Book a demo

Advanced Node Fabrication Patent Landscape 2026

Advanced Node Fabrication Patent Landscape 2026
Competitive Landscape

Advanced Node Fabrication Patent Landscape in 2026

The Advanced Node Fabrication patent corpus is tightly concentrated, with Novellus Systems and Praxair Technology holding the dominant positions across semiconductor device processing and specialty chemical routes. Filing activity is narrow in scope, with the bulk of recorded activity appearing in 2023 and the lifecycle stage not yet determinable from current evidence.

4
Patent families in scope
82%
Top-5 share of top-100 filers
3-yr filing growth (lag-adj.)
SG
Leading jurisdiction
↗ Tap any metric to explore the underlying patents and uncover deeper insights in PatSnap Eureka
Published byPatSnap Insights Team··5 min readVerified by PatSnap Eureka data
Overview

Novellus Systems leads a highly concentrated field

Novellus Systems Inc ranks first among all applicants, followed by Praxair Technology Inc in second place. The top five filers collectively account for 82% of the combined patent records held by the hundred largest filers, signaling an unusually concentrated competitive structure.

The tier gap between Novellus Systems and the remaining applicants is pronounced. Beyond the top two corporate entities, the remaining ranked names are individual inventors, suggesting that institutional R&D in this specific corpus is restricted to a small number of organizations.

Leading applicants
#ApplicantPatent recordsShare
1Novellus Systems Inc6
2Praxair Technology Inc3
3POWELL RONALD A2
4FELLIS AARON R2
5SPURGEON LAURENCE E1
6HEIDERMAN DOUGLAS C1
7SINHA ASHWINI K1
8SMITH STANLEY M1
↗ Hover a row · click a company to ask Eureka

Novellus Systems’ lead position, anchored in H01L 21 semiconductor device processing, implies that any new entrant must either differentiate on chemistry (as Praxair Technology does through C07F and C23F routes) or carve into adjacent application areas where coverage is currently sparse.

Activity in the most recent 18–24 months is subject to publication lag and should not be interpreted as an absence of ongoing R&D. Longer-window growth, applicant concentration, and technology-route coverage are therefore more reliable signals than the latest-year bar alone.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Chart shows the top applicants ranked by patent records; the corpus total is measured in patent families. These figures use different units and should not be compared directly.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Trends & Structure

Filing concentrated in 2023; technology mix spans devices and specialty chemicals

The annual filing trend and the IPC technology composition together reveal both the temporal pattern of activity and the technical routes that define this corpus.

Annual filing trend

Recorded filings are effectively zero for every year from 2017 through 2022 and from 2024 onward in this corpus, with all four patent families appearing in 2023. The most recent periods remain subject to publication lag, so the apparent absence of post-2023 activity should not be read as a cessation of R&D.

Annual filing trendAnnual values from 2017 to 2026, peaking at 4 in 2023.02017020180201902020020210202242023020240202502026↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka

Technology composition

H01L (Semiconductor devices) is the dominant IPC class, followed by C07F (Organo-metallic and non-carbon compounds) and C23F (Corrosion and metal removal). C09K (Materials for miscellaneous applications) and F17C (Pressure vessels and gas storage) each appear at low frequency, marking them as adjacent and relatively sparse branches within this corpus.

Technology compositionH01L · Semiconductor devices leads with 10; C07F · Organo-metallic & non-carbon compounds 4.H01L · Semiconductor dev…10C07F · Organo-metallic &…4C23F · Corrosion & metal…3C09K · Materials for mis…1F17C · Pressure vessels …1↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Technology-branch counts are measured in patent records; a single patent family can carry several IPC classes, so class totals can exceed the family total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Key Patents

Highly cited patent families surfaced by the query

Citation-heavy patent families returned by the query. Use this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents.

Featured patent
US8617982B2Published 2013-12-31

Subtractive patterning to define circuit components

Novellus SYSTEMS, INC.

