https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/active-clamp-flyback-and-resonant-topologies-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Power Electronics Patent Landscape
Active clamp flyback and resonant converter patents: who holds the ground and where it is still open
  • Filing sits well below its 2018 peak of 40, yet the 2021-to-2024 span still shows +14% growth, the only trend window in this dataset that is complete enough to read as a direction.
  • The top 5 assignees hold 22.6% of all 372 records, and the top 10 hold 33.3% — concentrated enough to matter, but with a long tail of single- and double-digit filers behind them.
  • 96.2% of records sit in H02M power conversion, while adjacent classes like G05F control (1.3%) and G01R measurement (1.6%) are touched by only a handful of filings each.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
372
Published Records
23%
Top-5 Share of All Records
+14%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
US
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (29 records) with 2024 (33) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 372 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··8 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Field Overview

What this landscape covers

Active clamp flyback and LLC resonant converter topologies address the same underlying problem from two circuit families: recovering energy trapped in transformer leakage inductance and achieving zero voltage switching across a wide load range. The search set here pulls 372 published records filed or published between 2015 and mid-2026, gated on claim or description language covering zero voltage switching, transformer leakage inductance, synchronous rectification, light load efficiency, control mode, or magnetizing current in combination with an active clamp flyback or LLC resonant converter title term.

That gate is narrow by design: it captures documents that engage directly with the switching and control mechanics of these two topologies, not every power-supply patent that happens to mention a flyback stage. The result is a working set for tracking which companies are actively defending claim space around soft-switching control and synchronous rectification, rather than a full census of AC/DC conversion patents.

Filing activity and technology composition, 2015–2026
  1. 1MORNSUN GUANGZHOU SCI & TECH25
  2. 2HUAWEI DIGITAL POWER TECH CO LTD17
  3. 3SEMICON COMPONENTS IND LLC16
  4. 4TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INC14
  5. 5DELTA ELECTRONICS INC(CN)12
  6. 6SOLUM CO LTD10
  7. 7INFINEON TECHNOLOGIES AMERICAS CORP8
  8. 8SANKEN ELECTRIC CO LTD8
  9. 9HANGZHOU SILAN MICROELECTRONICS CO LTD7
  10. 10SOUTHEAST UNIV7
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Active Clamp Flyback and Resonant Topologies covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Filing Data

Filing trend and technology composition

Two views of the same 372-record set: filing activity by year, and the IPC subclasses those records fall into. Because a single record can carry several IPC codes, the class shares below sum to more than 100% of the record total.

A peak in 2018, a recovery into 2024

Filings ran from 26 in 2017 to a peak of 40 in 2018, then eased before rebuilding: the 2021-to-2024 span shows 29 rising to 33 records, a +14% increase over that three-year window. 2025 and 2026 figures are visibly lower, but publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, so those two years understate actual filing activity rather than signalling a genuine slowdown.

A peak in 2018, a recovery into 2024010203040262017402018201920202021202220232024202582026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Power conversion dominates; adjacent classes are thin

H02M (power conversion) carries 96.2% of the 372 records, confirming this is fundamentally a power-conversion-circuit dataset. The next-largest classes — H01F transformers and inductors at 5.1%, H05B heating and lighting circuits at 4.6%, and H02J power supply systems at 3.8% — are all secondary groupings, while measurement (G01R, 1.6%) and control-variable classes (G05F, 1.3%) barely register, marking them as thin claim territory rather than crowded ground.

Power conversion dominates; adjacent classes are thinH02M · Power conversion (AC/DC etc.)35896.2%H01F · Magnets, inductors & transform…195.1%H05B · Electric heating & lighting ci…174.6%H02J · Power supply & grid systems143.8%H02H · Protective circuit arrangements92.4%B60L · Electric vehicle propulsion71.9%G01R · Electric & magnetic measurement61.6%G05F · Electric/magnetic variable con…51.3%Other143.8%

Shares are the percentage of the 372 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Active Clamp Flyback and Resonant Topologies covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Active Clamp Flyback and Resonant Topologies with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about active clamp flyback and resonant topologies and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Prior Art

Most-cited records in this set

Representative Filing
US7193866B12007-03-20

Half-bridge LLC resonant converter with a synchronous rectification function (US7193866B1)

CHICONY POWER TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD.

Discloses a half-bridge LLC resonant converter combining a first and second switch, a first and second transformer, a controller, and dual synchronous rectifiers. The controller drives the synchronous rectifiers directly, and the coupled second transformer in turn drives the primary-side switches directly — replacing conventional rectification with a low-conducting-resistance synchronous pair controlled through the transformer coupling itself.Filed by Chicony Power Technology; published 2007-03-20, predating the bulk of this dataset and illustrating the baseline synchronous-rectification architecture later filings build on or design around.

