Book a demo

Air Contactor Design Patents: Who Leads, Where the Gaps Are 2026

Air Contactor Design Patents: Who Leads, Where the Gaps Are 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/air-contactor-design-and-pressure-drop-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Direct Air Capture · Patent Landscape 2026
Air contactor design and pressure-drop patents: where filing has concentrated and where it hasn't
  • 35.2% of all 352 records sit with the top five assignees, so the field is concentrated at the top with a long tail of single- and low-filing entrants behind it.
  • Filings peaked in 2019 at 29 and the 2021→2024 comparison shows a -6% change, not a collapse — 2025 and later years are still filling in as publications lag filing.
  • B01D separation processes cover 60.2% of records while bioreactor and fermentation-adjacent classes (C12M, C12P) sit under 7% each, marking where contactor claims have not yet been extended.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
352
Published Records
35%
Top-5 Share of All Records
-6%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
US
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (17 records) with 2024 (16) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 352 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What this landscape covers

This dataset tracks 352 published patent records filed between 2015 and mid-2026 that combine air contactor or structured-packing claims with fan power demand, mass transfer coefficient, air residence time, wind-driven contactor, dust fouling, or geometry optimization language. That search logic isolates the hardware and airflow-engineering side of direct air capture — how a contactor is shaped, how packing is arranged, and how pressure drop and fouling are managed — rather than the sorbent chemistry that sits behind it.

Coverage runs to a 2026-07-31 cut-off, but publication typically lags filing by around eighteen months, so the last one to two years of the trend will keep filling in after this snapshot. Family-level counting in the assignee ranking neutralises the effect of continuations and multi-jurisdiction refiling, which matters here because several of the most-cited records belong to related CO2-recovery filing families.

Filing activity and technology composition, 2017–2026
  1. 1CARBON CLEAN SOLUTIONS31
  2. 2CANSOLV TECH INC28
  3. 3AIR PROD & CHEM INC23
  4. 4YALE UNIVERSITY21
  5. 5MONSANTO TECHNOLOGY LLC21
  6. 6SHELL INTERNATIONALE RESEARCH MAATSCHAPPIJ BV11
  7. 7UNIVERSITY OF REGINA11
  8. 8KVAERNER AS11
  9. 9PRAXAIR TECH INC11
  10. 10KC8 CAPTURE TECHNOLOGIES LTD10
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Air Contactor Design and Pressure Drop covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
The Data

Filing trend and technology composition

Two views of the same 352 records: how filing activity has moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses carry the claim density.

Filing trend, 2017-2026

Filings rose from 2 in 2017 to a peak of 29 in 2019, then eased. The 2021-to-2024 comparison (17 to 16, a -6% change) is the most reliable recent read; 2025 and 2026 figures are still incomplete because of publication lag and should not be read as a decline.

Filing trend, 2017-20260815233022017201829201920202021202220232024202532026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

IPC subclass composition

B01D (separation processes) appears in 60.2% of the 352 records, confirming that most contactor and pressure-drop claims are filed as separation-process hardware. B01J (17.9%) and C01B (8.8%) follow, while bioreactor-adjacent classes C12M and C12P sit at 6.0% and 4.5% respectively — evidence that contactor geometry claims have only lightly crossed into biological gas-exchange apparatus.

IPC subclass compositionB01D · Separation processes (filtrati…21260.2%B01J · Chemical/physical processes & …6317.9%C01B · Non-metallic elements & inorga…318.8%C07F · Organo-metallic & non-carbon c…236.5%F25J · Gas liquefaction & separation236.5%C12M · Bioreactors & enzyme apparatus216.0%C07C · Acyclic & carbocyclic compounds205.7%C12P · Fermentation & enzymatic synth…164.5%Other12334.9%

Shares are the percentage of the 352 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Air Contactor Design and Pressure Drop covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Air Contactor Design and Pressure Drop with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about air contactor design and pressure drop and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

Representative and most-cited filings

Representative Recent Filing
US20240157326A12024-05-16

Packing element, structured packing and use of structured packing (US20240157326A1)

EAST CHINA UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY

The packing element combines a collection-predistribution unit, a fluid uniform distribution unit and an opening window unit arranged in sequence. The fluid uniform distribution unit uses a substrate with circular and/or semicircular orifices sized 1-5 mm, and the opening window unit's window length is tied to the fluid viscosity by a 0.5-power relationship — a specific geometric claim over how liquid or air is distributed across the packing surface.Filed by East China University of Science and Technology, published 2024-05-16.

