Book a demo

Smart Grid Sensing Patents: Who Leads, Where the Gaps Are 2026

Smart Grid Sensing Patents: Who Leads, Where the Gaps Are 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/advanced-metering-and-smart-grid-sensing-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Power Electronics & Grid
Advanced Metering and Smart Grid Sensing Patents: Filing Trends and Open Claim Space
  • Filing has plateaued, not accelerated. the trend runs flat from a 2022 midpoint of 2 filings to a 2024 peak of just 5, with no assignee showing sustained recent-year momentum.
  • India is the busiest filing venue. 16 of the tracked receiving-office filings originate there, ahead of the United States at 9, which reframes where freedom-to-operate checks matter most.
  • Measurement and metering IPC codes dominate over connectivity codes. G01R and G01D together outnumber the H04L/H04Q/H04W communications codes combined, showing claims concentrate on sensing accuracy rather than transport.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
34
Published Records
38%
Top-5 Share of All Records
+67%
3-Yr Growth (lag-adjusted)
IN
Leading Jurisdiction
Published byPatsnap Research··6 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What this landscape covers

This dataset tracks patent families at the intersection of smart metering, advanced metering infrastructure (AMI), and grid sensing devices, filtered to records that make explicit claims around measurement accuracy, communication reliability, tamper detection, phasor measurement, or data privacy. The IPC scope spans G01R22 (electricity metering), H04Q9 (remote metering arrangements) and H02J13 (grid circuit arrangements), which keeps the corpus anchored to metering and sensing hardware rather than general smart-grid software.

With 34 published families across the 2015-2026 window, this is a compact field compared to adjacent battery or power-semiconductor landscapes. Publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 and 2026 figures understate actual filing activity and should be read as a floor, not a ceiling.

Filing activity and IPC composition, 2015-2026
  1. 1ACLARA METERS LLC4
  2. 2DIGIMARC CORP3
  3. 3NAGARAJ HEDIYAL2
  4. 4DR K NARAYAN SWAMY2
  5. 5BIGWOOD TECH INC2
  6. 6LANDIS GYR TECH INC2
  7. 7INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY KANPUR2
  8. 8WINAMR SYST2
  9. 9DIVAKAR B P2
  10. 10REVA UNIV2
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Advanced Metering and Smart Grid Sensing covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
The Data

Filing trend and technology composition

Two views of the same 34-family dataset: how filing activity has moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses carry the claim density.

A flat filing curve

Filings sat at zero in 2017, reached a midpoint of 2 in 2022, and peaked so far at 5 in 2024. That shape reads as a niche but persistent filing pattern rather than a technology in a growth phase — useful context before assuming this space is heating up.

A flat filing curve0134502017201820192020202120222023520245202512026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Measurement codes outweigh communication codes

G01R (24 records) and G01D (18) lead the composition, ahead of G06Q (15) and H02J (14). The communications-layer codes — H04L (12), H04Q (7), H04W (3) — are present but secondary, indicating that most claims here are about what is measured and how accurately, not how it is transmitted.

Measurement codes outweigh communication codesG01R · Electric & magnetic measurement2470.6%G01D · Measuring (general) & recording1852.9%G06Q · Business, commerce & admin dat…1544.1%H02J · Power supply & grid systems1441.2%H04L · Digital information transmissi…1235.3%H04Q · Switching & selecting720.6%G06F · Electric digital data processi…617.6%H04W · Wireless communication networks38.8%Other1132.4%

Shares are the percentage of the 34 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Advanced Metering and Smart Grid Sensing covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Advanced Metering and Smart Grid Sensing with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about advanced metering and smart grid sensing and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

Representative and most-cited filings

Representative filing
NZ600150B2014-03-04

NZ600150B — Head-end system for advanced metering infrastructure network

GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY

The filing discloses a head-end system for an AMI network built around a processor and memory that receives event signals from AMI meters, determines whether a command signal should be sent back to a given meter in response to an event, and transmits that command instructing the meter to perform a task. The architecture centres on event-driven, two-way communication between a central head-end and distributed meters rather than one-way meter reads.Filed by General Electric Company; dated 2014-03-04.

