Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →Filing growth compares 2021 (29 records) with 2024 (33) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 372 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.
Active clamp flyback and LLC resonant converter topologies address the same underlying problem from two circuit families: recovering energy trapped in transformer leakage inductance and achieving zero voltage switching across a wide load range. The search set here pulls 372 published records filed or published between 2015 and mid-2026, gated on claim or description language covering zero voltage switching, transformer leakage inductance, synchronous rectification, light load efficiency, control mode, or magnetizing current in combination with an active clamp flyback or LLC resonant converter title term.
That gate is narrow by design: it captures documents that engage directly with the switching and control mechanics of these two topologies, not every power-supply patent that happens to mention a flyback stage. The result is a working set for tracking which companies are actively defending claim space around soft-switching control and synchronous rectification, rather than a full census of AC/DC conversion patents.
Two views of the same 372-record set: filing activity by year, and the IPC subclasses those records fall into. Because a single record can carry several IPC codes, the class shares below sum to more than 100% of the record total.
Filings ran from 26 in 2017 to a peak of 40 in 2018, then eased before rebuilding: the 2021-to-2024 span shows 29 rising to 33 records, a +14% increase over that three-year window. 2025 and 2026 figures are visibly lower, but publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, so those two years understate actual filing activity rather than signalling a genuine slowdown.
H02M (power conversion) carries 96.2% of the 372 records, confirming this is fundamentally a power-conversion-circuit dataset. The next-largest classes — H01F transformers and inductors at 5.1%, H05B heating and lighting circuits at 4.6%, and H02J power supply systems at 3.8% — are all secondary groupings, while measurement (G01R, 1.6%) and control-variable classes (G05F, 1.3%) barely register, marking them as thin claim territory rather than crowded ground.
Shares are the percentage of the 372 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about active clamp flyback and resonant topologies and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaDiscloses a half-bridge LLC resonant converter combining a first and second switch, a first and second transformer, a controller, and dual synchronous rectifiers. The controller drives the synchronous rectifiers directly, and the coupled second transformer in turn drives the primary-side switches directly — replacing conventional rectification with a low-conducting-resistance synchronous pair controlled through the transformer coupling itself.Filed by Chicony Power Technology; published 2007-03-20, predating the bulk of this dataset and illustrating the baseline synchronous-rectification architecture later filings build on or design around.


| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US20120250360A1 | LLC controller with programmable fractional burst frequency | 106 |
| 2 | US20140268908A1 | Converter topologies | 95 |
| 3 | US6429604B2 | Power feedback power factor correction scheme for multiple lamp operation | 94 |
| 4 | US20170264206A1 | Active clamp flyback converter | 92 |
| 5 | US20020011801A1 | Power feedback power factor correction scheme for multiple lamp operation | 86 |
| 6 | CN101707440A | LLC谐振变换器控制方法、同步整流控制方法及装置 | 80 |
| 7 | US20140198536A1 | Resonant Converters and Methods | 72 |
| 8 | US7193866B1 | Half-bridge LLC resonant converter with a synchronous rectification function | 71 |
| 9 | US20180287481A1 | Switching Time Optimizer for Soft Switching of An Isolated Converter | 59 |
| 10 | US20140313790A1 | Optimal Trajectory Control for LLC Resonant Converter for Soft Start-Up | 56 |
Citation counts accumulate over time, so older records are structurally favoured; treat this as a map of influence within the corpus, not a ranking of current relevance.
Patent titles are shown in the language they were filed in, not translated, so that each record stays verifiable against the original filing — a translated title will not match in Eureka or in any national register. Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →Three read-outs from the filing, concentration and geographic data that matter for a freedom-to-operate or whitespace call.
The top 5 assignees combine for 22.6% of all 372 records and the top 10 for 33.3% — enough to show sustained investment from a handful of players, but with two-thirds of the field held by the remaining ranked companies and unranked filers. A leader at 25 records set against a tenth-place figure of 7 shows the drop-off is gradual, not a cliff.
After peaking at 40 records in 2018, filings dipped before climbing again: 2021's 29 records rose to 33 by 2024, a +14% gain over that span. The 2025–2026 figures sit lower still, but that reflects publication lag rather than declining filing activity.
United States and China receiving offices account for the bulk of filings at 152 and 132 records respectively, with Europe (23), Taiwan (21), WIPO/PCT (18) and India (5) trailing well behind. That split suggests parallel domestic prosecution strategies rather than a single global-first filing pattern.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to active clamp flyback and resonant topologies, with the prior art for and against each one.
