Book a demo

AMI Process Automation Patents: Who Leads, Where Filings Stall 2026

AMI Process Automation Patents: Who Leads, Where Filings Stall 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/advanced-metering-infrastructure-process-automation-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Smart Grid & Energy Systems · Patent Landscape
Advanced metering infrastructure process automation patents: where filing has cooled and who still holds the claim space
  • Filing has already peaked. Annual filings ran from 30 in 2017 to a high of 46 in 2018, then slid back toward single digits by 2026 — this is a mature, not a growing, claim space.
  • Communications, not metering, carries the bulk of the claims. H04L digital transmission (449 records) and H04W wireless networks (270) outweigh G01D measuring and recording (237), showing most contested ground sits in how meter data moves, not how it is sensed.
  • A dense co-filing cluster dominates the network. One assignee pair alone co-files 111 times — far ahead of any other pairing — pointing to a tightly bound partnership rather than a broad, open ecosystem.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
1,316
Published Records
46%
Top-5 Share of All Records
-41%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
US
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (27 records) with 2024 (16) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 1,316 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What this landscape covers

This landscape tracks patent families that combine advanced metering infrastructure (AMI) or smart-meter claims with automated meter reading, remote meter operation, or automated data-collection claims. It spans records published between 2015 and 2026, drawing on 1,316 patent families indexed across major receiving offices. The scope deliberately sits at the intersection of metering hardware and the software or communications layer that automates reading, reporting and remote operation — the part of the stack most exposed to process-automation claims rather than sensor design.

Because publication trails filing by roughly 18 months, the last one or two years in any chart will understate real filing activity; treat the most recent points as provisional rather than a confirmed downturn.

Filings by year, 2017-2026
  1. 1ITRON INC178
  2. 2CISCO TECHNOLOGY INC143
  3. 3DOMINION ENERGY TECHNOLOGIES INC127
  4. 4TRILLIANT NETWORKS INC81
  5. 5ITRON NETWORKED SOLUTIONS INC74
  6. 6ASTROLINK INT LLC73
  7. 7TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INC62
  8. 8TRC40
  9. 9KAMSTRUP38
  10. 10SENSUS USA INC36
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Advanced Metering Infrastructure Process Automation covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
The numbers

Filing trend and technology composition

Two views of the same dataset: how filing volume has moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses carry the claim density.

A peak already behind us

Filings rose from 30 in 2017 to a peak of 46 in 2018, held roughly level through the 2022 midpoint at 23, and have declined toward 5 by 2026. Read the last year or two as undercounted rather than as proof the field has stopped — but the multi-year decline from the 2018 peak is real and predates the reporting lag.

A peak already behind us013253850302017462018201920202021202220232024202552026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Communications carries more claim weight than sensing

H04L (digital information transmission, 449 records) and H04W (wireless communication networks, 270) together outweigh G01D (measuring and recording, 237), the subclass closest to the meter itself. G06Q (business and admin data processing, 178) and H02J (power supply and grid systems, 149) round out a picture where data transport, processing and billing logic are more heavily claimed than the physical metering function.

Communications carries more claim weight than sensingH04L · Digital information transmissi…44934.1%H04W · Wireless communication networks27020.5%G01D · Measuring (general) & recording23718.0%H04B · Transmission (general)22717.2%G06F · Electric digital data processi…21816.6%G06Q · Business, commerce & admin dat…17813.5%G01R · Electric & magnetic measurement15511.8%H02J · Power supply & grid systems14911.3%Other60245.7%

Shares are the percentage of the 1,316 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Advanced Metering Infrastructure Process Automation covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Advanced Metering Infrastructure Process Automation with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about advanced metering infrastructure process automation and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key patents

The most-cited records and one representative filing

Representative filing
EP2487946B12015-07-08

EP2487946B1 — wireless-enabled device configuration over an advanced metering infrastructure network

GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY

The filing, from General Electric, describes configuring a wireless-enabled device over an AMI network: a first device receives information about available wireless access points from a first network, then receives configuration information from a second device over a second network so it can connect to a wireless network through one of those access points.Granted 2015-07-08. The claim sits squarely in the H04W/G01D overlap this landscape flags as the busiest zone: remote configuration of metering endpoints over wireless infrastructure.

EP2487946B1 — patent drawing 1EP2487946B1 — patent drawing 2
View EP2487946B1 in Eureka →
Highest-citation records in this corpus
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US20100332373A1System and method for participation in energy-related markets1,021
2US20030093187A1PFN/TRAC systemTM FAA upgrades for accountable remote and robotics control to stop the unauthorized use of ai…977
3US20100217550A1System and method for electric grid utilization and optimization774
4US20110140911A1Reliable, long-haul data communications over power lines for meter reading and other communications services652
5US20050187677A1PFN/TRAC systemTM FAA upgrades for accountable remote and robotics control to stop the unauthorized use of ai…595
6US20150094968A1Comfort-driven optimization of electric grid utilization493
7US6965816B2PFN/TRAC system FAA upgrades for accountable remote and robotics control to stop the unauthorized use of airc…489
8US20100218108A1System and method for trading complex energy securities480
9US20100217642A1System and method for single-action energy resource scheduling and participation in energy-related securities442
10US20100217651A1System and method for managing energy resources based on a scoring system419

Citation counts inside a searched corpus favour older filings that have had more years to accumulate references — read these as markers of influence on later filings, not as a ranking of current commercial relevance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Advanced Metering Infrastructure Process Automation covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the filing pattern signals

Three read-throughs from the trend, the IPC split, and the co-filing structure.

