https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/advanced-high-strength-steel-environmental-durability-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Advanced Materials & Metallurgy
Advanced high-strength steel patents covering corrosion and hydrogen embrittlement resistance
  • Filings have cooled from their 2018 peak. 85 families in 2018 versus 49 at the 2022 midpoint, suggesting the core alloy-composition claim space is filling up rather than expanding.
  • Heat treatment claims ride alongside almost every alloy filing. 954 of 1,136 records touch C21D heat-treatment, showing that durability gains are being locked in through process claims as much as composition claims.
  • Europe and the US receive far more filings than China here. EPO leads with 379 filings and the US follows with 218, while China sits at just 45 — an unusual geographic skew for a steel technology.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
1,136
Published Records
85%
Top-5 Share of All Records
-43%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
EP
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (53 records) with 2024 (30) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 1,136 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What this landscape covers

This dataset tracks patent families at the intersection of advanced high-strength steel (AHSS) composition and processing claims and their tested environmental durability — corrosion resistance, hydrogen embrittlement resistance and stress corrosion cracking. The search combines alloy and heat-treatment IPC codes (C22C38/00) with corrosion-testing and electrochemical codes (C23F11, G01N17), so it captures records that make an explicit durability claim rather than every steel-alloy filing on record.

Coverage runs from 2015 through the middle of 2026, with the most recent year necessarily undercounted because publication typically lags filing by around 18 months. Read the last one to two years of any trend as a floor, not a ceiling.

Filing activity, 2017–2026
  1. 1JFE STEEL CORP535
  2. 2NIPPON STEEL CORPORATION238
  3. 3KOBE STEEL LTD89
  4. 4POHANG IRON & STEEL CO LTD75
  5. 5NIPPON STEEL & SUMITOMO METAL CORP33
  6. 6NISSHIN STEEL CO LTD17
  7. 7GEOBRUGG AG16
  8. 8RES INST OF IND SCI & TECH11
  9. 9BAOSHAN IRON & STEEL CO LTD9
  10. 10THYSSENKRUPP STEEL EUROPE AG PATENTE PATENT DEPARTMENT8
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Advanced High-Strength Steel Environmental Durability covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology

Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.

10,000 free credits to start
The numbers

Filing trend and technology composition

1,136 patent families make up this landscape, spanning eight IPC subclasses from bulk alloy composition through to electroplating and electrolytic cleaning steps used to prepare or protect the steel surface.

A peak in 2018, then a plateau

Filings ran at 73 in 2017, climbed to a peak of 85 in 2018, and had eased to 49 by the 2022 midpoint — a flat-to-declining pattern rather than sustained growth, consistent with a claim space that matured early in the coverage window.

A peak in 2018, then a plateau0255075100732017852018201920202021202220232024202522026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Alloy and heat-treatment codes dominate

C22C (alloys) appears in 1,112 of 1,136 records and C21D (heat treatment) in 954, confirming that durability improvements are claimed jointly through composition and process. Surface-side codes are thinner: C23C coating sits at 314, B32B laminates at 118, and electrochemical codes C25F and C25D fall to 70 and 52 respectively — the surface-engineering side of durability is comparatively under-claimed relative to bulk metallurgy.

Alloy and heat-treatment codes dominateC22C · Alloys1,11297.9%C21D · Heat treatment of metals95484.0%C23C · Coating & surface deposition31427.6%B32B · Layered products & laminates11810.4%B21B · Metal rolling998.7%C25F · Electrolytic removal & cleaning706.2%C25D · Electroplating & electroforming524.6%B21C · Metal extrusion & drawing302.6%Other24121.2%

Shares are the percentage of the 1,136 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Advanced High-Strength Steel Environmental Durability covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Advanced High-Strength Steel Environmental Durability with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about advanced high-strength steel environmental durability and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key patents

The records other filings build on

Representative filing
US20110268600A12011-11-03

High-strength steel material with excellent hydrogen embrittlement resistance (US20110268600A1)

NIPPON STEEL CORPORATION

The filing claims steel with hydrogen embrittlement resistance at a strength of 1200 MPa or greater, achieved by adding oxide, carbide or nitride hydrogen-trap deposits engineered to specific mean size, number density and aspect-ratio ranges. The trap sites hold hydrogen at a defined trap energy, and the claims tie the durability result to those measurable microstructural parameters rather than to a bulk composition alone.Filed by Nippon Steel Corporation, dated 2011-11-03 — one of the earlier records in this corpus and a frequent citation anchor for later hydrogen-trap-site claims.