US20240157326A1 — patent drawing 1US20240157326A1 — patent drawing 2
View full record
Most-cited records in scope
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US20040253159A1Method for recovery of CO2 from gas streams214
2US6228145B1Method for removing carbon dioxide from gases200
3US7056482B2Method for recovery of CO2 from gas streams185
4US20080159937A1Process for the recovery of carbon dioxide from a gas stream84
5US20020068836A1Reaction systems for making N- (phosphonomethyl) glycine compounds72
6US20080148936A1Composite structured adsorbents70
7WO2008060435A2Osmotic heat engine58
8US5925291AMethod and apparatus for high-efficiency direct contact condensation57
9US20110223650A1Modular Membrane Reactor and Process for Carbon Dioxide Extraction55
10WO2010014774A2Modular membrane reactor and process for carbon dioxide extraction54

Citation counts favour older filings in any searched corpus; treat this table as a signal of prior-art influence, not of which technology is currently most active.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Air Contactor Design and Pressure Drop covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers mean for a filing decision

Three read-outs from the ranking, trend and citation data that matter more than the raw counts on their own.

Concentration
35.2% / top 5
share of 352 records

Leadership is real but not exclusive

The top five assignees combined account for 35.2% of the 352 records in scope, and the top ten reach 50.6%. That leaves roughly half the field held by the other ninety ranked assignees plus unranked filers, so a new entrant is not filing into a single-owner space — but the leader alone holds 31 records against a fifth-place figure of 21, meaning the gap at the very top is wide.

Based on the 100-company assignee ranking
Momentum
-6% (2021→2024)
three-year filing change

Activity has cooled from its 2019 peak, not stopped

Filings peaked at 29 in 2019 and the 2021-to-2024 window shows a modest -6% change (17 to 16). That is a plateau reading, not a downturn claim, since 2025-2026 data is still incomplete due to the normal 18-month publication lag.

Peak year 2019 at 29 filings
Technology mix
60.2% in B01D
share of 352 records

Claims cluster in separation-process hardware

B01D covers 60.2% of records, far ahead of B01J at 17.9% and C01B at 8.8%. The narrower classes — C07F, F25J, C12M, C07C and C12P — each sit under 9%, indicating that most inventive effort is still framed as filtration/separation apparatus rather than as gas-liquefaction or bioreactor equipment.

Records can carry multiple IPC classes
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to air contactor design and pressure drop, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Air Contactor Design and Pressure Drop covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who is filing, and where the openings sit

The ranked leaders hold a meaningful but not dominant share of the field. Recent-year momentum across the largest historical filers has flattened, which is more informative about where to look next than the historical totals alone.

Top filer
31 records
leader's family count

A wide gap over the rest of the top five

The leading assignee holds 31 records against 21 at fifth place, a ten-record spread inside the top five alone. That gap suggests one organisation has built a genuinely broader portfolio rather than the top five being closely matched.

Top 5 combined: 124 records, 35.2% of 352
Mid-tier cluster
10 records
tenth-place threshold

A crowded band just below the leaders

Tenth place sits at 10 records, and the top ten together account for 50.6% of all 352 records. The step-down from fifth (21) to tenth (10) is steep, pointing to a mid-tier cluster of assignees with modest but active portfolios rather than a smooth long tail.

Top 10 combined: 178 records, 50.6% of 352
Recent activity
0 in latest year
across tracked leading assignees

Momentum has flattened at the top

Several of the historically largest filers, including the current leader, show zero filings in the latest tracked year, with one showing a -100% year-on-year change. That flattening among established names is consistent with the broader 2021-2024 plateau and suggests newer or smaller entrants may be driving whatever recent activity exists.

Recent-year momentum by assignee
🔍
Under-claimed sub-areas worth checking before filing
IPC composition shows where claim density is thin relative to the core separation-process cluster.
Dust fouling mitigation geometryWind-driven contactor orientation controlBioreactor-integrated gas-exchange packing (C12M overlap)Fermentation-coupled contactor design (C12P overlap)Orifice/window geometry ratios tied to fluid viscosity
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Carbon Clean Solutions0
Carbon Clean Solutions Ltd0-100%
Air Products and Chemicals, Inc.0
Yale University0
Monsanto Technology LLC0
LanzaTech NZ, Inc.0
Kredible CCS Inc.0
Ecmen Inc.0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Air Contactor Design and Pressure Drop covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's Next

Where to take this analysis

The landscape data points to specific next steps depending on whether the goal is freedom-to-operate, portfolio strategy, or spotting an open filing angle.

Check freedom-to-operate against the top five

With 35.2% of records held by five assignees, any contactor geometry or packing claim close to their filings needs a direct citation check before drafting.

Run a freedom-to-operate check in Eureka

Probe the under-claimed IPC branches

C12M and C12P sit under 7% of records each despite touching gas-exchange apparatus that overlaps contactor design — a candidate area for a first-mover claim.

Explore white space in Eureka

Track momentum, not just historical totals

Zero recent-year filings among several top-ranked assignees suggest the competitive picture is shifting; monitoring new entrants matters more than the historical ranking alone.

Set up assignee monitoring in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Air Contactor Design and Pressure Drop covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions about air contactor patents

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Air Contactor Design and Pressure Drop covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Air Contactor Design and Pressure Drop in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole air contactor design and pressure drop corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.