Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →Filing growth compares 2021 (53 records) with 2024 (30) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 1,136 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.
This dataset tracks patent families at the intersection of advanced high-strength steel (AHSS) composition and processing claims and their tested environmental durability — corrosion resistance, hydrogen embrittlement resistance and stress corrosion cracking. The search combines alloy and heat-treatment IPC codes (C22C38/00) with corrosion-testing and electrochemical codes (C23F11, G01N17), so it captures records that make an explicit durability claim rather than every steel-alloy filing on record.
Coverage runs from 2015 through the middle of 2026, with the most recent year necessarily undercounted because publication typically lags filing by around 18 months. Read the last one to two years of any trend as a floor, not a ceiling.
Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.
1,136 patent families make up this landscape, spanning eight IPC subclasses from bulk alloy composition through to electroplating and electrolytic cleaning steps used to prepare or protect the steel surface.
Filings ran at 73 in 2017, climbed to a peak of 85 in 2018, and had eased to 49 by the 2022 midpoint — a flat-to-declining pattern rather than sustained growth, consistent with a claim space that matured early in the coverage window.
C22C (alloys) appears in 1,112 of 1,136 records and C21D (heat treatment) in 954, confirming that durability improvements are claimed jointly through composition and process. Surface-side codes are thinner: C23C coating sits at 314, B32B laminates at 118, and electrochemical codes C25F and C25D fall to 70 and 52 respectively — the surface-engineering side of durability is comparatively under-claimed relative to bulk metallurgy.
Shares are the percentage of the 1,136 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about advanced high-strength steel environmental durability and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaThe filing claims steel with hydrogen embrittlement resistance at a strength of 1200 MPa or greater, achieved by adding oxide, carbide or nitride hydrogen-trap deposits engineered to specific mean size, number density and aspect-ratio ranges. The trap sites hold hydrogen at a defined trap energy, and the claims tie the durability result to those measurable microstructural parameters rather than to a bulk composition alone.Filed by Nippon Steel Corporation, dated 2011-11-03 — one of the earlier records in this corpus and a frequent citation anchor for later hydrogen-trap-site claims.


| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | EP2325346A1 | High-strength steel plate and manufacturing method thereof | 177 |
| 2 | JP2004332099A | High-strength thin steel sheet superior in hydrogen embrittlement resistance, weldability, hole-expandability… | 164 |
| 3 | US20110146852A1 | High strength steel sheet and method for manufacturing the same | 95 |
| 4 | JP2001323355A | Si-containing high-strength hot-dip galvanized steel sheet and coated steel sheet, excellent in plating adhes… | 80 |
| 5 | JP2009052139A | High-strength steel sheet | 79 |
| 6 | US4814141A | High toughness, ultra-high strength steel having an excellent stress corrosion cracking resistance with a yie… | 60 |
| 7 | JP2008007842A | High-strength hot-dip galvanized steel sheet excellent in appearance and superior in corrosion resistance, an… | 54 |
| 8 | EP2546368A1 | Method for producing high-strength steel sheet | 53 |
| 9 | US20130167980A1 | High-strength steel sheet and high-strength zinc-coated steel sheet which have excellent ductility and stretc… | 45 |
| 10 | US20110030854A1 | High-strength steel sheet and method for manufacturing the same | 44 |
Citation counts are drawn from documents inside this searched corpus and favour older filings; treat them as a measure of influence on later claims, not of current commercial relevance.
Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →Three patterns stand out once the raw counts are set against each other: where claim density sits, where geography skews, and where citations concentrate.
Annual filings fell from a 2018 peak of 85 to 49 by 2022. Combined with C22C appearing in 1,112 of 1,136 records, this reads as a claim space that filled quickly rather than one still opening up. New entrants filing on bulk composition alone are filing into dense prior art.
Most durability improvements are locked in through a specific heat-treatment schedule alongside the alloy claim, not through composition alone. A composition-only claim without a matched process route is likely to sit on top of, rather than clear, this prior art.
Europe leads with 379 filings and the US follows at 218, while China sits at 45 — far lower than is typical for a bulk steel technology. India, at 137, outranks Japan (122) and China here, worth checking before assuming any single jurisdiction dominates enforcement risk.
The most-cited records date to the earlier part of the corpus and concentrate on hydrogen embrittlement resistance and hot-dip galvanized corrosion resistance. High citation counts mark influence on later claim drafting, not current commercial weight — check filing recency separately before treating a highly cited record as still governing the field.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to advanced high-strength steel environmental durability, with the prior art for and against each one.
