Book a demo

Agricultural Biostimulant Patents: Leaders, Trends & White Space 2026

Agricultural Biostimulant Patents: Leaders, Trends & White Space 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/agricultural-biostimulant-technology-landscape-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Agriculture Technology
Agricultural Biostimulant Patents: Where Filing Concentrates and Where It Doesn't
  • Filing has flattened, not accelerated. annual filings rose from 2 in 2017 to a peak of 26 in 2024, but the 2022 midpoint of 11 shows growth was already levelling before the peak.
  • India rivals the PCT route. 16 filings went direct to India's patent office against 21 via WIPO, well ahead of Europe, the US or Canada individually — a sign of where commercial deployment is being protected first.
  • Co-filing is rare and concentrated. only 3 co-assignee pairs exist in the whole dataset, and one pairing alone accounts for 7 joint filings — most applicants are filing alone.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
84
Published Records
62%
Top-5 Share of All Records
+1200%
3-Yr Growth (lag-adjusted)
WO
Leading Jurisdiction
Published byPatsnap Research··6 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What this landscape covers

This review tracks 84 patent families published between 2015 and mid-2026 that claim biostimulant compositions or methods — seaweed extract, humic substances, microbial inoculants and stress-tolerance formulations — indexed under agrochemical and fertiliser IPC classes. The search combines free-text biostimulant terminology with classification codes spanning A01N (biocides), C05F (organic fertilisers) and A01P (pesticide activity), so it captures both the crop-protection framing and the fertiliser framing that this technology sits between.

Because publication typically lags filing by around eighteen months, the 2025 and 2026 figures in the trend chart understate actual filing activity; the true picture for those years will only firm up as later publications land.

Filing activity and technology composition, 2017–2026
  1. 1ACADIAN SEAPLANTS LTD22
  2. 2YARA INTERNATIONAL ASA10
  3. 3GREEN INNOVATION GMBH7
  4. 4UPM KYMMENE OYJ7
  5. 5NATURAL PLANT PROTECTION LTD6
  6. 6VERDESIAN LIFE SCIENCES LLC4
  7. 7BENDER CHARLES COLIN3
  8. 8UIST ASCO LTD3
  9. 9NIPPON PAPER IND CO LTD3
  10. 10ELICIR2
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Agricultural Biostimulant Technology Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
The Data

Filing trend and technology composition

Two views of the same 84-family dataset: how filing volume has moved year over year, and how those filings distribute across the IPC subclasses that define the biostimulant category.

A peak in 2024, not a straight climb

Filings moved from 2 in 2017 to a high of 26 in 2024, but the 2022 midpoint of 11 sits well below a straight-line trajectory to that peak — the growth curve is uneven rather than steadily compounding, and the partial 2026 count of 10 should be read against the publication lag rather than as a slowdown.

A peak in 2024, not a straight climb08152330220172018201920202021202220232620242025102026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Biocide and fertiliser classes dominate

A01N (75 records) and C05F (50) between them cover most of the dataset, with A01P (46) close behind — confirming that biostimulant claims are drafted primarily as agrochemical or organic-fertiliser compositions rather than under horticulture-specific codes; A01G appears in only 7 records.

Biocide and fertiliser classes dominateA01N · Biocides / agrochemicals7589.3%C05F · Organic & waste-derived fertil…5059.5%A01P · Pesticide activity4654.8%C05G · Fertiliser mixtures2428.6%C05D · Other inorganic fertilisers1416.7%C05C · Nitrogen fertilisers1011.9%C05B · Phosphate fertilisers89.5%A01G · Horticulture & forestry78.3%Other2529.8%

Shares are the percentage of the 84 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Agricultural Biostimulant Technology Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Agricultural Biostimulant Technology Landscape with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about agricultural biostimulant technology landscape and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

Representative and most-cited filings

Representative Filing
WO2026062693A12026-03-26

WO2026062693A1 — A biostimulant composition and method of preparation thereof

KHANBHAI, FATEMA AMAR

The present invention provides a bio-stimulant composition for promoting plant growth and development. The biostimulant composition comprises seaweed extract, milk solids, one or more amino acid and optionally one or more of the ingredients selected from protein hydrolysate, humic substance, macronutrient and micronutrient. The present invention also provides a method for preparing the bio-stimulant composition.Filed by an individual applicant rather than a corporate assignee, illustrating how open this filing category remains to smaller entrants.

