Book a demo

AMI Cybersecurity Patents: Who Leads, Where the Gaps Are 2026

AMI Cybersecurity Patents: Who Leads, Where the Gaps Are 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/advanced-metering-infrastructure-cybersecurity-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Smart Grid & Energy Systems
Advanced Metering Infrastructure Cybersecurity Patents
  • Filing has cooled since its 2019 peak of 258. 2026 is tracking at 29 (partial year), with the 2022 midpoint already below peak — this is a maturing claim space, not a growing one.
  • Digital transmission and data processing dominate the IPC mix. H04L and G06F together account for more than 2,280 of the 3,045 records, meaning most claims sit on communication and processing architecture rather than metering hardware.
  • Recent-year momentum is negative across the assignees tracked. Every named assignee in the latest-year momentum data shows a decline or a flat zero, consistent with a field where core positions were staked out earlier.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
3,045
Published Records
28%
Top-5 Share of All Records
-28%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
US
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (184 records) with 2024 (132) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 3,045 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What this landscape covers

Advanced Metering Infrastructure (AMI) cybersecurity sits at the intersection of grid operations and network security: it covers how smart meters authenticate, encrypt, detect tampering and report back through a home area network or wide-area communication link. The search underlying this page combines AMI and smart-meter terminology with cybersecurity terms — meter cybersecurity, secure communication and tamper detection — across 3,045 published patent families filed between 2015 and mid-2026.

Filing activity peaked in 2019 and has trended down since, with the most recent year understated because publication typically lags filing by around 18 months. The technology composition skews heavily toward digital transmission (H04L) and general data processing (G06F), with wireless networking (H04W) and grid power systems (H02J) as secondary clusters — a pattern that says more about where claims are concentrated than about where the unresolved engineering problems actually are.

Filing activity and IPC composition, 2017-2026
  1. 1CAUSAM ENERGY INC262
  2. 2INTUIT INC204
  3. 3GOOGLE LLC153
  4. 4TELEFONAKTIEBOLAGET LM ERICSSON (PUBL)138
  5. 5QUALCOMM INC88
  6. 6PURE STORAGE INC81
  7. 7ITRON INC74
  8. 8NAGRAVISION SA59
  9. 9DABCO LTD59
  10. 10KK TOSHIBA57
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Advanced Metering Infrastructure Cybersecurity covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
The data

Filing trend and technology composition

Two views of the same 3,045-family corpus: filing activity by year, and where those filings sit across the IPC classification system.

A peak-and-decline filing curve

Filings rose from 172 in 2017 to a peak of 258 in 2019, held near that level through the 2022 midpoint of 208, then declined toward 29 in 2026 (a partial year). Read the tail end cautiously: publication lag means 2025 and 2026 filings are still arriving.

A peak-and-decline filing curve075150225300172201720182582019202020212022202320242025292026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Communication and processing lead, metering hardware trails

H04L (1,478) and G06F (802) together cover roughly three-quarters of the corpus alongside H04W (727), pointing to claims built around transmission protocols, data handling and wireless networking rather than the physical meter. H02J, G06Q, G01D, G05B and G01R form a smaller tail covering grid integration, billing logic, measurement and control.

Communication and processing lead, metering hardware trailsH04L · Digital information transmissi…1,47848.5%G06F · Electric digital data processi…80226.3%H04W · Wireless communication networks72723.9%H02J · Power supply & grid systems39813.1%G06Q · Business, commerce & admin dat…38312.6%G01D · Measuring (general) & recording2458.0%G05B · Control & regulating systems2277.5%G01R · Electric & magnetic measurement2237.3%Other1,69555.7%

Shares are the percentage of the 3,045 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Advanced Metering Infrastructure Cybersecurity covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Advanced Metering Infrastructure Cybersecurity with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about advanced metering infrastructure cybersecurity and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key patents

A representative filing and the most-cited prior art

Representative record
US9106631B22015-08-11

US9106631B2 — Smart meter trust center switch (Honeywell International Inc., 2015-08-11)

HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC.

An apparatus includes a smart meter trust center switch. The switch includes a computer processor that is configured to execute a subset of functions of a smart meter in a home area network (HAN). The computer processor is also configured to be coupled to and communicate with the smart meter and an advanced metering infrastructure (AMI) and advanced meter reading (AMR) network.Filed in the earlier part of this corpus's active period, this patent frames the trust-center switch as an intermediary that executes a subset of smart-meter functions on behalf of the HAN — a pattern that recurs across later filings in the secure-communication cluster.