Filing momentum
46 → 5
peak (2018) to latest year

The growth phase is over

Filings peaked at 46 in 2018 and have declined through the 2022 midpoint of 23 down toward 5 in 2026. Even allowing for publication lag understating the last year or two, the multi-year decline from peak predates that lag and points to a field where the core claim space has largely been staked out.

Filing trend, 2017-2026
Claim distribution
449 vs 237
H04L records vs G01D records

The fight is in the data pipe, not the sensor

H04L (digital transmission) records nearly double G01D (measuring and recording) records. Firms building differentiated value in raw metrology may find more open ground than firms trying to patent yet another way to move meter data over a network.

IPC subclass composition
Co-filing structure
111 co-filings
top assignee pair, vs 19 for the next

One partnership dominates the collaboration graph

The strongest co-assignee pair co-files 111 times, roughly six times the next-strongest pairing at 19. That gap suggests a bilateral, tightly coordinated filing relationship rather than a broad industry consortium — useful context when assessing freedom to operate around either party's portfolio.

Co-assignee pair analysis, top 3 pairs
Geographic filing
503 US filings
vs 190 EPO, 141 PCT

US filing leads by a wide margin

United States receiving-office filings (503) outnumber EPO (190) and WIPO/PCT (141) filings combined by a comfortable margin, with Canada, Australia and Germany trailing further behind. Portfolio strategy in this space still centres on US protection first.

Receiving office distribution
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to advanced metering infrastructure process automation, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Advanced Metering Infrastructure Process Automation covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who holds the claim space, and where the momentum has stalled

Recent-year filing counts show the leading assignees in this corpus have all gone quiet in the latest reporting year — consistent with the overall filing decline rather than any single company retreating.

Filing scale
1,316 families
total in the ranking

A large but no-longer-growing pool

The assignee ranking covers 1,316 patent families, but recent-year momentum data shows the named leaders — including Itron, Cisco, Silver Spring Networks and Trilliant Networks — each recorded zero filings in the latest year, some down 100% year over year from prior activity.

Recent-year momentum by assignee
Collaboration
10 co-assignee pairs
identified in this corpus

Collaboration is concentrated, not distributed

Only 10 co-assignee pairs appear in the dataset, and filing volume within those pairs is heavily skewed toward one dominant relationship at 111 joint filings. Most collaboration in this space is bilateral rather than multi-party.

Co-assignee pair count
Technology reach
8 IPC subclasses
each with 149+ records

Portfolios span communications, compute and grid power

Leading assignees typically hold claims across several of the eight major subclasses — H04L, H04W, G01D, H04B, G06F, G06Q, G01R and H02J — rather than concentrating in one. That breadth raises the bar for a new entrant trying to design a clean, uncontested position.

IPC subclass spread
🔍
Under-claimed sub-areas worth checking before filing
Branches adjacent to the dense H04L/H04W/G01D core that carry comparatively lighter claim density in this corpus.
edge-based meter data pre-processingself-healing mesh reconfiguration protocolstamper-event root-cause classificationpower-line carrier fault localisationmeter firmware over-the-air rollback logic
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Itron, Inc.0-100%
Cisco Technology, Inc.0
Daming Energy Technology Co., Ltd.0
Astrolink International LLC0
Silver Spring Networks, Inc.0
TRILLIANT NETWORKS INC0
Texas Instruments Incorporated0-100%
Kamstrup A/S0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Advanced Metering Infrastructure Process Automation covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's next

Where to take this analysis

The dataset points to a mature, communications-heavy claim space with concentrated collaboration and cooling filing activity. Turning that into a filing or freedom-to-operate decision needs a closer read of specific claims.

Map freedom to operate against the dense H04L/H04W cluster

Before filing a new automated meter-reading or remote-operation claim, check it against the communications-layer subclasses that carry the heaviest density in this corpus, not just against metering-specific art.

Run a freedom-to-operate check in Eureka →

Watch the dominant co-filing pair

The strongest co-assignee relationship in this dataset files together at a scale no other pairing approaches; tracking its combined portfolio is more informative than tracking either party alone.

Track assignee portfolios in Eureka →

Test the under-claimed branches

Sub-areas like edge-based data pre-processing and tamper-event classification sit outside the densest IPC clusters and may offer cleaner claim drafting room.

Explore white space in Eureka →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Advanced Metering Infrastructure Process Automation covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Advanced Metering Infrastructure Process Automation covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Advanced Metering Infrastructure Process Automation in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole advanced metering infrastructure process automation corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.