Advanced Oxidation Process Disinfection Patents: Leaders & Trends 2026
- Flat filing activity. filings peaked at 5 in 2018 and have not recovered since; the 2022 midpoint sits at just 1 filing, pointing to a technology whose patenting wave has largely passed rather than one still building.
- No single dominant assignee. the strongest co-filing cluster is a group of individual inventors (Visnja Orescanin, Nenad Mikulic, Denis) rather than a corporate leader, alongside named entities like De Nora Water Technologies and Siemens.
- China leads filing venues. China accounts for 12 of the tracked filings ahead of WIPO's 9 and the EPO's 8, showing the recent procedural centre of gravity has shifted east even as overall volume stays low.
What this landscape covers
Advanced oxidation process (AOP) disinfection uses hydroxyl radicals and related reactive species — generated via ozone, UV, electrochemical cells or catalysis — to inactivate pathogens and break down contaminants that survive conventional chlorination. This dataset tracks 46 patent families filed between 2015 and 2026 across the core water-treatment classifications C02F 1/32 and C02F 1/78 together with the disinfection classification A61L 2/08, capturing both the water-treatment and sterilisation sides of the technology.
Filing activity is modest in absolute terms and has not grown since its 2018 peak, which puts this squarely in the category of a mature, narrowly practised technique rather than an emerging one. Publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so the most recent year in the trend understates true filing activity and should not be read as a real decline on its own.
Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology
Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.
Filing trend and technology composition
The trend and IPC breakdown below describe where AOP disinfection claims actually sit, and how filing intensity has moved since 2017.
A flat-to-declining filing curve
Filings ran at 4 in 2017 and peaked at 5 in 2018, but the 2022 midpoint shows only 1 filing, and the curve does not recover toward 2026. That pattern is consistent with a technology area where the core claim space was staked out early and has seen limited fresh entry since.
Concentrated in water treatment, spilling into disinfection and separation
C02F water and wastewater treatment carries the largest share at 38 records, with B01D separation processes (20) and A61L sterilising and disinfecting (13) forming the next tier. Smaller counts in B01J catalysis and single records in food, dental and packaging classes show occasional cross-domain application of the same oxidation chemistry rather than dedicated development in those fields.
Shares are the percentage of the 46 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
Go deeper on Advanced Oxidation Process Disinfection with Eureka
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about advanced oxidation process disinfection and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaMost-cited records and a representative filing
WO2021069677A1 — Wastewater treatment apparatus
Filed by De Nora Water Technologies Italy, this application describes a three-stage wastewater treatment apparatus: a primary solids-separation filter, a secondary stage combining microflotation with an oxidation treatment unit that performs ozone and hypochlorite-based advanced oxidation, and a tertiary membrane filtration module.Abstract trimmed for length; see the full record for complete claim language.


| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US20040120844A1 | Advanced oxidation of dangerous chemical and biological sources | 151 |
| 2 | US20150166383A1 | Process and device for electrochemical treatment of industrial wastewater and drinking water | 63 |
| 3 | WO2002045756A2 | Oxidation of dangerous chemical and biological substances | 33 |
| 4 | WO2013144664A1 | Process and device for electrochemical treatment of industrial wastewater and drinking water | 22 |
| 5 | US20170174536A1 | Disinfection of water mains using ultraviolet light and oxidizing agents | 12 |
| 6 | EP2559664A1 | Method and arrangement for water disinfection | 10 |
| 7 | CA2868932A1 | Process and device for electrochemical treatment of industrial wastewater and drinking water | 4 |
| 8 | US20140131285A1 | Method and Arrangement for a Water Treatment | 4 |
| 9 | US20200346947A1 | Advanced Oxidation UV Sterilizer | 3 |
| 10 | WO2013144664A9 | Process and device for electrochemical treatment of industrial wastewater and drinking water | 2 |
Citation counts reflect influence within the searched corpus and skew toward older filings; a low count on a recent family does not imply lower quality, only less time to accumulate citations.
Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
Put your own technology through the same analysis
Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →MCP server & REST API
When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →What the numbers say about the field
Three patterns stand out once the filing trend, IPC spread and citation data are read together.
The wave has largely passed
Filing peaked in 2018 and dropped to a single filing by the 2022 midpoint, with no sign of a rebound heading into 2026. This is a technology where the founding claims are largely in place; new entrants face an already-populated space rather than open ground.
Water treatment is the home base
The overwhelming majority of records sit in C02F, with disinfection (A61L) and separation (B01D) as secondary but substantial categories. The handful of records touching food, dental and packaging classes suggest occasional adaptation of the same chemistry, not standalone R&D tracks.
