AHSS Patents: Who Leads, Where Filings Are Flattening 2026
- Filings have flattened, not grown. Activity peaked at 22 families in 2022 and has not exceeded that level since, despite steady interest in dual-phase and martensitic grades.
- Heat treatment and alloy claims dominate. C21D and C22C together cover the large majority of the 569 families, while rolling and welding subclasses (B21B, B21C, B23K) remain thin.
- The oldest patents still carry the most weight. The most-cited records date to the 1990s dual-phase steel plate filings, a sign that foundational composition-and-process claims still anchor freedom-to-operate analysis.
Filing growth compares 2021 (18 records) with 2024 (8) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 569 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.
What this landscape covers
This dataset tracks patent families filed against advanced high-strength steel (AHSS) and dual-phase steel processing, restricted to claims touching hot rolling, annealing cycles, martensite formation, formability or hydrogen embrittlement, and classified under heat treatment (C21D), alloy composition (C22C) or related metallurgical IPC codes. It spans filings from 2015 through the mid-2026 data cut-off, covering 569 published families across six major receiving offices.
Because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, the 2025 and 2026 figures in any trend line understate real activity; treat the most recent one to two years as a floor, not a ceiling.
Filing trend and technology composition
Two views of the same 569-family dataset: how filing volume has moved year over year, and which parts of the International Patent Classification system carry the claim density.
A flat-to-declining filing curve
Filings rose from 14 in 2017 to a peak of 22 in 2022, then did not sustain that level. Read against the midpoint, the trend line is flat or declining rather than growing — this is a mature claim space, not an emerging one.
Heat treatment and alloy codes carry the weight
C21D (heat treatment) appears in 493 records and C22C (alloys) in 460, meaning most families claim a combination of microstructure control and composition. Surface coating (C23C, 110) is the next tier; rolling, extrusion, sheet-forming and welding subclasses each sit under 32 records, marking them as thinner, more contestable ground.
Shares are the percentage of the 569 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
Go deeper on Advanced High-Strength Steel Processing with Eureka
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about advanced high-strength steel processing and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaThe most-cited prior art
Process for making cold-rolled dual phase steel sheet (US9593399B2)
A process for manufacturing a cold rolled high strength dual phase steel. The process includes soaking a steel slab within a temperature range of 1200-1300°C, hot rolling the soaked steel slab in a roughing treatment and producing a transfer bar, and hot rolling the transfer bar in a finishing treatment and producing hot rolled strip. The hot rolled strip is cold rolled with at least a 55% reduction in thickness. The cold rolled sheet is intercritically annealed at a temperature between 790-840°C and rapidly cooled to a temperature between 450-500°C, producing a ferrite plus martensite microstructure with a 0.2% yield strength of at least 550 MPa.Filed by ThyssenKrupp Steel USA, LLC; published 2017-03-14.


| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US5545270A | Method of producing high strength dual phase steel plate with superior toughness and weldability | 107 |
| 2 | US5531842A | Method of preparing a high strength dual phase steel plate with superior toughness and weldability (LAW219) | 101 |
| 3 | US5653826A | High strength dual phase steel plate with superior toughness and weldability | 69 |
| 4 | US20040035500A1 | Dual phase steel sheet with good bake-hardening properties | 55 |
| 5 | US4613385A | High strength, low carbon, dual phase steel rods and wires and process for making same | 55 |
| 6 | US20090071575A1 | Hot rolled dual phase steel sheet, and method of making the same | 50 |
| 7 | JP1997176815A | High strength hot dip galvanized steel sheet excellent in plating adhesion | 49 |
| 8 | DE19610675C1 | Dual phase steel for cold rolled sheet or strip – contg. manganese@, aluminium@ and silicon | 47 |
| 9 | US20090277547A1 | High-strength steel sheets and processes for production of the same | 46 |
| 10 | CN101130847A | 中薄板坯连铸连轧双相钢板及其制造方法 | 45 |
Citation counts favour older filings simply because they have had longer to accumulate references; treat this table as a map of influence, not of current filing activity.
Patent titles are shown in the language they were filed in, not translated, so that each record stays verifiable against the original filing — a translated title will not match in Eureka or in any national register. Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
Put your own technology through the same analysis
Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →MCP server & REST API
When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →What the numbers mean for a filing decision
Three patterns stand out once the family counts, IPC spread and citation data are read together.
Volume growth has stalled
The climb from 14 families in 2017 to a peak of 22 in 2022 was not sustained. Whatever drove the mid-decade filing push — likely automotive lightweighting mandates — has not produced a second wave. New entrants should expect a crowded, not expanding, field.
Heat treatment and alloy claims overlap heavily
Nearly all families touch both microstructure control (C21D) and composition (C22C), which means a new filing claiming only one side of that pair is unlikely to clear prior art. Differentiated value sits in tightly specified combinations of both.
