Book a demo

Advanced Packaging Patents: Who Leads, Where the Gaps Are 2026

Advanced Packaging Patents: Who Leads, Where the Gaps Are 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/advanced-packaging-and-heterogeneous-integration-patent-landscape-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-08-31 · downloaded from the live page
Semiconductors & Microelectronics
Advanced Packaging and Heterogeneous Integration Patents: Filing Trends and Leading Filers
  • 36.8% concentration at the top. The five largest filers account for 1,136 of 3,086 records in scope, but the ranked field runs 100 companies deep with a long tail below tenth place.
  • Filings roughly tripled from 2021 to 2024. Complete-year filings rose from 135 in 2021 to 386 in 2024, a 186% increase — the clearest signal in the dataset that packaging claim space is filling fast.
  • H01L dominates, but four other subclasses each carry real volume. 69.2% of records sit in semiconductor devices (H01L), while H10W, H05K, H10P and G06F each cover thousands of records worth of adjacent claim territory.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
3,086
Published Records
37%
Top-5 Share of All Records
+186%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
US
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (135 records) with 2024 (386) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 3,086 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Field overview

What this landscape covers

This landscape tracks patent activity at the intersection of chiplet integration, advanced semiconductor packaging and the mechanical and electrical elements that make heterogeneous integration work — bonding pads, package substrates, thermal interfaces and electrical connections. The search spans 3,086 published records filed between 2015 and the 2026 data cut-off, drawn from receiving offices led by the United States, WIPO’s PCT route and the European Patent Office. It captures the shift from single-die packaging toward multi-die, multi-material assemblies where thermal and electrical interconnect claims sit alongside the underlying substrate and bonding art.

Because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, the most recent one to two years in any trend understate real filing activity — 2024 is the last year that can be read as complete, and everything after it will keep rising as records publish.

Filing activity and technology composition, 2015–2026
  1. 1TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING CO LTD440
  2. 2INTEL CORP312
  3. 3QUALCOMM INC160
  4. 4ADEIA SEMICONDUCTOR BONDING TECHNOLOGIES INC124
  5. 5SILVEBROOK KIA100
  6. 6APPLIED MATERIALS INC67
  7. 7XEROX CORP64
  8. 8INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINE CORPORATION61
  9. 9AVICENATECH CORP40
  10. 10SJ SEMICONDUCTOR (JIANGYIN) CORP38
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Advanced Packaging & Heterogeneous Integration Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
The data

Filing trends and technology composition

Two views of the same 3,086 records: how filing volume has moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses carry the claim density.

Filing trend, 2017–2026

Filings climbed from 69 in 2017 to a peak of 455 in 2025, with the 2021-to-2024 span alone showing a 186% rise from 135 to 386 complete-year filings. The 2026 figure of 51 is a partial year and should not be read as a slowdown.

Filing trend, 2017–2026012525037550069201720182019202020212022202320244552025512026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Technology composition by IPC subclass

H01L (semiconductor devices) touches 69.2% of the 3,086 records, with H10W close behind at 31.6%. H05K, H10P, G06F, H10B, H10D and G01R each cover a meaningful secondary share — since records can carry multiple classes, these figures add up to more than 100% and should be read as overlapping claim territory rather than a partition.

Technology composition by IPC subclassH01L · Semiconductor devices2,13669.2%H10W97631.6%H05K · Printed circuits & assemblies2999.7%H10P2578.3%G06F · Electric digital data processi…2508.1%H10B · Memory device manufacture1504.9%H10D · Semiconductor devices (general)1324.3%G01R · Electric & magnetic measurement1254.1%Other1,40345.5%

Shares are the percentage of the 3,086 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Advanced Packaging & Heterogeneous Integration Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Advanced Packaging & Heterogeneous Integration Patent Landscape with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about advanced packaging & heterogeneous integration patent landscape and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key patents

The most-cited records in this landscape

Representative recent filing
US20260165171A12026-06-11

Package substrate including embedded die and methods of forming the same (US20260165171A1)

TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING COMPANY LIMITED

Filed by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited and published 2026-06-11, this application claims a package substrate built around a core and a dielectric filling layer, with a die embedded in that filling layer. The die carries a device region on one side and a through-silicon via running from that device region through to the opposite side, and the method covers mounting the die on or in the core before forming the dielectric fill.Abstract text drawn directly from the published filing.

