Book a demo

Advanced Oxidation Process Patents: Leaders & Trends 2026

Advanced Oxidation Process Patents: Leaders & Trends 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/advanced-oxidation-processes-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Environmental & Water Treatment
Advanced Oxidation Process Patents: Who Files, Where, and What's Still Open
  • Filing peaked in 2020 at 19 records and has since flattened toward 8 by the 2022 midpoint, with no renewed upward trend visible in the data.
  • China and the US lead filing volume at 38 and 36 records respectively, ahead of PCT, South Korea, Europe and India.
  • Support functions remain thin filtration, mixing/dosing and real-time monitoring subclasses each sit far below the 159-record water-treatment core.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
159
Published Records
30%
Top-5 Share of All Records
-76%
3-Yr Growth (lag-adjusted)
CN
Leading Jurisdiction
Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What this landscape covers

This landscape tracks 159 patent families filed under advanced oxidation process, photocatalytic water treatment and ozonation treatment search terms, cross-referenced against claim language on hydroxyl radical generation, mineralization, byproduct formation, energy consumption and catalyst stability. The classification anchor is C02F, the water and wastewater treatment IPC subclass, which every record in the corpus falls under, alongside secondary activity in catalysis, filtration, mixing and electrolytic production.

Filing activity rose through the late 2010s to a peak in 2020, then flattened into the low double digits by 2022. Because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, the most recent years in this trend understate real filing activity, but the broader pattern is one of a technology with an established core and comparatively quiet recent momentum among its most active historical filers.

Filing trend and technology composition, 2017-2026
  1. 1EVOQUA WATER TECHNOLOGIES LLC16
  2. 2GREENTHREAD LTD14
  3. 3KOREA INST OF CIVIL ENG & BUILDING TECH8
  4. 4NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE5
  5. 5GREAT LAKES CLEAN WATER PARTNERSHIP5
  6. 6TECK RESOURCES LTD5
  7. 7OHIO UNIV3
  8. 8STREAMGO WATER USA LLC3
  9. 9EBARA CORP3
  10. 10KYONG HO ENGINEERING & ARCHITECTS CO LTD3
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Advanced Oxidation Processes covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Filing Data

Filing trends and technology composition

Filings in this corpus rose to a peak in 2020 before flattening, and the technology composition shows a dominant water-treatment core surrounded by thinner supporting subclasses.

Filing activity, 2017-2026

Filings climbed from 11 in 2017 to a peak of 19 in 2020, then declined toward a midpoint of 8 in 2022. The most recent year is partial and undercounts true filing activity because publication typically lags filing by around 18 months.

Filing activity, 2017-202605101520112017201820191920202021202220232024202502026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

IPC subclass distribution

C02F (water and wastewater treatment) anchors the entire corpus at 159 records, with catalysis (B01J), filtration (B01D), mixing (B01F) and electrolytic production (C25B) forming a secondary tier, and analytical/monitoring (G01N) and niche applications (A01K, B08B) trailing well behind.

IPC subclass distributionC02F · Water & wastewater treatment159100.0%B01J · Chemical/physical processes & …1710.7%B01D · Separation processes (filtrati…116.9%B01F · Mixing & stirring116.9%C25B · Electrolytic production of com…106.3%G01N · Material analysis & testing85.0%B08B · Cleaning (general)53.1%A01K · Animal husbandry & fishing42.5%Other3220.1%

Shares are the percentage of the 159 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Advanced Oxidation Processes covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Advanced Oxidation Processes with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about advanced oxidation processes and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

Most-cited records in this landscape

Representative Record
US20220411287A12022-12-29

Monitoring hydroxyl radical scavenging in water via real-time multi-fluorescence and parallel factor analysis

KOREA INSTITUTE OF CIVIL ENGINEERING AND BUILDING TECHNOLOGY

The system monitors a hydroxyl radical scavenging index in water using a real-time multi-fluorescence analyzer paired with parallel factor analysis, replacing the older rhodamine-B indicator method with a continuous flow analysis approach. Filed by Korea Institute of Civil Engineering and Building Technology, it is built for water treatment systems that apply an advanced oxidation process using ozone, ultraviolet light and hydrogen peroxide.Abstract condensed from the original filing for length.

US20220411287A1 — patent drawing 1US20220411287A1 — patent drawing 2
View full record
Highest-citation patents and applications
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US5593598AMethod and apparatus for closed loop recycling of contaminated cleaning solution126
2US20050171390A1Wet oxidation process and system45
3US20130299361A1System and Method for Treatment of Wastewater to Destroy Organic Contaminants by a Diamond Activated Electroc…37
4WO1997014657A1Advanced oxidation of water using catalytic ozonation37
5US20210032136A1Method and System for Purifying Water Using Photocatalysis36
6EP1686095A1Photocatalytic reactor with a modular configuration and advanced oxidation process for purifying and disinfec…29
7US20170225971A1Apparatus and method for water treatment21
8CN104724852A一种吹脱氧化降解含高浓度硝基苯废水的方法及装置18
9KR100541573B1Apparatus and method for treating water using advanced oxidation process17
10CN104710000A一种超重力场中催化臭氧降解硝基苯类废水的方法及装置16

Citation counts are drawn from the searched corpus and favor older filings; use them as a signal of influence on subsequent art, not of current commercial importance.

