AMI Process Automation Patents: Who Leads, Where Filings Stall 2026
- Filing has already peaked. Annual filings ran from 30 in 2017 to a high of 46 in 2018, then slid back toward single digits by 2026 — this is a mature, not a growing, claim space.
- Communications, not metering, carries the bulk of the claims. H04L digital transmission (449 records) and H04W wireless networks (270) outweigh G01D measuring and recording (237), showing most contested ground sits in how meter data moves, not how it is sensed.
- A dense co-filing cluster dominates the network. One assignee pair alone co-files 111 times — far ahead of any other pairing — pointing to a tightly bound partnership rather than a broad, open ecosystem.
Filing growth compares 2021 (27 records) with 2024 (16) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 1,316 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.
What this landscape covers
This landscape tracks patent families that combine advanced metering infrastructure (AMI) or smart-meter claims with automated meter reading, remote meter operation, or automated data-collection claims. It spans records published between 2015 and 2026, drawing on 1,316 patent families indexed across major receiving offices. The scope deliberately sits at the intersection of metering hardware and the software or communications layer that automates reading, reporting and remote operation — the part of the stack most exposed to process-automation claims rather than sensor design.
Because publication trails filing by roughly 18 months, the last one or two years in any chart will understate real filing activity; treat the most recent points as provisional rather than a confirmed downturn.
Filing trend and technology composition
Two views of the same dataset: how filing volume has moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses carry the claim density.
A peak already behind us
Filings rose from 30 in 2017 to a peak of 46 in 2018, held roughly level through the 2022 midpoint at 23, and have declined toward 5 by 2026. Read the last year or two as undercounted rather than as proof the field has stopped — but the multi-year decline from the 2018 peak is real and predates the reporting lag.
Communications carries more claim weight than sensing
H04L (digital information transmission, 449 records) and H04W (wireless communication networks, 270) together outweigh G01D (measuring and recording, 237), the subclass closest to the meter itself. G06Q (business and admin data processing, 178) and H02J (power supply and grid systems, 149) round out a picture where data transport, processing and billing logic are more heavily claimed than the physical metering function.
Shares are the percentage of the 1,316 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
Go deeper on Advanced Metering Infrastructure Process Automation with Eureka
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about advanced metering infrastructure process automation and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaThe most-cited records and one representative filing
EP2487946B1 — wireless-enabled device configuration over an advanced metering infrastructure network
The filing, from General Electric, describes configuring a wireless-enabled device over an AMI network: a first device receives information about available wireless access points from a first network, then receives configuration information from a second device over a second network so it can connect to a wireless network through one of those access points.Granted 2015-07-08. The claim sits squarely in the H04W/G01D overlap this landscape flags as the busiest zone: remote configuration of metering endpoints over wireless infrastructure.


| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US20100332373A1 | System and method for participation in energy-related markets | 1,021 |
| 2 | US20030093187A1 | PFN/TRAC systemTM FAA upgrades for accountable remote and robotics control to stop the unauthorized use of ai… | 977 |
| 3 | US20100217550A1 | System and method for electric grid utilization and optimization | 774 |
| 4 | US20110140911A1 | Reliable, long-haul data communications over power lines for meter reading and other communications services | 652 |
| 5 | US20050187677A1 | PFN/TRAC systemTM FAA upgrades for accountable remote and robotics control to stop the unauthorized use of ai… | 595 |
| 6 | US20150094968A1 | Comfort-driven optimization of electric grid utilization | 493 |
| 7 | US6965816B2 | PFN/TRAC system FAA upgrades for accountable remote and robotics control to stop the unauthorized use of airc… | 489 |
| 8 | US20100218108A1 | System and method for trading complex energy securities | 480 |
| 9 | US20100217642A1 | System and method for single-action energy resource scheduling and participation in energy-related securities | 442 |
| 10 | US20100217651A1 | System and method for managing energy resources based on a scoring system | 419 |
Citation counts inside a searched corpus favour older filings that have had more years to accumulate references — read these as markers of influence on later filings, not as a ranking of current commercial relevance.
Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
Put your own technology through the same analysis
Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →MCP server & REST API
When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →What the filing pattern signals
Three read-throughs from the trend, the IPC split, and the co-filing structure.
The growth phase is over
Filings peaked at 46 in 2018 and have declined through the 2022 midpoint of 23 down toward 5 in 2026. Even allowing for publication lag understating the last year or two, the multi-year decline from peak predates that lag and points to a field where the core claim space has largely been staked out.
The fight is in the data pipe, not the sensor
H04L (digital transmission) records nearly double G01D (measuring and recording) records. Firms building differentiated value in raw metrology may find more open ground than firms trying to patent yet another way to move meter data over a network.
One partnership dominates the collaboration graph
The strongest co-assignee pair co-files 111 times, roughly six times the next-strongest pairing at 19. That gap suggests a bilateral, tightly coordinated filing relationship rather than a broad industry consortium — useful context when assessing freedom to operate around either party's portfolio.
