Aero Engine Combustor Design Patents: Leaders & Filing Trends 2026
- Filing activity has already peaked. 2021 was the high point at 10 filings; by the 2022 midpoint activity had dropped to 3, and the trend has not recovered since.
- One legacy pair still anchors the field. Rolls-Royce and its German affiliate form the strongest co-assignee pair in the dataset, appearing together far more often than any other combination.
- Claim density concentrates in one IPC subclass. 43 of 47 families sit in F23R (combustion chambers), leaving adjacent subclasses like F23D burners and F02K jet propulsion comparatively thin.
What this landscape covers
This dataset tracks 47 patent families published between 2015 and mid-2026 that combine aero engine combustor or lean burn combustor language with claims touching NOx emission control, flame stability, fuel injector geometry, liner cooling or combustion efficiency, filtered to the core combustion-chamber and gas-turbine IPC classes. It is a narrow, claims-dense corner of propulsion engineering rather than a broad gas-turbine survey. Publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so the 2025-2026 count in any trend chart understates real filing activity for those years.
The receiving-office spread, with the United States and the European Patent Office ahead of China, the United Kingdom, Canada and India, points to a filing strategy built around the traditional engine-manufacturing home markets rather than broad global coverage.
Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology
Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.
Filing trend and technology composition
Two views of the same 47 families: when the claims were filed, and which IPC subclasses they sit in.
A single peak, then decline
Filings rose from 1 in 2017 to a peak of 10 in 2021, then fell back to 3 by 2022 and have stayed flat or lower since. That shape is more consistent with a design cycle tied to a small number of engine programmes than with an emerging, broadly adopted technology.
F23R dominates, everything else is a side branch
F23R (combustion chambers) covers 43 of 47 records, with F02C (gas-turbine plants) and F23C (combustion apparatus) as the next tiers. F23D burners, F02K jet propulsion, F23K fuel feeding, B64D aircraft equipment and F23M furnace linings each register in single digits, marking them as adjacent rather than central to where applicants are actually claiming.
Shares are the percentage of the 47 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
Go deeper on Aero Engine Combustor Design with Eureka
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about aero engine combustor design and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaThe most-cited prior art in this space
US11353215B1 — Lean burn combustor (Rolls-Royce)
A lean burn combustor includes a plurality of lean burn fuel injectors, each including a fuel feed arm and a lean burn fuel injector head with a lean burn fuel injector head tip, wherein the tip has a lean burn fuel injector head tip diameter, the lean burn fuel injector head including a pilot fuel injector and a main fuel injector, the main fuel injector being arranged coaxially and radially outwards of the pilot fuel injector; and a combustor chamber extending along an axial direction and including a radially inner annular wall, a radially outer annular wall, and a meter panel defining the size and shape of the combustor chamber, which includes a primary combustion zone with a primary comb…Abstract truncated as published.


| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | EP0728989A2 | Gas turbine engine combustor | 63 |
| 2 | US6253538B1 | Variable premix-lean burn combustor | 55 |
| 3 | CN106196174A | 一种用于超微涡喷发动机全环燃烧室的多微旋流器头部 | 13 |
| 4 | EP0728989B1 | Gas turbine engine combustor | 12 |
| 5 | US11353215B1 | Lean burn combustor | 7 |
| 6 | CN115031259A | 一种燃气轮机燃烧室及其设计方法 | 6 |
| 7 | US20160230994A1 | Combustion chamber | 6 |
| 8 | US20250377115A1 | Fuel spray nozzles | 5 |
| 9 | US20250377099A1 | Aviation fuel | 5 |
| 10 | US20220178543A1 | Combustor with improved aerodynamics | 4 |
Citation counts favour older filings; treat this as a map of influence on later applicants, not a ranking of current technical relevance.
Patent titles are shown in the language they were filed in, not translated, so that each record stays verifiable against the original filing — a translated title will not match in Eureka or in any national register. Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
Put your own technology through the same analysis
Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →MCP server & REST API
When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →What the data means for a filing decision
Three read-throughs from the trend, the citation table and the co-filing pattern.
The core design cycle has passed its peak
A single sharp peak in 2021 followed by a drop to 3 filings by 2022 suggests a wave tied to specific engine development programmes rather than sustained platform investment. New entrants filing now are working against a corpus that already covers the obvious lean burn injector geometries.
Two old families still shape freedom-to-operate review
The most-cited record and its divisional both predate the 2015 window and describe general gas-turbine combustor architecture. Any lean burn or premix injector claim filed since is likely to be examined against this baseline first.
Cross-border corporate filing is limited to one group
Only two co-assignee pairs appear in the dataset at all, and one of them – Rolls-Royce and its German affiliate – accounts for the overwhelming majority of joint filings. Co-ownership as a filing strategy is rare here outside that single corporate group.