US20110268600A1 — patent drawing 1US20110268600A1 — patent drawing 2
View full record
Most-cited records in this landscape
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1EP2325346A1High-strength steel plate and manufacturing method thereof177
2JP2004332099AHigh-strength thin steel sheet superior in hydrogen embrittlement resistance, weldability, hole-expandability…164
3US20110146852A1High strength steel sheet and method for manufacturing the same95
4JP2001323355ASi-containing high-strength hot-dip galvanized steel sheet and coated steel sheet, excellent in plating adhes…80
5JP2009052139AHigh-strength steel sheet79
6US4814141AHigh toughness, ultra-high strength steel having an excellent stress corrosion cracking resistance with a yie…60
7JP2008007842AHigh-strength hot-dip galvanized steel sheet excellent in appearance and superior in corrosion resistance, an…54
8EP2546368A1Method for producing high-strength steel sheet53
9US20130167980A1High-strength steel sheet and high-strength zinc-coated steel sheet which have excellent ductility and stretc…45
10US20110030854A1High-strength steel sheet and method for manufacturing the same44

Citation counts are drawn from documents inside this searched corpus and favour older filings; treat them as a measure of influence on later claims, not of current commercial relevance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Advanced High-Strength Steel Environmental Durability covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis


  
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the data means for a filing decision

Three patterns stand out once the raw counts are set against each other: where claim density sits, where geography skews, and where citations concentrate.

Filing trend
85 → 49
2018 peak vs 2022 midpoint

The core alloy space is not growing

Annual filings fell from a 2018 peak of 85 to 49 by 2022. Combined with C22C appearing in 1,112 of 1,136 records, this reads as a claim space that filled quickly rather than one still opening up. New entrants filing on bulk composition alone are filing into dense prior art.

Filing trend, 2017-2026
Process coupling
954 of 1,136
records also claim C21D heat treatment

Durability claims are process-dependent

Most durability improvements are locked in through a specific heat-treatment schedule alongside the alloy claim, not through composition alone. A composition-only claim without a matched process route is likely to sit on top of, rather than clear, this prior art.

IPC composition
Geography
379 vs 45
EPO filings vs China filings

Filing geography is inverted from typical steel patterns

Europe leads with 379 filings and the US follows at 218, while China sits at 45 — far lower than is typical for a bulk steel technology. India, at 137, outranks Japan (122) and China here, worth checking before assuming any single jurisdiction dominates enforcement risk.

Receiving office distribution
Citation anchors
177 citations
top-cited record, EP2325346A1

Citation weight sits with older filings

The most-cited records date to the earlier part of the corpus and concentrate on hydrogen embrittlement resistance and hot-dip galvanized corrosion resistance. High citation counts mark influence on later claim drafting, not current commercial weight — check filing recency separately before treating a highly cited record as still governing the field.

Most-cited records
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to advanced high-strength steel environmental durability, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Advanced High-Strength Steel Environmental Durability covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Who is filing

Assignee landscape and collaboration patterns

Filing activity concentrates among a small group of integrated steelmakers, with co-assignee filings mostly linking related entities within the same corporate group.

Momentum
-50% YoY
Nippon Steel, latest year

Even the leading filer is pulling back

Nippon Steel recorded just 1 filing in the latest tracked year, down 50% year on year, and several other frequent filers — JFE Steel, Kobe Steel, POSCO — show 0 filings in the latest year with year-on-year drops of -100%. That is consistent with the broader plateau in the filing trend rather than a single company's retreat.

Recent-year momentum
Collaboration
10 pairs
co-assignee pairs identified

Co-filing is mostly intra-group

The strongest co-assignee link, at 10 shared filings, connects Nippon Steel with its former Nippon Steel & Sumitomo Metal entity — a corporate-history artefact rather than an external partnership. The next strongest pair links POSCO with its own research institute. Cross-company joint filing outside these grouped relationships is rare in this dataset.

Co-assignee pairs
Geography
137 filings
India receiving-office filings

India is a bigger filing venue than Japan or China here

India's 137 filings outrank both Japan (122) and China (45) as a receiving office in this corpus, alongside the EPO's 379 and the US's 218. Anyone assessing freedom to operate on environmental-durability claims should not assume China is the primary jurisdiction to clear.

Receiving office distribution
🔍
Under-claimed branches worth a closer look
Sub-areas where filing density is thin relative to the core alloy and heat-treatment claims
electrolytic hydrogen-trap cleaning (C25F)electroplated corrosion-barrier layers (C25D)laminate/clad durability structures (B32B)cold-drawn wire environmental durability (B21C)
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Nippon Steel Corporation1-50%
JFE Steel Corporation0-100%
NIPPON STEEL & SUMITOMO METAL CORP0
Kobe Steel, Ltd.0-100%
POSCO0-100%
Nisshin Steel Co., Ltd.0
Gerdau S.A.0
Research Institute of Industrial Science & Technology (RIST)0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Advanced High-Strength Steel Environmental Durability covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's next

Where to take this next

The counts and rankings on this page are a starting point for a freedom-to-operate check or a claim-drafting session, not a substitute for one.

Map claims against your own alloy grade

Cross-check the dense C22C/C21D claim clusters here against the specific strength grade and heat-treatment schedule you plan to use, rather than the alloy family as a whole.

Explore in Patsnap Eureka

Watch the under-claimed surface-engineering branches

C25F and C25D filing counts are thin next to the core alloy claims — a narrower, well-drafted claim there faces less crowded prior art than a new composition claim.

Run a white-space search in Patsnap Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Advanced High-Strength Steel Environmental Durability covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions on this landscape

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Advanced High-Strength Steel Environmental Durability covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Advanced High-Strength Steel Environmental Durability in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole advanced high-strength steel environmental durability corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.