Book a demo

Active Noise Control Patents: Who Leads, Where Filings Cooled 2026

Active Noise Control Patents: Who Leads, Where Filings Cooled 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/active-noise-control-systems-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Acoustics & Noise Control
Active Noise Control System Patents: Filing Trends, Leading Assignees and Open Claim Space
  • Filings have cooled since the 2022 peak. 146 families in 2022 against 55 in 2017, with the curve now flattening rather than climbing — a sign that core feedforward and secondary-path claim territory is largely staked out.
  • One IPC subclass dominates. G10K (acoustics & sound generation) covers 1,480 of 1,610 records, nearly four times the next largest subclass, H04R (loudspeakers & transducers) at 370 — most of the contest is happening inside one classification, not spread across many.
  • Momentum has stalled even among the biggest names. Harman, Apple, Honda, Qualcomm and Cirrus Logic all show zero filings in the latest tracked year, consistent with a publication lag rather than an exit — but it means the visible ranking is already a year or more behind reality.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
1,610
Published Records
31%
Top-5 Share of All Records
-28%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
US
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (102 records) with 2024 (73) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 1,610 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What the active noise control patent record shows

Active noise control (ANC) systems cancel unwanted sound by generating an inverse acoustic signal, and the patent record concentrates around the control-theory core of that problem: reference microphone placement, secondary path estimation, LMS-family adaptive filters and feedforward architectures. The search corpus spans 1,610 patent families filed between 2015 and 2026, drawn primarily from the United States, European, Chinese, PCT, Japanese and UK offices, reflecting where headphone, automotive and telecom OEMs seek protection first.

Filing activity rose steadily through the late 2010s, peaked in 2022, and has since flattened — a pattern more consistent with claim space filling up than with the technology cooling off. Because publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, the last one to two years in any chart understate real activity; treat the most recent data points as a floor, not a ceiling.

Filing activity by year, 2017–2026
  1. 1HARMAN BECKER AUTOMOTIVE SYST GMBH141
  2. 2HARMAN INT IND INC133
  3. 3APPLE INC97
  4. 4HONDA MOTOR CO LTD74
  5. 5QUALCOMM INC57
  6. 6GOOGLE LLC35
  7. 7BOSE CORP33
  8. 8AIROHA TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION29
  9. 9HUAWEI TECH CO LTD28
  10. 10CIRRUS LOGIC INT SEMICON LTD24
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Active Noise Control Systems covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology

Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.

10,000 free credits to start
The Data

Filing trends and technology composition

Two views of the same 1,610-family dataset: filings over time, and where those filings sit across the International Patent Classification.

A peak in 2022, then a plateau

Filings grew from 55 in 2017 to a peak of 146 in 2022, then leveled off through the most recent tracked years. Read the tail end cautiously: the 2026 figure is partial and will rise as pending applications publish.

A peak in 2022, then a plateau038751131505520172018201920202021146202220232024202582026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

One subclass carries most of the weight

G10K accounts for 1,480 of the 1,610 records, with H04R (370) and G10L (140) as the next largest groups. Smaller counts in A61F, B60R, H03B, H03H and H04B mark where ANC claims cross into hearing devices, vehicle cabins, oscillator design and RF transmission — narrower but potentially less contested ground.

One subclass carries most of the weightG10K · Acoustics & sound generation1,48091.9%H04R · Loudspeakers & audio transduce…37023.0%G10L · Speech & audio analysis/synthe…1408.7%A61F · Implants & prostheses976.0%B60R · Vehicles, parts & accessories714.4%H03B · Oscillation generation613.8%H03H · Impedance networks & filters533.3%H04B · Transmission (general)523.2%Other46028.6%

Shares are the percentage of the 1,610 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Active Noise Control Systems covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Active Noise Control Systems with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about active noise control systems and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

The prior art doing the most citation work

Representative Filing
US20160300563A12016-10-13

US20160300563A1 — Active noise cancellation featuring secondary path estimation (Qualcomm)

QUALCOMM INCORPORATED

Techniques for robust estimation of a secondary path transfer function in an active noise cancellation (ANC) system are disclosed. The estimation techniques do not rely on a pilot signal. In addition, the techniques provide good approximations of secondary path transfer functions, and further, they can greatly reduce the risk of instability in feedback ANC systems. In one aspect, a secondary path transfer function estimation method includes receiving a first environmental signal (e.g., a reference microphone signal) and a second environmental signal (e.g., an error microphone signal) at an ANC system. The secondary path transfer function is then estimated based on the first environmental sigAbstract excerpted as published.

