Book a demo

Advanced Oxidation Process Disinfection Patents: Leaders & Trends 2026

Advanced Oxidation Process Disinfection Patents: Leaders & Trends 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/advanced-oxidation-process-disinfection-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Water & Environmental
Advanced Oxidation Process Disinfection Patents
  • Flat filing activity. filings peaked at 5 in 2018 and have not recovered since; the 2022 midpoint sits at just 1 filing, pointing to a technology whose patenting wave has largely passed rather than one still building.
  • No single dominant assignee. the strongest co-filing cluster is a group of individual inventors (Visnja Orescanin, Nenad Mikulic, Denis) rather than a corporate leader, alongside named entities like De Nora Water Technologies and Siemens.
  • China leads filing venues. China accounts for 12 of the tracked filings ahead of WIPO's 9 and the EPO's 8, showing the recent procedural centre of gravity has shifted east even as overall volume stays low.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
46
Published Records
+300%
3-Yr Growth (lag-adjusted)
CN
Leading Jurisdiction
24
Active Filers Ranked
Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What this landscape covers

Advanced oxidation process (AOP) disinfection uses hydroxyl radicals and related reactive species — generated via ozone, UV, electrochemical cells or catalysis — to inactivate pathogens and break down contaminants that survive conventional chlorination. This dataset tracks 46 patent families filed between 2015 and 2026 across the core water-treatment classifications C02F 1/32 and C02F 1/78 together with the disinfection classification A61L 2/08, capturing both the water-treatment and sterilisation sides of the technology.

Filing activity is modest in absolute terms and has not grown since its 2018 peak, which puts this squarely in the category of a mature, narrowly practised technique rather than an emerging one. Publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so the most recent year in the trend understates true filing activity and should not be read as a real decline on its own.

Filing activity, 2017-2026
  1. 1NENAD MIKULIC9
  2. 2VISNJA ORESCANIN9
  3. 3DENIS7
  4. 4ATLANTIUM LASERS LTD6
  5. 5Tianjin Kelien Environmental Protection Technology Co., Ltd.4
  6. 6UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH AFRICA3
  7. 7AMERICAN WATER WORKS CO INC3
  8. 8TRIBELSKY ZAMIR3
  9. 9DE NORA OZONE SRL3
  10. 10ENDE MICHAEL3
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Advanced Oxidation Process Disinfection covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology

Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.

10,000 free credits to start
The data

Filing trend and technology composition

The trend and IPC breakdown below describe where AOP disinfection claims actually sit, and how filing intensity has moved since 2017.

A flat-to-declining filing curve

Filings ran at 4 in 2017 and peaked at 5 in 2018, but the 2022 midpoint shows only 1 filing, and the curve does not recover toward 2026. That pattern is consistent with a technology area where the core claim space was staked out early and has seen limited fresh entry since.

A flat-to-declining filing curve013454201752018201920202021202220232024202502026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Concentrated in water treatment, spilling into disinfection and separation

C02F water and wastewater treatment carries the largest share at 38 records, with B01D separation processes (20) and A61L sterilising and disinfecting (13) forming the next tier. Smaller counts in B01J catalysis and single records in food, dental and packaging classes show occasional cross-domain application of the same oxidation chemistry rather than dedicated development in those fields.

Concentrated in water treatment, spilling into disinfection and separationC02F · Water & wastewater treatment3882.6%B01D · Separation processes (filtrati…2043.5%A61L · Sterilising & disinfecting1328.3%B01J · Chemical/physical processes & …1123.9%A23L · Foods & non-alcoholic beverages12.2%A61C · Dentistry & oral hygiene12.2%B08B · Cleaning (general)12.2%B65B · Packaging & wrapping12.2%Other24.3%

Shares are the percentage of the 46 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Advanced Oxidation Process Disinfection covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Advanced Oxidation Process Disinfection with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about advanced oxidation process disinfection and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key patents

Most-cited records and a representative filing

Representative filing
WO2021069677A12021-04-15

WO2021069677A1 — Wastewater treatment apparatus

DE NORA WATER TECHNOLOGIES ITALY S.R.L.

Filed by De Nora Water Technologies Italy, this application describes a three-stage wastewater treatment apparatus: a primary solids-separation filter, a secondary stage combining microflotation with an oxidation treatment unit that performs ozone and hypochlorite-based advanced oxidation, and a tertiary membrane filtration module.Abstract trimmed for length; see the full record for complete claim language.

