Book a demo

AMI Modularity & Standardization Patents: Fragmented Field, Long Tail 2026

AMI Modularity & Standardization Patents: Fragmented Field, Long Tail 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/advanced-metering-infrastructure-modularity-and-standardization-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Smart Grid & Energy Systems
Advanced Metering Infrastructure Modularity and Standardization Patents
  • Filing has not built momentum. activity peaked at 4 families in 2021 and fell to 1 by the 2022 midpoint, with no sustained climb since.
  • Claim activity clusters outside the meter itself. the largest IPC subclass is H04N (pictorial communication), ahead of the core measurement class G01R, suggesting camera/video-security integration is drawing more filing than metrology proper.
  • No single assignee dominates. the strongest co-filing links are a single university and its named inventors, each with just one family in the latest year — this is a long-tail field, not a concentrated one.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
24
Published Records
-100%
3-Yr Growth (lag-adjusted)
US
Leading Jurisdiction
10
Active Filers Ranked
Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Field Overview

What this patent landscape covers

This landscape tracks patent families that combine advanced metering infrastructure (AMI) or smart-meter subject matter with claims to standardized or modular metering and interoperability standards. The search string requires both elements to appear in title, abstract or claims, which narrows the set to documents that treat modularity or standard-setting as a filed invention rather than a background feature. Coverage runs from 2015 through the 2026 data cut-off, with 24 published families identified across that window.

The set is small enough that individual documents move the picture: a single highly cited video-recorder patent sits inside the corpus alongside university-filed metering hardware, and the technology composition reflects that mix rather than a single dominant engineering approach.

Filing activity and technology composition, 2015–2026
  1. 1Honeywell International Inc.6
  2. 2RAZBERI TECHNOLOGIES INC6
  3. 3GALVIN TOM4
  4. 4Marktech Instruments3
  5. 5General Electric Company2
  6. 6EXPLICATION AUTOMATION LLC2
  7. 7GUJARAT TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY1
  8. 8DR SACHIN VRAJLAL RAJANI1
  9. 9DR DARSHITA SURYAKANTBHAI PATHAK1
  10. 10CHITRANG KAMENDU VYAS1
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Advanced Metering Infrastructure Modularity and Standardization covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
The Data

Filing trend and technology composition

Two views of the same 24-family corpus: filings by year, and where those filings land across IPC subclasses.

Filing trend, 2017–2026

Filings rose from 2 in 2017 to a peak of 4 in 2021, then dropped back to 1 by 2022 and have not recovered. With 2026 still partial and publication typically lagging filing by around 18 months, the most recent one to two years will read low regardless of underlying activity — but even accounting for that lag, the trend line is flat-to-declining rather than growing.

Filing trend, 2017–2026012342201720182019202042021202220232024202512026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

IPC subclass composition

H04N (pictorial communication) leads with 10 records, ahead of G01R (electric and magnetic measurement) at 7 and G06F (data processing) and G08B (signalling/alarm) at 5 each. G01D (general measuring and recording) and H04L (digital transmission) each hold 4, with G01C and G06Q at 2 apiece. The weight toward H04N and G08B indicates a meaningful share of this corpus is about metering integrated with video/security monitoring rather than pure measurement or communication-protocol standardization.

IPC subclass compositionH04N · Pictorial communication (video…1041.7%G01R · Electric & magnetic measurement729.2%G06F · Electric digital data processi…520.8%G08B · Signalling & alarm systems520.8%G01D · Measuring (general) & recording416.7%H04L · Digital information transmissi…416.7%G01C · Distance, navigation & gyrosco…28.3%G06Q · Business, commerce & admin dat…28.3%Other1250.0%

Shares are the percentage of the 24 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Advanced Metering Infrastructure Modularity and Standardization covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Advanced Metering Infrastructure Modularity and Standardization with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about advanced metering infrastructure modularity and standardization and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

Representative filing and most-cited prior art

Representative Record
US20130169266A12013-07-04

Meter disconnect relay (US20130169266A1)

ACLARA METERS LLC

A modular meter disconnect relay built around a base, a solenoid with a moving plunger, a shuttle driven by that plunger, and one or more disconnect switches opened or closed by the shuttle's movement. A spring supplements the plunger's outward force, and a magnet is part of the solenoid assembly.Filed by Aclara Meters LLC; published 2013-07-04.