Filing activity concentrates among a small group of integrated steelmakers, with co-assignee filings mostly linking related entities within the same corporate group.
Nippon Steel recorded just 1 filing in the latest tracked year, down 50% year on year, and several other frequent filers — JFE Steel, Kobe Steel, POSCO — show 0 filings in the latest year with year-on-year drops of -100%. That is consistent with the broader plateau in the filing trend rather than a single company's retreat.
The strongest co-assignee link, at 10 shared filings, connects Nippon Steel with its former Nippon Steel & Sumitomo Metal entity — a corporate-history artefact rather than an external partnership. The next strongest pair links POSCO with its own research institute. Cross-company joint filing outside these grouped relationships is rare in this dataset.
India's 137 filings outrank both Japan (122) and China (45) as a receiving office in this corpus, alongside the EPO's 379 and the US's 218. Anyone assessing freedom to operate on environmental-durability claims should not assume China is the primary jurisdiction to clear.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Nippon Steel Corporation | 1 | -50% |
| JFE Steel Corporation | 0 | -100% |
| NIPPON STEEL & SUMITOMO METAL CORP | 0 | — |
| Kobe Steel, Ltd. | 0 | -100% |
| POSCO | 0 | -100% |
| Nisshin Steel Co., Ltd. | 0 | — |
| Gerdau S.A. | 0 | — |
| Research Institute of Industrial Science & Technology (RIST) | 0 | — |
The counts and rankings on this page are a starting point for a freedom-to-operate check or a claim-drafting session, not a substitute for one.
Cross-check the dense C22C/C21D claim clusters here against the specific strength grade and heat-treatment schedule you plan to use, rather than the alloy family as a whole.
Explore in Patsnap EurekaC25F and C25D filing counts are thin next to the core alloy claims — a narrower, well-drafted claim there faces less crowded prior art than a new composition claim.
Run a white-space search in Patsnap EurekaIn this dataset, it is a patent family that combines an alloy or heat-treatment claim under codes like C22C38/00 or C21D with an explicit durability test or mechanism claim — corrosion resistance, hydrogen embrittlement resistance, or stress corrosion cracking under codes such as C23F11 or G01N17. That combination matters because many AHSS patents claim strength or formability without ever testing or claiming a durability result, so a pure composition search would pull in far more noise. The 1,136 families here all make a durability claim explicitly, not just an alloy claim.
Filing activity concentrates among a small set of integrated steelmakers including Nippon Steel, JFE Steel, Kobe Steel and POSCO, with POSCO's own research institute appearing as a frequent co-assignee. Momentum has cooled across the board: Nippon Steel's latest-year filings fell 50% year on year, and several other frequent filers show a full year-on-year drop to zero filings. That pattern points to a maturing claim space rather than an actively expanding one.
Filings ran at 73 in 2017, rose to a peak of 85 in 2018, and had fallen to 49 by the 2022 midpoint. This is consistent with early, broad alloy and heat-treatment claims being filed quickly once the core durability mechanisms — hydrogen trapping, coating adhesion, corrosion-resistant compositions — were established, leaving less open ground for follow-on filers. Note that the most recent one to two years in any patent trend are understated because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so the apparent decline at the very end of the window should be read cautiously.
US20110268600A1, filed by Nippon Steel, claims steel with hydrogen embrittlement resistance at 1200 MPa or greater strength, achieved through hydrogen-trap deposits of oxides, carbides or nitrides held within specific size, density and aspect-ratio ranges. A later filer working on hydrogen-trap-site engineering at comparable strength levels and similar microstructural parameter ranges is the one most likely to run into this claim. It does not block composition-only claims that do not rely on engineered trap-site geometry, nor does it cover surface-coating routes to corrosion resistance, which sit in a different part of this landscape.
Filing density is heavily weighted toward bulk alloy composition (C22C, 1,112 records) and heat treatment (C21D, 954 records), while surface-engineering routes are comparatively thin: electrolytic cleaning and hydrogen-trap removal (C25F) sits at 70 records, and electroplating-based corrosion barriers (C25D) at 52. Laminate and clad durability structures (B32B, 118) and cold-drawn wire durability (B21C, 30) are similarly under-claimed relative to the core alloy space. A first claim in these narrower branches faces less crowded prior art than a new bulk-composition claim would.
Go past this page: query the whole advanced high-strength steel environmental durability corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.