WO2026062693A1 — patent drawing 1WO2026062693A1 — patent drawing 2
View full filing
Most-cited records in this corpus
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US20230172194A1Composition including effervescent agents, biostimulant, nutrient, and pesticide25
2CN109380243A杀菌组合物及其应用9
3CN113788722A一种生物刺激素及其制备方法4
4CN109984149A一种利用氨基酸发酵尾液制备生物刺激素的方法4
5WO2021159220A1Biostimulant based on the bacterium pseudomonas lini strain s57 and method of application for promoting plant…3
6WO2025131933A1Biostimulant composition and methods of use2
7US20240049727A1Biostimulant and method for stimulating plant growth2
8US20240065262A1Composition including effervescent agents, biostimulant, nutrient, and pesticide2
9WO2024019053A1Plant growth promoter2
10WO2025210150A1Fungicidal composition1

Citation counts favour older filings simply by virtue of longer exposure; treat them as a measure of influence within this searched corpus, not as a ranking of current technical importance.

Patent titles are shown in the language they were filed in, not translated, so that each record stays verifiable against the original filing — a translated title will not match in Eureka or in any national register. Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Agricultural Biostimulant Technology Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers indicate

Three patterns stand out once the filing trend, geography and citation data are read together.

Filing Cadence
2 → 26 → 10
filings, 2017 / peak 2024 / 2026 (partial)

Growth already flattening before the peak

The 2022 midpoint of 11 filings sits below where a compounding trend to the 2024 peak of 26 would put it, meaning the acceleration was concentrated in 2023-2024 rather than sustained across the whole period.

Read 2025-2026 against the ~18-month publication lag.
Filing Geography
India: 16
direct national filings, second only to PCT's 21

India is a primary filing destination, not an afterthought

With 16 direct filings, India sits ahead of Europe (9), the US (9), Canada (6) and Mexico (6) individually — applicants are protecting biostimulant formulations in a major agricultural market directly rather than relying solely on PCT entry.

Receiving-office data, not examined-grant data.
Collaboration
3 pairs
co-assignee pairings across the whole dataset

Filing alone is the norm

Only three co-assignee pairs appear across 84 families, and one pairing accounts for 7 of the joint filings recorded — collaborative filing is the exception in this space, not the pattern.

Counts reflect named co-assignees on the same family.
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to agricultural biostimulant technology landscape, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Agricultural Biostimulant Technology Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who is filing, and who has slowed

Recent-year momentum diverges sharply from historical filing volume: some previously active assignees show zero filings in the latest year, while one has the largest single-year count in the dataset.

Momentum Leader
5
filings in the latest year

Acadian Seaplants is still filing actively

Acadian Seaplants recorded 5 filings in the latest year, the highest recent-year count of any assignee in this dataset, and also appears in a co-assignee pairing with UIST ASCO worth 3 joint filings.

Latest-year counts are subject to publication lag.
Stalled Filers
-100% YoY
for two previously active assignees

Yara and Natural Plant Protection show zero recent filings

Yara International and Natural Plant Protection Ltd both moved from prior activity to 0 filings in the latest year, a -100% year-on-year change for each — worth checking whether this reflects a strategy shift or simply publication timing.

Compare against the ~18-month publication lag before reading this as withdrawal.
Strongest Pairing
7 filings
joint filings, strongest co-assignee pair

UPM and Green Innovation file jointly at unusual depth

The pairing of UPM (Finland) and Green Innovation accounts for 7 joint filings, by far the strongest co-assignee relationship in the dataset against a backdrop where only three such pairs exist at all.

Co-assignee pairs are rare across this corpus overall.
🔍
Under-claimed sub-areas
Branches with low filing density relative to the core biocide and fertiliser classes.
Horticulture-specific delivery formats (A01G)Phosphate-carrier biostimulant blends (C05B)Nitrogen-fertiliser co-formulation claims (C05C)Stress-tolerance strain combinationsEffervescent or controlled-release delivery
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Acadian Seaplants Limited5
Verdesian Life Sciences, LLC2
Yara International0-100%
UPM-Kymmene Corporation0
Green Innovation Ltd.0
NATURAL PLANT PROTECTION LTD0-100%
Nippon Paper Industries Co., Ltd.0
UIST ASCO LTD0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Agricultural Biostimulant Technology Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's Next

Where to take this analysis

The dataset points to specific follow-up questions for teams deciding where to file or where freedom-to-operate risk concentrates.

Check India filing strategy specifically

With 16 direct India filings second only to the PCT route, teams targeting that market should review the India-specific claim scope rather than assuming PCT coverage is representative.

Explore India filings in Eureka

Watch the stalled assignees

Two previously active filers show a -100% year-on-year drop; confirming whether this is a strategy change or a publication-lag artefact matters before drawing conclusions about competitive retreat.

Track assignee momentum in Eureka

Probe the under-claimed IPC branches

A01G, C05B and C05C carry far fewer filings than A01N, C05F and A01P — worth a targeted search to confirm whether that gap is genuine white space or simply a classification artefact.

Run a white-space search in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Agricultural Biostimulant Technology Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions on biostimulant patents

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Agricultural Biostimulant Technology Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Agricultural Biostimulant Technology Landscape in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole agricultural biostimulant technology landscape corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.