US20130169266A1 — patent drawing 1US20130169266A1 — patent drawing 2
View full record
Most-cited records in this corpus
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US20120113265A1Network video recorder system156
2US7437204B2Method and apparatus for monitoring host to tool communications92
3US20210183175A1System of privacy oriented automated electric vehicle miles traveled usage fee assessment and settlement usin…57
4US20160232764A1System and method for a security system51
5US7200671B1Method and apparatus for monitoring host to tool communications49
6US20150103179A1Network video recorder system47
7US20170201724A1System and method for a security system45
8US20200099896A1System and method for a security system41
9US8922658B2Network video recorder system35
10US20070094548A1Method and Apparatus for Monitoring Host to Tool Communications20

Citation counts favour older documents that have had more time to accumulate references within the searched corpus; treat them as a measure of influence on this field's citation graph, not as a ranking of current commercial relevance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Advanced Metering Infrastructure Modularity and Standardization covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers indicate

Three patterns stand out once the filing trend, IPC mix and assignee structure are read together.

Filing Momentum
4 → 1
peak (2021) to midpoint (2022)

No sustained filing wave

Filings peaked at 4 families in 2021 and fell back to 1 by 2022, with the run of years since showing no renewed climb. For a field this small, a single active applicant can produce a visible bump — the 2021 peak does not by itself indicate a broadening trend.

24 families total, 2015–2026
Technology Split
10 of 24
H04N share of records

Video/security integration outweighs core metrology

H04N, the pictorial-communication class, holds more records than G01R, the electric-measurement class most directly tied to meter accuracy. That split suggests a meaningful part of this corpus is filed around metering combined with camera or surveillance functions, not standardization of the measurement chain itself.

IPC composition, 24 records
Assignee Structure
6 pairs
co-assignee relationships

A long tail, not a concentrated field

The strongest co-filing links in the dataset are a university and its named inventors, each contributing a single family. No corporate assignee shows a multi-family cluster of recent activity, which points to a field still being staked out by individual filers rather than consolidated by a small set of large players.

Recent-year momentum by assignee
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to advanced metering infrastructure modularity and standardization, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Advanced Metering Infrastructure Modularity and Standardization covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who is filing, and where the gaps sit

The assignee list is short and thinly spread: a university research group with named co-inventors accounts for the only recent-year activity in the ranking, while several corporate holders in the broader citation set show no filings in the latest year.

Academic Filer
1 family
latest-year filing

Gujarat Technological University and named inventors

The university appears alongside three separate named co-inventors, each pairing producing one family. This is a research-driven filing pattern rather than a product-line one, and it is the only entrant with activity recorded in the latest year.

Co-assignee pairs, strongest links
Legacy Corporate Holders
0 in latest year
recent-year momentum

Prior corporate assignees have gone quiet

Assignees that appear in the broader citation history show no filings in the most recent year tracked, consistent with a corpus where early activity has not been followed by renewed corporate investment.

Recent-year momentum by assignee
Filing Geography
19 of 24
US receiving office share

Heavily concentrated in the United States

Nineteen of the tracked filings went through the United States receiving office, with small counts at the EPO, Austria, Germany and India. Anyone filing a standardization-focused claim outside the US faces far less prior art to contend with in this specific search.

Receiving offices, 24 records
🔍
Under-claimed branches worth checking before filing
These sub-areas show low or no direct representation in the current 24-family set.
Cross-vendor meter data protocol conformance testingModular disconnect-switch retrofit kitsInteroperability certification workflows for third-party metersStandardized meter firmware update signalling
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
GUJARAT TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY1
DR SACHIN VRAJLAL RAJANI1
DR DARSHITA SURYAKANTBHAI PATHAK1
CHITRANG KAMENDU VYAS1
Honeywell International Inc.0
RAZBERI TECHNOLOGIES INC0
GALVIN TOM0
Marktech Instruments0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Advanced Metering Infrastructure Modularity and Standardization covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's Next

Where to take this analysis

The filing pattern here is thin enough that manual review of the full family list is practical before committing to a filing or freedom-to-operate position.

Check the claim language directly

With only 24 families, reading full claim sets for the H04N-heavy records is feasible and will show whether video-integration claims actually read on standard metering hardware or sit in an adjacent product category.

Explore claims in Eureka

Watch for renewed filing activity

The flat trend since 2021 means a new filer entering this space would be visible quickly against the low baseline. Set an alert on the search string rather than relying on periodic manual checks.

Set up monitoring in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Advanced Metering Infrastructure Modularity and Standardization covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions about this patent landscape

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Advanced Metering Infrastructure Modularity and Standardization covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Advanced Metering Infrastructure Modularity and Standardization in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole advanced metering infrastructure modularity and standardization corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.