Book a demo

Advanced Oxidation Process Patent Landscape 2026

Advanced Oxidation Process Patent Landscape 2026
Competitive Landscape

Advanced Oxidation Process Patent Landscape in 2026

The advanced oxidation process (AOP) patent field is moderately concentrated, with Evoqua Water Technologies holding a commanding lead over a long tail of challengers; water and wastewater treatment dominates the technology mix. Activity peaked in 2020 and has since eased on an annual basis, signaling a maturing field where strategic positioning in adjacent branches — such as electrolytic production and sterilization — may offer the clearest differentiation.

1,543
Patent families in scope
27%
Top-5 share of top-100 filers
-18%
3-yr filing growth (lag-adj.)
United States
Leading jurisdiction
↗ Tap any metric to explore the underlying patents and uncover deeper insights in PatSnap Eureka
Published byPatSnap Insights Team··7 min readVerified by PatSnap Eureka data
Overview

Evoqua leads a moderately concentrated field with a long challenger tail

Evoqua Water Technologies LLC holds the top position by a substantial margin, followed by NCH Corp, Trevi Systems, and Air Liquide — a ranking that reflects the field’s commercial orientation toward industrial and municipal water treatment.

The top five filers account for 27% of the combined total among the hundred largest filers, indicating moderate concentration: a single clear leader exists, but no oligopoly has formed. A large number of smaller applicants — including academic institutions such as Tianjin University and Nanjing University — sustain a competitive second tier.

Leading applicants
#ApplicantPatent familiesShare
1Evoqua Water Technologies LLC197
2NCH Corp64
3Trevi Systems Inc40
4LAIR LIQUIDE SA POUR LETUDE & LEXPLOITATION DES PR…29
5Greenthread Ltd28
6AIR PROD & CHEM INC27
7Toshiba Corporation26
8Access Business Group International LLC25
9Blucher GmbH24
10Applied Process Tech23
#ApplicantPatent familiesShare
11UV Cleaning Systems Inc23
12KOREA INST OF CIVIL ENG & BUILDING TECH23
13Permascand22
14Tianjin University19
15Yokogawa Electric Corporation18
16Clean Chem Inc18
17Nanjing University17
18De Nora Permelec Ltd16
19VEOLIA WATER SOLUTIONS & TECHNOLOGIES SUPPORT SAS16
20De Nora Marine Technologies LLC15
↗ Hover a row · click a company to ask Eureka

Evoqua’s scale implies significant freedom-to-operate risks for new entrants in core water treatment routes; however, the breadth of the applicant base across universities and specialist firms signals that process innovation and niche application areas remain actively contested.

Filing data for approximately the most recent 18–24 months is subject to publication lag and likely understates actual activity; trend readings for 20252026 should be treated as provisional. Longer-window growth, applicant concentration, and technology-route coverage are therefore more reliable signals than the latest-year bar alone.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Chart shows the top applicants ranked by patent families. Applicant counts can overlap where a patent family lists several applicants, so they need not sum to the total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Trends & Structure

Activity peaked in 2020 and water treatment anchors the technology mix

The annual filing trend chart and IPC composition chart together reveal where momentum has been built and where it remains thin — useful inputs for prioritizing R&D bets.

Annual filing trend

Filings ramped from 147 in 2017 to a peak of 244 in 2020, then declined steadily through 2023, with a partial rebound to 182 in 2024. The 2025 and 2026 figures (127 and 14 respectively) reflect publication lag and should not be read as a continued decline. The overall multi-year trajectory confirms a field that expanded strongly through 2020 and has since moderated.

Annual filing trendAnnual values from 2017 to 2026, peaking at 244 in 2020.147201715320181592019244202020220211692022146202318220241272025142026↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka

Technology composition

C02F (water and wastewater treatment) dominates the technology mix by a wide margin, with B01D (separation/filtration) and B01J (chemical and physical processes and catalysis) forming a secondary cluster. Lower-share branches — including C25B (electrolytic production), A61L (sterilization and disinfection), and B01F (mixing and stirring) — sit at the margins and represent areas where filing density is comparatively sparse relative to the core.

Technology compositionC02F · Water & wastewater treatment leads with 2,622; B01D · Separation processes (filtration etc.) 522.C02F · Water & wastewate…2,622B01D · Separation proces…522B01J · Chemical/physical…500B01F · Mixing & stirring169C25B · Electrolytic prod…134A61L · Sterilising & dis…106C01B · Non-metallic elem…83G01N · Material analysis…65↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Technology-branch counts are measured in patent records; a single patent family can carry several IPC classes, so class totals can exceed the family total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Key Patents

Highly cited patent families surfaced by the query

Citation-heavy patent families returned by the query. Use this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents.

