Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →Accident tolerant fuel (ATF) concepts cover the materials and design changes meant to slow steam oxidation and hydrogen generation in a loss-of-coolant event, principally through chromium-coated zirconium cladding, silicon carbide composite cladding, and ceramic microencapsulated fuel forms. This landscape draws on 25 published records filed between 2015 and the 2026 cut-off, spanning steam oxidation kinetics, irradiation stability, manufacturing scalability and licensing-pathway claims tied to lead test rod deployment.
The corpus is small relative to broader nuclear fuel patenting, which makes single filers and single families visible in a way they would not be in a larger field. Readers should treat any one record as materially shifting the picture, not as noise.
Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.
Two views of the same 25-record corpus: filings by year, and the IPC subclasses those filings carry. Because a record can sit in more than one subclass, the composition shares sum above 100%.
Activity starts at zero in 2017, climbs to a peak of 5 filings in 2020, and tapers toward the 2026 cut-off. The most recent year is a partial count and understates true filing volume once the typical 18-month publication lag is factored in.
G21C (nuclear reactors) covers 80.0% of records, confirming that most claims sit at the reactor-and-fuel-assembly level rather than in coating chemistry alone. C23C (coating and surface deposition) and C04B (ceramics) trail well behind at 24.0% and 12.0%, marking the materials-science slice of the field as comparatively thin.
Shares are the percentage of the 25 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about accident tolerant fuel concepts and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaThis family, published as US20170287575A1 and carried forward in US11101048B2 and WO2017171937A1, describes a fully ceramic microencapsulated fuel using a burnable poison as a sintering aid. It anchors the ceramic-fuel branch of the corpus and is the most-cited record in the field by a wide margin.Cited 26 times, the highest count in this corpus.


| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US20170287575A1 | Fully ceramic microencapsulated fuel fabricated with burnable poison as sintering aid | 26 |
| 2 | US20200273684A1 | Method and apparatus for metal and ceramic nanolayering for accident tolerant nuclear fuel, particle accelera… | 12 |
| 3 | US11101048B2 | Fully ceramic microencapsulated fuel fabricated with burnable poison as sintering aid | 6 |
| 4 | WO2017171937A1 | Fully ceramic microencapsulated fuel fabricated with burnable poison as sintering aid | 6 |
| 5 | US12211679B2 | Method and apparatus for metal and ceramic nanolayering for accident tolerant nuclear fuel, particle accelera… | 2 |
| 6 | US20260005004A1 | Method and apparatus for metal and ceramic nanolayering for accident tolerant nuclear fuel, particle accelera… | 1 |
| 7 | WO2020176536A1 | Method and apparatus for metal and ceramic nanolayering for accident tolerant nuclear fuel, particle accelera… | 1 |
Citation counts favour older records simply because they have had more time to accumulate references; treat this as a signal of influence within the searched corpus, not of current technical importance.
Publication numbers are shown where the record carries one (7 of 7 rows); clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →Three signals stand out once the ranking, the trend and the classification data are read together.
The leading assignee holds 11 records; by fifth place the count is down to 1. With only 7 companies in the entire ranking, this is a field with a dominant filer and a long, thin tail rather than a genuinely competitive multi-party race.
Filings rose from zero in 2017 to a peak of 5 in 2020, then eased off. A growth rate cannot be computed reliably from the years remaining once publication lag is stripped out, but the shape is a single wave rather than a steady climb.
G21C nuclear-reactor classification touches 80.0% of the 25 records in scope, while coating chemistry (C23C, 24.0%) and ceramics (C04B, 12.0%) are comparatively under-claimed. Filers are staking reactor-and-assembly-level ground more than the underlying materials science.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to accident tolerant fuel concepts, with the prior art for and against each one.
The ranking is short enough that each assignee's position is meaningful on its own, and the recent-year momentum data shows the field has gone quiet for everyone except the newest entrant.
The top-ranked assignee holds 11 of the records in this corpus, well ahead of the rest of the ranked list. Its most-cited family, on ceramic microencapsulated fuel, is also the most-cited record in the whole dataset.
FORERO, GREGORY ALAVRO filed the sole 2026 record in this corpus, a GPU-accelerated reactor digital twin covering multiple cladding configurations including chromium-coated and silicon carbide options. It is the only assignee with any activity in the latest year.
Assignees that built the ceramic-fuel and coated-cladding base of this corpus, including one filer with a -100% year-on-year drop, show no filings in the latest tracked year. That leaves the field's most recent activity concentrated in reactor-control software rather than materials.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| FORERO GREGORY ALAVRO | 1 | — |
| Ultra Safe Nuclear Corp | 0 | — |
| Starfire Industries LLC | 0 | -100% |
| KEPCO Nuclear Fuel Co., Ltd. | 0 | — |
| Xi'an Jiaotong University | 0 | — |
The dataset points to a small set of next steps for anyone deciding where to file or where to license in.
The only 2026 filing sits in reactor control software rather than cladding materials. If that pattern continues, licensing conversations may shift from materials chemistry toward simulation and control claims.
Explore reactor control filingsCoating adhesion, joint sealing and manufacturing scale-up carry far fewer filings than the reactor-level claims that dominate this corpus, and may offer cleaner room for a first claim.
Map the white space in EurekaIn this dataset, it means a published record whose claims combine an accident-tolerant fuel or cladding concept, such as chromium-coated cladding, silicon carbide composite cladding, or ceramic microencapsulated fuel, with a specific performance or deployment angle like steam oxidation kinetics, irradiation stability, manufacturing scalability, licensing pathway, or lead test rod testing. The search string used to build this landscape required both elements to be present. That combination is why the corpus is small (25 records) relative to nuclear fuel patenting generally, and why individual filings carry more weight in the ranking than they would in a larger field.
The ranking returned for this topic covers 7 companies, with the leading assignee holding 11 records and a steep drop to just 1 record by fifth place. That shape, a dominant filer with a thin tail, is typical of a niche technical combination rather than a broad commercial race. It means due diligence on freedom to operate should focus heavily on the leader's family rather than spreading attention evenly across the ranked list.
Filing activity rose from zero in 2017 to a peak of 5 records in 2020, then eased off toward the 2026 cut-off. A reliable growth rate cannot be stated because too few complete years remain once the typical 18-month publication lag is accounted for. The honest read is a single wave of activity around 2020 rather than a steady upward trend, with the most recent years understated in the raw counts.
Reactor-level claims dominate: the G21C nuclear-reactors IPC subclass appears on 80.0% of the 25 records in scope. Coating and surface-deposition claims (C23C) sit at 24.0% and ceramics claims (C04B) at 12.0%, meaning the underlying materials chemistry is comparatively under-claimed next to reactor and fuel-assembly level filings. That gap is worth checking before assuming a materials-focused claim will run into dense prior art.
The newest record, US20260221301A1, filed by FORERO, GREGORY ALAVRO, is a GPU-accelerated real-time digital twin for controlling land-based pressurized water reactors. It models multiple cladding configurations, including chromium-coated zirconium alloy, iron-chromium-aluminum alloy and silicon carbide composites, within a closed-loop control system rather than claiming a new material itself. It is the only filing in the corpus from the latest tracked year, and it signals that some recent activity is moving toward simulation and control rather than cladding chemistry.
Go past this page: query the whole accident tolerant fuel concepts corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.
Help us improve
Something wrong, out of date, or missing on this page? Tell us and it goes straight to the team that maintains it.
This page