Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →Filing growth compares 2021 (61 records) with 2024 (118) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 885 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.
Advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) — Fenton and Fenton-like oxidation, ozonation, UV-activated persulfate and related radical-generating routes — are patented almost entirely under water and wastewater treatment classifications, with C02F covering all 885 families in this dataset. The next-largest clusters sit in B01J (catalysis and reactor chemistry, 151 records) and B01D (separation and filtration, 84 records), showing that most inventive activity is still concentrated on the oxidation chemistry itself rather than on downstream separation or mixing hardware.
Smaller clusters in electrolytic production (C25B, 27 records), alkali-metal compounds (C01D, 9) and even fuel cells (H01M, 7) point to AOP chemistry migrating into adjacent processes such as electro-oxidation and brine treatment, but each of these remains a minority share next to the core water-treatment classification.
Annual filing counts and IPC composition for the 885 patent families tracked in this dataset, covering 2017 through the partial 2026 year.
Filings rose from 30 in 2017 to a peak of 118 in 2024, passing through 71 at the 2022 midpoint. The count of 17 for 2026 is a partial-year figure and understates true filing volume, since publication typically lags filing by around 18 months.
C02F accounts for every record in the search, confirming the corpus is tightly scoped to water treatment; B01J, B01D and B01F represent the largest adjacent chemistry and hardware clusters, while C25B, C01D, H01M and B08B mark smaller crossover zones.
Shares are the percentage of the 885 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about advanced oxidation process wastewater treatment and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaFiled by SK Hynix and published in mid-2026, this application couples a UV/PDS advanced oxidation tank — activating peroxydisulfate with ultraviolet light to break down tetramethyl ammonium hydroxide (TMAH) in semiconductor process wastewater — with a downstream anaerobic biological reactor. It illustrates AOP patenting moving beyond generic municipal or industrial effluent into fab-specific chemistries.Number, assignee and filing date are rendered from the dataset above.


| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US5593598A | Method and apparatus for closed loop recycling of contaminated cleaning solution | 126 |
| 2 | US20180148350A1 | Method and System for Treating Brine Waste Water | 116 |
| 3 | US6960301B2 | Leachate and wastewater remediation system | 69 |
| 4 | US20070125719A1 | System and method of reducing organic contaminants in feed water | 67 |
| 5 | US20030173300A1 | Leachate and wastewater remediation system | 66 |
| 6 | US20150166383A1 | Process and device for electrochemical treatment of industrial wastewater and drinking water | 63 |
| 7 | CN102050532A | 一种油田含油污水集成处理工艺 | 55 |
| 8 | US20060076299A1 | Synthesis of bentonite clay-based iron nanocomposite and its use as a heterogeneous photo fenton catalyst | 48 |
| 9 | JP2005058854A | Method and apparatus for waste water treatment | 47 |
| 10 | CN101372382A | 一种废纸制浆造纸废水的深度处理方法及处理系统 | 45 |
Citation counts inside a searched corpus accumulate over time, so older filings such as the 1990s closed-loop recycling patent and the mid-2000s brine and leachate remediation filings lead the table. Treat this as a measure of historical influence rather than of current technical importance.
Patent titles are shown in the language they were filed in, not translated, so that each record stays verifiable against the original filing — a translated title will not match in Eureka or in any national register. Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →Four patterns stand out once filing volume, geography and citation data are read together.
Filings climbed steadily from 30 in 2017 to a peak of 118 in 2024, but the 2026 count of 17 (partial year) and the flat trajectory through the 2022 midpoint of 71 suggest the field is past its steepest growth phase, even accounting for publication lag.
China's receiving office accounts for the majority of tracked filings, more than eight times the next-largest venue, the United States. Filers targeting international protection are using WIPO, South Korea, Europe and India at comparable, much smaller scale.
Every record in this corpus sits in C02F, and the next-largest classification, B01J catalysis and reactor chemistry, covers under a fifth as many records. Separation (B01D) and mixing (B01F) trail further behind, indicating claim activity concentrates on the chemical process rather than mechanical treatment plant design.
The single most-cited record in this corpus is a closed-loop cleaning-solution recycling patent from the 1990s, cited 126 times. Because citation counts accumulate with age, this signals foundational influence on the field rather than continued relevance to what is being claimed today.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to advanced oxidation process wastewater treatment, with the prior art for and against each one.
