Adiabatic Compressed Air Energy Storage Patents: Leaders & Trends 2026
- Filing has cooled since its 2025 peak. 336 records published in 2025, but the count drops to 55 in 2026 as the field settles after several years of rapid growth from 97 in 2017.
- No single filer dominates. The leader holds 154 records and the top 5 combined account for just 22.8% of all 2,588 records in scope — concentration is moderate, not locked up.
- Thermal and turbomachinery classes overlap heavily. F01K (steam & thermal power plants) and F04B (positive-displacement pumps) each cover close to 30% of records, showing most filings straddle compression and heat-storage claims together.
What the adiabatic CAES patent record shows
Adiabatic compressed air energy storage (A-CAES) captures the heat generated during air compression and returns it during expansion, avoiding the fuel burn that conventional compressed air energy storage relies on. The patent record spanning 2015 to 2026 reflects a technology still being defined at the system level: claims span compressors, expanders, thermal energy storage media, cavern and vessel design, and grid coupling, rather than settling around one dominant architecture. Publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so the drop-off visible in the most recent year understates real filing activity.
The dataset covers 2,588 published records drawn from a search combining adiabatic CAES and compression heat recovery terminology with claim-level technical filters covering round-trip efficiency, cavern and vessel behaviour, and start-up time. Receiving-office data shows filings concentrated heavily in China, with the United States, Europe and PCT filings making up smaller but still substantial shares.
Filing trends and technology composition
Two views of the same 2,588-record dataset: how filing volume has moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses carry the claim density.
A decade of uneven growth, now cooling
Filings rose from 97 in 2017 to a peak of 336 in 2025, passing through a 2022 midpoint of 169. The 2026 figure of 55 is a partial year and should be read as an in-progress count, not a decline signal on its own.
Claims cluster around thermal and mechanical subsystems
F01K (steam & thermal power plants) and F04B (positive-displacement pumps) each appear in close to 30% of the 2,588 records, with F02C (gas-turbine plants) not far behind at 27.2%. Grid integration (H02J, 15.6%) and pressure-vessel storage (F17C, 6.0%) sit further down, marking them as smaller but distinct claim territories rather than default inclusions.
Shares are the percentage of the 2,588 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
Go deeper on Adiabatic Compressed Air Energy Storage with Eureka
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about adiabatic compressed air energy storage and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaThe most-cited prior art in this field
Adiabatic compressed air energy storage system with liquid thermal energy storage
The system pairs a compressor, air storage unit and turbine with a thermal energy storage system built around a liquid TES medium held in a container, moved by pumps through heat exchangers, with a thermal separation system inside the container to keep the stored liquid at distinct temperature zones.Filed by General Electric Company, published 2011-05-05 as US20110100010A1.


| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US5491969A | Power plant utilizing compressed air energy storage and saturation | 500 |
| 2 | US5537822A | Compressed air energy storage method and system | 486 |
| 3 | US20110115223A1 | Compressed air energy storage system utilizing two-phase flow to facilitate heat exchange | 220 |
| 4 | US4765142A | Compressed air energy storage turbomachinery cycle with compression heat recovery, storage, steam generation … | 220 |
| 5 | US20110100010A1 | Adiabatic compressed air energy storage system with liquid thermal energy storage | 206 |
| 6 | US4872307A | Retrofit of simple cycle gas turbines for compressed air energy storage application | 185 |
| 7 | US20100251712A1 | Advanced Adiabatic Compressed Air Energy Storage System | 169 |
| 8 | US4281256A | Compressed air energy storage system | 169 |
| 9 | US4593202A | Combination of supercritical wet combustion and compressed air energy storage | 157 |
| 10 | US5379589A | Power plant utilizing compressed air energy storage and saturation | 153 |
Citation counts favour older records simply because they have had longer to accumulate citations inside the searched corpus — treat this as a signal of influence on the field's vocabulary, not of current commercial relevance.
Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
Put your own technology through the same analysis
Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →MCP server & REST API
When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →What the numbers mean for filing strategy
Reading the concentration, trend and citation data together points to a field with an open middle: established thermal-storage mechanics are well claimed, but system integration and grid-facing claims are thinner.
Leadership is real but not exclusive
The leading assignee holds 154 records against a field of 2,588, and the top 5 combined take only 22.8%. That leaves the large majority of filings distributed across a long tail of single- and few-filing entrants, which is unusual for a technology this technically mature.
Filing has passed its peak, on current data
Volume rose steadily from 97 in 2017 through a 169 midpoint in 2022 to 336 in 2025 before falling to 55 in the partial 2026 year. Given the roughly 18-month publication lag, the true 2026 figure will be higher once later filings publish, but the multi-year climb through 2025 is not in question.
