of the F25B total, and the C23F corrosion cluster (42) shows the alkalinity and metal-attack problem is still being claimed piecemeal rather than solved once. This is the layer where composition-specific claims have more room.
Every assignee tracked for recent-year momentum — from long-established filers to newer entrants — shows zero filings in the latest year, including one entity down 100% year over year. That does not mean the field is abandoned; it means active prosecution has likely shifted to filers outside this named set, or is sitting in the publication-lag window.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to absorption chiller refrigerant, with the prior art for and against each one.
The assignee set spans HVAC OEMs, chemicals majors and a handful of research institutions and universities. None of the tracked names show filings in the latest year, which makes the co-assignee pairs — mostly inventor-company links inside single organisations — more informative than any single company's recent count.
These names anchor the most-cited records and the strongest co-assignee pairs in this corpus, but every one of them shows zero filings in the most recent tracked year. Their portfolios still define the prior art a new filer has to search around, even without current activity.
King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals, Gas Research Institute and Ben-Gurion University of the Negev all appear in the assignee set but at low, non-recurring volume — consistent with sponsored or single-project filings rather than sustained programmes.
The three strongest co-assignee pairs in the corpus all involve E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Company (DuPont) paired with named inventors, which points to concentrated internal R&D rather than cross-company collaboration.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Carrier Corporation | 0 | — |
| COLUMBIA GAS SYSTEM SERVICE CORP | 0 | — |
| E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Company (DuPont) | 0 | — |
| King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals | 0 | -100% |
| Gas Research Institute | 0 | — |
| BorgWarner Inc. | 0 | — |
| Honeywell International Inc. | 0 | — |
| Ben-Gurion University of the Negev | 0 | — |
The dataset points to a mature system-architecture layer and a more open chemistry layer, but confirming either requires looking past this summary at the underlying claims.
Before drafting new working-fluid claims, check the C09K and C23F clusters directly against the corrosion-inhibited and low-GWP formulations named above — the claim density there is much lower than in F25B but not zero.
Explore absorbent chemistry claims in EurekaEvery tracked assignee shows zero filings in the latest year; publication lag means some of that may reverse once 2025–2026 filings clear the pipeline. Re-check assignee momentum in six to twelve months rather than treating the current silence as final.
Set up assignee monitoring in EurekaThe most-cited records in this corpus are decades old; confirm which of their claims have expired or narrowed before assuming they still block new filings.
Review citation chains in EurekaThe two dominant absorbent-refrigerant pairs in commercial absorption chillers are lithium bromide solution with water as the refrigerant, and an ammonia-water pair where ammonia is the refrigerant and water is the absorbent. Lithium bromide systems are more common in building-scale cooling because water is non-toxic and the cycle runs efficiently above 0°C, while ammonia-water systems are used where sub-zero refrigeration is needed since ammonia has a much lower boiling point. This patent corpus reflects that split, with the largest single chemistry cluster (C09K, 175 records) covering working-fluid compositions built around these two pairs.
Aqueous lithium bromide solution is alkaline and, in the presence of oxygen, corrosive to the carbon steel and copper alloys typically used in chiller shells and tubing. The corrosion cluster in this dataset (C23F, 42 records) traces a decades-long effort to control this through inhibitor chemistry and alkalinity management, starting with early approaches like the carbon dioxide dosing method in US3968045A. Because the underlying corrosion mechanism has not changed, filers keep returning to inhibitor formulation and dosing-control claims rather than solving the problem once.
The strongest historical filers in this dataset include Carrier, DuPont, Honeywell and BorgWarner, alongside research bodies such as Gas Research Institute and university programmes. Notably, every one of these tracked assignees shows zero filings in the most recent year, which is unusual for a field with this filing history and likely reflects a combination of publication lag and a genuine slowdown in new system-level patenting. The strongest co-assignee links in the corpus sit inside DuPont's internal inventor network rather than across companies.
Filing volume peaked at 11 in 2017 and has declined since, reaching 4 at the 2022 midpoint and 2 in the most recent tracked year — a flat-to-declining trend rather than a growing one. Because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, the last one or two years understate true activity, so the field is not necessarily dormant, just harder to read at the most recent edge. The more reliable signal is the IPC split: C09K materials claims and C23F corrosion claims remain active relative to the much larger F25B system-hardware base.
The clearest gaps sit below the dense F25B system-architecture layer, in narrower chemistry and component claims: corrosion-inhibited lithium bromide formulations, low-global-warming-potential ammonia-water pairs, falling-film absorber heat-exchanger geometries, and crystallization-prevention methods in the separation stage. These sub-areas show materially lower filing density than core refrigeration-cycle claims, meaning a well-drafted composition or method claim there is less likely to run into blocking prior art than a system-level claim would.
Go past this page: query the whole absorption chiller refrigerant corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.