US filing leads by a wide margin
United States receiving-office filings (503) outnumber EPO (190) and WIPO/PCT (141) filings combined by a comfortable margin, with Canada, Australia and Germany trailing further behind. Portfolio strategy in this space still centres on US protection first.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to advanced metering infrastructure process automation, with the prior art for and against each one.
Who holds the claim space, and where the momentum has stalled
Recent-year filing counts show the leading assignees in this corpus have all gone quiet in the latest reporting year — consistent with the overall filing decline rather than any single company retreating.
A large but no-longer-growing pool
The assignee ranking covers 1,316 patent families, but recent-year momentum data shows the named leaders — including Itron, Cisco, Silver Spring Networks and Trilliant Networks — each recorded zero filings in the latest year, some down 100% year over year from prior activity.
Collaboration is concentrated, not distributed
Only 10 co-assignee pairs appear in the dataset, and filing volume within those pairs is heavily skewed toward one dominant relationship at 111 joint filings. Most collaboration in this space is bilateral rather than multi-party.
Portfolios span communications, compute and grid power
Leading assignees typically hold claims across several of the eight major subclasses — H04L, H04W, G01D, H04B, G06F, G06Q, G01R and H02J — rather than concentrating in one. That breadth raises the bar for a new entrant trying to design a clean, uncontested position.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Itron, Inc. | 0 | -100% |
| Cisco Technology, Inc. | 0 | — |
| Daming Energy Technology Co., Ltd. | 0 | — |
| Astrolink International LLC | 0 | — |
| Silver Spring Networks, Inc. | 0 | — |
| TRILLIANT NETWORKS INC | 0 | — |
| Texas Instruments Incorporated | 0 | -100% |
| Kamstrup A/S | 0 | — |
Where to take this analysis
The dataset points to a mature, communications-heavy claim space with concentrated collaboration and cooling filing activity. Turning that into a filing or freedom-to-operate decision needs a closer read of specific claims.
Map freedom to operate against the dense H04L/H04W cluster
Before filing a new automated meter-reading or remote-operation claim, check it against the communications-layer subclasses that carry the heaviest density in this corpus, not just against metering-specific art.
Run a freedom-to-operate check in Eureka →Watch the dominant co-filing pair
The strongest co-assignee relationship in this dataset files together at a scale no other pairing approaches; tracking its combined portfolio is more informative than tracking either party alone.
Track assignee portfolios in Eureka →Test the under-claimed branches
Sub-areas like edge-based data pre-processing and tamper-event classification sit outside the densest IPC clusters and may offer cleaner claim drafting room.
Explore white space in Eureka →Frequently asked questions
No — filings in this corpus peaked in 2018 at 46 and have declined steadily since, reaching an estimated 5 in 2026. Some of the drop in the most recent one to two years is an artefact of publication lag, since filings typically take around 18 months to appear in the public record. But the multi-year decline from the 2018 peak through the 2022 midpoint of 23 predates that lag and reflects a genuine slowdown in new filing activity, consistent with a claim space where the core ground has already been staked out.
H04L, covering digital information transmission, is the single largest subclass in this dataset at 449 records, ahead of H04W wireless networks at 270 and G01D measuring and recording at 237. This means claim density is heaviest in how meter data is transmitted and processed, not in the sensing or metrology function itself. Anyone drafting new claims in this space should search H04L and H04W art as closely as G01D art, since the communications layer is where most prior art sits.
The corpus's recent-year momentum data shows named leaders such as Itron, Cisco, Silver Spring Networks and Trilliant Networks all recorded zero filings in the latest reporting year, several down 100% year over year. This does not necessarily mean these companies have exited the space — it is consistent with the broader industry-wide filing slowdown and possibly with publication lag understating the newest filings. It does mean recent activity should be checked directly against each company's current filing behaviour rather than assumed from older portfolio size.
Branches adjacent to the dense communications and measurement core — such as edge-based meter data pre-processing, self-healing mesh reconfiguration, tamper-event root-cause classification, power-line carrier fault localisation, and firmware rollback logic for over-the-air updates — carry comparatively lighter claim density in this dataset than the core H04L, H04W and G01D subclasses. These are reasonable areas to search more closely before assuming a claim is blocked, though a lighter density in this corpus is not a guarantee of a clear path; a full clearance search is still required.
EP2487946B1, granted to General Electric in 2015, claims a method for configuring a wireless-enabled device over an AMI network, where a first device receives information about available wireless access points from one network and receives separate configuration information from a second device over a second network to complete the connection. Work that configures a metering endpoint's wireless connection using a single network path, or that does not rely on a distinct second device supplying configuration data, sits outside the literal claim as summarised here. Anyone building remote wireless configuration for metering endpoints should read the full granted claim set rather than rely on the abstract, since the two-network, two-device structure is the specific mechanism at issue.
Research Advanced Metering Infrastructure Process Automation in depth with Eureka
Go past this page: query the whole advanced metering infrastructure process automation corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.