https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/advanced-fission-reactors-patent-landscape-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-08-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Advanced Fission Reactors
Advanced fission reactor patents: mapping who is building the claim base
  • 56.9% concentration. The top 5 of 44 ranked assignees hold 70 of 123 records in scope — over half the field sits with a small group.
  • +267% filing growth. Filings rose from 3 in 2021 to 11 in 2024, the last year the data can treat as complete before publication lag distorts the count.
  • Fuel containment dominates citations. The two most-cited records both concern ceramic fuel containment barriers, drawing 175 and 97 citations respectively — well ahead of anything else in the set.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
123
Published Records
57%
Top-5 Share of All Records
+267%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
US
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (3 records) with 2024 (11) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 123 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What this landscape covers

This dataset tracks 123 published records at the intersection of advanced fission reactor design and the hardware that makes such a reactor operable: reactor coolant systems, fuel assemblies, radiation fields, safety barriers, neutron flux management and thermal hydraulics. It spans filings from 2015 through the 2026 cut-off, though the most recent one to two years are understated because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months. The scope favours Generation IV concepts — molten salt, sodium-cooled fast, and small modular designs — over conventional light-water reactor incrementalism.

Reading the field through patent families rather than raw document counts matters here: continuation practice and multi-jurisdiction filing can inflate a single invention into several records, so family-level counting is the fairer basis for judging who actually holds ground.

Records by filing year, 2015–2026
  1. 1WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORP21
  2. 2TERRAPOWER LLC18
  3. 3NUGEN LLC13
  4. 4COPENHAGEN ATOMICS AS12
  5. 5SAVANNAH RIVER NUCLEAR SOLUTIONS LLC6
  6. 6LAWRENCE LIVERMORE NAT SECURITY LLC6
  7. 7SHANGHAI NUCLEAR ENGINEERING RESEARCH & DESIGN INSTITUTE CO LTD6
  8. 8FRIESTH KEVIN4
  9. 9BATTELLE ENERGY ALLIANCE LLC3
  10. 10COMMISSARIAT A LENERGIE ATOMIQUE ET AUX ENERGIES ALTERNATIVES3
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Advanced Fission Reactors Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology

Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.

10,000 free credits to start
The Data

Filing trends and technology composition

Two views of the same 123 records: how filing activity has moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses carry the claim density.

Filing trend

Filings held near zero through the mid-2010s, then climbed from 3 in 2021 to 11 in 2024 — a +267% rise over that span. 2025 shows a peak of 16, but because publication trails filing by around 18 months, that figure and 2026 should be read as still filling in, not as a plateau.

Filing trend0510152002017201820192020202120222023202416202502026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Technology composition

G21C (nuclear reactors) covers 67.5% of the 123 records, confirming this is a reactor-hardware-centric dataset rather than a fuel-cycle or grid one. G21D (nuclear power plants, 17.9%) and F02C (gas-turbine plants, 9.8%) trail well behind, with radiation measurement (G01T), fusion (G21B) and radiation shielding (G21F) each sitting near or under 7% — signals of adjacent but far less crowded claim territory.

Technology compositionG21C · Nuclear reactors8367.5%G21D · Nuclear power plants2217.9%F02C · Gas-turbine plants129.8%G01T · Nuclear & X-radiation measurem…97.3%C25B · Electrolytic production of com…86.5%G21B · Fusion reactors75.7%G21F · Radiation protection & shieldi…75.7%F01K · Steam & thermal power plants54.1%Other5141.5%

Shares are the percentage of the 123 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Advanced Fission Reactors Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Advanced Fission Reactors Patent Landscape with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about advanced fission reactors patent landscape and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

The record every design-around has to clear

Representative filing
US9384863B22016-07-05

US9384863B2 — Apparatus for retention of molten material outside Generation IV reactor after nuclear power plant accident

SHANGHAI NUCLEAR ENGINEERING RESEARCH & DESIGN INSTITUTE

The apparatus provides core-melt retention for a Generation IV reactor following a severe accident: an inner wall, a vapor channel wall with a bottom opening, a pressure vessel forming a vapor rising channel, an outer wall, a core molten material retention structure at the base, and a deflector forming a coolant falling channel — together directing molten core material and coolant flow to prevent breach of containment.Filed by Shanghai Nuclear Engineering Research & Design Institute, published 2016-07-05.

