Book a demo

Aero Engine Combustor Design Patents: Leaders & Filing Trends 2026

Aero Engine Combustor Design Patents: Leaders & Filing Trends 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/aero-engine-combustor-design-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Aerospace Propulsion
Aero Engine Combustor Design Patents: Who Holds the Core Claims
  • Filing activity has already peaked. 2021 was the high point at 10 filings; by the 2022 midpoint activity had dropped to 3, and the trend has not recovered since.
  • One legacy pair still anchors the field. Rolls-Royce and its German affiliate form the strongest co-assignee pair in the dataset, appearing together far more often than any other combination.
  • Claim density concentrates in one IPC subclass. 43 of 47 families sit in F23R (combustion chambers), leaving adjacent subclasses like F23D burners and F02K jet propulsion comparatively thin.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
47
Published Records
-40%
3-Yr Growth (lag-adjusted)
US
Leading Jurisdiction
12
Active Filers Ranked
Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What this landscape covers

This dataset tracks 47 patent families published between 2015 and mid-2026 that combine aero engine combustor or lean burn combustor language with claims touching NOx emission control, flame stability, fuel injector geometry, liner cooling or combustion efficiency, filtered to the core combustion-chamber and gas-turbine IPC classes. It is a narrow, claims-dense corner of propulsion engineering rather than a broad gas-turbine survey. Publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so the 2025-2026 count in any trend chart understates real filing activity for those years.

The receiving-office spread, with the United States and the European Patent Office ahead of China, the United Kingdom, Canada and India, points to a filing strategy built around the traditional engine-manufacturing home markets rather than broad global coverage.

Filing activity by year, 2015-2026
  1. 1ROLLS ROYCE PLC29
  2. 2ROLLS ROYCE DEUT LTD & CO KG16
  3. 3PRATT & WHITNEY CANADA CORP6
  4. 4EURPOEAN GAS TURBINES3
  5. 5BEIHANG UNIV3
  6. 6SOLANKI HITESH KISHORBHAI1
  7. 7AECC HUNAN AVIATION POWERPLANT RES INST1
  8. 8KULSHRESHTHA DIGVIJAY BIPINCHANDRA1
  9. 9CHANDIGARH UNIVERSITY1
  10. 10AECC SHENYANG ENGINE RES INST1
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Aero Engine Combustor Design covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology

Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.

10,000 free credits to start
The Numbers

Filing trend and technology composition

Two views of the same 47 families: when the claims were filed, and which IPC subclasses they sit in.

A single peak, then decline

Filings rose from 1 in 2017 to a peak of 10 in 2021, then fell back to 3 by 2022 and have stayed flat or lower since. That shape is more consistent with a design cycle tied to a small number of engine programmes than with an emerging, broadly adopted technology.

A single peak, then decline03581012017201820192020102021202220232024202522026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

F23R dominates, everything else is a side branch

F23R (combustion chambers) covers 43 of 47 records, with F02C (gas-turbine plants) and F23C (combustion apparatus) as the next tiers. F23D burners, F02K jet propulsion, F23K fuel feeding, B64D aircraft equipment and F23M furnace linings each register in single digits, marking them as adjacent rather than central to where applicants are actually claiming.

F23R dominates, everything else is a side branchF23R · Combustion chambers4391.5%F02C · Gas-turbine plants1225.5%F23C · Combustion apparatus919.1%F23D · Burners510.6%F02K · Jet & reaction propulsion36.4%F23K · Fuel feeding to furnaces36.4%B64D · Aircraft equipment12.1%F23M · Furnace casings & linings12.1%Other12.1%

Shares are the percentage of the 47 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Aero Engine Combustor Design covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Aero Engine Combustor Design with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about aero engine combustor design and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

The most-cited prior art in this space

Representative Filing
US11353215B12022-06-07

US11353215B1 — Lean burn combustor (Rolls-Royce)

ROLLS-ROYCE PLC

A lean burn combustor includes a plurality of lean burn fuel injectors, each including a fuel feed arm and a lean burn fuel injector head with a lean burn fuel injector head tip, wherein the tip has a lean burn fuel injector head tip diameter, the lean burn fuel injector head including a pilot fuel injector and a main fuel injector, the main fuel injector being arranged coaxially and radially outwards of the pilot fuel injector; and a combustor chamber extending along an axial direction and including a radially inner annular wall, a radially outer annular wall, and a meter panel defining the size and shape of the combustor chamber, which includes a primary combustion zone with a primary comb…Abstract truncated as published.