Certain embodiments pertain to local interconnects formed by subtractive patterning of blanket layer of tungsten or other conductive material. The grain sizes of tungsten or other deposited metal can be grown to relatively large dimensions, which results in increased electrical conductivity due to, e.g., reduced electron scattering at grain boundaries as… (excerpt from the patent abstract)

Subtractive patterning to define circuit components — patent drawingSubtractive patterning to define circuit components — patent drawing
Representative drawings from the patent document.
Open this patent in Eureka →
Highly cited patent families surfaced by this query
#PatentCitations
1Subtractive patterning to define circuit components39
2Subtractive patterning to define circuit components16
3Subtractive patterning to define circuit components1

Ranked by total forward citations. Citation counts favour older and broadly cited patent families, and broad or adjacent patents may appear when they match the search scope. Treat this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents. Some patent titles may be shown in their original, non-English language where an accurate translation could not be guaranteed.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Citation-ranked patent families surfaced by this query.Open in Eureka →
Insights

What the competitive structure means for R&D investment

Four structural signals — maturity, concentration, collaboration patterns, and geographic footprint — frame the practical implications for teams deciding where to place R&D bets.

Maturity

Lifecycle stage not yet determinable

The evidence does not currently support a definitive lifecycle classification for this corpus. All recorded filing activity is concentrated in 2023, and the corpus contains only 4 patent families, making trend-based lifecycle inference unreliable. Teams should treat this as an emerging or early-stage signal rather than a mature field until more filing history accumulates.

Early signal
Concentration

Two corporate entities dominate; individuals fill the remainder

Novellus Systems and Praxair Technology are the only corporate filers of note. All other ranked applicants are individual inventors, which is atypical for an advanced semiconductor fabrication topic and may reflect the narrow scope of this particular corpus. The top five filers’ share of 82% among the hundred largest filers leaves limited room for mid-tier challengers within the current corpus boundary.

High concentration
Collaboration

Novellus Systems is the hub of all recorded co-filing activity

Four co-applicant pairs are identified, each linking an individual inventor — Powell Ronald A, Gao Juwen, Fellis Aaron R, and Danek Michal — with Novellus Systems, each with two co-filed records. No inter-corporate collaboration is recorded. This hub-and-spoke pattern around a single corporate anchor is consistent with internal inventor teams rather than cross-organizational alliances.

Hub-and-spoke
Geography

Singapore, United States, and PCT routes share lead jurisdiction status

Singapore, the United States, and WIPO (PCT) each account for three patent records, with Europe (EPO) recording one. Singapore’s prominence as a lead office alongside the United States and PCT is notable and may reflect manufacturing or R&D operations in the Asia-Pacific region. Coverage in other major semiconductor jurisdictions such as Japan, South Korea, or Taiwan is not evidenced in this corpus.

SG / US / PCT
PatSnap Eureka · TRIZ Solution Agent
Facing a specific technical bottleneck in this field?

Go beyond the landscape: Eureka’s TRIZ Solution agent breaks down an R&D problem and returns patented concept solutions, each with a technical approach and cited patent & literature evidence.

Solve it in Eureka →
Top collaboration links
ApplicantCollaboratorCo-filings
POWELL RONALD ANovellus Systems Inc2
GAO JUWENNovellus Systems Inc2
FELLIS AARON RNovellus Systems Inc2
DANEK MICHALNovellus Systems Inc2

Co-filing pairs, ranked by the number of jointly-filed patent families.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Insight cards are grounded in applicant ranking, collaboration pairs, jurisdiction, and lifecycle evidence.Explore insights →
Leaders

Novellus Systems leads on semiconductor processing; Praxair Technology differentiates on chemistry

Two corporate entities define the competitive frontier in this corpus, each with a distinct technical emphasis and both appearing as new entrants in the recent filing window.

