Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →Filing growth compares 2021 (3 records) with 2024 (11) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 123 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.
This dataset tracks 123 published records at the intersection of advanced fission reactor design and the hardware that makes such a reactor operable: reactor coolant systems, fuel assemblies, radiation fields, safety barriers, neutron flux management and thermal hydraulics. It spans filings from 2015 through the 2026 cut-off, though the most recent one to two years are understated because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months. The scope favours Generation IV concepts — molten salt, sodium-cooled fast, and small modular designs — over conventional light-water reactor incrementalism.
Reading the field through patent families rather than raw document counts matters here: continuation practice and multi-jurisdiction filing can inflate a single invention into several records, so family-level counting is the fairer basis for judging who actually holds ground.
Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.
Two views of the same 123 records: how filing activity has moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses carry the claim density.
Filings held near zero through the mid-2010s, then climbed from 3 in 2021 to 11 in 2024 — a +267% rise over that span. 2025 shows a peak of 16, but because publication trails filing by around 18 months, that figure and 2026 should be read as still filling in, not as a plateau.
G21C (nuclear reactors) covers 67.5% of the 123 records, confirming this is a reactor-hardware-centric dataset rather than a fuel-cycle or grid one. G21D (nuclear power plants, 17.9%) and F02C (gas-turbine plants, 9.8%) trail well behind, with radiation measurement (G01T), fusion (G21B) and radiation shielding (G21F) each sitting near or under 7% — signals of adjacent but far less crowded claim territory.
Shares are the percentage of the 123 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about advanced fission reactors patent landscape and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaThe apparatus provides core-melt retention for a Generation IV reactor following a severe accident: an inner wall, a vapor channel wall with a bottom opening, a pressure vessel forming a vapor rising channel, an outer wall, a core molten material retention structure at the base, and a deflector forming a coolant falling channel — together directing molten core material and coolant flow to prevent breach of containment.Filed by Shanghai Nuclear Engineering Research & Design Institute, published 2016-07-05.

| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US20060039524A1 | Multi-layered ceramic tube for fuel containment barrier and other applications in nuclear and fossil power pl… | 175 |
| 2 | US20090032178A1 | Multi-layered ceramic tube for fuel containment barrier and other applications in nuclear and fossil power pl… | 97 |
| 3 | US20150078504A1 | Hybrid molten salt reactor with energetic neutron source | 65 |
| 4 | US20180254109A1 | System and method for modeling a nuclear reactor | 56 |
| 5 | US20200338639A1 | Advanced Automated Fabrication System And Methods For Thermal And Mechanical Components Utilizing Quadratic O… | 35 |
| 6 | WO2019099928A2 | Advanced automated fabrication system and methods for thermal and mechanical components utilizing quadratic o… | 24 |
| 7 | US9368244B2 | Hybrid molten salt reactor with energetic neutron source | 22 |
| 8 | US20060050835A1 | Bi-disperse pebble-bed nuclear reactor | 20 |
| 9 | WO2006076039A2 | Multi-layered ceramic tube for fuel containment barrier and other applications in nuclear and fossil power pl… | 17 |
| 10 | WO2018157157A2 | System and method for modeling a nuclear reactor | 14 |
Citation counts inside a searched corpus favour older filings — treat this as a signal of influence on later work, not of current commercial importance.
Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →Three read-outs from the dataset that matter more for a filing or licensing decision than the headline counts.
The top 5 of 44 ranked assignees account for 70 of the 123 records in scope, with the leader alone holding 21. That leaves a long tail of single- and few-filing entrants below tenth place, which holds 3.
Annual filings rose from 3 in 2021 to 11 in 2024 — the last year the trend can be read as complete. 2025's headline count of 16 is real but still incomplete relative to eventual publication.
The two most-cited records in the set both concern multi-layered ceramic tube fuel containment barriers, cited 175 and 97 times respectively — far ahead of the next tier, which centres on reactor modelling and hybrid molten salt design.