Featured patent
US20240383789A1Published 2024-11-21

Systems and methods for producing ultrapure water …

Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing COMPANY, LTD.

Systems and methods for producing ultrapure water (UPW) for use in semiconductor fabrication include an ABA module that performs an advanced oxidation process (AOP) pre-treatment step, a bioremediation step, and an advanced oxidation process post-treatment step. Raw water flows through the ABA module, which is part of a water treatment system for producing… (excerpt from the patent abstract)

Systems and methods for producing ultrapure water … — patent drawingSystems and methods for producing ultrapure water … — patent drawing
Representative drawings from the patent document.
Open this patent in Eureka →
Highly cited patent families surfaced by this query
#PatentCitations
1Aqueous treatment apparatus utilizing precursor ma…234
2Method and apparatus for closed loop recycling of …126
3Doped carbonaceous materials for photocatalytic re…117
4Use of controlled periodic illumination for an imp…108
5Electrochemical carbon nanotube filter and method107
6Method and apparatus for UV-oxidation of toxics in…100
7Doped graphitic carbon nitrides, methods of making…95
8Process and apparatus for oxidation of contaminant…88

Ranked by total forward citations. Citation counts favour older and broadly cited patent families, and broad or adjacent patents may appear when they match the search scope. Treat this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents. Some patent titles may be shown in their original, non-English language where an accurate translation could not be guaranteed.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Citation-ranked patent families surfaced by this query.Open in Eureka →
Insights

What the patent structure means for R&D and investment decisions

Four structural dimensions — maturity, concentration, collaboration, and geography — each carry direct implications for where new investment is likely to generate defensible IP.

Decline

Past-peak: field is maturing after a 2020 surge

The lifecycle stage is Decline, with annual filings easing back from the 2020 peak of 244 families. On a multi-year basis the corpus remains substantial at 1,543 patent families, but the annual deceleration signals that the foundational solution space is crowded. R&D investment is best directed toward differentiated variants — novel oxidant combinations, hybrid membrane-AOP systems — rather than incremental repetition of established routes.

Past-peak · 2020 peak
Concentration

Moderate concentration with an accessible second tier

The top five filers account for 27% of the hundred largest filers’ combined total, with Evoqua holding nearly 197 patent families — more than three times the next-ranked applicant, NCH Corp at 64. Below the top five, the ranking disperses quickly across specialist firms and universities. This structure means the core water treatment space carries meaningful freedom-to-operate risk from Evoqua’s portfolio, while adjacent application areas remain more open.

Moderate concentration
Collaboration

Corporate-affiliate co-filing dominates observed collaboration

The most active co-filing pairs are Toshiba Corporation with Toshiba Infrastructure Systems and Solutions Corporation (14 joint filings) and Air Liquide’s parent entity with Air Liquide America (13 joint filings). Both pairs reflect intra-group coordination rather than external partnerships, suggesting that cross-company R&D collaboration in AOP remains limited. New entrants seeking ecosystem leverage may find the collaborative landscape relatively open to genuine external partnerships.

Intra-group co-filing
Geography

US and China lead; Asia-Pacific and Europe add meaningful coverage

The United States leads jurisdiction coverage, followed closely by China, with WIPO PCT and EPO applications indicating active international prosecution strategies. South Korea and India each carry substantial records, reflecting regional treatment infrastructure investment. Germany and Israel also appear in the top ten jurisdictions, pointing to European industrial and municipal water market relevance. New filings should consider PCT and EPO routes for broadest protection given the geographic spread of end markets.

US · China · PCT · EPO
PatSnap Eureka · TRIZ Solution Agent
Facing a specific technical bottleneck in this field?

Go beyond the landscape: Eureka’s TRIZ Solution agent breaks down an R&D problem and returns patented concept solutions, each with a technical approach and cited patent & literature evidence.

Solve it in Eureka →
Top collaboration links
ApplicantCollaboratorCo-filings
Toshiba CorporationToshiba Infrastructure Systems & Solutions Corporation14
L’Air Liquide SA pour l’Etude et l’Exploitation des Procedes Georges ClaudeAir Liquide America Inc13

Co-filing pairs, ranked by the number of jointly-filed patent families.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Insights derived from applicant ranking, lifecycle, collaboration, and jurisdiction evidence.Explore insights →
Leaders

Evoqua dominates water treatment routes; Air Liquide pivots on mixing and gas delivery

The top two players differ in both scale and technology emphasis: Evoqua concentrates on water treatment and separation, while Air Liquide’s AOP portfolio emphasizes mixing and gas-delivery processes.