Filing strategy still centres on home markets
The United States and Europe together account for the bulk of receiving-office activity, well ahead of China, the UK, Canada and India. That points to protection being sought where engine manufacturing and certification are concentrated rather than broad global filing.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to aero engine combustor design, with the prior art for and against each one.
Who is active, and where the gaps sit
Recent-year momentum is thin across the board: most tracked assignees show zero or one filing in the latest year, consistent with the post-2021 slowdown.
Rolls-Royce slows but stays present
Rolls-Royce shows one filing in the latest tracked year, down 50% year on year, while its German affiliate shows none. Together they remain the dataset's strongest filing group historically, built on the 16-family co-assignee link.
Chinese research institutes are the active newcomers
AECC Shenyang Engine Research Institute registers a filing in the latest year, while established Western players such as Pratt & Whitney Canada and Europe's gas-turbine consortium show none. Chinese aerospace research institutes appear to be the more active filers at the current margin.
No single assignee dominates the full set
With only one strong co-assignee pair and most tracked organisations showing zero recent filings, the field reads as a small number of legacy programmes plus scattered single-institution activity rather than a market with one clear leader.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Rolls-Royce plc | 1 | -50% |
| AECC Shenyang Engine Research Institute | 1 | — |
| Rolls-Royce Deutschland Ltd & Co KG | 0 | — |
| Pratt & Whitney Canada Corp. | 0 | — |
| European Gas Turbines Limited | 0 | — |
| Beihang University | 0 | — |
| Shenzhen Datang Baochang Gas Power Generation Co., Ltd. | 0 | -100% |
| Beijing Institute of Technology | 0 | -100% |
Where to take this analysis
The filing trend and IPC composition here are a starting point for scoping a freedom-to-operate review or a white space search in Eureka.
Check the under-claimed branches
F23D burners, F02K jet propulsion and F23M furnace linings each carry single-digit record counts inside this corpus. Run a targeted search on those subclasses before assuming a design direction is open.
Explore white space in EurekaMap the citation network around the oldest families
EP0728989A2 and its divisional anchor the citation table years after filing. Tracing what cites them and what they cite narrows down which downstream claims are likely to face rejection.
Trace citations in EurekaCommon questions on this landscape
Within this 47-family dataset, Rolls-Royce and its German affiliate form the strongest filing group, linked by the dataset's largest co-assignee pair with 16 shared families. Chinese research institutes such as AECC Shenyang Engine Research Institute and universities like Beihang appear as smaller, more recent filers. No single organisation holds a dominant share of the full set, and the field reads as a handful of legacy programmes plus a long tail of single-institution filings.
Filing activity peaked in 2021 at 10 records and had already dropped to 3 by 2022, with recent-year momentum by assignee mostly flat or at zero. That pattern suggests the core lean burn and liner cooling claim space filled up during a design cycle tied to specific engine programmes rather than continuing to grow. New filings are still occurring, but at a lower rate, and any new application will be examined against a denser prior-art base than it would have faced five years ago.
F23R, covering combustion chambers, accounts for 43 of the 47 families in this dataset and is the class to search first. F02C (gas-turbine plants) and F23C (combustion apparatus) are secondary but still meaningful, while F23D burners, F02K jet propulsion, F23K fuel feeding, B64D aircraft equipment and F23M furnace linings each register only a handful of records. A thorough freedom-to-operate search should still cover the smaller classes, since low volume there can mean either genuine white space or simply that the language used in those filings differs from the search terms used here.
US11353215B1, assigned to Rolls-Royce, claims a lean burn combustor built around fuel injectors with a pilot injector arranged coaxially inside a main injector, plus a defined injector head tip diameter and a combustor chamber geometry set by a meter panel. It does not claim lean burn combustion generally, so a design that uses a different injector arrangement, a different tip geometry, or a different means of defining primary combustion zone size is unlikely to be blocked by this specific claim set. Anyone designing a coaxial pilot-main injector with similar tip dimensioning should review the full claim language rather than rely on the abstract.
The clearest gaps sit in subclasses adjacent to the dominant F23R combustion-chamber class: burner design under F23D, jet and reaction propulsion integration under F02K, and furnace-casing thermal linings under F23M all show single-digit record counts in this dataset. Multi-microswirler injection heads and fine-grained liner cooling hole geometry also appear thinly claimed relative to the volume of combustor-chamber filings overall. Low volume in a niche search does not guarantee the space is legally open, so any filing decision there should be paired with a broader keyword and classification check.
Research Aero Engine Combustor Design in depth with Eureka
Go past this page: query the whole aero engine combustor design corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.