G21C (nuclear reactors) touches two-thirds of records, while fusion (G21B) and radiation shielding (G21F) each sit at 5.7% — adjacent branches with far less claim density given the overlap this search string was built to capture.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to advanced fission reactors patent landscape, with the prior art for and against each one.
Filing concentration at the top does not mean the whole field is closed — several IPC branches inside this same search remain lightly claimed.
The leading assignee's 21 records sit well ahead of fifth place at 6, meaning the gap between first and the rest of the top tier is itself a signal of where an incumbent has built defensive density.
Below the top 10 — which together hold 74.8% of all 123 records — filing activity fragments into single-digit and single-filing entrants, consistent with a field still being staked out rather than consolidated.
Several of the largest historical filers show zero filings in the latest year with year-over-year drops recorded, which given the 18-month publication lag likely reflects reporting delay rather than an actual pullback.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Westinghouse Electric Corporation | 0 | -100% |
| TerraPower LLC | 0 | -100% |
| NUGEN LLC | 0 | — |
| Copenhagen Atomics AS | 0 | -100% |
| Savannah River Nuclear Solutions LLC | 0 | — |
| Lawrence Livermore National Security LLC | 0 | — |
| Shanghai Nuclear Engineering Research & Design Institute Co., Ltd. | 0 | — |
| FRIESTH KEVIN | 0 | — |
The dataset points to a field that is filing faster than it is consolidating. Two directions follow from that.
G21B, G21F and G01T each sit under 8% of records inside this same search scope — worth tracking as separate claim maps before the leaders extend into them.
Explore adjacent IPC classesBecause 2025 and 2026 filings are still surfacing, any read on whether the top assignees have slowed should wait for at least one more publication cycle before drawing conclusions.
Track filing trends over timeThe ranked assignee list covers 44 companies, with the leader alone holding 21 of the 123 records in scope — roughly a fifth of the field. The top 5 combined account for 70 records, or 56.9% of the total, and the top 10 together hold 74.8%. Below that tier, filing fragments quickly into single- and few-filing entrants, so the practical picture is a small group of dense holders sitting above a long, active tail.
Filings rose from 3 in 2021 to 11 in 2024, a +267% increase over that three-year span, and 2024 is the most recent year the data can treat as complete. 2025 shows a higher raw count of 16, but publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, so that figure and 2026's are still filling in rather than representing a slowdown or a peak that has passed. Treat the 2021-2024 window as the reliable growth signal.
US9384863B2 claims an apparatus for retaining molten core material outside a Generation IV reactor after a severe accident, built around an inner/outer wall arrangement, a vapor rising channel formed against a pressure vessel, and a deflector creating a coolant falling channel. It is a specific structural arrangement for core-melt retention, not a claim over molten-material retention generally, so designs using different channel geometries or different coolant flow paths for the same accident-mitigation function are not automatically blocked. Anyone working on severe-accident containment hardware should still map their design against this claim's specific wall and channel configuration before finalising geometry.
Inside this dataset's scope, fusion-adjacent coolant interfaces (G21B, 5.7% of records), radiation shielding for modular units (G21F, 5.7%) and neutron flux instrumentation (G01T, 7.3%) all carry far fewer filings than core reactor hardware under G21C, which touches 67.5% of records. That gap does not mean these areas are technically easier — it means fewer claims have been staked there yet, which is where a well-drafted first claim has more room to establish position rather than immediately colliding with dense prior art.
The two most-cited records in this set — both concerning multi-layered ceramic tube fuel containment barriers — carry 175 and 97 citations respectively, far ahead of anything filed more recently. This is a structural feature of citation counting inside any searched corpus: older filings have simply had more years to accumulate citations from subsequent work. High citation counts signal influence on the field's prior art base, not that the underlying technology is still the most commercially relevant approach today.
Go past this page: query the whole advanced fission reactors patent landscape corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.