Leader · Novellus Systems Inc

Novellus Systems Inc

Novellus Systems holds the top position with 6 patent records, all concentrated in H01L 21 (semiconductor device processing). Co-filing activity links the company with four named inventors across two records each. Praxair Technology Inc is not listed among applicants with prior-period filings in the momentum data, and Novellus Systems does not appear in the momentum table, suggesting its base was established prior to the recent measurement window.

patent records: 6
Challenger · Praxair Technology Inc

Praxair Technology Inc

Praxair Technology holds second place with 3 patent records, differentiated from Novellus Systems by its emphasis on C07F 5 (organo-metallic and non-carbon compounds), C23F 1 (corrosion and metal removal), and H01L 21. Its momentum trend is marked as a new entrant in the recent filing window, indicating its 3 records all fall within the most recent period tracked.

patent records: 3
🔍
See the full applicant breakdown
Access ranked data for all filers, including individual inventors and emerging entrants.
Novellus Systems IncPraxair Technology Inc+ more
Unlock full assignee analysis →
Leading-applicant momentum (recent 3 yrs, lag-adjusted)
ApplicantRecent (3 yrs)Trend
Praxair Technology Inc3▲ new entrant
SPURGEON LAURENCE E1▲ new entrant
SMITH STANLEY M1▲ new entrant
SINHA ASHWINI K1▲ new entrant
HEIDERMAN DOUGLAS C1▲ new entrant
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Player cards cite patent record counts from the applicant ranking and technology focus from IPC data.Explore players →
Adjacent Branches

Under-served adjacent branches worth monitoring

Two IPC branches sit at the periphery of this corpus with single-record coverage each, representing areas where technical overlap with advanced node fabrication exists but dedicated patent activity is sparse.

C09K · Materials for Miscellaneous Applications

C09K carries only 1 patent record and a 5% share within this corpus, making it the sparsest classified branch. The branch covers specialty functional materials — including etchants, release agents, and surface-treatment formulations — that are directly relevant to advanced node process chemistry. An entrant with novel process-compatible materials could file here with limited existing coverage to navigate.

Search this in Eureka →

F17C · Pressure Vessels & Gas Storage

F17C also holds a single patent record and a 5% share. Precision gas delivery and high-purity precursor storage are critical enablers in advanced deposition and etch processes. The sparse coverage in this branch is an observation of relative under-representation; whether it constitutes an opportunity depends on whether a team’s gas-handling innovations can be meaningfully differentiated from broader industrial gas IP held outside this corpus.

Search this in Eureka →
🔒
Unlock the full white-space map
See all adjacent IPC branches ranked by filing density and technical proximity to your R&D roadmap.
C09K · Materials for misc. applicationsF17C · Pressure vessels & gas storage+ more
Unlock full analysis →
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Adjacent branch counts are based on IPC classifications assigned to patent records in the corpus.Explore emerging →
Route Matrix

How leaders differ by technology route

Strength of each leader across the main technology routes.

PlayerH01L 21 · Semiconductor devicesC07F 5 · Organo-metallic & non-carbon compoundsC23F 1 · Corrosion & metal removalC09K 13 · Materials for misc. applicationsF17C 5 · Pressure vessels & gas storage
Praxair Technology IncStrong · 3Strong · 3Strong · 3AbsentAbsent
FELLIS AARON RStrong · 4AbsentAbsentAbsentAbsent
POWELL RONALD AStrong · 4AbsentAbsentAbsentAbsent
Novellus Systems IncStrong · 4AbsentAbsentAbsentAbsent
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Matrix values are measured in patent records and should not be compared directly with family-level applicant totals.Compare in Eureka →
Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

Still have questions? PatSnap Eureka answers them from patent and research data.Ask Eureka →
PatSnap Eureka

Ready to map your own Advanced Node Fabrication landscape?

Join 18,000+ innovators using PatSnap Eureka to map any technology landscape: search 2B+ patents and papers, surface key assignees, and generate a report like this in minutes.

18,000+innovators worldwide
2B+patents & papers
< 5 minper landscape report

Disclaimer. This page is generated from PatSnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. PatSnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Explore in Eureka ↗
Powered by PatSnap Eureka

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.