https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/actuator-redundancy-and-force-fight-control-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Aircraft Hydraulics & Actuation
Actuator redundancy and force fight control patents: mapping who owns the claim space
  • 71.2% of all 111 records sit with just five assignees, leaving 22 ranked companies to split the remainder.
  • Filings peaked in 2021 at 13 and 2021→2024 shows a -100% swing — though 2025-26 counts are still filling in under publication lag.
  • B64C aeroplane/helicopter claims cover 74.8% of records while G06F digital-processing claims sit at just 4.5%, a narrow slice for an increasingly software-defined control problem.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
111
Published Records
71%
Top-5 Share of All Records
-100%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
US
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (13 records) with 2024 (0) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 111 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Field Overview

What this landscape covers

Actuator redundancy and force fight control addresses a narrow but consequential engineering problem: when two or more actuators drive the same control surface, small differences in position feedback, load, or timing can cause the actuators to fight each other, wasting energy and stressing the mechanism. The patent record in scope combines dual redundant actuator and actuator control electronics claims with mitigation techniques such as force equalization, load sharing, damping mode switching and cross channel monitoring.

The 111 records in scope run from 2015 through the 2026-07-31 cut-off, concentrated heavily in aerospace flight-control hardware rather than generic motor control, and dominated by a handful of airframe and actuation-system suppliers.

Filing activity and technology composition, 2015-2026
  1. 1THE BOEING CO26
  2. 2BELL HELICOPTER TEXTRON INC20
  3. 3HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC14
  4. 4TEXTRON INNOVATIONS INC12
  5. 5UNITED TECH CORP7
  6. 6GOODRICH ACTUATION SYST7
  7. 7EMBRAER SA6
  8. 8BOMBARDIER INC5
  9. 9AIRBUS CANADA LLP4
  10. 10RTX CORP3
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Actuator Redundancy and Force Fight Control covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
The Numbers

Filing trend and technology composition

Two views of the same 111 records: how filings have moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses the claims actually sit in.

Filing activity, 2017-2026

Filings rose from 7 in 2017 to a peak of 13 in 2021, then fell to 0 by 2024 — a -100% swing over that three-year span. Counts for 2025 and 2026 are not yet representative: publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, so the most recent years will fill in as records publish.

Filing activity, 2017-2026048111572017201820192020132021202220232024202502026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

IPC subclass composition

B64C (aeroplanes & helicopters) covers 74.8% of the 111 records, confirming this is fundamentally an airframe control problem rather than a generic actuator one. F15B (fluid-pressure actuators) follows at 27.9%, with G05D, B64F, G05B, B64D, H02P and G06F each covering under 10% — a record can carry several classes, so these shares add up to more than 100%.

IPC subclass compositionB64C · Aeroplanes & helicopters8374.8%F15B · Fluid-pressure actuators & sys…3127.9%G05D · Control of non-electric variab…119.9%B64F · Ground installations for aircr…109.0%G05B · Control & regulating systems87.2%B64D · Aircraft equipment65.4%H02P · Control of motors & generators65.4%G06F · Electric digital data processi…54.5%Other1715.3%

Shares are the percentage of the 111 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Actuator Redundancy and Force Fight Control covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Actuator Redundancy and Force Fight Control with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about actuator redundancy and force fight control and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

Most-cited records and a representative claim

Representative Filing
US8245967B22012-08-21

US8245967B2 — Actuator force equalization controller

THE BOEING COMPANY

An actuation system using position sensors for rate feedback and force sensors for delta pressure, feeding a control loop that sums the difference in actuator rates with the difference in actuator forces to generate positioning commands that equalize force across a control surface.Filed by The Boeing Company; published 2012-08-21.

US8245967B2 — patent drawing 1US8245967B2 — patent drawing 2
View full record
Highest-cited records in scope
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US5350988ADigital motor controller129
2US20120290153A1Flight control system with alternate control path83
3US6154686ADistributed architecture75
4US20110251739A1Distributed fly-by-wire system74
5US6227481B1Method and apparatus for controlling force fights in a rotating shaft47
6US8935015B2Flight control system with alternate control path37
7US20100127132A1Actuator force equalization controller31
8US20070068291A1Failure-tolerant redundant actuator system31
9WO2015088967A1Fiber optic sensing and control system27
10EP2374714A2Distributed fly-by-wire system27

Citation counts favour older records simply because they have had longer to accumulate citations inside the corpus — read this as a signal of influence on the field, not of current commercial importance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Actuator Redundancy and Force Fight Control covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis


  
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Signals

What the data implies for filing strategy

Three patterns stand out once records, assignees and dates are cross-tabulated.