US7193866B1 — patent drawing 1US7193866B1 — patent drawing 2
View full record
Highest-citation documents
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US20120250360A1LLC controller with programmable fractional burst frequency106
2US20140268908A1Converter topologies95
3US6429604B2Power feedback power factor correction scheme for multiple lamp operation94
4US20170264206A1Active clamp flyback converter92
5US20020011801A1Power feedback power factor correction scheme for multiple lamp operation86
6CN101707440ALLC谐振变换器控制方法、同步整流控制方法及装置80
7US20140198536A1Resonant Converters and Methods72
8US7193866B1Half-bridge LLC resonant converter with a synchronous rectification function71
9US20180287481A1Switching Time Optimizer for Soft Switching of An Isolated Converter59
10US20140313790A1Optimal Trajectory Control for LLC Resonant Converter for Soft Start-Up56

Citation counts accumulate over time, so older records are structurally favoured; treat this as a map of influence within the corpus, not a ranking of current relevance.

Patent titles are shown in the language they were filed in, not translated, so that each record stays verifiable against the original filing — a translated title will not match in Eureka or in any national register. Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Active Clamp Flyback and Resonant Topologies covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis


  
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Landscape Signals

What the numbers indicate

Three read-outs from the filing, concentration and geographic data that matter for a freedom-to-operate or whitespace call.

Concentration
22.6% / 33.3%
top 5 / top 10 share of 372 records

Leadership is real but not locked in

The top 5 assignees combine for 22.6% of all 372 records and the top 10 for 33.3% — enough to show sustained investment from a handful of players, but with two-thirds of the field held by the remaining ranked companies and unranked filers. A leader at 25 records set against a tenth-place figure of 7 shows the drop-off is gradual, not a cliff.

Based on the 100-company ranked assignee list
Filing momentum
29 → 33 (+14%)
records, 2021 to 2024

Growth resumed after the 2018 peak

After peaking at 40 records in 2018, filings dipped before climbing again: 2021's 29 records rose to 33 by 2024, a +14% gain over that span. The 2025–2026 figures sit lower still, but that reflects publication lag rather than declining filing activity.

2024 is the most recent year treated as complete
Geographic filing
US 152 · CN 132
records by receiving office

Filing is split between two home markets

United States and China receiving offices account for the bulk of filings at 152 and 132 records respectively, with Europe (23), Taiwan (21), WIPO/PCT (18) and India (5) trailing well behind. That split suggests parallel domestic prosecution strategies rather than a single global-first filing pattern.

Receiving office counts, all 372 records
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to active clamp flyback and resonant topologies, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Active Clamp Flyback and Resonant Topologies covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Competitive Set

Who is filing, and where the field is still open

The ranked list runs to 100 companies rather than a curated top tier, and momentum data show recent-year activity has cooled even among the largest historical filers — a sign the field's competitive shape is due for a reshuffle rather than settled.

Leader position
25 records
top-ranked assignee

A single leader, not a duopoly

The leading assignee holds 25 of the 372 records, well ahead of the fifth-place figure of 12 and tenth-place figure of 7. That gap between first and fifth suggests one company has built a genuinely larger portfolio rather than the field being split evenly among a small cluster.

Assignee ranking, 372 records in scope
Recent momentum
0 in latest year
across several major historical filers

Historical leaders show no latest-year filings

Several of the assignees with the largest historical portfolios show zero filings in the latest tracked year. Combined with the 2025–2026 publication lag, this does not necessarily mean withdrawal from the space, but it does mean recent competitive activity cannot be read from the biggest historical names alone.

Recent-year momentum by assignee
Co-filing
2 pairs
co-assignee relationships identified

Collaboration is rare, not structural

Only two co-assignee pairs appear across the dataset, each linked by a single shared record. Filing in this space is overwhelmingly a single-assignee activity rather than one built on joint ventures or foundry-and-fabless partnerships.

Co-assignee pair count, whole dataset
🔍
Under-claimed sub-areas worth a closer look
Classes with only a handful of records relative to the 372-record base, where claim space is comparatively open.
Magnetizing-current sensing for control loopsLight-load burst-mode control (G05F overlap)EV-side active clamp integration (B60L overlap)Protective circuits for synchronous rectifiers (H02H)In-situ leakage inductance measurement (G01R)
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Guangzhou Jinsheng Electronic Technology Co., Ltd.0
Texas Instruments Inc.0
Delta Electronics, Inc.0
Huawei Technologies (USA) Co., Ltd.0
Semiconductor Components Industries, LLC0
Cypress Semiconductor Corporation0
Sanroku Kenkyusho Co., Ltd.0
Sanken Electric Co., Ltd.0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Active Clamp Flyback and Resonant Topologies covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Next Steps

Where to take this analysis

This landscape frames the field; the next step is testing a specific claim, design or filing strategy against it directly.

Check a design against the cited baseline

Run a candidate synchronous-rectification or active-clamp control scheme against the most-cited records in this set, starting with the synchronous rectification architecture in US7193866B1, to see what is already claimed.

Analyse a design in Eureka

Track the leading assignee's recent filings

The leader holds 25 of 372 records but shows no filings in the latest tracked year in this dataset — worth confirming directly whether that reflects publication lag or a genuine shift in strategy.

Monitor assignee activity in Eureka

Probe the under-claimed control classes

G05F and G01R overlaps sit under 2% of records each; a control-loop or measurement claim drafted against this thin base has more room to stand clear of prior art.

Explore whitespace in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Active Clamp Flyback and Resonant Topologies covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions on this landscape

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Active Clamp Flyback and Resonant Topologies covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Active Clamp Flyback and Resonant Topologies in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole active clamp flyback and resonant topologies corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.