Leader · Evoqua Water Technologies LLC

Evoqua Water Technologies LLC

Evoqua holds 197 patent families — the largest position in the field by a wide margin — concentrated in C02F water and wastewater treatment (176 records) and B01D separation processes (42 records). Its recent filing trend shows a decline of 39% versus the prior three-year period, suggesting the portfolio is maturing rather than expanding. Despite the deceleration, Evoqua’s depth in core treatment routes makes it the primary freedom-to-operate reference for any new entrant.

families: 197
Challenger · Air Liquide (L’Air Liquide SA)

L’Air Liquide SA

Air Liquide’s AOP portfolio of 29 patent families is concentrated in C02F water treatment (31 records) but distinguished by a significant presence in B01F mixing and stirring (18 records under B01F 23 and 8 under B01F 3), reflecting a gas-injection and ozone-dissolution emphasis that differs from Evoqua’s filtration-heavy approach. The recent filing trend shows a sharp decline of 95% versus the prior period — consistent with a small recent-window base — and intra-group collaboration with Air Liquide America (13 joint filings) amplifies its effective portfolio reach.

families: 29
🔍
See the full applicant breakdown
Access ranked profiles for all top 100 AOP filers, including technology emphasis and momentum scores.
NCH CorpTrevi Systems Inc+ more
Unlock full assignee analysis →
Leading-applicant momentum (recent 3 yrs, lag-adjusted)
ApplicantRecent (3 yrs)Trend
Evoqua Water Technologies LLC47▼ -39%
L’Air Liquide SA pour l’Etude et l’Exploitation des Procedes Georges Claude1▼ -95%
Access Business Group International LLC5▼ -64%
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Player cards are based on patent-family rankings and IPC focus data.Explore players →
Adjacent Branches

Under-served routes adjacent to the AOP core worth monitoring

Several IPC branches sit at the periphery of the AOP corpus with low filing density relative to the dominant C02F class; two in particular have plausible technical synergies and realistic entry paths.

C25B · Electrolytic production of compounds

With 134 patent records and a 3% share of the corpus, electrolytic AOP routes — including electrochemical ozone and hydroxyl-radical generation — are notably sparse given the growing interest in on-site oxidant production for decentralized water treatment. Incumbent depth in this branch is low relative to the core, and the technology overlaps naturally with AOP hardware already deployed in municipal and industrial settings. A focused filing program in electrochemical reactor design and electrode materials could establish a defensible position ahead of wider adoption.

Search this in Eureka →

A61L · Sterilising & disinfecting

AOP applications in sterilization and medical-grade disinfection account for only 106 patent records and a 2% share, despite the mechanistic overlap between hydroxyl-radical chemistry used in water treatment and high-efficacy pathogen inactivation. This branch has plausible value in hospital wastewater treatment, surface decontamination, and food-contact surface sanitation — sectors with tightening regulatory requirements. The sparse filing density and absence of a dominant incumbent in this intersection suggest it is an observable gap, though commercial path clarity would need further market validation.

Search this in Eureka →
🔒
Unlock the full white-space map
See all under-served IPC branches ranked by sparsity and technical adjacency to the AOP core.
G01N · Material analysis & testingC01B · Non-metallic elements & inorganic compounds+ more
Unlock full analysis →
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Adjacent branches are identified by low filing share relative to the dominant C02F class.Explore emerging →
Route Matrix

How leading applicants differ across AOP technology routes

Strength of each leader across the main technology routes.

PlayerC02F 1 · Water & wastewater treatmentC02F 101 · Water & wastewater treatmentC02F 9 · Water & wastewater treatmentC02F 103 · Water & wastewater treatmentC02F 3 · Water & wastewater treatment
Evoqua Water Technologies LLCStrong · 176Emerging · 24Emerging · 32Moderate · 71Absent
NCH CorpStrong · 64AbsentAbsentModerate · 16Absent
Blucher GmbHStrong · 24Moderate · 11AbsentAbsentAbsent
Trevi Systems IncStrong · 34AbsentAbsentAbsentAbsent
Access Business Group International LLCStrong · 25AbsentModerate · 7AbsentAbsent
L’Air Liquide SA pour l’Etude et l’Exploitation des Procedes Georges ClaudeStrong · 31AbsentAbsentAbsentAbsent
Greensource Fabrication LLCAbsentStrong · 9Strong · 13Strong · 9Absent
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Matrix values are measured in patent records and should not be compared directly with family-level applicant totals.Compare in Eureka →
Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

Still have questions? PatSnap Eureka answers them from patent and research data.Ask Eureka →
PatSnap Eureka

Ready to map your own Advanced Oxidation Process landscape?

Join 18,000+ innovators using PatSnap Eureka to map any technology landscape: search 2B+ patents and papers, surface key assignees, and generate a report like this in minutes.

18,000+innovators worldwide
2B+patents & papers
< 5 minper landscape report

Disclaimer. This page is generated from PatSnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. PatSnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Explore in Eureka ↗
Powered by PatSnap Eureka

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.