Concentration
71.2% / 5 assignees
share of 111 records

Claim space is held by a small group

Five assignees account for 79 of the 111 records in scope. The tenth-ranked company holds only 3 records, meaning the ranked field of 27 companies has a steep drop after the leaders and a long tail of single- or few-filing entrants.

Top 5 combined: 79 of 111 records
Momentum
13 → 0
peak year to 2024

Activity has cooled from its 2021 peak

2021 was the busiest year at 13 filings; by 2024, the last year treatable as complete, published counts had fallen to 0, a -100% swing. Given the roughly 18-month publication lag, this should be read as a slowdown through the visible window rather than a verdict on 2025-26 activity, which is still filling in.

2021=13 → 2024=0
Technology mix
74.8% B64C
of 111 records

Aerospace hardware dominates, software claims are thin

Claims concentrate in aeroplane/helicopter structures (B64C, 74.8%) and fluid-pressure actuator systems (F15B, 27.9%). Digital data processing (G06F) appears in only 4.5% of records, suggesting the control-law and software layer of force-fight mitigation is comparatively under-claimed relative to the mechanical and hydraulic layers.

G06F: 5 of 111 records
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to actuator redundancy and force fight control, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Co-filing is rare
AssigneeCo-assigneeShared families
Bombardier Inc.C Series Aircraft Limited Partnership2
Bell Helicopter Textron Inc.SCHULTZ DAVID P1
Bell Helicopter Textron Inc.PRICE IAN L1
Bell Helicopter Textron Inc.FENNY CARLOS A1
Bell Helicopter Textron Inc.CURD DAVID A1
Bombardier Inc.Short Brothers plc1

Only 6 co-assignee pairs appear across the dataset, and the strongest pair shares just 2 records — most filings in this space are single-assignee, not joint ventures.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Actuator Redundancy and Force Fight Control covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who holds the leaderboard, and where it thins out

The ranking covers all 27 companies the data endpoint returns for this search — not a top-50 or top-100 cut. The leader holds 26 records; by fifth place that has already dropped to 7, and by tenth place to 3.

Leader
26 records
of 111 in scope

One assignee holds roughly a quarter of the field

The top-ranked assignee's 26 records make it the single largest holder in the dataset, well ahead of the rest of the top five, whose fifth-place holder has just 7 records.

Leader: 26 of 111 records
Mid-field drop-off
7 → 3
5th to 10th place

The field thins out fast after the top five

Record counts fall from 7 at fifth place to 3 at tenth, and the top 10 combined still only reach 104 of 111 records (93.7%) — meaning the remaining 17 ranked companies share just 7 records between them.

Top 10 combined: 104 of 111 records
Momentum check
0 in latest year
across leading assignees

Recent-year activity has gone quiet across the board

Every one of the leading assignees shows 0 filings in the latest year on record, consistent with the broader -100% swing from the 2021 peak. This likely reflects publication lag as much as any real pullback, since 2025-26 filings are still working through to publication.

-100% YoY, leading assignee
🔍
Under-claimed adjacent branches
Sub-areas with filing density well below the B64C/F15B core, worth checking before assuming the space is closed.
digital control-law force-fight algorithmscross-channel monitoring diagnosticselectric motor-driven actuator load sharingground-test failure transient simulationground installation actuator interfaces
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Bell Helicopter Textron Inc.0
The Boeing Company0
Honeywell International Inc.0
Textron Innovations Inc.0-100%
United Technologies Corporation0
Goodrich Actuation Systems0
Embraer S.A.0
Bombardier Inc.0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Actuator Redundancy and Force Fight Control covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Next Steps

Where to take this analysis

The dataset points to specific follow-up questions rather than a single conclusion.

Check the software layer for open claim space

G06F digital-processing claims cover only 4.5% of records, well behind the mechanical and hydraulic classes. Before assuming this is closed, run a targeted search on control-law and diagnostic algorithms specifically.

Explore white space in Eureka

Watch the leader's continuation activity

With 26 of 111 records, the top assignee sets the boundary most new filings will need to design around. Track its recent filings even though the latest-year count reads as zero under publication lag.

Track assignee activity in Eureka

Re-run the trend once 2025-26 data settles

The -100% swing from 2021 to 2024 is real for completed years, but 2025-26 figures are not yet reliable given the roughly 18-month publication lag. Revisit the trend chart in six to twelve months.

Set a trend alert in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Actuator Redundancy and Force Fight Control covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions about this landscape

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Actuator Redundancy and Force Fight Control covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Actuator Redundancy and Force Fight Control in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole actuator redundancy and force fight control corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.