US9384863B2 — patent drawing 1
View full filing
Most-cited records in scope
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US20060039524A1Multi-layered ceramic tube for fuel containment barrier and other applications in nuclear and fossil power pl…175
2US20090032178A1Multi-layered ceramic tube for fuel containment barrier and other applications in nuclear and fossil power pl…97
3US20150078504A1Hybrid molten salt reactor with energetic neutron source65
4US20180254109A1System and method for modeling a nuclear reactor56
5US20200338639A1Advanced Automated Fabrication System And Methods For Thermal And Mechanical Components Utilizing Quadratic O…35
6WO2019099928A2Advanced automated fabrication system and methods for thermal and mechanical components utilizing quadratic o…24
7US9368244B2Hybrid molten salt reactor with energetic neutron source22
8US20060050835A1Bi-disperse pebble-bed nuclear reactor20
9WO2006076039A2Multi-layered ceramic tube for fuel containment barrier and other applications in nuclear and fossil power pl…17
10WO2018157157A2System and method for modeling a nuclear reactor14

Citation counts inside a searched corpus favour older filings — treat this as a signal of influence on later work, not of current commercial importance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Advanced Fission Reactors Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis


  
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers say about where this field stands

Three read-outs from the dataset that matter more for a filing or licensing decision than the headline counts.

Concentration
56.9% / top 5
share of 123 records

Half the field sits with a handful of holders

The top 5 of 44 ranked assignees account for 70 of the 123 records in scope, with the leader alone holding 21. That leaves a long tail of single- and few-filing entrants below tenth place, which holds 3.

Assignee ranking, 44 companies
Momentum
+267%
2021 → 2024 filings

Filing activity accelerated sharply mid-decade

Annual filings rose from 3 in 2021 to 11 in 2024 — the last year the trend can be read as complete. 2025's headline count of 16 is real but still incomplete relative to eventual publication.

Filing trend, 2021-2024
Citation influence
175 citations
top-cited record

Fuel containment barriers anchor the prior art

The two most-cited records in the set both concern multi-layered ceramic tube fuel containment barriers, cited 175 and 97 times respectively — far ahead of the next tier, which centres on reactor modelling and hybrid molten salt design.

Most-cited records table
Class spread
67.5% G21C
of 123 records

Reactor-core hardware dominates the classification mix

G21C (nuclear reactors) touches two-thirds of records, while fusion (G21B) and radiation shielding (G21F) each sit at 5.7% — adjacent branches with far less claim density given the overlap this search string was built to capture.

IPC composition
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to advanced fission reactors patent landscape, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Advanced Fission Reactors Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who holds the ground, and where the gate is set

Filing concentration at the top does not mean the whole field is closed — several IPC branches inside this same search remain lightly claimed.

Leader
21 records
single top assignee

One assignee holds close to a fifth of the field

The leading assignee's 21 records sit well ahead of fifth place at 6, meaning the gap between first and the rest of the top tier is itself a signal of where an incumbent has built defensive density.

Assignee ranking
Long tail
34 of 44
below top 10

Most ranked assignees hold small, recent positions

Below the top 10 — which together hold 74.8% of all 123 records — filing activity fragments into single-digit and single-filing entrants, consistent with a field still being staked out rather than consolidated.

Top 10 combined, 92 records
Momentum check
0 in latest year
several leaders

Recent-year activity has gone quiet for the biggest names

Several of the largest historical filers show zero filings in the latest year with year-over-year drops recorded, which given the 18-month publication lag likely reflects reporting delay rather than an actual pullback.

Recent-year momentum by assignee
🔍
Under-claimed branches worth a closer look
These IPC areas sit inside the same search scope but carry far fewer records than G21C, leaving room for a first-mover claim.
Fusion reactor coolant interfaces (G21B)Radiation shielding for modular units (G21F)Neutron flux instrumentation (G01T)Steam cycle integration with Gen IV cores (F01K)Electrolytic hydrogen co-production (C25B)
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Westinghouse Electric Corporation0-100%
TerraPower LLC0-100%
NUGEN LLC0
Copenhagen Atomics AS0-100%
Savannah River Nuclear Solutions LLC0
Lawrence Livermore National Security LLC0
Shanghai Nuclear Engineering Research & Design Institute Co., Ltd.0
FRIESTH KEVIN0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Advanced Fission Reactors Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's Next

Where to take this analysis

The dataset points to a field that is filing faster than it is consolidating. Two directions follow from that.

Watch the white-space branches

G21B, G21F and G01T each sit under 8% of records inside this same search scope — worth tracking as separate claim maps before the leaders extend into them.

Explore adjacent IPC classes

Recheck momentum after the next publication cycle

Because 2025 and 2026 filings are still surfacing, any read on whether the top assignees have slowed should wait for at least one more publication cycle before drawing conclusions.

Track filing trends over time
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Advanced Fission Reactors Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions on advanced fission reactor patents

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Advanced Fission Reactors Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Advanced Fission Reactors Patent Landscape in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole advanced fission reactors patent landscape corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.