US20260165171A1 — patent drawing 1US20260165171A1 — patent drawing 2
View full filing
Highest-cited patents in scope
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US7335972B2Heterogeneously integrated microsystem-on-a-chip426
2US7242081B1Stacked package structure423
3US5613861APhotolithographically patterned spring contact408
4US20030119279A1Three dimensional device integration method and integrated device312
5US7126212B2Three dimensional device integration method and integrated device300
6US5325265AHigh performance integrated circuit chip package259
7US9431368B2Three dimensional device integration method and integrated device233
8US20140254979A1Waveguide and semiconductor packaging233
9US20030158588A1Minimally invasive retinal prosthesis218
10US20140185264A1Methods and apparatus for forming package-on-packages217

Citation counts inside this corpus favour older filings that have had more time to accumulate citations — treat them as a signal of historical influence on the field, not of current filing priority.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Advanced Packaging & Heterogeneous Integration Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers mean for a filing decision

Three readings of the same dataset, each pointing at a different question a filing or freedom-to-operate review needs answered.

Concentration
36.8% of 3,086
held by the top five

The top is dense but not closed

The five largest assignees hold 36.8% of all 3,086 records, and the top ten hold 45.6% — a meaningful concentration, but one that still leaves more than half the field to a long tail of single- and few-filing entrants. A new entrant is not filing into a monopoly; it is filing into a crowded but not fully occupied space.

Based on the 100-company ranked assignee list.
Growth
+186%
2021 → 2024 filings

Momentum built fast, then flattened at the leaders

Complete-year filings rose from 135 in 2021 to 386 in 2024. At the same time, recent-year momentum among several of the largest named filers is negative year-on-year, which suggests the growth is broadening across the field rather than concentrating further at the historical leaders.

Growth figure covers complete years only; 2025–2026 are still publishing in.
Claim density
69.2% in H01L
of 3,086 records

H01L is the densest, but not the only route

H01L absorbs the large majority of records, yet H10W, H05K, H10P and G06F each carry thousands of records' worth of claim activity on printed-circuit assembly, data-processing integration and related subclasses — these secondary classes are where less-crowded claim language is more likely to be found.

Subclass shares overlap because records carry multiple IPC codes.
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to advanced packaging & heterogeneous integration patent landscape, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Advanced Packaging & Heterogeneous Integration Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Who is filing

Leading filers and where the gaps sit

The ranked field runs 100 companies deep, led by a foundry, an IDM and a fabless leader, with contract packaging and IP-licensing specialists filling out the tail. Recent-year momentum among several of the largest named filers is falling, which is more consistent with a maturing filing cadence at the top than with reduced overall activity in the field.

Leader
440 records
leading assignee

A single foundry sets the pace

The leading assignee's record count is more than four times the tenth-place figure of 38, reflecting a foundry-scale filing programme across substrate, bonding and thermal-interface claims tied to its own process nodes.

Counted in patent families / records.
Mid-field
100 records
fifth place

A sharp drop after the leader

Fifth place sits at 100 records, well below the leader's 440 — the concentration in this field is front-loaded rather than evenly graduated across the ranked list.

Fifth-ranked assignee by record count.
Momentum
-38% to -100%
YoY, named filers

Several large filers are pulling back

Named leaders in the momentum data show year-on-year declines ranging from double digits to a full drop-off in the latest year, which given the 18-month publication lag likely reflects incomplete recent-year data as much as any real change in filing intent.

Latest-year counts are partial due to publication lag.
🔍
Under-claimed branches worth a closer look
Sub-areas where filing density is comparatively thin relative to the core H01L claim space.
Thermal interface material integration in TSV stacksBonding-pad redistribution for chiplet interconnectPackage substrate embedded-die TSV routingElectrical connection reliability testing for 3D stacksHandling-unit identification for die-level traceability
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Qualcomm Inc.18-38%
Intel Corp.5-67%
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd. (TSMC)2-95%
International Business Machines Corporation (IBM)1-50%
SJ Semiconductor (Jiangyin) Corp.1-50%
Adeia Semiconductor Bonding Technologies Inc.0-100%
SILVEBROOK KIA0-100%
Applied Materials, Inc.0-100%
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Advanced Packaging & Heterogeneous Integration Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's next

Where to take this next

The landscape points to specific next steps depending on whether the question is freedom-to-operate, white space, or competitive tracking.

Map claim language in the under-claimed subclasses

H10W, H05K and G06F carry real volume but sit well below H01L's density — a claim-language pull across just those subclasses will show where language is still open.

Explore in Eureka

Track the leaders' recent filings, not just their totals

Momentum figures suggest filing cadence is shifting even among the largest assignees; a rolling watch on recent publications catches direction changes before the ranking does.

Set up monitoring in Eureka

Run a freedom-to-operate check against the most-cited records

The highest-cited patents in this set date back over a decade and still anchor citation networks in heterogeneous integration — worth checking against any new embedded-die or TSV design.

Run a check in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Advanced Packaging & Heterogeneous Integration Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions about this landscape

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Advanced Packaging & Heterogeneous Integration Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Advanced Packaging & Heterogeneous Integration Patent Landscape in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole advanced packaging & heterogeneous integration patent landscape corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.