Two families anchor the citation graph
The two most-cited records both concern oxidation of chemical and biological threats broadly, one drawing 151 citations and a related family 33. Newer, more disinfection-specific filings sit well below that, which is expected given how citation counts favour older, foundational records over recent ones.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to advanced oxidation process disinfection, with the prior art for and against each one.
Who is filing, and where the gaps sit
No corporate assignee dominates this space; the strongest filing cluster is a set of individual co-inventors, with named corporate players appearing at lower volume alongside them.
A tight inventor cluster, not a corporate leader
The strongest co-filing relationships in the dataset link individual inventors Visnja Orescanin, Nenad Mikulic and Denis, who appear together on 8-9 shared families. That is unusual for this field and suggests a research group filing under personal names rather than a single assignee company.
Established water-treatment firms hold isolated positions
Corporate assignees such as De Nora Water Technologies and Siemens appear in the dataset with representative filings on integrated treatment apparatus, but none show the filing depth to be called a category leader here.
Momentum has stalled across the board
Every assignee tracked for recent-year momentum, including the individual inventor cluster and named corporate entities, shows zero filings in the latest year. Combined with the flat overall trend, this points to a lull in active prosecution rather than one player pulling ahead.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| VISNJA ORESCANIN | 0 | — |
| NENAD MIKULIC | 0 | — |
| DENIS | 0 | — |
| Atlantium Lasers Ltd. | 0 | — |
| Tianjin Kelien Environmental Protection Technology Co., Ltd. | 0 | — |
| TRIBELSKY ZAMIR | 0 | — |
| ENDE MICHAEL | 0 | — |
| De Nora Ozone LLC | 0 | — |
Where to take this analysis
The dataset points to a mature, low-growth filing area with a few dense citation anchors and several thin adjacent branches. The next steps depend on whether the goal is freedom-to-operate, sourcing, or identifying a filing gap.
Run a freedom-to-operate check on the cited anchors
The two highest-cited records concern broad oxidation of chemical and biological sources; any new UV or electrochemical disinfection claim should be checked against their claim scope before drafting.
Explore prior art in EurekaMap the individual-inventor cluster's full portfolio
The Orescanin/Mikulic/Denis co-filing group holds a disproportionate share of the recent activity in this dataset and is worth tracking as a licensing or acquisition target.
Trace assignee portfolios in EurekaProbe the under-claimed branches directly
Photocatalytic and electrochemical AOP variants applied outside core water treatment show thin coverage; a targeted search can confirm whether that gap is real or an artefact of classification.
Search white space in EurekaCommon questions on AOP disinfection patents
Advanced oxidation processes generate highly reactive hydroxyl radicals, typically through combinations of UV light, ozone, hydrogen peroxide, electrochemical cells or catalytic surfaces, to break down organic contaminants and inactivate pathogens. In a disinfection context this overlaps with sterilisation classifications like A61L 2/08 as well as water-treatment classifications like C02F 1/32 and C02F 1/78. The patent literature treats it as a chemistry-and-apparatus combination rather than a single mechanism, which is why filings span filtration, catalysis and sterilisation classes at once.
There is no single dominant corporate assignee in this dataset; the strongest filing relationship is a cluster of individual co-inventors (Visnja Orescanin, Nenad Mikulic and Denis) who appear together across multiple shared families. Named corporate assignees such as De Nora Water Technologies and Siemens hold representative filings but not concentrated portfolios. This is consistent with a technology area where the founding patents were filed some years ago and current activity is thin across many small filers rather than a race between a few large ones.
Filing activity peaked at 5 records in 2018 and had fallen to just 1 by the 2022 midpoint, with no recovery evident heading toward 2026. Because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, the very last year or two in any such trend is always understated, but the multi-year decline from the 2018 peak is a real pattern, not a data artefact. Overall this points to a mature, low-growth filing area rather than one still attracting fresh investment.
Thin coverage shows up in photocatalytic disinfection applied outside core water treatment (food-contact and packaging uses), combined microflotation-plus-AOP staging, and electrochemical AOP specifically targeted at drinking water distribution mains. These branches have single-digit or single-record representation in the underlying IPC classes despite the core water-treatment classification carrying the bulk of filings. A first claim in one of these areas would need to tie the oxidation chemistry to the specific application context (e.g., a packaging line or a distribution main) to distinguish from the broad prior art anchors.
US20040120844A1, titled Advanced oxidation of dangerous chemical and biological sources, is the most-cited record in this dataset at 151 citations and represents broad early claim scope over using advanced oxidation against combined chemical and biological threats. New filings on pathogen inactivation methods that rely on similarly broad hydroxyl-radical generation and exposure steps should be checked against its claims and its related family WO2002045756A2. Because citation counts favour older records, its high citation count reflects long-standing influence on the field rather than current commercial dominance.
Research Advanced Oxidation Process Disinfection in depth with Eureka
Go past this page: query the whole advanced oxidation process disinfection corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.