US20160300563A1 — patent drawing 1US20160300563A1 — patent drawing 2
View full filing
Most-cited records in this dataset
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US20110007907A1Systems, methods, apparatus, and computer-readable media for adaptive active noise cancellation406
2US20100014685A1Adaptive noise control system335
3US20050207585A1Active noise tuning system270
4US5940519AActive noise control system and method for on-line feedback path modeling and on-line secondary path modeling244
5US20110299695A1Active noise cancellation decisions in a portable audio device217
6US20080181422A1Active noise control system211
7US5481615AAudio reproduction system208
8US6278786B1Active noise cancellation aircraft headset system207
9US20140044275A1Active noise control with compensation for error sensing at the eardrum204
10US20100124337A1Quiet zone control system185

Citation counts favour older filings simply because they have had longer to accumulate references inside this corpus — read them as a signal of influence on later filers, not as a measure of present-day importance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Active Noise Control Systems covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers mean for a filing decision

Three patterns stand out once the raw counts are read against filing dates and classification codes.

Concentration
1,480 of 1,610
records classified under G10K

Core acoustics claims are the densest ground

Nearly all activity sits inside G10K, meaning the fundamental control loop — reference sensing, adaptive filtering, secondary path modeling — has been claimed repeatedly across a decade of filings. New entrants competing directly on this loop face a crowded field.

Source: IPC subclass composition, this dataset
Plateau
146 (2022) vs. 8 (2026, partial)
peak year vs. latest tracked year

The filing curve has flattened since 2022

Growth from 2017 to 2022 was substantial; since then the trend has been flat to declining. Given the ~18-month publication lag, the 2025-2026 figures will revise upward, but the shape of the slowdown from the 2022 peak is already visible.

Source: filing trend, this dataset
Momentum
0 in latest year
for several top-ranked assignees

Leaderboard rankings are lagging indicators

Harman, Apple, Honda, Qualcomm and Cirrus Logic each show zero filings in the most recent tracked year. That is consistent with publication lag rather than withdrawal from the field, but it means today's visible ranking reflects filing decisions made a year or more ago.

Source: recent-year momentum by assignee, this dataset
Collaboration
10 co-assignee pairs
identified across the dataset

Co-filing is rare and concentrated

Only ten co-assignee pairs appear in the dataset, and the strongest by far links two Japanese manufacturers at 17 shared filings — most other pairings sit at single digits. Joint filing is the exception here, not the norm.

Source: co-assignee pairs, this dataset
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to active noise control systems, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Active Noise Control Systems covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who is filing, and where the field is thinning

The assignee ranking spans automotive audio suppliers, consumer electronics makers and semiconductor firms, with filing pace uneven across all of them in the most recent tracked year.

Automotive & Cabin Audio
-100% YoY
for leading automotive-audio assignees

Cabin noise specialists have gone quiet in the latest data

Assignees historically strong in vehicle cabin noise control show a sharp drop-off in the most recent tracked year. Given publication lag, this likely reflects filings still in the pipeline rather than a retreat from the space.

Source: recent-year momentum by assignee
Consumer Electronics
0 in latest year
for leading consumer device assignees

Headphone and mobile-device filers show the same lag pattern

Large consumer electronics assignees show zero recorded filings in the latest year, matching the pattern seen across the wider dataset rather than signalling reduced R&D investment in ANC for wearables and mobile devices.

Source: recent-year momentum by assignee
Semiconductor & Chipset
3 shared filings
in the strongest chipset-related co-assignee pair

Chipset vendors file individually more than jointly

Semiconductor and audio-chipset assignees appear repeatedly in the ranking but co-file infrequently; the strongest chipset-linked pairing tops out at three shared filings, well below the leading cross-company pair.

Source: co-assignee pairs, this dataset
🔍
Under-claimed branches worth a closer look
Sub-areas where filing density is markedly lower than the G10K core, based on the IPC composition in this dataset.
hearing-aid secondary path modeling (A61F crossover)vehicle-cabin multi-reference feedforward arrays (B60R crossover)oscillator-driven active cancellation circuits (H03B crossover)impedance-network filter co-design for ANC (H03H crossover)RF-transmission-linked ANC telemetry (H04B crossover)
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Harman Becker Automotive Systems GmbH0-100%
Harman International Industries, Incorporated0-100%
Apple Inc.0
Honda Motor Co., Ltd.0
Qualcomm Incorporated0
Cirrus Logic International Semiconductor Ltd.0
Google LLC0-100%
Bose Corporation0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Active Noise Control Systems covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's Next

Where to take this analysis

The dataset points to a field with a dense, well-claimed core and thinner claim density at its edges. The next steps depend on whether the goal is defensive clearance or a genuine white-space filing.

Map claims against the G10K core before filing

With 1,480 of 1,610 records sitting in one subclass, a freedom-to-operate check against feedforward and secondary-path claims should come before any drafting work on core ANC control loops.

Run a claim comparison in Eureka

Track the lagging assignees directly

Zero-filing years for major assignees are likely a reporting lag, not a strategy shift. Set up monitoring on those specific entities to catch newly published filings as they clear the 18-month lag.

Set up assignee monitoring in Eureka

Test the under-claimed crossover branches

Lower filing density in A61F, B60R, H03B, H03H and H04B crossovers suggests room for narrowly scoped claims tied to specific hardware contexts rather than the general control loop.

Explore white space in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Active Noise Control Systems covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions about active noise control patents

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Active Noise Control Systems covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Active Noise Control Systems in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole active noise control systems corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.