View full filing
Most-cited records in this corpus
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US20160198245A1Synchronized metrology in power generation and distribution networks57
2US20230072795A1Online State Estimation and Topology Identification Using Advanced Metering Infrastructure (AMI) Measurements16
3US9330563B2Synchronized metrology in power generation and distribution networks12
4GB2463156ASmart Meter with secure communications and secure hosting of third party applications10
5US20210293576A1Programming electric meter global positioning system coordinates using smart device7
6WO2024187507A1一种配电网的拓扑辨识方法、装置、设备及介质6

Citation counts favour older records by construction — treat them as a signal of historical influence within this searched corpus, not of current commercial weight.

Patent titles are shown in the language they were filed in, not translated, so that each record stays verifiable against the original filing — a translated title will not match in Eureka or in any national register. Publication numbers are shown where the record carries one (6 of 6 rows); clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Advanced Metering and Smart Grid Sensing covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers mean for a filing decision

Three read-throughs from the trend, the IPC mix and the citation table, translated into what they imply for someone deciding where to file next.

Filing pace
2022→2024: 2 to 5
families/year

Growth is incremental, not a land rush

The climb from a 2022 midpoint of 2 to a 2024 peak of 5 is real but small in absolute terms. A 34-family corpus over more than a decade means this remains a specialist niche rather than a crowded rush, which changes how aggressively a new entrant needs to clear the field before filing.

Based on year-over-year family counts
Venue concentration
India: 16 of tracked filings
receiving office

India is the primary filing venue, not the US

16 filings route through India against 9 through the United States, with Australia, Canada, the UK and New Zealand each in single digits. Freedom-to-operate work that defaults to a US-centric search will miss where most of this activity actually sits.

Receiving office counts across the corpus
Claim focus
G01R 24 vs H04W 3
IPC subclass records

Sensing accuracy is claimed harder than connectivity

G01R and G01D combined (42 records) dwarf the wireless-specific H04W code (3). Claims on measurement accuracy and tamper detection are dense; claims tied specifically to wireless transport methods are comparatively sparse and may be easier to design around.

IPC subclass tallies from the technology composition table
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to advanced metering and smart grid sensing, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Advanced Metering and Smart Grid Sensing covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who is filing, and where the gate sits

No single assignee shows sustained recent-year filing momentum in this dataset — recent-year counts for the more active organisations sit at zero in the latest tracked year, consistent with the flat overall trend.

Momentum check
0 in latest year
across leading assignees

Recent-year filing has gone quiet across the field

Every assignee tracked for recent-year momentum, including General Electric and Aclara, shows zero filings in the latest year of this dataset. Given the 18-month publication lag, this likely understates true activity, but it also means no single organisation currently appears to be pulling ahead.

Recent-year momentum by assignee
Collaboration signal
7 co-assignee pairs
shared filings

Co-filing is limited and mostly individual-to-individual

Only 7 co-assignee pairings appear across the corpus, and the strongest pairs involve named individual inventors rather than corporate joint ventures. That points to a field still driven by discrete corporate or academic filers rather than consortium-style development.

Co-assignee pair counts
Historic anchor
57 citations
top-cited record

Early synchronized-metrology filings still anchor the citation graph

The most-cited record in the corpus, on synchronized metrology in power generation and distribution networks, carries 57 citations — well ahead of the next tier. That reflects its age and foundational position more than current enforcement relevance.

Most-cited records table
🔍
Under-claimed sub-areas worth a closer look
Branches where filing density is comparatively thin relative to the core measurement claims
Meter-side data privacy controlsGPS-based meter location programmingPhasor measurement at the meter edgeTamper-detection sensor fusionThird-party app hosting on meter hardware
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
General Electric Company0
Aclara Technologies LLC0
Daimu Technology Company0
Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur0
Landis+Gyr Innovations Limited0
Aclara Meters LLC0
WINAMR SYST0
RHOADS GEOFFREY B0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Advanced Metering and Smart Grid Sensing covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's Next

Where to take this analysis

The trend and IPC tables answer what has been filed; the next step is testing specific claim language against this corpus before committing engineering time.

Stress-test a draft claim against the corpus

Run a candidate claim on tamper detection or phasor measurement through the full-text corpus to see how close the nearest prior art actually sits before drafting continues.

Explore claim clearance in Eureka

Track the assignees showing zero recent-year activity

Zero-momentum does not mean zero interest — set an alert on the organisations named here so a resumed filing pattern surfaces early rather than after publication lag clears.

Set up assignee monitoring in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Advanced Metering and Smart Grid Sensing covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions on this landscape

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Advanced Metering and Smart Grid Sensing covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Advanced Metering and Smart Grid Sensing in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole advanced metering and smart grid sensing corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.