WO2021069677A1 — patent drawing 1WO2021069677A1 — patent drawing 2
View full record
Highest-cited records in the corpus
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US20040120844A1Advanced oxidation of dangerous chemical and biological sources151
2US20150166383A1Process and device for electrochemical treatment of industrial wastewater and drinking water63
3WO2002045756A2Oxidation of dangerous chemical and biological substances33
4WO2013144664A1Process and device for electrochemical treatment of industrial wastewater and drinking water22
5US20170174536A1Disinfection of water mains using ultraviolet light and oxidizing agents12
6EP2559664A1Method and arrangement for water disinfection10
7CA2868932A1Process and device for electrochemical treatment of industrial wastewater and drinking water4
8US20140131285A1Method and Arrangement for a Water Treatment4
9US20200346947A1Advanced Oxidation UV Sterilizer3
10WO2013144664A9Process and device for electrochemical treatment of industrial wastewater and drinking water2

Citation counts reflect influence within the searched corpus and skew toward older filings; a low count on a recent family does not imply lower quality, only less time to accumulate citations.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Advanced Oxidation Process Disinfection covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers say about the field

Three patterns stand out once the filing trend, IPC spread and citation data are read together.

Filing momentum
5 in 2018 vs 1 in 2022
peak vs midpoint filings

The wave has largely passed

Filing peaked in 2018 and dropped to a single filing by the 2022 midpoint, with no sign of a rebound heading into 2026. This is a technology where the founding claims are largely in place; new entrants face an already-populated space rather than open ground.

Filing trend, 2017-2026
Classification spread
38 of 46 records in C02F
water & wastewater treatment

Water treatment is the home base

The overwhelming majority of records sit in C02F, with disinfection (A61L) and separation (B01D) as secondary but substantial categories. The handful of records touching food, dental and packaging classes suggest occasional adaptation of the same chemistry, not standalone R&D tracks.

IPC subclass distribution
Prior art concentration
151 citations
top-cited record

Two families anchor the citation graph

The two most-cited records both concern oxidation of chemical and biological threats broadly, one drawing 151 citations and a related family 33. Newer, more disinfection-specific filings sit well below that, which is expected given how citation counts favour older, foundational records over recent ones.

Most-cited records table
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to advanced oxidation process disinfection, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Advanced Oxidation Process Disinfection covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who is filing, and where the gaps sit

No corporate assignee dominates this space; the strongest filing cluster is a set of individual co-inventors, with named corporate players appearing at lower volume alongside them.

Filing pattern
9 co-assignee pairs
shared filings

A tight inventor cluster, not a corporate leader

The strongest co-filing relationships in the dataset link individual inventors Visnja Orescanin, Nenad Mikulic and Denis, who appear together on 8-9 shared families. That is unusual for this field and suggests a research group filing under personal names rather than a single assignee company.

Co-assignee pair analysis
Corporate presence
De Nora, Siemens named
in the tracked records

Established water-treatment firms hold isolated positions

Corporate assignees such as De Nora Water Technologies and Siemens appear in the dataset with representative filings on integrated treatment apparatus, but none show the filing depth to be called a category leader here.

Representative and cited records
Recent activity
0 filings, latest year
top-named assignees

Momentum has stalled across the board

Every assignee tracked for recent-year momentum, including the individual inventor cluster and named corporate entities, shows zero filings in the latest year. Combined with the flat overall trend, this points to a lull in active prosecution rather than one player pulling ahead.

Recent-year momentum by assignee
🔍
Under-claimed branches worth checking before filing
These sub-areas show thin representation relative to the core C02F/A61L claim space and are worth a freedom-to-operate check before assuming they are open.
Photocatalytic disinfection in food-contact systemsCombined microflotation + AOP stagingElectrochemical AOP for drinking water mainsAOP dosing control tied to pathogen sensingPackaging-integrated disinfection modules
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
VISNJA ORESCANIN0
NENAD MIKULIC0
DENIS0
Atlantium Lasers Ltd.0
Tianjin Kelien Environmental Protection Technology Co., Ltd.0
TRIBELSKY ZAMIR0
ENDE MICHAEL0
De Nora Ozone LLC0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Advanced Oxidation Process Disinfection covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's next

Where to take this analysis

The dataset points to a mature, low-growth filing area with a few dense citation anchors and several thin adjacent branches. The next steps depend on whether the goal is freedom-to-operate, sourcing, or identifying a filing gap.

Run a freedom-to-operate check on the cited anchors

The two highest-cited records concern broad oxidation of chemical and biological sources; any new UV or electrochemical disinfection claim should be checked against their claim scope before drafting.

Explore prior art in Eureka

Map the individual-inventor cluster's full portfolio

The Orescanin/Mikulic/Denis co-filing group holds a disproportionate share of the recent activity in this dataset and is worth tracking as a licensing or acquisition target.

Trace assignee portfolios in Eureka

Probe the under-claimed branches directly

Photocatalytic and electrochemical AOP variants applied outside core water treatment show thin coverage; a targeted search can confirm whether that gap is real or an artefact of classification.

Search white space in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Advanced Oxidation Process Disinfection covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions on AOP disinfection patents

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Advanced Oxidation Process Disinfection covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Advanced Oxidation Process Disinfection in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole advanced oxidation process disinfection corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.