Recent-year momentum data shows several established water-treatment names recording zero filings in the latest tracked year, alongside a long tail of individual co-filers active in smaller regional programmes.
Named water-treatment specialists and a major research university show zero filings in the most recent year tracked, with one recording a -100% year-on-year drop. This does not necessarily mean exit from the field — publication lag of roughly 18 months means the newest work from these assignees may not yet be visible.
The strongest co-assignee relationships in this dataset are between individual named inventors rather than corporate entities, with the top pair sharing nine filings and two other pairings sharing eight each — a pattern typical of a small specialist consultancy or lab group rather than a large corporate R&D programme.
With the large majority of filings routed through China and the remainder split thinly across the US, WIPO, South Korea, Europe and India, most assignees appear to be prioritising domestic protection over broad multi-jurisdiction coverage.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| GREENTHREAD LTD | 0 | — |
| Evoqua Water Technologies LLC | 0 | — |
| Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. | 0 | — |
| Degremont | 0 | — |
| Ondeo Degremont | 0 | — |
| Dalian University of Technology | 0 | -100% |
| VISNJA ORESCANIN | 0 | — |
| NENAD MIKULIC | 0 | — |
This landscape identifies the filing patterns; deciding what to file, license or challenge next requires digging into the specific claims behind these numbers.
C02F filings are dense and the most-cited prior art dates back decades — before drafting new Fenton or ozonation claims, check what specific mechanisms and dosing parameters are already occupied versus open.
Explore claims in EurekaSeveral established names show zero filings in the latest year. Confirming whether that reflects publication lag, a strategy shift, or genuine exit changes how much weight to give their existing portfolios.
Monitor assignees in EurekaSmall but present clusters in electrolytic production, alkali-metal compounds and fuel cells suggest AOP chemistry is being adapted into adjacent processes — these are worth watching for early competitive signals.
Search adjacent IPC classes in EurekaIn this dataset, advanced oxidation process (AOP) filings cover Fenton and Fenton-like oxidation, ozonation, and related radical-generating chemistries used to break down recalcitrant pollutants in wastewater. Nearly all of these filings are classified under IPC subclass C02F, the dedicated water and wastewater treatment classification, which covers all 885 tracked families. Smaller but distinct clusters extend the technique into catalysis-heavy reactor designs (B01J), separation and filtration hardware (B01D), and electrolytic production processes (C25B), showing the core chemistry frequently gets paired with mechanical or electrochemical add-ons in a single filing.
Filing volume rose steadily from 30 families in 2017 to a peak of 118 in 2024, but the pace has since flattened; the 2022 midpoint of 71 sits well below the 2024 peak, and 2026's count of 17 is a partial year that will rise as later filings publish. Taken together, the trend looks like a field that grew through the late 2010s and early 2020s and has since plateaued rather than one still accelerating. Because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, the true 2025-2026 filing rate will not be fully visible for some time.
China's receiving office accounts for 560 of the 885 tracked filings, far ahead of any other jurisdiction. The United States follows with 66, then WIPO's PCT route with 44, South Korea with 42, Europe with 41, and India with 35. This distribution suggests most inventive activity in this space is being protected domestically in China first, with international filers spreading more thinly across the remaining major markets.
The corpus shows a mix of specialist water-treatment corporations, a research university, and a small group of individual co-filing inventors, rather than a single dominant leader. Several named corporate and university assignees recorded zero filings in the most recent tracked year, which may reflect either a genuine slowdown or simply that their newest applications have not yet published. The strongest co-filing relationships in the data are between individual named inventors, pointing to close-knit specialist teams working outside large corporate R&D structures.
The smaller IPC clusters point to the open branches: electrolytic production (C25B, 27 records), alkali-metal compound handling (C01D, 9 records), and fuel-cell-adjacent designs (H01M, 7 records) are all present but thin relative to the dominant C02F and B01J clusters. Recent representative filings, such as a 2026 semiconductor wastewater application combining UV-activated persulfate oxidation with anaerobic biological treatment, suggest hybrid and application-specific combinations remain comparatively under-claimed. Anyone drafting new claims should look at these hybrid combinations before defaulting to standalone Fenton or ozonation claims, which sit on the densest prior art.
Go past this page: query the whole advanced oxidation process wastewater treatment corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.