1990s dual-phase steel patents still anchor the field
The five most-cited records were filed in the 1990s and early 2000s around dual-phase steel plate strength, toughness and weldability. Any new process claim on comparable microstructures needs to be checked against this older core before assuming novelty.
Filing activity is spread across six offices, not concentrated in one
US, EPO, India, South Korea, China and WIPO each carry a meaningful share of receiving-office filings. A freedom-to-operate check limited to a single jurisdiction will miss a large share of the relevant art.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to advanced high-strength steel processing, with the prior art for and against each one.
Who holds the claim space
Assignee activity in this corpus is dominated by integrated steelmakers and their research arms, with co-filing patterns suggesting close vendor-customer or joint-development relationships rather than open licensing.
Joint filings cluster around a small number of research partnerships
The strongest co-assignee pairing in the corpus links an upstream research arm with a major steelmaker, with a second, smaller cluster tied to a European steel R&D entity and a named inventor. Only 10 co-assignee pairs exist across 569 families, so most filings are still solo efforts.
No major assignee filed in the most recent tracked year
Every leading assignee in the momentum data shows zero filings in the latest year. Given the 18-month publication lag, this likely reflects reporting delay rather than an actual halt in R&D, but it means recent competitive positioning cannot yet be read from public filings.
The earliest dual-phase steel patents remain the most-referenced
The two most-cited records in the corpus were both filed for dual-phase steel plate with superior toughness and weldability. Their continued citation weight signals that later filers are still building on, or designing around, this original composition-and-process combination.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| AK Steel Properties, Inc. | 0 | — |
| ExxonMobil Upstream Research Company | 0 | — |
| Tata Steel Limited | 0 | — |
| Kobe Steel, Ltd. | 0 | — |
| POSCO | 0 | — |
| ArcelorMittal Research & Development LLC | 0 | — |
| UEC Technologies, LLC | 0 | — |
| JSW Steel Limited | 0 | — |
Where to take this analysis
This landscape identifies the pattern; the next step is testing a specific claim or process route against it.
Check a draft claim against the dense C21D/C22C core
If a new filing proposes a heat-treatment-and-composition combination, run it against the most-cited dual-phase steel plate records before submission.
Run a claim comparison in Patsnap EurekaWatch for the delayed 2025-2026 filing wave
Zero recent-year momentum across major assignees is likely a publication-lag artefact; re-check this trend once later filings surface.
Set a filing alert in Patsnap EurekaExplore the thinner rolling and welding subclasses
B21B, B21C and B23K carry far fewer records than the metallurgical core, and may offer narrower, more defensible claim territory.
Explore white space in Patsnap EurekaCommon questions on AHSS patent filings
This dataset counts 569 published patent families filed between 2015 and mid-2026 that combine AHSS or dual-phase steel terminology with process claims around hot rolling, annealing, martensite formation, formability or hydrogen embrittlement. That figure is a fair proxy for real filing activity because families neutralise repeat filings of the same invention across jurisdictions. The true current total is likely somewhat higher, since publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, so the most recent one to two years are undercounted.
The corpus is dominated by integrated steelmakers and their research subsidiaries, several of which also appear paired together in joint filings rather than filing solely on their own. Recent-year momentum data shows every tracked leading assignee at zero filings in the latest year, which most likely reflects publication delay rather than an actual pullback. A full ranking by family count is provided in the assignee table above rather than summarised here, since the exact order shifts as later filings publish.
Filing volume rose from 14 families in 2017 to a peak of 22 in 2022 and has not exceeded that level since. A flat-to-declining curve after a peak typically means the core claim space around a technology has become occupied, pushing new filers toward narrower or adjacent claims rather than broad composition-and-process patents. It does not necessarily mean R&D activity has slowed, since manufacturing process improvements are not always patented and the most recent years are still underreported due to publication lag.
Heat treatment (C21D) and alloy composition (C22C) are heavily claimed, appearing in 493 and 460 of the 569 records respectively, so a filing that only restates that combination faces dense prior art. Subclasses tied to metal rolling, extrusion and drawing, sheet-metal working and welding each carry far fewer records, roughly a tenth of the core classes, suggesting narrower and more specific claims there face less crowded prior art. Hydrogen-embrittlement-resistant coating and resistance-weld joint microstructure are two specific branches worth checking first.
US9593399B2, assigned to ThyssenKrupp Steel USA, claims a specific cold-rolled dual-phase steel process defined by exact soaking, hot-rolling reduction, intercritical annealing and rapid-cooling temperature ranges, plus a resulting ferrite-plus-martensite microstructure with defined yield and tensile strength minimums. Anyone developing a similar cold-rolled dual-phase route needs to check whether their process parameters and resulting mechanical properties fall inside those claimed ranges. Because the corpus also contains earlier, more heavily cited dual-phase steel patents from the 1990s, a full freedom-to-operate check should not stop at this one filing.
Research Advanced High-Strength Steel Processing in depth with Eureka
Go past this page: query the whole advanced high-strength steel processing corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.