Patent titles are shown in the language they were filed in, not translated, so that each record stays verifiable against the original filing — a translated title will not match in Eureka or in any national register. Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Advanced Oxidation Processes covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Signals

What the filing data signals

Citation weight, jurisdiction spread and co-filing patterns together point to a field with mature core chemistry and thinner activity around its support technologies.

Citation depth
126 cites
top-cited record

Prior art on closed-loop oxidation runs deep

US5593598A, a closed-loop contaminated cleaning solution recycling method, carries 126 citations, the heaviest in this corpus. That depth signals long-standing prior art on general process architecture for oxidation-based water recycling, which any new filer in that specific space needs to search closely.

Citation counts favor older records; treat this as historical influence, not current activity.
Jurisdiction spread
38 vs 36
China vs United States filings

Filing is split across two lead markets, not concentrated in one

China and the United States sit close together as the top two receiving offices, with WIPO PCT filings at 18 indicating a real share of applicants pursuing multi-jurisdiction protection rather than filing domestically only.

South Korea, Europe and India each hold a meaningful secondary share.
Technology concentration
159 of 159
records classified under C02F

Every record sits under the water-treatment core classification

C02F anchors the entire dataset, with catalysis, filtration, mixing and electrolytic production forming a secondary tier well behind it. Monitoring and niche application subclasses trail furthest, marking the thinnest claim density in the corpus.

Thin subclass counts indicate open claim space, not lack of relevance.
Filing trajectory
19 → 8
peak (2020) to midpoint (2022)

Momentum has cooled since the 2020 peak

Filings rose to 19 in 2020 and had fallen to 8 by 2022, a pattern more consistent with a maturing filing wave than with an accelerating one, though the most recent years are understated by publication lag.

Read the tail years cautiously; 18-month publication lag applies.
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to advanced oxidation processes, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Advanced Oxidation Processes covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who is filing, and where the gaps sit

Recent-year momentum across the assignees tracked in this corpus shows no active filer with continuing output in the latest year, pointing to a field where the historical leaders have gone quiet rather than one with a clear current frontrunner.

Momentum check
0 in latest year
across all tracked leading assignees

Leading historical filers show no recent output

Evoqua Water Technologies, Korea Institute of Civil Engineering and Building Technology, Teck Resources, National University of Singapore and Air Products and Chemicals all show zero filings in the latest tracked year, consistent with the broader flattening trend after the 2020 peak.

Publication lag means the very latest year is always undercounted.
Co-filing pattern
10 pairs
co-assignee relationships identified

Co-filing is limited and institute-centered

The strongest co-assignee link in the corpus is Korea Institute of Civil Engineering and Building Technology filing jointly with a Korean architecture and engineering consultancy, appearing three times. Co-filing overall is sparse across the dataset, suggesting most applicants file independently.

Ten total co-assignee pairs were identified across 159 families.
Jurisdiction reach
6 offices tracked
China, US, WIPO, Korea, EPO, India

Filing strategy spans major markets plus PCT

With China and the United States as the top two receiving offices and 18 PCT filings recorded, applicants in this space are pursuing both direct national filing in large markets and multi-jurisdiction PCT strategies.

South Korea, Europe and India round out the secondary jurisdiction tier.
🔍
Under-claimed sub-areas worth screening before filing
These branches sit well below the core water-treatment claim density and warrant a freedom-to-operate check before committing claim scope.
Real-time radical-scavenging monitoringReagent dosing & mixing hardwareFiltration-integrated AOP reactorsAquaculture water-reuse AOPElectrochemical diamond-electrode systems
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Evoqua Water Technologies LLC0
GREENTHREAD LTD0
Korea Institute of Civil Engineering and Building Technology0
Teck Resources Limited0
National University of Singapore0
Air Products and Chemicals, Inc.0
Ebara Corporation0
Nanjing University0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Advanced Oxidation Processes covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's Next

Where to take this analysis

The filing data points to a field with settled core chemistry and open support-technology claims. The next steps depend on whether you are screening for freedom to operate or scouting where to file.

Screen the under-claimed branches

Filtration integration, dosing hardware and real-time monitoring all sit well below the core treatment claim density and are worth a dedicated freedom-to-operate pass before drafting.

Run a white space search in Eureka →

Track the quiet historical leaders

The assignees with the deepest historical filing show zero output in the latest year; watch for renewed activity or new entrants filling the gap.

Set up assignee monitoring in Eureka →

Map claims against the top-cited prior art

The most heavily cited records cover broad process architecture; any new filing near closed-loop recycling or wet oxidation should be checked against them directly.

Compare claim scope in Eureka →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Advanced Oxidation Processes covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Advanced Oxidation Processes covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Advanced Oxidation Processes in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole advanced oxidation processes corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.