Thermal and compression claims overlap most filings
F01K, F04B and F02C together cover the bulk of the dataset, meaning most applicants are claiming across steam/thermal plant, positive-displacement compression and gas-turbine elements simultaneously rather than isolating one subsystem.
Filing activity is centred on China
China accounts for the largest share of receiving-office filings, well ahead of the United States, EPO, WIPO/PCT, Canada and the United Kingdom combined. Freedom-to-operate work that only checks US and EPO registers will miss most of the activity in this field.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to adiabatic compressed air energy storage, with the prior art for and against each one.
Who is filing, and where the activity is slowing
Recent-year momentum figures show a field where even the more active recent filers are pulling back, which is consistent with a peak-then-cool pattern rather than a new entrant displacing incumbents.
Even active filers are slowing
Xi'an Jiaotong University filed 6 records in the latest year, down 25% year over year — among the least steep declines in the tracked group, but still a decline.
Research-institute filing is contracting sharply
The Institute of Engineering Thermophysics at the Chinese Academy of Sciences dropped to 4 records in the latest year, a 67% year-over-year fall, suggesting earlier-stage research claims in this group are largely staked out.
Several established filers have gone quiet
Kobe Steel, Xi'an Thermal Power Research Institute and LightSail Energy show zero filings in the latest year in this dataset, with Xi'an Thermal Power Research Institute down 100% year over year from its prior pace.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Xi'an Jiaotong University | 6 | -25% |
| Institute of Engineering Thermophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences | 4 | -67% |
| China Energy Engineering Digital Technology Group Co., Ltd. | 2 | -88% |
| Kobe Steel, Ltd. | 0 | — |
| Xi'an Thermal Power Research Institute Co., Ltd. | 0 | -100% |
| LightSail Energy Inc. | 0 | — |
| Tsinghua University | 0 | -100% |
| China Three Gorges Corporation | 0 | -100% |
Where to take this next
The dataset points to specific next steps depending on whether the goal is freedom-to-operate, licensing or new filing.
Check China-originated filings first
With 1,584 of 2,588 records receiving office China, any freedom-to-operate or competitive review that starts and ends with US/EPO registers is working from a partial picture.
Explore filings by geographyTest claim language against the thinner classes
F17C (pressure vessels) and F03D (wind motors) carry noticeably fewer records than the thermal and compression classes, which is where new claim language is less likely to collide with existing art.
Map white space by IPC classWatch for the 2026 lag correction
The apparent drop to 55 records in 2026 is a partial-year artefact of publication lag; revisit the trend once later filings from the same period have published.
Track filing trend updatesCommon questions on adiabatic CAES patents
The leading assignee in this dataset holds 154 of the 2,588 records in scope, with the top 5 assignees combined accounting for 22.8% of all records. That leaves the majority of filings spread across a long tail of organisations with fewer filings each, so no single company controls the field outright. Anyone assessing competitive risk should look past the single leader and review the broader ranked list, since a meaningful share of relevant art sits outside the top handful of filers.
Filing volume grew from 97 records in 2017 to a peak of 336 in 2025, passing through 169 at the 2022 midpoint, which is clear multi-year growth. The 2026 figure of 55 looks like a sharp drop, but publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, so the most recent year is always understated in any patent trend. The more reliable read is that the field grew steadily through 2025 and the true 2026 trajectory will only be clear once later filings from that year publish.
The heaviest claim density sits in F01K (steam and thermal power plants) at 30.1% of the 2,588 records, F04B (positive-displacement pumps) at 29.6%, and F02C (gas-turbine plants) at 27.2%. Because a single record can carry multiple IPC classes, these figures overlap rather than sum to a whole, showing that most filings combine compression, expansion and thermal-storage claims in one application. Grid integration (H02J) and pressure-vessel storage (F17C) are present but at noticeably lower shares, at 15.6% and 6.0% respectively.
China is the dominant receiving office with 1,584 of the 2,588 records, well ahead of the United States at 355, the European Patent Office at 153, WIPO/PCT filings at 143, Canada at 58 and the United Kingdom at 54. This distribution means a competitive or freedom-to-operate review limited to US and European filings would miss the majority of the documented patent activity in this field. Chinese-language search and translation are effectively required for a complete view of this landscape.
US20110100010A1, assigned to General Electric Company and published in 2011, claims an adiabatic CAES system built around a liquid thermal energy storage medium held in a container, circulated by pumps through heat exchangers, with a thermal separation system inside the container to maintain distinct temperature zones. It is one of the more cited records in this dataset, reflecting its influence on how later filings describe liquid-medium TES integration. Anyone designing a liquid-TES-based ACAES system should review its specific claim language on the separation mechanism and conduit coupling before finalising a design, though citation volume alone does not establish current enforceability or scope.
Research Adiabatic Compressed Air Energy Storage in depth with Eureka
Go past this page: query the whole adiabatic compressed air energy storage corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.