US11353215B1 — patent drawing 1US11353215B1 — patent drawing 2
View full record
Highest-cited records in the searched corpus
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1EP0728989A2Gas turbine engine combustor63
2US6253538B1Variable premix-lean burn combustor55
3CN106196174A一种用于超微涡喷发动机全环燃烧室的多微旋流器头部13
4EP0728989B1Gas turbine engine combustor12
5US11353215B1Lean burn combustor7
6CN115031259A一种燃气轮机燃烧室及其设计方法6
7US20160230994A1Combustion chamber6
8US20250377115A1Fuel spray nozzles5
9US20250377099A1Aviation fuel5
10US20220178543A1Combustor with improved aerodynamics4

Citation counts favour older filings; treat this as a map of influence on later applicants, not a ranking of current technical relevance.

Patent titles are shown in the language they were filed in, not translated, so that each record stays verifiable against the original filing — a translated title will not match in Eureka or in any national register. Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Aero Engine Combustor Design covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the data means for a filing decision

Three read-throughs from the trend, the citation table and the co-filing pattern.

Filing Momentum
Peak 2021, 10 filings
then declining

The core design cycle has passed its peak

A single sharp peak in 2021 followed by a drop to 3 filings by 2022 suggests a wave tied to specific engine development programmes rather than sustained platform investment. New entrants filing now are working against a corpus that already covers the obvious lean burn injector geometries.

Filing trend, 2017-2026
Prior Art Anchor
EP0728989A2, cited 63
top citation count

Two old families still shape freedom-to-operate review

The most-cited record and its divisional both predate the 2015 window and describe general gas-turbine combustor architecture. Any lean burn or premix injector claim filed since is likely to be examined against this baseline first.

Most-cited records table
Co-filing Pattern
16 shared families
strongest co-assignee pair

Cross-border corporate filing is limited to one group

Only two co-assignee pairs appear in the dataset at all, and one of them – Rolls-Royce and its German affiliate – accounts for the overwhelming majority of joint filings. Co-ownership as a filing strategy is rare here outside that single corporate group.

Co-assignee pairs, n=2
Geographic Spread
US 19, EPO 11
leading receiving offices

Filing strategy still centres on home markets

The United States and Europe together account for the bulk of receiving-office activity, well ahead of China, the UK, Canada and India. That points to protection being sought where engine manufacturing and certification are concentrated rather than broad global filing.

Receiving offices, six jurisdictions
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to aero engine combustor design, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Aero Engine Combustor Design covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who is active, and where the gaps sit

Recent-year momentum is thin across the board: most tracked assignees show zero or one filing in the latest year, consistent with the post-2021 slowdown.

Momentum Leader
1 filing, latest year
-50% YoY

Rolls-Royce slows but stays present

Rolls-Royce shows one filing in the latest tracked year, down 50% year on year, while its German affiliate shows none. Together they remain the dataset's strongest filing group historically, built on the 16-family co-assignee link.

Recent-year momentum table
New Entrant
1 filing, latest year
flat

Chinese research institutes are the active newcomers

AECC Shenyang Engine Research Institute registers a filing in the latest year, while established Western players such as Pratt & Whitney Canada and Europe's gas-turbine consortium show none. Chinese aerospace research institutes appear to be the more active filers at the current margin.

Recent-year momentum table
Long Tail
47 families total
across all assignees

No single assignee dominates the full set

With only one strong co-assignee pair and most tracked organisations showing zero recent filings, the field reads as a small number of legacy programmes plus scattered single-institution activity rather than a market with one clear leader.

Assignee ranking, 47 families
🔍
Under-claimed sub-areas worth checking before filing
These branches sit adjacent to the F23R core but carry far fewer records – worth a freedom-to-operate check before assuming open space.
Liner cooling hole geometryFuel injector head tip diameter tuningMulti-microswirler injection headsPilot/main fuel staging controlFurnace-casing thermal linings
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Rolls-Royce plc1-50%
AECC Shenyang Engine Research Institute1
Rolls-Royce Deutschland Ltd & Co KG0
Pratt & Whitney Canada Corp.0
European Gas Turbines Limited0
Beihang University0
Shenzhen Datang Baochang Gas Power Generation Co., Ltd.0-100%
Beijing Institute of Technology0-100%
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Aero Engine Combustor Design covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's Next

Where to take this analysis

The filing trend and IPC composition here are a starting point for scoping a freedom-to-operate review or a white space search in Eureka.

Check the under-claimed branches

F23D burners, F02K jet propulsion and F23M furnace linings each carry single-digit record counts inside this corpus. Run a targeted search on those subclasses before assuming a design direction is open.

Explore white space in Eureka

Map the citation network around the oldest families

EP0728989A2 and its divisional anchor the citation table years after filing. Tracing what cites them and what they cite narrows down which downstream claims are likely to face rejection.

Trace citations in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Aero Engine Combustor Design covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions on this landscape

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Aero Engine Combustor Design covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Aero Engine Combustor Design in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole aero engine combustor design corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.