The ranked list runs to 100 companies rather than a curated top tier, and momentum data show recent-year activity has cooled even among the largest historical filers — a sign the field's competitive shape is due for a reshuffle rather than settled.
The leading assignee holds 25 of the 372 records, well ahead of the fifth-place figure of 12 and tenth-place figure of 7. That gap between first and fifth suggests one company has built a genuinely larger portfolio rather than the field being split evenly among a small cluster.
Several of the assignees with the largest historical portfolios show zero filings in the latest tracked year. Combined with the 2025–2026 publication lag, this does not necessarily mean withdrawal from the space, but it does mean recent competitive activity cannot be read from the biggest historical names alone.
Only two co-assignee pairs appear across the dataset, each linked by a single shared record. Filing in this space is overwhelmingly a single-assignee activity rather than one built on joint ventures or foundry-and-fabless partnerships.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Guangzhou Jinsheng Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. | 0 | — |
| Texas Instruments Inc. | 0 | — |
| Delta Electronics, Inc. | 0 | — |
| Huawei Technologies (USA) Co., Ltd. | 0 | — |
| Semiconductor Components Industries, LLC | 0 | — |
| Cypress Semiconductor Corporation | 0 | — |
| Sanroku Kenkyusho Co., Ltd. | 0 | — |
| Sanken Electric Co., Ltd. | 0 | — |
This landscape frames the field; the next step is testing a specific claim, design or filing strategy against it directly.
Run a candidate synchronous-rectification or active-clamp control scheme against the most-cited records in this set, starting with the synchronous rectification architecture in US7193866B1, to see what is already claimed.
Analyse a design in EurekaThe leader holds 25 of 372 records but shows no filings in the latest tracked year in this dataset — worth confirming directly whether that reflects publication lag or a genuine shift in strategy.
Monitor assignee activity in EurekaG05F and G01R overlaps sit under 2% of records each; a control-loop or measurement claim drafted against this thin base has more room to stand clear of prior art.
Explore whitespace in EurekaActive clamp flyback patents typically claim a clamp switch and capacitor across the transformer's primary that recycles leakage-inductance energy and enables zero voltage switching on the main switch, usually in single-switch, isolated designs. LLC resonant converter patents instead claim a resonant tank of inductance and capacitance driven by a half- or full-bridge switch pair, tuned to achieve zero voltage switching across a wider load range. Both families intersect heavily in this dataset because they share control problems — synchronous rectification timing, light-load efficiency, and magnetizing current management — even though the power stages differ. A given patent may claim elements of both if it describes a hybrid or adaptive topology.
The ranked assignee list in this dataset covers 100 companies, with the leading filer holding 25 of the 372 records in scope and the fifth-ranked filer holding 12. The top 5 assignees combined account for 22.6% of all records, and the top 10 account for 33.3%, meaning most of the field sits with companies outside that leading group. This is a moderately concentrated field rather than one dominated by two or three players, so a freedom-to-operate review needs to look well past the top few names.
Filing activity peaked at 40 records in 2018, eased over the following years, and then grew again: 2021's 29 records rose to 33 by 2024, a +14% increase over that three-year span. Figures for 2025 and 2026 in this dataset appear lower, but publication typically lags actual filing by roughly 18 months, so those recent years are undercounted rather than genuinely quieter. The most defensible read is that filing activity has been rebuilding since a mid-decade dip, not shrinking.
US7193866B1 claims a half-bridge LLC resonant converter architecture in which the controller drives synchronous rectifiers on the secondary side directly, and a coupled second transformer in turn drives the primary-side switches directly, replacing conventional diode rectification with a low-conducting-resistance synchronous pair. Anyone designing a synchronous-rectification scheme for a half-bridge LLC topology should check whether their control and drive path overlaps with this transformer-coupled driving arrangement specifically. It was published in 2007, well before most of the records in this dataset, so it functions as baseline prior art that many later filings had to design around rather than a currently live enforcement risk on its own.
The IPC composition shows 96.2% of records sitting in H02M power conversion, while adjacent classes like G05F control-variable circuits (1.3%) and G01R electric and magnetic measurement (1.6%) are touched by only a handful of records. That imbalance points to under-claimed ground in control-loop implementations for light-load and burst-mode operation, and in in-situ measurement techniques for leakage inductance or magnetizing current, rather than in the core power-stage topology itself, which is comparatively dense with prior art.
Go past this page: query the whole active clamp flyback and resonant topologies corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.