Accessory Gearbox Patents: Top Companies & Filing Trends 2026
Accessory gearbox and power take-off patents: who holds the claim space and where it is still open
Concentrated at the top. the leading assignee alone accounts for 42 of 205 records, and the top 5 combined hold 65.9% of the field. Filings peaked in 2017 at 34 and have run lower since; the last complete comparison window, 2021 to 2024, shows growth of +17% (6 to 7 records). Treat 2025 and 2026 figures as provisional given publication lag.
- 1PRATT & WHITNEY CANADA CORP42
- 2HAMILTON SUNDSTRAND CORP40
- 3KAWASAKI JUKOGYO KK19
- 4ASTRONICS ADVANCED ELECTRONIC SYSTEMS CORP18
- 5GE AVIO SRL16
See the full accessory gearboxes and power take off analysis in Eureka
- The complete ranking, not just the top five
- Every IPC branch with its share of the corpus
- The most-cited records, and where claim space is still thin
Common questions about accessory gearbox patents
Who holds the most patents on aircraft accessory gearboxes?
In this dataset of 205 records, filings are concentrated at the top, with the leading assignee alone accounting for 42 records and the top five assignees combined holding 65.9% of all records in scope. This pattern is typical of aircraft-engine subsystems, where a handful of OEMs and their systems suppliers control most of the core architecture claims. Anyone entering this space should expect the leading portfolios to cover the fundamental gear-shaft and drive-train configurations, leaving more room in interface and failure-mode hardware than in base architecture.
Is accessory gearbox patent filing activity growing or declining?
Filings peaked in 2017 at 34 records and have not returned to that level since, but that is not the same as a declining field. The last full comparison window with complete data, 2021 to 2024, shows growth of +17%, rising from 6 to 7 records. Because patent publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, the apparent drop in 2025 and 2026 reflects incomplete data rather than reduced inventive activity.
What is the difference between accessory gearbox claims and turbine engine claims in this space?
Only 20.0% of the 205 records in scope carry the dedicated gearing class F16H, while 55.1% carry the gas-turbine plant class F02C and 48.3% carry the turbines/non-positive engines class F01D. This means most accessory-gearbox intellectual property is filed as part of a broader gas-turbine engine disclosure rather than as a standalone transmission patent, which affects how a search or freedom-to-operate review should be scoped: searching F16H alone would miss most of the relevant art.
Disclaimer. This analysis is based on Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent records and is provided for general information and reference only. Patent data carries inherent limitations — recent filings are under-counted because of publication lag, counts may be on a record or family basis, classification and applicant-name data may contain errors or duplicates, and the underlying search query defines the scope shown — so the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing here is an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Verify independently and review with qualified patent and legal professionals before acting on it.
Method: Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Accessory Gearboxes and Power Take Off covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish. Every share divides by all records in scope. Data: Patsnap Eureka. See the full landscape report.