US9106631B2 — patent drawing 1US9106631B2 — patent drawing 2
View full record →
Most-cited records in this corpus
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US20160012465A1System and method for distributing, receiving, and using funds or credits and apparatus thereof2,555
2US20170006135A1Systems, methods, and devices for an enterprise internet-of-things application development platform1,900
3US7020701B1Method for collecting and processing data using internetworked wireless integrated network sensors (WINS)1,457
4US6735630B1Method for collecting data using compact internetworked wireless integrated network sensors (WINS)1,420
5US6859831B1Method and apparatus for internetworked wireless integrated network sensor (WINS) nodes1,175
6US20030093187A1PFN/TRAC systemTM FAA upgrades for accountable remote and robotics control to stop the unauthorized use of ai…977
7US20130152047A1System for distributed software quality improvement961
8US20080177678A1Method of communicating between a utility and its customer locations897
9US6832251B1Method and apparatus for distributed signal processing among internetworked wireless integrated network senso…668
10US20100148940A1Apparatus for internetworked wireless integrated network sensors (WINS)660

Citation counts favour older filings that have had more time to accumulate citations within the searched corpus; treat them as a measure of influence, not of current relevance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Advanced Metering Infrastructure Cybersecurity covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers say about the field

Four read-outs from the filing trend, IPC composition and citation data.

Filing trajectory
258 → 29
peak year (2019) vs. 2026 (partial)

The claim space is settling, not expanding

Activity has fallen steadily since 2019, and the 2022 midpoint of 208 already sits well below peak. New entrants now face a corpus with a decade of prior art rather than an open field.

Filing trend, 2017-2026
Technology mix
1,478 records
H04L, digital information transmission

Security claims cluster on the network layer

H04L alone covers nearly half the corpus. Combined with G06F's 802 records, the bulk of claim activity addresses how meter data moves and is processed, not the metering sensor itself.

IPC subclass distribution
Citation pattern
2,555 citations
top-cited record

Foundational sensor-network patents still anchor the field

The most-cited records include early wireless integrated network sensor (WINS) patents from the early 2000s, showing how much of today's AMI security architecture traces back to general sensor-networking foundations rather than metering-specific origins.

Most-cited records in corpus
Filing geography
1,273 filings
United States receiving office

Filing is concentrated in the US, with EPO and PCT as secondary routes

The United States receives roughly triple the filings of the next office (EPO, 460), with WIPO/PCT, India, Australia and Canada forming a smaller but still active secondary tier.

Receiving office distribution
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to advanced metering infrastructure cybersecurity, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Advanced Metering Infrastructure Cybersecurity covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Assignee activity and where the gaps sit

Recent-year momentum across tracked assignees is uniformly flat or negative, and co-assignment pairs are few — this looks like a field where positions were established early and are now being maintained rather than expanded.

Momentum
-33% to -100%
YoY change, tracked assignees

No assignee is accelerating

Every assignee in the recent-year momentum data shows a decline or a flat zero in the latest year, including large diversified filers. This is consistent with the overall filing peak having passed in 2019.

Recent-year momentum by assignee
Collaboration
10 pairs
co-assignee pairs identified

Co-filing is rare and concentrated

Only ten co-assignee pairs appear in the corpus, and the strongest pair links a single corporate group's two entities rather than reflecting broad industry collaboration.

Co-assignee pair analysis
Filing base
3,045 families
total in assignee ranking

A long tail beneath the largest filers

The assignee ranking spans the full 3,045-family set, with activity distributed across telecom equipment makers, grid technology firms and single-filing entrants rather than sitting entirely with one dominant player.

Assignee ranking, full corpus
🔍
Under-claimed sub-areas worth checking before filing
These sit adjacent to the dense H04L/G06F cluster but carry noticeably fewer records in this corpus.
Meter-side physical tamper-evident enclosuresGrid-edge key rotation for HAN devicesCross-utility tamper-event correlationLow-power authentication for meter mesh networksFirmware attestation at the meter gateway
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Qualcomm Incorporated2-33%
CAUSAM ENERGY INC1-88%
Pure Storage, Inc.1-86%
Itron, Inc.0
Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson0-100%
Google LLC0
Nagravision S.A.0
Toshiba Corporation0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Advanced Metering Infrastructure Cybersecurity covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's next

Where to take this analysis

The dataset points to a field with declining new filing but a dense, unevenly distributed prior-art base. Two directions follow from that.

Map claim boundaries before drafting

With H04L and G06F this dense, a new secure-communication or tamper-detection filing needs a clause-level design-around check against the most-cited records, not just a keyword search.

Explore claims in Eureka →

Track the under-claimed branches

Meter-side tamper enclosures and mesh-network authentication show up thinly in this corpus relative to the network-layer cluster — worth monitoring for new entrants before the space fills in.

Set up monitoring in Eureka →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Advanced Metering Infrastructure Cybersecurity covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions about AMI cybersecurity patents

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Advanced Metering Infrastructure Cybersecurity covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Advanced Metering Infrastructure Cybersecurity in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole advanced metering infrastructure cybersecurity corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.